Author Topic: Thai Milky Nottingham  (Read 2880 times)


45 review(s) for Thai Milky (29 positive, 9 neutral, 7 negative) [Indexed by alibirmingham]
37 review(s) for Milky (25 positive, 8 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by scouting]

Offline alftupper

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

£70 for 30 minutes plus £20 for owo.

First off, it is the girl in the pictures, but they are out of date, as she admits herself she's been eating too much. She's a lot curvier than the pictures, and has a bit of a belly. Didn't put me off, but wouldn't be surprised if others disagree.

Comms by text, all answered pretty quickly.

I've not been there before, but from reading reviews on here its a popular venue on Cranbrook St.

Only extra quoted was for owo which I paid, fk was supposed to be included and I assumed it was on when she asked me to chew some gum before we started. However, apart from a quick peck when we started it was avoided. She also likes her wet wipes, she's probably keeping the industry going on her own. Wipe down before owo, couple of times during as well, asked me to wipe my face and mouth after I went down on her, and used half a packet to clean me up after we'd finished.

She started by kissing and sucking my nipples, not something I'm keen on normally, but quite enjoyed this time, worked her way down for a bit of a tit wank then onto owo. Nice technique, mixture of licking and sucking, with lots of attention to my balls. If it wasn't for the wet wipes it would have been spot on. I went down on her, got her nice and wet, onto more owo as I fingered her. Condom on, I prefer cowgirl, she asked for missionary, wasn't going to argue, switched to doggy to finish.

Had a bit of time left and was hoping for a massage, but she made it clear that wasn't going to happen.

The service was fine, nothing spectacular but should have been a positive. The inaccurate pictures (which I was expecting given the price), lack of kissing, and overuse of wet wipes makes it a neutral in my eyes.




Offline EvilS


Offline Charliehutton

I reckon that's a fair appraisal, Alf. I saw her early in the year and thought she was much beefier than she was 3 or 4 years ago. She still took it up the arse like a trouper, though.

I wonder why she has a new AW number? She has a whole string of reviews, with not many negative.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2024, 05:09:20 pm by Charliehutton »

Offline alftupper

Believe this was her old profile

External Link/Members Only

I reckon that's a fair appraisal, Alf. I saw her early in the year and thought she was much beefier than she was 3 or 4 years ago. She still took it up the arse like a trouper, though.

I wonder why she has a new AW number? She has a whole string of reviews, with not many negative.

Well if I was more acquainted with the Thai tourers I might have recognised her, or at least searched the name, rather than just her aw number. I assumed she was a toft, nowhere near it.

The fact she's set up a new profile without updating her pictures is just taking the piss.