Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Submissive charlotte  (Read 8460 times)


7 review(s) for SubmissiveCharlotte (7 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline johnburton1993

Link: External Link/Members Only

In a word - AMAZING!

£100 for 1/2 hour incall.

Quiet street

I asked her to switch roles, and be a little dominant over me, which she did very well! Cuffed me to the bed and rode me well. 

Whatever she did with her hands was amazing! I was blindfold at the time, next time I want to see!!

I will definitely be returning to Charlotte asap!

John

Offline CatBBW

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,048
  • Likes: 0
What age would you say she is please?

Offline Vivago

Interesting.  She looks a little chubby.  Is she really size 10?  Is everything still covered?
Banned reason: For taking the piss after being advised
Banned by: Head1

Offline dieseldriver

External Link/Members Only

Also advertises in ITC mag that also has it on line. For those never seen ITC-mag.com, a site where pro doms and pro subs advertise their services. Also has a message board with some interesting posts on it!!

ITC = In The Corner. Where naughty boys and girls are sent after getting spanked   :sarcastic:

Offline barnstorm123

Interesting.  She looks a little chubby.  Is she really size 10?  Is everything still covered?

She's an AW 10 if you ask me. At very best she is a 12 and probably more like a 14. I don't understand why WGs feel the need to lie about dress size, Charlotte looks very attractive, she's got a really beautiful face and a nice curvy body that plenty of punters will love. As ever, take the stated dress size and at add 2 or 4 for any profile you see on AW and then you won't be disappointed.


Offline johnburton1993

Interesting.  She looks a little chubby.  Is she really size 10?  Is everything still covered?

Not sure on dress sizes tbh, she sure as heck doesn't need one!!!  :D

She is a very stunning lady and knows what she is doing!

John

James999

  • Guest
She's quite a lump (nearer a 14 than a 10) and her rates are a joke, £100 30 mins £180 for an hour and she charges extra's !

You could book a pretty slim girl for far less  :thumbsdown:

James999

  • Guest
knows what she is doing!

Ripping guys off and eating cakes by the looks of things  :thumbsdown:

Quesadilla

  • Guest
Some interesting services but no good if she doesn't do the basics - no OWO, no CIM, no thank you!

Cornish sub

  • Guest

In a word - AMAZING!

£100 for 1/2 hour incall.


In another word - EXPENSIVE!
« Last Edit: November 03, 2014, 10:16:08 am by Cornish sub »

Offline mh

In another word - EXPENSIVE!

Not necessarily given the specific services she offers. It was a while back that I saw her and I don't think she is working out of the same place any more, but she offered quite a specialist experience. I'd not have paid what I did for a standard punt but with sub services, bondage and use of rather specialist equipment it was value for money. She's now charging £270 for 90 minutes which is £70 more than I paid. But £180 for an hour does not seem that outlandish. There are plenty of escorts charging that for less specialist tastes.

Cornish sub

  • Guest
Not necessarily given the specific services she offers. It was a while back that I saw her and I don't think she is working out of the same place any more, but she offered quite a specialist experience. I'd not have paid what I did for a standard punt but with sub services, bondage and use of rather specialist equipment it was value for money. She's now charging £270 for 90 minutes which is £70 more than I paid. But £180 for an hour does not seem that outlandish. There are plenty of escorts charging that for less specialist tastes.
Her services may be specialist but they don't incur any expense on her part. And yes, I realise she has loads of expensive bondage equipment, but it was her choice to buy them and get into that side of adult services, so her rates shouldn't be set as high as they are to effectively get the punter to pay for her equipment. And £270 for 90 minutes isn't just expensive, it's fucking extortionate.

Offline JamesRockford

Thanks for the review "John".  If you can't be bothered to provide details then really why go to the trouble of starting a new thread?

Imagine the following film review: "It was a great film, started on time and the cinema had several seats - some of the seats were aisle seats - wow! The film finished on time and it was full of surprises.  I had a Cornetto and some Wine Gums and went to the loo during the interval (toilets were nice). I'll certainly be back to this cinema."

