AsianBaddiex - Bolton

[Zach_D]

AW profile: External Link/Members Only  (Link corrected.)
My first proper review on here (please be nice!😂)

So I don’t really do reviews, more read them to help me selecting who I see, but I feel like this meet would make it a disservice not to do one, so here we are…

30mins booking (£80). I always go for 30mins for new finds if available to gauge if I liked it then more for further meets. I honestly wouldn’t have minded an hour for this one, as she charges £130 for an hour, and compared to what others charge nowadays, that’s pretty good.

Comms:

booked the day before, very prompt replies and a time was arranged swiftly. Sent a message couple hours before meet the next day to confirm things were still going ahead as planned, went fine. So as far as comms things were as good as you could ask for really.

Location:

As stated by the most recent review of her, it’s along off Chorley Road in Bolton, was very easy to find Not the best looking area, she even says it’s a bit gloomy🤣.

Girl:

It says that she’s 26 on her AW profile, upon seeing her, this was very believable and was also confirmed by her (some would say even younger). I would have honestly been fine if she  didn’t look like a carbon copy of her pics, the occasional editing is pretty common for pics and stuff and as long as it’s not too drastic it doesn’t really ruin the experience in my opinion. That being said, this was not the case. She was absolutely stunning and looked even better in person. I was in awe but kept it cool . She’s 5"1 (155cm) tall. Breasts were bolt-ons but look tidy and nice to the touch, nice shaped ass, good figure, petite, luscious lips and lovely tattoos. As you can guess, at this point, I was already kinda regretting not going for the full hour haha.

Action:

Shower offered upon arrival, declined as I like to shower and get clean in my place before I head off. Was quite cold outside but her place was quite cosy and she had a heater which made it nice and warm.

Was offered a drink which I took, she told me to get comfortable and that I shouldn’t worry about time which made me ease right up. She left for a bit and came back in lingerie. She looked so good and then offered me a massage, which I eagerly took. Massage was nothing out of the ordinary but really relaxing nonetheless. This was made better when she took to her bra and massaged my back with her tits, was absolutely lovely.

After massage she turned me around and started kissing me with those lips of hers, if you like kissing then you’re in for a treat with this one, she’s a really good kisser and doesn’t hold anything back, she’ll really match your rhythm. She then started kissing me neck and worked her way down to my piece. I was already hard, the kissing was really hot.

She started off by working her mouth around my cock and lubricating it. Then she went in and put it inside mouth, she started off slowly going back and forth and I could feel my dick going in an out of her mouth, then she upped the tempo and started going quite deep and choking on it, it felt sooo good. All this whilst arching and rubbing her pussy and you could tell she was really into it as she was getting wet.

This really turned me on and I picked her up and put her face down on the bed and started eating her pussy, I could feel her legs jittering and she was full on moaning holding nothing back, which got me really into it. She grabbed her pillow to silence her moans but I could still feel her legs lightly shaking. She then got on top of me into the 69 position and we were fully going at it, I could feel and hear her choking on my dick whilst I was eating her pussy was very lucky not to cum here, another couple mins or so and I knew I’d not be able to hold myself back.

So I got up, rubber on and she started with reverse cowgirl, she was bouncing up and down my cock and the view was lovely, at one point my hand was around her waist guiding her motions up and down and it felt really good. We also did cowgirl of which at one point she layed down on me whilst I was inside her and put my hands on her ass and egged me on to go deep which I did she had one of her orgasms here.

After all that madness, we went to doggy, the view was phenomenal, and then missionary which was heaven. I’m a pretty big guy so during missionary I was able to lift her up and give it to her whilst standing, she wrapped her hands behind my neck and  I was bouncing her up and down and she really seemed to love this when I also picked and told me to keep going till she orgasmed again. The OP of the most recent review was right like she gives it real energy!

Finished off with a hand job + blowjob combo which was literal heaven and made me cum so hard and she seemed to really love it. Checked the time and 40mins had gone! She still offered me a shower regardless which was nice.

Final thoughts:

All in all it was an amazing meet, I couldn’t really ask for more. No extras were offered as well, she has no limits in what you can do in your time together ( as long as it is safe sex of course). Even had a nice convo after too, she’s not English of course but she speaks well and you’ll have no problems on the communication front. she says she misses Thailand and will probably go back after a while. Also said she’s unfortunately leaving Bolton in the next days and will be in Northampton and potentially Manchester.


