When does a Massage Review become an Escort Review?

[tantraman]

This latest review on Hana got me thinking, 'cos I read it under our London board's Escort Reviews, whereas all her prior reviews have been under Massage Reviews.

Although we've all received rampant rimming during Hana's B2B massage, as well as awesome OWO/CIM instead of usual HR, I've always interpreted any such activity as bonuses by some SPs during FBSM ... and so I have still reported 'em as Massage Reviews.

Only if actual intercourse has occured during FBSM, only then do I report that as an Escort Review.

I appreciate that there is a fine line between when a Massage Review ought to morph into an Escort Review, but I just wonder how others classify, if there are no hard (ahem!) rules?

[tantraman]

... ah, I guess the question has been answered, 'cos I now see someone has moved the said report to Massage Reviews

[bdyno]

This is purely subjective, but to me I'm guessing it depends on what they advertise as?

I actually have a review from a week or so ago I need to write which potentially crosses the line (and may if I see her again before posting).  Advertises as massage on VS, nothing ticked to imply more than a probable happy ending, but the happy ending was done orally and afterwards she said full service would have happened as well if I hadn't already popped.

I'm still leaning towards posting in in massages when the time comes, mainly because (I think) those reviews are only visible by signed in members, so less is given away about the otherwise genuine massage parlours who do a bit extra rather than those who blatantly advertise it.

[scutty brown]

There's nothing subjective about it.
The girl publicly offers massage services, not full service. As such, openly posting on here that she offered FS could cause problems with her management / landlords / council /  whatever.
We've already had in the past cases where massage girls have been sacked following revelations of extra services on here. That's why the "massage reviews" section is hidden from non-members: so that reports of massage girls offering extras can be kept away from public view. Reviews by girls advertising "massage" belong in the massage section.
One of the mods - I think it was Davie - stated this quite clearly within the last couple of weeks

[lillythesavage]

There's nothing subjective about it.
The girl publicly offers massage services, not full service. As such, openly posting on here that she offered FS could cause problems with her management / landlords / council /  whatever.
We've already had in the past cases where massage girls have been sacked following revelations of extra services on here. That's why the "massage reviews" section is hidden from non-members: so that reports of massage girls offering extras can be kept away from public view. Reviews by girls advertising "massage" belong in the massage section.
One of the mods - I think it was Davie - stated this quite clearly within the last couple of weeks

Yet busybody Forum Helpers reading every post decide what constitutes an Escort type meet and move them from the massage section ? 

[bdyno]

There's nothing subjective about it.
The girl publicly offers massage services, not full service. As such, openly posting on here that she offered FS could cause problems with her management / landlords / council /  whatever.
We've already had in the past cases where massage girls have been sacked following revelations of extra services on here. That's why the "massage reviews" section is hidden from non-members: so that reports of massage girls offering extras can be kept away from public view. Reviews by girls advertising "massage" belong in the massage section.
One of the mods - I think it was Davie - stated this quite clearly within the last couple of weeks

Thanks, that's what I thought so thanks for confirming 

[Thephoenix]

There's nothing subjective about it.
The girl publicly offers massage services, not full service. As such, openly posting on here that she offered FS could cause problems with her management / landlords / council /  whatever.
We've already had in the past cases where massage girls have been sacked following revelations of extra services on here. That's why the "massage reviews" section is hidden from non-members: so that reports of massage girls offering extras can be kept away from public view. Reviews by girls advertising "massage" belong in the massage section.
One of the mods - I think it was Davie - stated this quite clearly within the last couple of weeks

For the same reasons, even discussing/enquiring about extra services in massage establishments are best kept within the massage reviews section of each area.
North West, North Wales, West Mids already have a dedicated thread at the head of their respective massage reviews section .

[DastardlyDick]

Yet busybody Forum Helpers reading every post decide what constitutes an Escort type meet and move them from the massage section ? 

Surely that's their job on here? 

[windowlicker]

If it is a massage with extras and the primary reason for the visit is the massage I stick in the massage section even if full service is available.

However, if it is an escort who does a bit of massage I feel it should be in the escort section.

I find the quality of the massage is significantly better in the 1st instance.

I appreciate the point about shops but there are a lot of independents too where this does not apply.

[RedKettle]

Yet busybody Forum Helpers reading every post decide what constitutes an Escort type meet and move them from the massage section ? 

Would you like to take a turn? Perhaps index some of the constant stream of reviews, correct ratings when asked etc etc.

[scouting]

Yet busybody Forum Helpers reading every post decide what constitutes an Escort type meet and move them from the massage section ? 

I can't speak for all Helpers as we don't actually communicate with each other, but in the main I would contest the description of busybodies. We generally try to keep things tidy, adhere to protocol and fill in the blanks where links, names, location, description etc have been omitted. I would imagine our invitation to do so is based on our previous input.

There will be occasions where we may get our judgement wrong and as scutty brown pointed out, daviemac gave guidance on a recent thread on this very subject. I recall you being particularly rude to another Helper which was not very constructive. On that occasion my view would have been different, but having received davie's guidance I accept it and will work with it in the future. Please don't think we have any other agenda.   

[90125]

Yet busybody Forum Helpers reading every post decide what constitutes an Escort type meet and move them from the massage section ? 

Helpers have an important role here sharing the burden of keeping everything tidy. You might want to withdraw the accusation they are busybodies because then certainly ARE NOT.

[bdyno]

Although they probably are bodies who are quite busy with all the work they do 

[Atrueyorkie]

If it is a massage with extras and the primary reason for the visit is the massage I stick in the massage section even if full service is available.

However, if it is an escort who does a bit of massage I feel it should be in the escort section.

I find the quality of the massage is significantly better in the 1st instance.

I appreciate the point about shops but there are a lot of independents too where this does not apply.

This and nothing more.

[the_exile]

It would depend on what services were advertised - I think I reviewed a girl who was advertising massage on VS, so put that in the massages section, although after contacting her I found out that a lot more was on offer & I had sex with her when we met up.