Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Vanessa$ - great looks but not quite matched by service  (Read 3621 times)


11 review(s) for Vanessa$ (8 positive, 3 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline stayer

https://www.adultwork.com/799764 or https://www.adultwork.com/Vanessa%24
I had a decent punt with Vanessa, but it was a service lacking engagement and enthusiasm. Sometimes I felt that she was going through the motions.

First, it started well. Comms were good and I easily found her street which is a couple of minutes' walk from High Street Kensington Tube station. As instructed I sent her a text just before the hour mark and got a reply with the flat number.

The door opened into a living room which Vanessa uses as her bedroom. The kitchen adjoins it.

She has a very nice figure and face and was dressed in bra and knickers as requested. But why does she and so many other prossies wear high heel shoes?

She's Italian with a reasonable understanding of English. After chatting for a couple of minutes and being aware that times is money I asked for my shower. For that you have to go downstairs to the bathroom which has the bedroom next to it.

On my return I produced (unasked) the £250 for the 1.5hr session. She told me to put it on the table and never counted the notes in the time I was there.

Off with her bra and started to play with her breasts and nipples. Honestly, you'd never know that they were fake. We kissed but she did it softly and not quite as deeply as I wanted. This was the first of a number of negatives.

I asked her to lick my nipples which she did for quite a while and then started OWO. Again it was softly done so I told her to do it harder. Then she rimmed me. I thought that she was pushing her tongue hard into my hole, but realised that it her her finger that was doing it. So, yes, there was some licking taking place but not the best I've had.

Then some more OWO and she agreed to the 69 position. Again I told her to suck harder. Then came the best bit because when she licked harder it was pretty good.

I asked her to mastubate. She did so for a while, and then just stopped. Again, a lack of enthusiasm.

Some more OWO and she said I could CIM. She then mastubated me hard but I told her to back off. I had a look at the time on my mobile phone, 10 past the hour. Plenty of time I said. No, she said, 10-20 minutes, she has another client coming. No, I said, 20 minutes to go.

Now I'm not a a particularly good mood as she's trying to get rid of me. Some more OWO and I masturbated into her mouth.

On leaving, I checked the time: 28 past the hour. I'd been in her flat for 1.5hrs, not a minute more.

Positives:
- excellent location
- good looker with good figure

Negatives:
- service lacking some enthusiasm
- back-to-back booker


11 review(s) found for Vanessa$ linked to in above post (8 positive, 3 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline Bobdayley

The prossies usually start counting the time as soon as you step in the flat, even before you take the shower or enter the room or pay her, that's how it has always been. It is not as soon as the action starts.
Banning reason: aka Kennedyr007

Offline mrhappypants

Thanks for your review. I think previous commentary on Vanessa looks suspect; the same dodgy members writing "persuasive" reviews on expensive looking tarts. Your review adds to my doubts. Thanks for sharing and better luck next time.

Dave

Offline west8

She's Italian with a reasonable understanding of English. After chatting for a couple of minutes and

Vanessa is Russian. Her family live in Latvia. Just over 40% of the Latvian population are Russian.



Offline Henry Miller

Saw Vanessa a few days ago. The DFK was so intense (as was the sex) that I could detect no discernible difference between having sex with her and a long-term partner. Usually with an escort, you can sense some sort of mental or physical resistance to what's going on. With Vanessa, I really felt she was genuinely into it. If I was taken in by a very fine piece of acting, then I'm absolutely delighted to have been duped in so fine a fashion. :)

One thing she did tell me was that she doesn't like young stallions bounding in wanting to fuck her senseless as soon as the money is on the table. I get the impression she likes an older gentleman who is aware of the concept of 'foreplay', and someone who is generally respectful - i.e. doesn't treat her like a robot.

As with anyone else at work though, it's possible she was just having a bad day and that none of these issues were contributing factors. It can be quite frustrating when you don't get the service you paid for, and often (in my experience at least) few WGs are prepared to take the time to show you where things have gone wrong...assuming it was a client-side issue of course.


« Last Edit: November 13, 2014, 01:36:26 PM by Henry Miller »
Banning reason: Troll

Hi thinking of seeing her - does she have tatts and piercings as I like the pornstar look?

Saw Vanessa recently and service was fantastic. V beautiful EE lady, tanned and toned with large breasts. Looks younger than 39 and gives epic BJ - highly recommended. Location v discreet and price good for central location. Only downside was a little rushed but was happy for cum twice.

password02

Saw Vanessa recently and service was fantastic. V beautiful EE lady, tanned and toned with large breasts. Looks younger than 39 and gives epic BJ - highly recommended. Location v discreet and price good for central location. Only downside was a little rushed but was happy for cum twice.

I do not take members too seriously in their posts when they comment on girls along the lines of - 'Saw this girl recently' etc etc and all they do is tag a few lines onto an existing thread.