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[daviemac]

So I don’t really do reviews, more read them to help me selecting who I see, but I feel like this meet would make it a disservice not to do one, so here we are…

That attitude is against the whole ethos of the site, do you really think it's fair that others should contribute reviews on a regular basis just so others can benefit without giving anything back?   

It's even in the rules that you agreed to that members are expected to post reviews.

[quatter11]

She looks as fit as fuck but I just can't contemplate going there after she ghosted me.

[Zach_D]

She looks as fit as fuck but I just can't contemplate going there after she ghosted me.

Yep she really is! As shown by the last reviews and mine things seem to have gotten a bit better now comms wise. But I don’t blame you for that tbh, I’d be pretty annoyed and put off too. But just so you know, she told me she’s not the one who handles the comms, it’s her friend that does them. So I’m pretty sure most of the rudeness came from them and not her directly. That being said it’s still unacceptable to make you knock on someone’s door like that and put you on the spot

[HLD]

Yes she is full on not been able to get ver to Bolton will keep an eye out as would like her again 

[Chris1990mcr]

Is there anyone trusted and verified whos seen this one or just a few new profiles with no posts or reviews seeing her?

[manfox]

Is there anyone trusted and verified whos seen this one or just a few new profiles with no posts or reviews seeing her?

My thoughts exactly! I'm a smidge dubious about this WG and her reports although I may arrange to meet and if so will do a report.

[TomTank]

I texted for a booking yestaerday and got no answer

[Chris1990mcr]

And TomTank and Manfox with 80+ reviews a pop seem a bit more believable than the brand new review posters who both produce review links with pics in ( I can't even do that and I've posted a fair few reviews  )

[Cord_the_boy]

Is there anyone trusted and verified whos seen this one or just a few new profiles with no posts or reviews seeing her?

I’ve met her, just not got round to reviewing yet but can confirm she is legit and an absolute babe.

[Chris1990mcr]

I’ve met her, just not got round to reviewing yet but can confirm she is legit and an absolute babe.

More credible and thanks for sharing mate. 

[northern_lust]

And TomTank and Manfox with 80+ reviews a pop seem a bit more believable than the brand new review posters who both produce review links with pics in ( I can't even do that and I've posted a fair few reviews  )

So a review is only believable if the reviewer has 80+? Until you get there, do you just have to put up with people acting like the Gestapo and dubious as fuck?

Honestly, half the reason people can't be arsed.

[Zach_D]

So a review is only believable if the reviewer has 80+? Until you get there, do you just have to put up with people acting like the Gestapo and dubious as fuck?

Honestly, half the reason people can't be arsed.

it’s alright, i tried to make my first review as informative and detail oriented as possible, to try to make up for the lack of prolific reviews, but of course i’m not gonna be as trustworthy as someone with lots of backed up reviews, it just makes sense. So i think its a very valid concern on their part.

someone with quite a few reviews in this thread who has seen her, has already confirmed she’s legit, so all’s good

[Cord_the_boy]

it’s alright, i tried to make my first review as informative and detail oriented as possible, to try to make up for the lack of prolific reviews, but of course i’m not gonna be as trustworthy as someone with lots of backed up reviews, it just makes sense. So i think its a very valid concern on their part.

someone with quite a few reviews in this thread who has seen her, has already confirmed she’s legit, so all’s good

She’ll be in Manchester next all being well so you may be able to pop over and get your fix.

If that fails, let me know when you’re next going Thailand and I’ll tell you where she works

[FilthLoverGuy]

She’ll be in Manchester next all being well so you may be able to pop over and get your fix.

If that fails, let me know when you’re next going Thailand and I’ll tell you where she works

Do you mean after she’s done in Northampton (which is where she is listed as being currently) or did she say she was going to Manchester straight after Bolton?

[Cord_the_boy]

Do you mean after she’s done in Northampton (which is where she is listed as being currently) or did she say she was going to Manchester straight after Bolton?

I’ve been trying to tempt her here on the proviso that I will literally fuck her daily  but she told me there has been some confusion over premises etc.

