Flora Glasgow Escorts Agency - Glasgow

[JamesScott]

External Link/Members Only

Usual flat we all know, next to the Clyde and bridge.
£160 1 hour
Personally, I did not find her attractive, too many tattoos, on arms, legs and chest.
Very deep voice, never known a woman with such a deep voice.
More of a street walker type, small petite girl.
Didn’t do it for me. I just didn’t find her that sexy, other may differ of course.
Attitude wise she could not be faulted, absolutely 100% friendly and made every effort to please.
Great dfk, owo, gfe and sex in many positions.
I wouldn't return.
This agency has gone downhill over the years.

[Max121]

Good Review - straight to the point ! 👌🏻

[oddson1970]

I totally get the neutral rating but there are punters  who would rate this a positive due to her attitude and eagerness to please.Looks are subjective and your review is welcome especially as she's a newbie in GEA

[Glesgaboy]

Good Review - straight to the point ! 👌🏻

+1

[FBman78]

Wonder why the tattoos have been airbrushed out by GEA

[Glesgaboy]

They often do this( but not always) as tatts are unique and can identify the bearer and most SPs seek privacy hence the blurred face pics 

[Bru1901]

Wonder why the tattoos have been airbrushed out by GEA

It seems pointless if shes not local. Unless her nationality isnt Canadian?

[big-al93]

It seems pointless if shes not local. Unless her nationality isnt Canadian?

She will still have friends, and could have family in the area. And easy if she was identifiable for someone to out her to family in Canada.

Good review OP, thanks.

[oddson1970]

GEA have always air brushed the tats out.Makes sense as some girls escort  part time and tattoos can easily identify them to friends colleagues etc.Their nationality is irrelevant as far as this is concerned.....they might have lived here for years and built up a network of friends .

[bluetable]

Makes sense to blur or obscure the tattoos for sure, but it makes her pictures here very misleading because they’re totally gone – she looks like has none at all.   While it does say “Tatoos: Yes” on her profile, it doesn’t jump out at you and the photo’s would lead you to believe she maybe only have a few small ones.

[Falkirk GND]

Makes sense to blur or obscure the tattoos for sure, but it makes her pictures here very misleading because they’re totally gone – she looks like has none at all.   While it does say “Tatoos: Yes” on her profile, it doesn’t jump out at you and the photo’s would lead you to believe she maybe only have a few small ones.

I agree 100%.  They should have a graded description instead of just Y/N.  Admittedly it’d be hard to choose a system that would suit everyone, but something that would help those of us who don’t like lots of tattoos to avoid those girls would be great.  The OPs description was very useful - thank you - as Flora would be too inked for me.

[HumphryB]

I'll say this for one
 Im almost 99% sure i regularly see a working girl, recently retired (never booked/met) about my neighbourhood.

Purely from her tattoos that were posted in her free gallery.
They're quite distinctive,
So take from that what you will

[mrwhite]

I'm always partial to meeting a lady with tattoos. 

I know why GEA have obscured them, but it would have been better if they had been blurred out to avoid identification, rather than completely airbrushed out to make them look non-existent.