Smiley-Miley - 1311155 - Mechanical & probably jaded

[BuridansAss]

Smiley-Miley - 1311155
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

1 hour in-call, Earls Court, London
£110
No extras


Notes
Looks like her pictures, but a little bit older now
Uniforms galore - take your pick
FK, but not deep DFK
No anal (not bothered)
OWO (no swallow, although mentioned on her 'likes' list)
Disinterested and mechanical
Back-to-back bookings



Smiley Miley has been reviewed copiously on the site already, so I won't go into much detail as it has been covered all before.  She was cute, looked older than her pictures however, and offers everything on her 'likes' list as noted above.

The flat was a bit of a mess, the shower a bit dank and dingy, but true to form she was smiley and in a happy mood.  A shame then that it didn't translate into getting involved in the punt.  Yes she did all the services mentioned, but kissing was perfunctory, oral was lacking in enthusiasm, and she made very little effort in getting involved in the sex.  Disinterested and mechanical is how I would describe the hour.

Maybe it's me physically that she didn't like, and if so then I guess fair enough.  Although, if the roles were reversed I'd at least try and pretend to enjoy myself.  Haven't had a problem like this with any other WG I've seen, quite the contrary in fact, so I guess as they say, your mileage might vary...

[charming_red]

That sure sounds like Miley 

Symptoms of shagging fatigue have been showing for a while now.

[nigel4498]

The fact that she likes or doesn't like a punter should not come into it. She is providing a service that you paid good money for so she said have provided what you required.
Pity it was a bad punt for you as she is well reviewed on here and I imagine you were looking forward to a first  class session.

[Clooney]

Bringing up the rear of almost universally positive reviews over a long period of time, are now two or three poor ones in a row.

Normaly you'd view them with surprise or even scepticism, but the two negatives that I can recall seemed very matter of fact, impartial (or as much as you can be when leaving a negative) but also quite fair, so I personally don't suspect anything other than the girl burning out, which is a real shame.

I suppose it was slightly inevitable though, given her age and the length of time she's been working full on.

I hope that I'm wrong or that she takes a break and returns, because she looks and until recently sounded amazing.

There's nothing better than a hard bodies, slim young thing bouncing away or your cock, but also nothing worse than the same standard of girl with no spark or enthusiasm.

Let's hope this is a speedbump because this review doesn't seem great, but equally appears fairly written.

[Dusktildawn]

Taken out of my hot list

Too many poor reviews recently

[jesus_jones]

She has always had her detractors (me included). I saw her 3 years ago - she was stroppy, sarcastic, awkward, prickly... simply not not worth the effort/price.

[Goofy85]

She has always had her detractors (me included). I saw her 3 years ago - she was stroppy, sarcastic, awkward, prickly... simply not not worth the effort/price.

I echo this. I have already noted my comments onto one of the existing reviews.

Very awkward, cold sense of humour, not very welcoming and made tries to play mind games with you. Not an enjoyable punt at all. This was around six months ago.

[mystery7]

She was being a twat again when I saw her a few weeks back, looking grumpy for the first half of the session, got better for the second. Won't bother again, done with the moody little bitch

[mystery7]

I'll do a review of all 6 times I've seen her soon, always shied away from it as she was my favorite WG. I've had better service from Romanians recently......and thats saying something. I'll miss that phat ass though

[kefcseries]

Won't bother again, done with the moody little bitch

 

When I saw her last year she was a cheeky little cow but funny with it, which I liked. At least it showed she had some personality. Look forward to reading your review.

[Vivago]

 Pity that she appears to have gone downhill.  She was one of my very best punts of 2013.  She has an incredibly sexy body... a  near perfect 10 on my subjective scale.

 One thing she cannot be accused of is greed. Her rate  hasn't changed since I first hotlisted her and, considering what she offers, when she is on form, must  still rate as one  of the better value punts on Adultworks. Problem is catching her on a going day.

[SamLP]

When I saw her last year she was a cheeky little cow but funny with it, which I liked. At least it showed she had some personality. Look forward to reading your review.

Ditto. Have been meaning to go back many times but haven't ventured to Earls Court in a while.

[Gandalfthewhite]

Met her a couple of times recently when I remembered I didn't actually fuck her the first time we met years ago:-)

Ironically she's one of the least smiley escorts I have ever met, though she was friendly overall and seemed to be making an effort at being personable (I think she's just not at all naturally effervescent). She has a way of talking where you feel constantly like she's thinking something which she's not saying and it can make people uncomfortable - guess it takes some getting used to.

The positives are that she does everything listed on her profile without hesitation, including taking a proper facial and allowing filming without additional costs for either, and take s proper pounding. That's more than can be said for most girls.

[Big Cat]

allowing filming without additional costs for either.

Had no idea about this when I visited her - kicking myself 

[Vivago]

Had no idea about this when I visited her - kicking myself 

She does insist on wearing her pussy mask though ( that's a feline mask, not a mask on her twat ).