James999

  • Guest
Perhaps he realises it may not have been her that fucked him in the arse  :scare:

Cuffed me to the bed and rode me well. 
I was blindfold at the time,

Offline mh

Her services may be specialist but they don't incur any expense on her part.

Since when has the cost of providing the service been the determining factor in WG prices?!

Supply and demand, that's all there is to WG pricing. They have to select a level of the market in which they wish to compete, depending on their assets and willingness; they can go Aldi, Tesco, Sainsburys, Waitrose or specialist deli. if they look skanky there's still a market for them. If they look like princesses that's a different market. And if they are willing to be tied by a stranger to a St Andrew's Cross frame whilst being fucked then tied to a bed, degraded and spunked on well then that's another market.

If a girl charges £500 an hour she won't get my business, but she's clearly not looking for it at that price. If a girl charges £50 more than a girl with identical services in the same vicinity she'll lose many bookings purely on price. But some men will sometimes pay that extra £50 or more for a particular different kink and I did with Charlotte just to try a sub session in a dungeon playroom and tick it off my bucket list.

Offline JamesRockford

... if they are willing to be tied by a stranger to a St Andrew's Cross frame whilst being fucked then tied to a bed, degraded and spunked on

Man, I never realised that I was so vanilla.  I need to get out more.

Offline mh

Man, I never realised that I was so vanilla.  I need to get out more.

I know I'm a little up the scale from vanilla, but this one was further up the scale than my norm! I'm nowhere near Hendrix level...

Offline johnburton1993

In another word - EXPENSIVE!

There are tesco cakes at £10, then there are freshly made, awesome tasting cakes at £200, everyone has their choices. And I prefer awesome tasting cake. ;)

John

Offline johnburton1993

Thanks for the review "John".  If you can't be bothered to provide details then really why go to the trouble of starting a new thread?

Imagine the following film review: "It was a great film, started on time and the cinema had several seats - some of the seats were aisle seats - wow! The film finished on time and it was full of surprises.  I had a Cornetto and some Wine Gums and went to the loo during the interval (toilets were nice). I'll certainly be back to this cinema."

Wow, some details are best left "private" IMO.  And seeing as I'm not an expert, you ask questions and I will respond for you.

John

Offline johnburton1993

Some interesting services but no good if she doesn't do the basics - no OWO, no CIM, no thank you!

Everyone has different tastes, I prefer to be protected thanks!

James999

  • Guest
There are tesco cakes at £10, then there are freshly made, awesome tasting cakes at £200, everyone has their choices.

She clearly made her choice and brought the £2 ones at Aldi as she could get more for her money, glad you had a nice time but seriously look at her pictures she's not attractive nor does she have a good body, the fact you took one up the arse while blindfolded may cloud your judgement, but that's really between you / her & the cock owner  :sarcastic:

Offline johnburton1993

She clearly made her choice and brought the £2 ones at Aldi as she could get more for her money, glad you had a nice time but seriously look at her pictures she's not attractive nor does she have a good body, the fact you took one up the arse while blindfolded may cloud your judgement, but that's really between you / her & the cock owner  :sarcastic:

As I've said, everyone has different tastes, and Charlotte is very attractive IMO.  And just to correct you, she rode my cock, not the other way round thank you.

John

James999

  • Guest
As I've said, everyone has different tastes,

The "different taste" is rolled out, the reality is some fat birds can be pretty, she clearly isn't the fact you like her is great, but don't get upset when people point out she's overpriced and nothing special to look at (being very kind there)  :hi:

You may want to edit your last post  :hi:
« Last Edit: November 03, 2014, 07:25:20 pm by James999 »

Offline StevenS



You may want to edit your last post  :hi:

Why would john want to do that?


James999

  • Guest
Why would john want to do that?

Don't be a cunt, as one day if you slip up someone may not be so kind as to tell you  :hi:

And repeating th eerror just causes work for Admin if he asks for it to be corrected.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2014, 07:41:07 pm by James999 »

Cornish sub

  • Guest
There are tesco cakes at £10, then there are freshly made, awesome tasting cakes at £200, everyone has their choices. And I prefer awesome tasting cake. ;)

John
£200 for a cake?!!! No cake's THAT awesome.