Basically most of the Thais are ferried around between a few main groups of older Thai women who have been here a few years. They rent the premises, run the profiles and answer the txts. GG did tell me though that she’s too cold in England and will probably be going back home sooner rather than later as she misses Thailand (this is her first time in the UK). She’s a big earner in either country so I don’t think the financial “pull” of England is very large.

[Iloveoral]

it’s alright, i tried to make my first review as informative and detail oriented as possible, to try to make up for the lack of prolific reviews, but of course i’m not gonna be as trustworthy as someone with lots of backed up reviews, it just makes sense. So i think its a very valid concern on their part.

someone with quite a few reviews in this thread who has seen her, has already confirmed she’s legit, so all’s good

You’ve probably said the wrong thing with you don’t usually review to be honest, it does rub other members nose in it a bit, and Davie has already commented this above.

Your first review is appreciated thank you, I hope you can continue sharing matey, it helps others and keeps the site going, you will also find members a bit more helpful in return.

If you find any comments against your review (or future reviews) unfair please hit the report button next to the comment, we will deal with it 

[TomTank]

I do worry that we lose many potential future great contributors, because people jump on them about lack of reviews, and they end up responding in a way that gets them banned (sometimes it even looks like they're goaded into getting themselves a ban).

I realise what the site's ethos is, and it's not my call on the rules, however I don't personally care if someone benefits from my posts / reviews, but doesn't give back.
They might in the future, they might not, and even if they make just one comment about someone / something in the future, it adds to the site.

[Iloveoral]

I do worry that we lose many potential future great contributors, because people jump on them about lack of reviews, and they end up responding in a way that gets them banned (sometimes it even looks like they're goaded into getting themselves a ban).

I realise what the site's ethos is, and it's not my call on the rules, however I don't personally care if someone benefits from my posts / reviews, but doesn't give back.
They might in the future, they might not, and even if they make just one comment about someone / something in the future, it adds to the site.

If everyone took and didn’t give there wouldn’t be a site matey.

The rules are set by the site owner, it’s a privately owned site, rules state we all contribute, it’s a sharing community.

Why should a member that’s paid to be here and reviews have to support members that give nothing but read the reviews, meet the girls from positives and give nothing back, seems unfair to me. 

It’s members that have contributed nothing for years not new members of less than a year or two we warn, some members have been here since 2015 and have no intention, they aren’t future contributors 

When put on a ban timer, around 90% of members review within a few days, some members that haven’t reviewed in 10 years kick a review out in less than 10 hours, it’s not they can’t in most cases, it’s because they are too lazy.

[TomTank]

If everyone took and didn’t give there wouldn’t be a site matey.

The rules are set by the site owner, it’s a privately owned site, rules state we all contribute, it’s a sharing community.

Why should a member that’s paid to be here and reviews have to support members that give nothing but read the reviews, meet the girls from positives and give nothing back, seems unfair to me. 

It’s members that have contributed nothing for years not new members of less than a year or two we warn, some members have been here since 2015 and have no intention, they aren’t future contributors 

When put on a ban timer, around 90% of members review within a few days, some members that haven’t reviewed in 10 years kick a review out in less than 10 hours, it’s not they can’t in most cases, it’s because they are too lazy.

Like I said, I understand it's the prerogative of the owner, and they set the rules.
Just my personal opinion that it doesn't bother me, and wouldn't stop me contributing if I thought my info was being used by people that weren't contributing.

The 90% is a good number and shows it has a good effect - I just occasionally see someone get banned, who looks like they can add to the knowledge base, even though they're not the most prolific of reviewers.

[Bustydusty]

She looks faf but the vivastreet profile has everything I’d want as an extra

Sorry my mistake ignore that

[northern_lust]

If everyone took and didn’t give there wouldn’t be a site matey.

The rules are set by the site owner, it’s a privately owned site, rules state we all contribute, it’s a sharing community.

Why should a member that’s paid to be here and reviews have to support members that give nothing but read the reviews, meet the girls from positives and give nothing back, seems unfair to me. 

It’s members that have contributed nothing for years not new members of less than a year or two we warn, some members have been here since 2015 and have no intention, they aren’t future contributors 

When put on a ban timer, around 90% of members review within a few days, some members that haven’t reviewed in 10 years kick a review out in less than 10 hours, it’s not they can’t in most cases, it’s because they are too lazy.

