Hawk Tuah!

[bp3]

Just had an STI scare following OWO with some "Hawk Tuah, Spit on that thing".

Burning penis, sore balls...

Turns out I'm negative for STI but have a UTI.  Likely from the spitting as the mouth carries lots of bacteria. 

[RandomGuy99]

That's why you need to pee after cuming as it clears the pipes.

Apparently it is unusual for men to get UTIs as our pipes are longer.

[bp3]

Yeah the doc said it's quite unusual.  I could pinpoint the exact time the bacteria got there!

[daviemac]

Just had an STI scare following OWO with some "Hawk Tuah, Spit on that thing".

Burning penis, sore balls...

Turns out I'm negative for STI but have a UTI.  Likely from the spitting as the mouth carries lots of bacteria.

I presume this was with a civvy as it can't be in a paid sex environment as judging by your lack of reviews you don't punt.

Is there a reason for your total lack of contributions?

[MLawro93]

Penile trauma is common. The harder you fuck, the more likely you'll be sore the next day. 

[RandomGuy99]

I once had a slice of the skin on the head of my penis come off after a rather aggressive blow job.  I had to stop for a while and get tested as a precaution. The skin grew back and I tested negative, but it was ouch for a while.

[RandomGuy99]

I once had a slice of the skin on the head of my penis come off after a rather aggressive blow job.  I had to stop for a while and get tested as a precaution. The skin grew back and I tested negative, but it was ouch for a while.

And there was no blood anywhere.

[Stevelondon]

I’m obviously having problems understanding the language spoken on here.

Hawk Tuah ????

[Doc Holliday]

I’m obviously having problems understanding the language spoken on here.

Hawk Tuah ????

Google is your friend 

[DastardlyDick]

I’m obviously having problems understanding the language spoken on here.

Hawk Tuah ???? Clearing your throat then spitting the result onto your sex partners genitals - usually assumed to be a cock.

[versace]

I presume this was with a civvy as it can't be in a paid sex environment as judging by your lack of reviews you don't punt.

Is there a reason for your total lack of contributions?

Talk about kicking someone when they are down.

[Charliehutton]

Google is your friend 

I've just googled it. I've no idea who Haliey Welch is, or why her name is spelt wrong.

[Stevelondon]

Google is your friend 

Most of the time Google is definitely NOT My friend.
As in this instance it’s just confused me even more.

But as it’s not going to affect my sleep I’ll get over it.

[daviemac]

Talk about kicking someone when they are down.

Can you explain exactly what you mean by that and why you are involving yourself in moderation issues.

BTW this does require an answer.

[versace]

Can you explain exactly what you mean by that and why you are involving yourself in moderation issues.

BTW this does require an answer.

It’s a good old saying, you never heard of it?

[scutty brown]

I’m obviously having problems understanding the language spoken on here.

Hawk Tuah ????

Sounds like a Maori Haka!

[daviemac]

It’s a good old saying, you never heard of it?

Whether it's an old saying or not is irrelevant, explain what you mean by it and why you are getting involved in moderation issues.

The OP hasn't posted any reviews during his 7+ years of membership so he has been questioned about it, why do you think that is wrong?   

[Billy no mates]

Most of the time Google is definitely NOT My friend.
As in this instance it’s just confused me even more.

But as it’s not going to affect my sleep I’ll get over it.

Last year, a guy out filming/interviewing young partying women for YouTube/tiktok in America
Asks a young 20’s, pretty (ish) ‘southern belle’ type girl “what do you do to drive a man wild in bed”
She responds “hawk tuah, spit on that thing” while motioning a blow job.
Clip goes viral and she has 5 minutes of fame, including I believe some sort of music release.
Probably back flipping burgers now.


I suspect it took me longer to type this out than her moment of fame lasted.

[Stevelondon]

Last year, a guy out filming/interviewing young partying women for YouTube/tiktok in America
Asks a young 20’s, pretty (ish) ‘southern belle’ type girl “what do you do to drive a man wild in bed”
She responds “hawk tuah, spit on that thing” while motioning a blow job.
Clip goes viral and she has 5 minutes of fame, including I believe some sort of music release.
Probably back flipping burgers now.


I suspect it took me longer to type this out than her moment of fame lasted.

Do you think that’s where the term came from ?