Why do you not do a review even if it is a few lines after you have seen the girl? Really do not understand people who punt but who do not share their experiences Good or Bad - I know its up to each member to review or not but this is a forum for sharing. Where would we be if everyone just stopped the reviews and all we did share was in PM between individual groups?  Really cannot understand!!!!  :dash: :dash:

A few cheerleaders in this thread. The reviewer is entitled to post his experiences; if anybody had a different experience, then they should post their own review and not question the reviewer's hygiene, or make bullshit excuses for mediocre service like 'maybe you didn't click' or 'maybe she had an off day'.

West, for a seemingly smart bloke, you come out with some ridiculous claims. How can you claim she's top 3 in the milfs of London? You haven't even punted every milf in London, and even if she is as good as you claim, it's entirely subjective. Have you seen Milf Wendy in Hendon, for instance? Costs less than half the price and have me and others a good service.

People need to stop white knighting, or they probably won't last on here.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2014, 11:51:00 AM by jesus_jones »

mate i have fucked over 1000 hookers.   She is the one sp that of you go see her as a paying client... still have to treat her like a lady and not a whore.   She is that classy and elegant.   She loves her job, loves connecting with the client.  She goes above and beyond with what she does, dfk rimming and cim.   Can take a pounding as well, but if you are looking for an isabella ice or belladonna type fuck then give her a miss.

if you want to feel like you just finished a date with a model milf, think EE lesley zen - no embellishment - that you really liked, then go see her.

if the OP came in aggressively, being the woman she is, i can see why it didnt mesh

You've fucked over a thousand wgs and have 0 reviews, yet you feel you can post here and bring the reviewer's hygiene and attitude into question, and start making excuses for Vanessa. She is not classy, she sells her minge and sucks dick for a living, so refrain from this kind of white-knighting bullshit. Go and post your own review.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2014, 11:59:53 AM by jesus_jones »

I do not take members too seriously in their posts when they comment on girls along the lines of - 'Saw this girl recently' etc etc and all they do is tag a few lines onto an existing thread.

Why do you not do a review even if it is a few lines after you have seen the girl? Really do not understand people who punt but who do not share their experiences Good or Bad - I know its up to each member to review or not but this is a forum for sharing. Where would we be if everyone just stopped the reviews and all we did share was in PM between individual groups?  Really cannot understand!!!!  :dash: :dash:

Broadly agree with your sentiments here, however in my case having met Vanessa$ on two occasions BEFORE I joined UKP,
from my perspective unable to justify writing up a review for her as they would be rather dated and potentially lacking in
relevance.

password02

Broadly agree with your sentiments here, however in my case having met Vanessa$ on two occasions BEFORE I joined UKP,
from my perspective unable to justify writing up a review for her as they would be rather dated and potentially lacking in
relevance.

+1 - Agree with old reviews - i would not bother with doing a review for a girl I saw in late 2012 or early 2013 as IMO pointless. But when you are talking about seeing a girl in the last 5-6 months then why not do a review instead of doing a 1-2 line tag onto an existing review

Online boywonder

You've fucked over a thousand wgs and have 0 reviews, yet you feel you can post here and bring the reviewer's hygiene and attitude into question, and start making excuses for Vanessa. She is not classy, she sells her minge and sucks dick for a living, so refrain from this kind of white-knighting bullshit. Go and post your own review.
 

i dont write reviews often bc i am on the verge of dropping the hobby..   But i have been posting on prossienet for the last 4 years under the same handle.   

Secondly, we can debate whether or not a woman who sells sex is less classy, i am aware of the social stigma but men and woman who are normal people do it alike.   It is ignorant to think that just bc a woman is a prossie automatically means she is low class.

i am defending vannessa bc he may have had a bad time but overall his review is inaccurate.  Instead of trying to blindly defend him, go see her for yourself.   She has more fans than haters.

lastly, my response in itself was a review, not sure why it was deleted.

« Last Edit: November 24, 2014, 09:37:47 PM by boywonder »

 

i dont write reviews often bc i am on the verge of dropping the hobby..   But i have been posting on prossienet for the last 4 years under the same handle.   

Secondly, we can debate whether or not a woman who sells sex is less classy, i am aware of the social stigma but men and woman who are normal people do it alike.   It is ignorant to think that just bc a woman is a prossie automatically means she is low class.

i am defending vannessa bc he may have had a bad time but overall his review is inaccurate.  Instead of trying to blindly defend him, go see her for yourself.   She has more fans than haters.

lastly, my response in itself was a review, not sure why it was deleted.

The only aspect of the OP's review that's incorrect was stating Vanessa's nationality as being Italian, when in fact she is
a Russian speaking Latvian. He's entitled to express his opinion of how the meeting went, no WG is completely infallible
for that matter.

I'm not a hater of this WG or for that matter anyone else (WG/client/punter), have no agenda as I've met her twice
and personally speaking my experiences were positive. However my meetings with her took place in November 2010
and September 2013, hence will NOT write a review as my input will be somewhat dated and irrelevant with respect
to 2014.

