I think being called or thought of as old fashioned is mild,
The sanction of marriage doesn't guarantee sex, the cessation of sex within a marriage does not constitute a breach of marital vows or obligation.
The key bits of the successful appeal were for me these....
"In the Court's view, consent to marriage could not imply consent to future sexual relations," the ECHR said. "Such an interpretation would be tantamount to denying that marital rape was reprehensible in nature."
The ECHR added it "concluded that the very existence of such a marital obligation ran counter to sexual freedom" and to France's obligation to combat domestic and sexual violence.
Do you not think that sexual violence and rape occur within a marriage or relationship?
Is domestic abuse a non entity? In any form......M to F or F to M etc
How do you know her claims of cruelty, sexual abuse and violence are not true?
We should always remember that there are 3 sides to every story, side A, side B and the truth
Imo the appeal court got it right and going forward i feel that the French courts will be looking on such cases differently after the Pelicot case.