Strange how things start innit 😀

I’ve never heard of it at all and quite frankly. The idea of it turns me off. 

[Richthescouser]

Last year, a guy out filming/interviewing young partying women for YouTube/tiktok in America
Asks a young 20’s, pretty (ish) ‘southern belle’ type girl “what do you do to drive a man wild in bed”
She responds “hawk tuah, spit on that thing” while motioning a blow job.
Clip goes viral and she has 5 minutes of fame, including I believe some sort of music release.
Probably back flipping burgers now.


I suspect it took me longer to type this out than her moment of fame lasted.

Very much not flipping burgers - lots of media interviews and launched a crypto coin with some major questions asked afterwards. Like she owned most of them and sold them at a hugely inflated price and the value dropped. Made herself a lot of money but her “fans” lost out big time.

[big-al93]

TBF investing in any crypto is very risky and most fail. To invest in one being touted by a minor "celebrity" riding her 15 minutes is sheer stupidity and imho the fools, sorry I mean fans who lost money shouldn't be blaming anyone but themselves.

[Punterperson1971]

TBF investing in any crypto is very risky and most fail. To invest in one being touted by a minor "celebrity" riding her 15 minutes is sheer stupidity and imho the fools, sorry I mean fans who lost money shouldn't be blaming anyone but themselves.

I think also she was probably badly advised by some body who then ripped her off

[Charliehutton]

Can you explain exactly what you mean by that and why you are involving yourself in moderation issues.

BTW this does require an answer.

When I read his comment I took it to be a backhanded compliment to you, for having made your point so dryly.

[versace]

When I read his comment I took it to be a backhanded compliment to you, for having made your point so dryly.

+1

[daviemac]

+1

I would suggest you don't use phrases you don't understand.

External Link/Members Only

[versace]

I would suggest you don't use phrases you don't understand.

External Link/Members Only

Au contraire, you are the one who doesn't understand.

You are getting triggered way too easily these days, I would suggest you go out and get laid, it's been well over 2 years since your last review.

[Hobbit]

Just had an STI scare following OWO with some "Hawk Tuah, Spit on that thing".

Burning penis, sore balls...

Turns out I'm negative for STI but have a UTI.  Likely from the spitting as the mouth carries lots of bacteria.

Just to add my two cents worth.

It's extremely unlikely you got this from her Spit. Just make sure you are showering every day, cleaning your genitals properly which includes cleaning behind your foreskin, and drinking at least 1.5 litres of water per day.

[RandomGuy99]

External Link/Members Only

[Stevelondon]

Au contraire, you are the one who doesn't understand.

You are getting triggered way too easily these days, I would suggest you go out and get laid, it's been well over 2 years since your last review.

If I were you. I would not fall into the trap of thinking just because someone has not reviewed for a while……they are NOT punting.
Or getting laid as you so eloquently put it.


There will be plenty on here who return to the SP’s they have reviewed already. Me being one of them.
Are you catching my drift ?

[daviemac]

Au contraire, you are the one who doesn't understand.

You are getting triggered way too easily these days, I would suggest you go out and get laid, it's been well over 2 years since your last review.

If you have an issue with my review count report it. If you aren't prepared to report it don't mention it.

I should add you really need to learn to mind your own business and stay out of things that don't concern you, there was no need for you to pass any comment at all.

My questioning a member who hasn't reviewed in 7 years is not me 'kicking him when he's down', leeches are about the most complained about thing on the site and most members support the mods when they do something about it.

The phrase you used has a clearly defined definition.

[catweazle]

If you have an issue with my review count report it. If you aren't prepared to report it don't mention it.

While reviews are the lifeblood of this forum, I have always believed that mods contribute to the site very heavily through their moderator duties, and, therefore, they have a 'free pass' through some of the membership requirements. I would certainly never expect a mod to be questioned over their review count.

[Stevelondon]

It’s the suggestion that Versace was making. That someone not writing reviews is somehow NOT punting.

If you look at mine for example there is a 4 month gap between my review of a massage I had up North and my visit to see mistress Chrome.
Yet I’ve probably punted 10-12 times in that period. With no point in reviewing the SP’s I’ve seen already………. And reviewed already.