It's up to any punter/client to make an informed decision and choice to visit a WG or not, reviews are important however
for me I take into consideration other matters such as initial communications (email preferably as I'm not an impulse
punter) and research from a variety of sources. But I'm still exposed to the risk that a session may turn out badly
even if a WG has positive reviews either here or from other sites.

Do have the grace to accept the underlying principle of the OP being entitled to write and express an opinion
as to how the session transpired for him.

 
i am defending vannessa bc he may have had a bad time but overall his review is inaccurate.  Instead of trying to blindly defend him, go see her for yourself.   She has more fans than haters.

lastly, my response in itself was a review, not sure why it was deleted.

You don't get it. Everyone here is free to post their experiences without fear of a backlash from prostitutes or cheeleaders/guard dogs (you appear to be the latter). I am not blindly defending the reviewer, but rather you are BLINDLY attacking him when you know nothing about him or the punt that he had. He has posted his experience, which reads like a perfectly valid review to me, and you have jumped to defend Vanessa with the following possible explanations:

Maybe the reviewer's hygiene was off
He was aggressive and she is too 'classy' for that
Maybe you didn't click
Maybe she had on off day

Just because you had a good time with her, doesn't mean you have to try to make lame excuses for her if another punter has a sub-par experience. The reason your posts were deleted, I suspect, is that they were full of white-knight, cheerleading bullshit.


Offline west8

West, for a seemingly smart bloke, you come out with some ridiculous claims. How can you claim she's top 3 in the milfs of London? You haven't even punted every milf in London, and even if she is as good as you claim, it's entirely subjective. Have you seen Milf Wendy in Hendon, for instance? Costs less than half the price and have me and others a good service.

I made no such claim. I stated (from experience) what I still believe to be accurate: that Vanessa is probably the best Russian MILF punt in central London.


https://www.adultwork.com/799764

Not only is Vanessa a very pleasant, sophisticated and service-minded lady, she is also super fit, filthy and her oral skills are the result of many years of practice. For a hot MILF encounter in London, there are three Russian-speaking girls that anyone would recommend: Latvian Valery, Russian Roxxy and Vanessa. Choosing between them is borderline impossible as each brings a unique skillset and list of redeeming features.

For sheer filth, Roxxy can’t be beaten. For her breath-taking body, Valery is a marvel. But if you want a sure-fire, top drawer MILF encounter, Vanessa$ is the safest choice. Not only is she both very, very experienced and very, very dirty, she also has a killer rack that any 21-year-old WG would kill for.



11 review(s) found for Vanessa$ linked to in above post (8 positive, 3 neutral, 0 negative)

I made no such claim. I stated (from experience) what I still believe to be accurate: that Vanessa is probably the best Russian MILF punt in central London.

The post where you made the claim has been deleted from this review, thankfully.

Offline west8

The post where you made the claim has been deleted from this review, thankfully.

.. and you conveniently forgot to quote it prior to deletion of course.

Or maybe you just made up my supposed quote.  ;)

.. and you conveniently forgot to quote it prior to deletion of course.

Or maybe you just made up my supposed quote.  ;)

I already paraphrased it.

Anyway it's good too see some of your more dubious posts being moderated. Probably won't save you from wanker of the year award.

Offline Ben4454

The prossies usually start counting the time as soon as you step in the flat, even before you take the shower or enter the room or pay her, that's how it has always been. It is not as soon as the action starts.
- What a bunch of crap. I have always counted the time from when money exchanges hands like any business transaction. You need to be abit more firm and not let these prossies rip you off. When you go upto the flat you're not committed until money exchanges hands. Remember that. Otherwise we'd be ripped off money when deciding to walk.



                   
« Last Edit: November 26, 2014, 03:02:10 PM by Ben4454 »
Banning reason: Ignored admin warning after temporary banning and signed up to malicious troll anti-UKP site

Offline west8

I already paraphrased it.

Anyway it's good too see some of your more dubious posts being moderated. Probably won't save you from wanker of the year award.

No, you didn't. You paraphrased what I wrote above. In other words, you paraphrased what you thought I'd written, as opposed to what I actually wrote.

But nevermind, I'm used to simpletons misquoting to make failed points.

No, you didn't. You paraphrased what I wrote above. In other words, you paraphrased what you thought I'd written, as opposed to what I actually wrote.

But nevermind, I'm used to simpletons misquoting to make failed points.

I'm not the one making massive, sweeping generalisations in most of my reviews and posts. I would call that the posting style of a simpleton.

In this instance, your posts were so full of shit that they were deleted by a mod. I don't think it was the first time, and it won't be the last as long as you continue to post.


I have always counted the time from when money exchanges hands like any business transaction.
   

Not really.  I hand over money after the initial greeting but I have always counted the time from when I emerge from the initial shower (and I have never had a disagreement with a WG about that - some even expressly state it in their profile).




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)