Hayley-x-x - Eastleigh

[Roadster]

External Link/Members Only  or External Link/Members Only


From what I have previously read here about Hayley, this review is not going to make me terribly popular.

I have read a lot about how wonderful Hayley was, and had been working in the Eastleigh area a few times recently. I have attempted to make contact on a number of occasions but could not find a suitable date. A couple of weeks ago I managed to get time that suited both of us and I booked in for a half-hour slot.

Hayley is indeed a very beautiful woman. She has a great body, amazing small boobs, a flat stomach, lovely legs, a beautiful face and nicely done hair and make up. If your idea of a perfect punt, if you have sex with a 10, she is definitely the girl for you.

I found her disinterested, mechanical and frankly, boring.

It seemed as though she felt her beauty was all she needed and she needed to put in no further effort. At £120 per half hour, I disagree.

She wasn't particularly welcoming when I arrived.

She did everything I asked, but clinically and without any enthusiasm at all. She gave very little eye contact. She was uncommunicative and didn't engage in conversation, almost at all.  Polite but cold. I got the definite feeling that she didn't want to be there and that she would rather be doing anything else. Maybe it's me that's too ugly, but the, that's partly what the £120 was for.

We did OWO, RO, and protected sex. Towards the end I was just trying to get myself off in order to leave.

She showed me to the door and didn't even say goodbye, just closed the door behind me.

I was in and out in 20 minutes.

I have given her a neutral because I didn't think it was quite bad enough to warrant a negative. She didn't do anything wrong, she just wasn't particularly present. For that kind of money, I expect some engagement, something a little closer to GFE.

I would not return.  I will instead, continue my search for rough looking women who love cock. They're better, they're juicier, and they are usually cheaper.

[The_Don]

I found her disinterested, mechanical and frankly, boring.


She wasn't particularly welcoming when I arrived.


She showed me to the door and didn't even say goodbye, just closed the door behind me.



I have given her a neutral because I didn't think it was quite bad enough to warrant a negative

Your punt, review and rating (IMO)


Thanks for sharing 

[MichaelDBW]

I saw her in 2018/2019 long before I was active on here and my review would have pretty similar to yours, just didn't feel any real warmth from her and felt very clinical. I travelled a fair way to see her and think I'd told myself it was going to be the best punt I've had, so perhaps I'd built it up too much in advance and anything less than perfection was going to be disappointing .. So maybe it was partly on me.

[macman26]

I think they all do this. Do you think about it? She probably fucked 2000 people easily and had all of the issues and problems with people. She could probably write a really good book.. looking at her blog you can see the same.. 

[Yellowman1]

Mine meet with her fairly similar but I think mainly becuase I’d built it up to be the best meet ever and it was good just not spectacular

[mh]

Your review and rating, she's clearly not for you and the description of your ideal supports that:

I will instead, continue my search for rough looking women who love cock. They're better, they're juicier, and they are usually cheaper.

She's not a rough, cheap woman - and I do on occasion like a rough, cheap woman, I am not denigrating them!

I would say that, with me the first time, she really wanted to please but if you don't tell her what you want her to do (quite specifically) she kind of waits for you to do so (while asking to try and find out). Now that could be seen as a bit disinterested or cold, I suppose. Once I started getting specific with requests she got very involved in delivering.

[timsussex]

I would describe her as professional at times and waiting for you to decide what you want
 
We must remember that we are all human and have some less good days or people rub them the wrong way, and that applies to both sides

I don't think anyone can give 100% every time however as I'm paying I do expect a minimum service from a professional escort even if we don't click and this sounds like what you got

Oh and as a fan of Hayley for nearly 10 years I have no problem with your Neutral review -
1) your review - your rating
2) it might mean increased availabilty for me ! 

[Waterhouse]

Oh and as a fan of Hayley for nearly 10 years I have no problem with your Neutral review -
1) your review - your rating
2) it might mean increased availabilty for me ! 

… or it may prompt Hayley to rethink her retirement timelines and bring them forward, and that would be a sad day for punters coming sooner rather than mid-term.

I genuinely hope this review doesn’t hasten her exit plan as she is a diamond-class SP in my experience.

[timsussex]

… or it may prompt Hayley to rethink her retirement timelines and bring them forward, and that would be a sad day for punters coming sooner rather than mid-term.