[Blackpool Rock]

While reviews are the lifeblood of this forum, I have always believed that mods contribute to the site very heavily through their moderator duties, and, therefore, they have a 'free pass' through some of the membership requirements. I would certainly never expect a mod to be questioned over their review count.

As I previously posted on another thread where someone questioned a Mods reviews what none of us know is whether certain Mods actually have secondary accounts which they are actively reviewing on for discretionary reasons 
Can't remember which Mods / Admin is is now but at least 2 of those accounts were set up on the same day so clearly 2nd accounts for doing the Mod / Admin duties which run parallel to their existing reviewing accounts.

I'm just a bit dumbfounded why anyone would question a Mods reviews and back in the old days if anyone had questioned Old Admin on his lack of reviews then their feet wouldn't have touched the floor 
Numerous people even got banned for suggesting he was also J999 

[lewisjones23]

I'm just a bit dumbfounded why anyone would question a Mods reviews and back in the old days if anyone had questioned Old Admin on his lack of reviews then their feet wouldn't have touched the floor 
Numerous people even got banned for suggesting he was also J999 

Always used to amuse me when members demanded to know why James was allowed to be very active with no reviews attached to that account.

What was it to do with them?

Admin was obviously aware of James and had decided that account was fine to not have any reviews so people demanding answers or saying he must have been active were on a hiding to nothing.

Even worse were the people who came off worse in a bit of verbal jousting so then asked where his reviews were to try and have the last word, how boring and predictable

[Thephoenix]

While reviews are the lifeblood of this forum,.......... I would certainly never expect a mod to be questioned over their review count.

Neither would I, unless for some reason there was some personal animosity or grudge.
Reviews may be the lifeblood of this forum, but the mods are like the arteries and veins keeping the blood circulating, and the kidneys to remove waste products and excess fluid.

... and  heres a special 'like' to my favourite mod who is always at hand to provide his unique brand of concoctions, remedies and advice on our ailments. 

[Blackpool Rock]

Always used to amuse me when members demanded to know why James was allowed to be very active with no reviews attached to that account.

What was it to do with them?

Admin was obviously aware of James and had decided that account was fine to not have any reviews so people demanding answers or saying he must have been active were on a hiding to nothing.

Even worse were the people who came off worse in a bit of verbal jousting so then asked where his reviews were to try and have the last word, how boring and predictable

Most people came off worse trying to argue with J999, he was quite horrible to deal with when I was 1st on here but after a couple of years I actually quite liked some of what he posted and it genuinely made me laugh.
No idea if he had a 2nd account that he reviewed on and while i think quite a few good members did get banned as a result of getting into a spat with him he also had a good nose for sniffing out trolls

One of the funniest threads was when J999 and JRC were having one of their usual spats and it descended into an argument about their review counts 

[lewisjones23]

Most people came off worse trying to argue with J999, he was quite horrible to deal with when I was 1st on here but after a couple of years I actually quite liked some of what he posted and it genuinely made me laugh.
No idea if he had a 2nd account that he reviewed on and while i think quite a few good members did get banned as a result of getting into a spat with him he also had a good nose for sniffing out trolls

One of the funniest threads was when J999 and JRC were having one of their usual spats and it descended into an argument about their review counts 

I thought he was hilarious, he had so many people on strings.

How and why people got wound up about what a mystery person on the internet posted tickled me.

[versace]

While reviews are the lifeblood of this forum, I have always believed that mods contribute to the site very heavily through their moderator duties, and, therefore, they have a 'free pass' through some of the membership requirements. I would certainly never expect a mod to be questioned over their review count.

You should be able to question anyone regardless, moderator or not, it doesn’t matter. This isn’t Nazi Germany after all.

[Blackpool Rock]

You should be able to question anyone regardless, moderator or not, it doesn’t matter. This isn’t Nazi Germany after all.

It's also not necessarily the same sort of free speech democracy as the 6th form debating society, it only takes pushing 1 button, just saying 

[daviemac]

You should be able to question anyone regardless, moderator or not, it doesn’t matter. This isn’t Nazi Germany after all.

Feel free to hit the report to moderator button and as a moderator I'll have a look at my contributions and take whatever action is deemed appropriate.   

I should add that the site owner, site admin and other mods are fully aware of the contributions I make to the site.

