Mindful V (was Sapio V) in budget hotel between Old Street and Moorgate

[palatino]

Location: Incall at a well-known national budget chain hotel between Old Street and Moorgate. Clean non-descript room, anonymous and discreet.

AW profile link: External Link/Members Only

Price: this was a couple of weeks ago, £200 for 2h. Looked like a bargain in today's environment. No extras.

Communication: This is where it becomes complicated. She is all about this being also “a meeting of minds” and not just bodies. Fine with me, as indeed the best encounters tend to be that way. However, it becomes annoying when you have to pretend you take her pretentious twaddle seriously. So there will be some back-and-forth on AW until she is convinced. Once we had agreed something, she was reliable and I saw her on time.

The Girl
Philippina lady approaching middle age, probably a few years older than the stated 33. But alright body and boat. I think the pictures are of her, obviously chosen for the nicest angle.

Services:  This is where it becomes annoying. Everything is super slow, soft, she may think it’s sensuous, but really she’s just lazy. Be prepared to get told exactly what to do. Touch me here, don’t touch me there, not so fast, don’t do this, don’t do that. She clearly doesn’t identify as a service provider at all. Lacklustre FK, lazy sex, mediocre OWO without CIM. And oh, the pretentious pseudo-intellectual talk… incredibly tedious after a while.

Recommended? Only for like minded twats.
Will I return? Clearly not.

[patelprat]

Recommended? Only for like minded twats.

Absolutely love this summary 

[MLawro93]

Yes, that special type of pretentious pseudo-intellectual talk that she engages in will drive anyone mad. 

Almost booked her once, and boy am I glad I never went through with it. 

[petercamford]

I saw her must be at 15 years ago in my full sex days. She was easy going then and not pretentious. But most of all she was a prodigious squirter. Never quite understood why she never made more of that on her advertising copy. She clearly enjoyed it. Maybe she has come to regard it as an embarrassment in middle age. Shame

[boredtryst]

I saw her 5 years ago and wrote a review, was a fun one at the time. But reading this review, I'm glad I've not gone back.

[deg_dilemma]

I was the only other one to leave "Sapio" a negative here. And my experience was almost exactly akin to yours. Lazy is a great way to describe her - it's all about her and the fact you're paying is made to feel like a guilt trip: you're there to pleasure her - as far as she is concerned. Everything is too much hard work or is "wrong" according to her.

I cannot fathom why she has so many positives here. I will refrain from saying why I believe that's the case.

[patelprat]

I was the only other one to leave "Sapio" a negative here. And my experience was almost exactly akin to yours. Lazy is a great way to describe her - it's all about her and the fact you're paying is made to feel like a guilt trip: you're there to pleasure her - as far as she is concerned. Everything is too much hard work or is "wrong" according to her.

I cannot fathom why she has so many positives here. I will refrain from saying why I believe that's the case.

Well, it appears there's a market for every type of SP these days.

Personally not my cup of tea. Just reading her overly pretentious and self-indulgent AW profile tells me that.

[jamiekinkxxx]

Well, it appears there's a market for every type of SP these days.

Personally not my cup of tea. Just reading her overly pretentious and self-indulgent AW profile tells me that.

One man’s edging is another’s lengthy HJ… one’s man’s slim is another’s fat… one man’s… etc

[Brompton]

I was the only other one to leave "Sapio" a negative here. And my experience was almost exactly akin to yours. Lazy is a great way to describe her - it's all about her and the fact you're paying is made to feel like a guilt trip: you're there to pleasure her - as far as she is concerned. Everything is too much hard work or is "wrong" according to her.

I cannot fathom why she has so many positives here. I will refrain from saying why I believe that's the case.

I’ve commented on a previous review but I saw her before I was a member here, a couple of times in fact, no idea why I went back in the days she was working at Fulham Broadway. She should have paid me as she was definitely into her own pleasure & not much thought given to the client.

As you say though she has plenty positives 

[Jayjay1]

Seen her few times many years ago. Once she gets into it, the sex is great with her but i do see the issue people raised about her. She is a acquired taste and some does think your there to pleasure her not the other way round

[SomTumFucker]

I haven’t seen Vee since her Fulham Broadway days when I enjoyed our encounters but I outgrew her highly prescriptive vanilla service many moons ago. One of the best DFK‘’ers I’ve ever experienced but not nearly enough else on offer to tempt me back. Little sympathy though for punters who fail to read or understand her voluminous AW profile, book her with unrealistic expectations and then complain about it.