I genuinely hope this review doesn’t hasten her exit plan as she is a diamond-class SP in my experience.

or she may decide not to see new clients; as she has already reduced her availability any further reduction and she wouldn't need to risk new clients

[dubhcarr]

Thanks for your review OP this is one lassie I have wondered whether to visit or not. I am surprised that she offers 30 min so thanks for the info I wonder if the image I have of her as a pse/ fetish kind of escort fits with my GFE type preference.(?) Maybe this is what stops me from trying to book. Your input is food for thought 

[Bunbury]

She probably fucked 2000 people

..and the rest x 10

[mh]

I am surprised that she offers 30 min so thanks for the info I wonder if the image I have of her as a pse/ fetish kind of escort fits with my GFE type preference.(?) Maybe this is what stops me from trying to book. Your input is food for thought 

30 minutes does feel a bit 'brisk' for the breadth of her offering, if I can put it that way. I can't imagine wating to get in and out so quickly (oo-er, madam) with Hayley.

[mh]

..and the rest x 10

Indeed, just 10 encounters a week with many weeks off each year gets you to 2,000 in 5 years.

[Haderach]

I first saw her in 2013 and I think she has been working a year or two then as well. A great SP who really has been a gold standard imo. Of course you can’t please all the people, all the time.

[Cunning Punt]

… or it may prompt Hayley to rethink her retirement timelines and bring them forward, and that would be a sad day for punters coming sooner rather than mid-term.

I genuinely hope this review doesn’t hasten her exit plan as she is a diamond-class SP in my experience.

Are you being sarcastic because if you're being serious that is an absolute dickish comment which is totally against the spirit of this forum and makes you sound like a cunt-struck white knight fanboy. 

Are you seriously suggesting a member should not post a non-positive review because you and others think the SP is brilliant?!

On a practical level, a very popular SP brings forward her retirement because of one review that isn't glowing? Really? (And clearly you and others have latched onto the retirement marketing spin.)

Even if that were the case in theory, it's irrelevant because this forum is all about reviews and a range of them. A reviewer is entitled to their opinion, and everyone has different experiences with the same girl and different preferences etc. You weren't in the room.

Clearly Hayley is popular and many people have great experiences - I'm genuinely very pleased for you. But several have had mediocre experiences with Hayley, some of us have given her a neutral, others have given what reads like a generous positive, and others won't have written reviews at all, some worried about the backlash.

[Cunning Punt]

Thanks for your review OP this is one lassie I have wondered whether to visit or not. I am surprised that she offers 30 min so thanks for the info I wonder if the image I have of her as a pse/ fetish kind of escort fits with my GFE type preference.(?) Maybe this is what stops me from trying to book. Your input is food for thought 

The OP's experience reflects my booking, also 30mins, from a couple of years back, also reviewed. Some have suggested one should not expect GFE from any escort in 30mins - which is bollocks. I have only done 30mins bookings for several years and have had GFE from several top SPs on the first meet, not just subsequent visits.

Hayley is charging £120 for 30mins, not £70, and if any a SP doesn't feel comfortable enough in 30mins bookings, then she shouldn't do 30mins bookings.

Time issue aside, Hayley claims she is "most happy in a relaxed GFE situation" but that's questionable - from her reviews, not just our couple of neutrals, she seems more PSE. It's also worth noting that - by her own admission - she doesn't do DFK which, going on your reviews, you like.

[Stevelondon]

… or it may prompt Hayley to rethink her retirement timelines and bring them forward, and that would be a sad day for punters coming sooner rather than mid-term.

I genuinely hope this review doesn’t hasten her exit plan as she is a diamond-class SP in my experience.

Now I’ve told you before about this.
You forget to put one little smiley or a winking face emoji……..  you get some know it all coming along,  calling you a cunt struck white knight fanboy.

[Stevelondon]

Oops…….. my apologies. Forgot to put in one of these 😀

[dubhcarr]

The OP's experience reflects my booking, also 30mins, from a couple of years back, also reviewed. Some have suggested one should not expect GFE from any escort in 30mins - which is bollocks. I have only done 30mins bookings for several years and have had GFE from several top SPs on the first meet, not just subsequent visits.

Hayley is charging £120 for 30mins, not £70, and if any a SP doesn't feel comfortable enough in 30mins bookings, then she shouldn't do 30mins bookings.

Time issue aside, Hayley claims she is "most happy in a relaxed GFE situation" but that's questionable - from her reviews, not just our couple of neutrals, she seems more PSE. It's also worth noting that - by her own admission - she doesn't do DFK which, going on your reviews, you like.

Yes I read your review Mr CP (thanks  ) I think we have similar requirements so I'm no serious about this SP there are so many SP's left that fit my requirement, not always my pocket way pricing has escalated, but punting is a game of choice. 