As I have said before either report it or stop mentioning it and forget about any grudge you have against me.  (Rule #32)

[versace]

It's also not necessarily the same sort of free speech democracy as the 6th form debating society, it only takes pushing 1 button, just saying 

Oh no I’m trembling in my boots. What would I do with my life if I was banned from this site?! Oh dear god.

Feel free to hit the report to moderator button and as a moderator I'll have a look at my contributions and take whatever action is deemed appropriate.   

I should add that the site owner, site admin and other mods are fully aware of the contributions I make to the site.

As I have said before either report it or stop mentioning it and forget about any grudge you have against me.  (Rule #32)

I don’t have a grudge. I simply made a comment about “kicking someone when they are down” it was meant as a joke. As the OP came here looking for advice because of his burning cock and whatnot. Only to come back and find out that you pulled him up on his lack of reviews instead. Hence the comment I made about kicking someone when they are down. It was meant as a lighthearted joke as I said. But you didn’t see it this way. Anyways, whatever.

[daviemac]

Oh no I’m trembling in my boots. What would I do with my life if I was banned from this site?! Oh dear god.

I don’t have a grudge. I simply made a comment about “kicking someone when they are down” it was meant as a joke. As the OP came here looking for advice because of his burning cock and whatnot. Only to come back and find out that you pulled him up on his lack of reviews instead. Hence the comment I made about kicking someone when they are down. It was meant as a lighthearted joke as I said. But you didn’t see it this way. Anyways, whatever.

You've had the warning, next time you question anyone about contributions you will be banned, not your job.

[versace]

You've had the warning, next time you question anyone about contributions you will be banned, not your job.

Heil mein Fuehrer

[catweazle]

Heil mein Fuehrer

Oh dear. When you're in a hole, stop digging.

[Bornslippy]

 Perfectly good member/contributer banned because a mod threw a hissy fit. Ridiculous

[daviemac]

Perfectly good member/contributer banned because a mod threw a hissy fit. Ridiculous

You don't know the history mate, he's had a lot of warnings in the background, this is just the last in a line so I would be careful if I were you.

[Blackpool Rock]

Perfectly good member/contributer banned because a mod threw a hissy fit. Ridiculous

While it's unfortunate for someone with over 100 reviews to get banned he was the architect of his own downfall and it was obvious the way he was heading, like watching a car crash in slow motion he couldn't stop posting shit which was clearly getting him closer and closer to a ban.

To me it looks like Versace was having a hissy fit 

[Bornslippy]

So now I'm being threatened for having an opinion? Wow

[daviemac]

So now I'm being threatened for having an opinion? Wow

No you are not being threatened for having an opinion, I'm advising you not to get involved in something you don't know about.

Question for you, how many times do you think a member should be warned about their behaviour? you don't know what has gone on in the background or how long it's been going on for. Warnings are not always in public and this thread is the last in a long line of his out of order posts.

We have tried to get him to stop, he hasn't and yes it is unfortunate when a good contributor gets banned we would rather not do it but some people just can't help themselves.

Kicking someone when they are down is not a good thing, questioning a member about a lack of reviews is and is what members expect mods to do.

Edit

It's a genuine question, how many times would you say a member should be warned before being banned?   

[Doc Holliday]

It's a genuine question, how many times would you say a member should be warned before being banned?   

The vast majority of valuable contributors who post large numbers of reviews do not go looking for trouble. There are a very small number who rather than stick to what they do best, decide to push boundaries and break the rules.

Versace has previously received at least one temporary ban in the past (and I think it may be two?) for either acting as a moderator or criticising one.

Many years ago on another forum to which I made a huge contribution, I had a confrontation with a moderator who I knew had misunderstood me. He banned me. I complained to the owner asking to be reinstated based on my contribution and that I could demonstrate the Mod had made a mistake. He pointed out that whilst he found my contribution valuable to him especially, it was irrelevant to the discussion. He also already knew the Mod had made a mistake and misunderstood my comments, and had discussed it with him, but if he didn't change his mind he would always support his mods decisions.

He was of course quite right on both counts, but I was 'so far up my own' I thought otherwise. I learned my lesson that day that I was not as special as I thought.

Most members don't need to be taught this lesson about forum moderation and rules, but a very small number do not understand the reality and Versace is/was one of them.

EDIT ... just to clarify I am not saying in this instance, Davie has made any kind of mistake