A member who's paid to be here shouldn't be upset because the site can't decide whether membership is free or not

To be fair, most probably don't leave a review once a "ban timer" is up, not because they're "lazy"; more likely because during that time you've made it clear their input wasn't wanted.

[Iloveoral]

A member who's paid to be here shouldn't be upset because the site can't decide whether membership is free or not

The site owner has decided who pays?
Why would you think otherwise, I’m confused ?

It’s really really simple, when the new site owner took over, a membership charge was added from a certain date moving forward, meaning all new members paid.

As a gesture of good will, all members that joined prior to that date haven’t been charged, like yourself, but I can put you in the new members group if you prefer ?

[Iloveoral]

I just occasionally see someone get banned, who looks like they can add to the knowledge base, even though they're not the most prolific of reviewers.

To be fair yes we do consider a lot of things before banning anyone.
There are members who have been here years without reviews that only contribute information in the “Europe” section, they aren’t meeting uk SP’s so that’s allowed.

Members that aren’t here very often / length of membership / questions asked etc / info offered plus a lot more is all considered.

If you are obviously a waste of space and offer little back then we set a timer.

We aren’t here to ban everyone, just those that don’t seem to contribute.

[northern_lust]

To be fair yes we do consider a lot of things before banning anyone.
There are members who have been here years without reviews that only contribute information in the “Europe” section, they aren’t meeting uk SP’s so that’s allowed.

Members that aren’t here very often / length of membership / questions asked etc / info offered plus a lot more is all considered.

If you are obviously a waste of space and offer little back then we set a timer.

We aren’t here to ban everyone, just those that don’t seem to contribute.

Just seems weird to have a mod having a go at OP, underneath his contribution... I know a fair few can't be arsed with input cause of that kind of attitude.

[northern_lust]

The site owner has decided who pays?
Why would you think otherwise, I’m confused ?

It’s really really simple, when the new site owner took over, a membership charge was added from a certain date moving forward, meaning all new members paid.

As a gesture of good will, all members that joined prior to that date haven’t been charged, like yourself, but I can put you in the new members group if you prefer ?

I hadn't said otherwise? You're also explaining something that doesn't need it; I know how the membership works. I was asking why somebody who's newer (so pays), would take it as a personal slight that someone who's been here longer, hasn't written a review.. as the new member is only paying because of a timeline the owner has decided, not because of any kind of input scale.

I didn't suggest that, anywhere, did I? So not sure where the threat came from really coming off as reasonable with that

[scouting]

Just seems weird to have a mod having a go at OP, underneath his contribution... I know a fair few can't be arsed with input cause of that kind of attitude.

Mate you seem to be spoiling for an unnecessary fight.  Davie picked the OP up for an ill advised comment and ILO has been very reasoned with his explanation of how the Mods work. Meanwhile I see that the OP having woken from his 6 month dormancy is now making valid contributions. All seems good to me, I suggest you leave it. 

By the way ....I know a fair few can't be arsed with input cause of that kind of attitude.   I don't know any other member on here   

[Iloveoral]

I hadn't said otherwise? You're also explaining something that doesn't need it; I know how the membership works. I was asking why somebody who's newer (so pays), would take it as a personal slight that someone who's been here longer, hasn't written a review.. as the new member is only paying because of a timeline the owner has decided, not because of any kind of input scale.

I didn't suggest that, anywhere, did I? So not sure where the threat came from really coming off as reasonable with that

You comment that I highlighted for you above, “because the site can't decide whether membership is free or not “ - I was explaining just for, because clearly you don’t understand.

[TomTank]

Mate you seem to be spoiling for an unnecessary fight.  Davie picked the OP up for an ill advised comment and ILO has been very reasoned with his explanation of how the Mods work. Meanwhile I see that the OP having woken from his 6 month dormancy is now making valid contributions. All seems good to me, I suggest you leave it. 

By the way ....I know a fair few can't be arsed with input cause of that kind of attitude.   I don't know any other member on here   

I agree.
Sometimes I see mods spoiling for a fight, and a potential good contributor ends up with a ban.
This time the potential good contributor is digging a hole for themselves ..... hopefully he backs off and we keep as many useful contributors as possible .....