[Stevelondon]

Yes I read your review Mr CP (thanks  ) I think we have similar requirements so I'm no serious about this SP there are so many SP's left that fit my requirement, not always my pocket way pricing has escalated, but punting is a game of choice. 

It’s why reviews are so important. Reading them even more important 

This lass has a lot more positives than neutrals and yet you seem to be deciding NOT to choose her because of the lower number.
Like you say. Punting is a game of choice. 😂


I’ve never met this SP so can’t comment one way or the other about her service good, bad, indifferent etc.

But I think if I was nearer to the location I’d definitely be motivated to see her.
Then again I’m more your friendly soft fetish type of bloke so think she would suit my taste over and hour of so. Rather than an awkwardly pricy 30 minutes. 🤷🏼

[Roadster]

Your review and rating, she's clearly not for you and the description of your ideal supports that:

Quote from: Roadster on June 02, 2025, 09:15:17 am

I will instead, continue my search for rough looking women who love cock. They're better, they're juicier, and they are usually cheaper.

She's not a rough, cheap woman - and I do on occasion like a rough, cheap woman, I am not denigrating them!

I would say that, with me the first time, she really wanted to please but if you don't tell her what you want her to do (quite specifically) she kind of waits for you to do so (while asking to try and find out). Now that could be seen as a bit disinterested or cold, I suppose. Once I started getting specific with requests she got very involved in delivering.

But that wasn't what I sad was it?

I never suggested that she was remotely rough.  And she sure as hell ain't cheap!

I also didn't say that that was my ideal.  My ideal is creative, enthusiastic and competently delivered sex.  Price is a secondary consideration, but I do quite like value for money, which I didn't feel that I got here.  In my experience of forty odd years of punting I have noticed that my ideal is more often to be found amongst the lesser mortals, (the ones who actually love cock and don't get worshiped from afar very much ... YMMV).

I am there for sex, she was ... just there.  As far as I am concerned a directed mechanical shag is, in fact, a mechanical shag.

For the record, I have less than zero interest in returning again and again to a sub-optimal prossy and then repeatedly paying over the odds to try to get closer to a half way decent punt.

Had she only joined in, I would have given her a positive.  Had the punt been approaching the standard of her looks, I'd have been a regular.  As it was I was merely under-whelmed.

You are obviously quite invested in this hooker.  Whether or not that is healthy is a matter for you.

But please do not twist my words to defend your Damsel.

Thank you.

[Stevelondon]

She's not a rough, cheap woman - and I do on occasion like a rough, cheap woman, I am not denigrating them!

I would say that, with me the first time, she really wanted to please but if you don't tell her what you want her to do (quite specifically) she kind of waits for you to do so (while asking to try and find out). Now that could be seen as a bit disinterested or cold, I suppose. Once I started getting specific with requests she got very involved in delivering.


But that wasn't what I sad was it?

I never suggested that she was remotely rough.  And she sure as hell ain't cheap!

I also didn't say that that was my ideal.  My ideal is creative, enthusiastic and competently delivered sex.  Price is a secondary consideration, but I do quite like value for money, which I didn't feel that I got here.  In my experience of forty odd years of punting I have noticed that my ideal is more often to be found amongst the lesser mortals, (the ones who actually love cock and don't get worshiped from afar very much ... YMMV).

I am there for sex, she was ... just there.  As far as I am concerned a directed mechanical shag is, in fact, a mechanical shag.

For the record, I have less than zero interest in returning again and again to a sub-optimal prossy and then repeatedly paying over the odds to try to get closer to a half way decent punt.

Had she only joined in, I would have given her a positive.  Had the punt been approaching the standard of her looks, I'd have been a regular.  As it was I was merely under-whelmed.

You are obviously quite invested in this hooker.  Whether or not that is healthy is a matter for you.

But please do not twist my words to defend your Damsel.

Thank you.

Woah...........I'm not coming to mh aid here. But if you post a review then folk have a right to have an opinion on it mate.
A little less of the aggression and more of the pub banter goes a long way on here.

You did'nt get on with the lass........nuff said. 


Damsel......I love it 

[mh]

She's not a rough, cheap woman - and I do on occasion like a rough, cheap woman, I am not denigrating them!

I would say that, with me the first time, she really wanted to please but if you don't tell her what you want her to do (quite specifically) she kind of waits for you to do so (while asking to try and find out). Now that could be seen as a bit disinterested or cold, I suppose. Once I started getting specific with requests she got very involved in delivering.


But that wasn't what I sad was it?

I never suggested that she was remotely rough.  And she sure as hell ain't cheap!

