EnglishNaughtyLulu - London Earls Court

[Obelisk12]

AW id: 7628494

Strong negative. The girl is pretty and we had a good time in terms of activities undertaken. But Lulu is working allegation’s removed .

I arrived, we start fooling around and kissing. I noticed she was happy, didn't bother me too much. She looked great in her full-body outfit with stockings. I was excited to see what's underneath. I get myself comfortable on the bed while she takes off her outfit. She gives me (excellent) OWO, I consider returning the favour but just use my fingers instead. She then returns for OWO with a finish and I'm mentally prepping to go for round 2.


Posting this as soon as possible after the meet to warn fellow punters because this is obviously a time-sensitive risk. Stay safe.

[GingerNuts]

Please try and post the links from the bottom of the AW profile.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Iloveoral]

we can’t post allegations on this site, sorry matey

25 Allegations of sexually transmitted diseases
Past incidents have shown that such extreme and damaging allegations are malicious and from troublemakers. Therefore, it is generally not acceptable to make such allegations against others.

30 No discussions of illegal drugs

Please read the site rules, there’s a link at the bottom of every page

[KatieEdinburgh]

Edit: you beat me too it sorry

[seed_sprayer]

Don’t think I can review without breaking rules, but if I could then it’s a strong negative (based on recent experience).

[bradders8896]

Gents - I’m due to visit tomorrow and punt for the first time in ages. Sounds to me like I should cancel but the fact everything is vague on here I can’t properly make an informed decision… anyone able to shed any light?

[GingerNuts]

Gents - I’m due to visit tomorrow and punt for the first time in ages. Sounds to me like I should cancel but the fact everything is vague on here I can’t properly make an informed decision… anyone able to shed any light?

You can see from ILO's comments you won't get any more detail. You should be able to read between the lines though...

[Socrates50]

Bradders8896: Wow you got a booking in advance !? She has been quite impolite (rude / swearing) to me by text for trying to book her in advance, she has told me to only text her on the day. Seems to be easily annoyed. I think she looks great but like you interested in the facts. Perhaps she’s just stressed at the moment ?

[bradders8896]

Yeah don’t get me wrong she’s done the standard “need to confirm on the day” so I could well be double-booked.

I am reading between the lines - I’m just someone who doesn’t like grey areas that’s all

[GingerNuts]

I think she looks great but like you interested in the facts.

I am reading between the lines - I’m just someone who doesn’t like grey areas that’s all

You'll both have to make do with what's in the thread. There's enough for you to make a fairly well informed choice.

[Obelisk12]

I understand why the rules are in place, I can see how 'he said she said' could get out of hand. Sorry. I was not aware of them when I posted.

For those asking 'should I go see her' my response would be categorically absolutely fuck no.

You can look at my previous reviews for some context if you like. I never write such strong reviews so perhaps there's a very good reason even if I can't tell you exactly what it is.

[bradders8896]

 

[demimonde]

Yeah don’t get me wrong she’s done the standard “need to confirm on the day” so I could well be double-booked.

I am reading between the lines - I’m just someone who doesn’t like grey areas that’s all

If you just read Iloveoral's mod reasons for removing text it's pretty clear imo.

[zxc]

I visited her and wrote a review. So, I think that I can tell what I saw.

Removed as per ILO's post.

[GingerNuts]

I visited her and wrote a review. So, I think that I can tell what I saw.

Whatever the cause you didn't think it was worth covering in your review?

[zxc]

Whatever the cause you didn't think it was worth covering in your review?

I think it is only a skin problem. I have a decolouration too. I gave it no importance.

[GingerNuts]

I think it is only a skin problem. I have a decolouration too. I gave it no importance.

You write a review for the benefit of the other members. When they're potentially shelling out £200+ for an hour I'm sure what you describe would be off-putting to some to say the least.

The OP, for example, may not have wasted his time and money if he'd had a heads-up.

[Iloveoral]

In fairness I’ve occasionally missed out something in a review I saw no importance or issue with, for it later to be questioned in the review thread, as is this.
As zxc  has mention, he saw no issue especially as he could relate 

[Heph]

You write a review for the benefit of the other members. When they're potentially shelling out £200+ for an hour I'm sure what you describe would be off-putting to some to say the least.

The OP, for example, may not have wasted his time and money if he'd had a heads-up.

C'mon GN... skin discolouration is not a universal red flag

I'd sooner red-flag a fatty, but many (barely explicably to me) see no problems with voluntarily visiting chubsters

[GingerNuts]

In fairness I’ve occasionally missed out something in a review I saw no importance or issue with, for it later to be questioned in the review thread, as is this.
As zxc  has mention, he saw no issue especially as he could relate 

That may be true but if he thought about it outside his own world view for a second he should have realised it's an important thing to mention when appearance can be a significant factor to punters. Hopefully something he'll take on board going forward.

[GingerNuts]

C'mon GN... skin discolouration is not a universal red flag

I'd sooner red-flag a fatty, but many (barely explicably to me) see no problems with voluntarily visiting chubsters

I didn't say it was a red flag but it's the sort of thing you'd like to know if you find it off-putting. I do also have the benefit of having seen the unedited review which wasn't so gentle in describing the issue.

[Iloveoral]

That may be true but if he thought about it outside his own world view for a second he should have realised it's an important thing to mention when appearance can be a significant factor to punters. Hopefully something he'll take on board going forward.

I am not a doctor,

Your looking too deep, leave it alone matey you’re doing exactly what we are trying to avoid, if you aren’t happy hit report on his comment, a mod will look into it, not you please.
I’m happy with his and others replies.

[Obelisk12]

I am not a doctor, but I only saw skin problems. Those can be a problem for her but not for you.

Did you get a look at her legs?

[zxc]

Did you get a look at her legs?

She was wearing stockings. However, I saw many small white spots on her back and psoriasis on her knuckles, which made me think she had skin problems, nothing else. I would have thought about something serious if she had had dark stains, but she did not have.

I stayed because I was not worried. As I said, I thought it was a skin problem only. If I had thought about a serious problem, I would have walked away... And you should have walked. Contrary to me you indeed thought she had an STD. Why did you stay then?

[Obelisk12]

Why did you stay then?

The majority of my comment was removed. I left as soon as I noticed her legs.

I had also previously noticed her back and was not concerned. Her legs were different.