I also didn't say that that was my ideal.  My ideal is creative, enthusiastic and competently delivered sex.  Price is a secondary consideration, but I do quite like value for money, which I didn't feel that I got here.  In my experience of forty odd years of punting I have noticed that my ideal is more often to be found amongst the lesser mortals, (the ones who actually love cock and don't get worshiped from afar very much ... YMMV).

I am there for sex, she was ... just there.  As far as I am concerned a directed mechanical shag is, in fact, a mechanical shag.

For the record, I have less than zero interest in returning again and again to a sub-optimal prossy and then repeatedly paying over the odds to try to get closer to a half way decent punt.

Had she only joined in, I would have given her a positive.  Had the punt been approaching the standard of her looks, I'd have been a regular.  As it was I was merely under-whelmed.

You are obviously quite invested in this hooker.  Whether or not that is healthy is a matter for you.

But please do not twist my words to defend your Damsel.

Thank you.

Jeez, take a beat! Your rating and review is yours, I'm not disputing that was your experience. Of course you weren't saying she was rough/cheap - quite the opposite. But you said you'd "continue my search for rough looking women who love cock. They're better, they're juicier, and they are usually cheaper" which clearly expresses your preference and it is hard to see how Hayley fitted the brief. My bad if that was too much of an interpretation, but that's what I understood from your words.

As for 'invested' or '[my] damsel', I've seen her 3 times over my 15 punting years, so hardly an obsession. I frequently reply on reviews of girls I've seen myself. It's just that there are way more of those for Hayley than others I have seen!

[Cunning Punt]

Now I’ve told you before about this.
You forget to put one little smiley or a winking face emoji……..  you get some know it all coming along,  calling you a cunt struck white knight fanboy.

It’s why reviews are so important. Reading them even more important 

This lass has a lot more positives than neutrals and yet you seem to be deciding NOT to choose her because of the lower number.
Like you say. Punting is a game of choice. 😂

And reading posts before commenting on them is also important, which you don't seem to have done. 

I said the post made him sound like a fanboy not was, which it did. The way it was written, there was absolutely no sense of irony there but I did preface it by saying I didn't know whether he was being sarcastic but...

Acting like a know it all? Hardly.

And, like any savvy punter, dubhcarr is indeed reading the reviews not going on the ratings and is basing his assessment on the service that he wants ie GFE not PSE.

[Stevelondon]

And reading posts before commenting on them is also important, which you don't seem to have done. 

I said the post made him sound like a fanboy not was, which it did. The way it was written, there was absolutely no sense of irony there but I did preface it by saying I didn't know whether he was being sarcastic but...

Acting like a know it all? Hardly.

And, like any savvy punter, dubhcarr is indeed reading the reviews not going on the ratings and is basing his assessment on the service that he wants ie GFE not PSE.

Oh I guess we both read pretty much alike my friend. Albeit I’ve had to struggle more with the language as it’s not me mother tongue   
As for you NOT saying he was a fanboy…………. Well why say it in the first place if it’s NOT something you’re suggesting.    Oh forget it. Life’s too short. 

My apologies for the know it all jibe. A stupid remark.

The OP wrote a review and it’s appreciated …… as always.

[Waterhouse]

Are you being sarcastic because if you're being serious that is an absolute dickish comment which is totally against the spirit of this forum and makes you sound like a cunt-struck white knight fanboy. 

Are you seriously suggesting a member should not post a non-positive review because you and others think the SP is brilliant?!

On a practical level, a very popular SP brings forward her retirement because of one review that isn't glowing? Really? (And clearly you and others have latched onto the retirement marketing spin.)

Even if that were the case in theory, it's irrelevant because this forum is all about reviews and a range of them. A reviewer is entitled to their opinion, and everyone has different experiences with the same girl and different preferences etc. You weren't in the room.

Clearly Hayley is popular and many people have great experiences - I'm genuinely very pleased for you. But several have had mediocre experiences with Hayley, some of us have given her a neutral, others have given what reads like a generous positive, and others won't have written reviews at all, some worried about the backlash.

Get your facts straight - where in my reply did I suggest or even hint that the OP or any other member of the forum should not be posting non-positive reviews? I never commented on yours or the other neutral reviews, nor have I ever suggested that a review rating should be anything other than what the op/reviewer has said it was.

You may want to take a look at your own post when talking about breaching the spirit of the forum (maybe look at R23) - calling me a cunt-struck white knight fanboy is out of line and couldn’t be further from the truth - I’ve seen her only 3 times since reviewing over 3½ years ago. Hardly the actions of a besotted cunt-struck white knight fanboy.

Oh, and for the record, yes I do believe she is planning to retire - I wouldn’t have mentioned it in my reply otherwise.