Cornish sub

  • Guest
Wow, some details are best left "private" IMO .  And seeing as I'm not an expert, you ask questions and I will respond for you.

John
Ah, so you're one of those 'What happened between us will stay between us' twats then. Would you like to advise anyone seeing Charlotte to 'Treat her well' while you're at it?


Offline johnburton1993

Ah, so you're one of those 'What happened between us will stay between us' twats then. Would you like to advise anyone seeing Charlotte to 'Treat her well' while you're at it?

Not everything has to stay between us. Bear in mind this is my first review, so I'm not sure into what details is normal, if you ask the questions then I will respond.

John

Offline johnburton1993

The "different taste" is rolled out, the reality is some fat birds can be pretty, she clearly isn't the fact you like her is great, but don't get upset when people point out she's overpriced and nothing special to look at (being very kind there)  :hi:

You may want to edit your last post  :hi:

I'm not upset, everyone sees people differently. ;) Imo, she certainly isn't fat, and she isn't a supermodel, she's inbetween.

John

Offline mh

...seriously look at her pictures she's not attractive nor does she have a good body...

Sorry, James, but she is attractive to me too. I prefer skinny girls as a rule but even though she's not skinny I had absolutely no complaints about Charlotte's face or body. In any case I didn't book her just to look at her! :)

I won't waste my time telling you to book her to see for yourself, you would not do that as her profile doesn't attract you. Fair enough. Neither would you report back anyway. But stop telling others who they should and did find attractive.

James999

  • Guest
But stop telling others who they should and did find attractive.

I doubt you will see the irony in that comment  :sarcastic:

Offline StevenS


Offline The High Sparrow

She's quite a lump (nearer a 14 than a 10) and her rates are a joke, £100 30 mins £180 for an hour and she charges extra's !

You could book a pretty slim girl for far less  :thumbsdown:
Some like em with a bit of meat on the bone
You could also book uglier girls for more

 :hi:
« Last Edit: November 04, 2014, 11:16:54 am by Chicken Commando »

Offline StevenS

Some like em with a bit of meat on the bone
You could also book uglier girls for more

 :hi:

+1. Different strokes for different folks. Unfortunately none of us have been gifted with the knowledge of what the right answer is to the question of what is attractive. Mainly because the one person who clearly has that information never ever reviews. Perhaps he's just a chubby-chaser that likes to be shit on and would prefer that to remain undisclosed.

Offline JamesRockford

I'm not upset, everyone sees people differently. ;) Imo, she certainly isn't fat

John

I think that our friend "John" has tried all that dieting and exercise stuff, and it just isn't for her.  If there are people who are prepared to pay £180/hr to roll around with a lazy pastry queen (sorry... submissive curvy lady) then she's happy enough in her body.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2014, 12:35:12 pm by JamesRockford »

Offline mh

I doubt you will see the irony in that comment  :sarcastic:
Irony or a typo?

Yeah, I got called away and rushed the post before I read it through. Only just back.

So J999, why are you intent on telling others who they should and should not have found (or did/didn't find) attractive? I know from many of your posts that you don't like the look of a vast list of WGs. Perhaps you were brought up with an older sister who stole the food off your plate and you worry that a woman above size 8 might eat your grub before you get a look in. I obviously can't tell from your reports what you might consider attractive.

maxjabby

  • Guest

Offline Jimmyredcab

Sorry, James, but she is attractive to me too.

May I suggest a visit to Specsavers.    :hi:



Offline mh

May I suggest a visit to Specsavers.    :hi:

The only time I went there they gave me glasses that were entirely incorrectly prescribed, and no, I'm not still using this pair!

For me, Charlotte's appeal was the "girl next door" look coupled with filthy specialist sub services that she fulfilled admirably in a well equipped setting. In my personal dwelling experiences the "girl next door" has rarely been a supermodel but can be all the more attractive for potentially not being totally out of my league. Of course it always turns out I'm a couple of divisions lower than I had initially hoped!

To clarify, I've only seen Charlotte once, it was 18 months ago, her rates are now higher and I don't think she is utilising the same dungeon facility with all the specialist equipment that played a part in our meeting. So I am not recommending her at her current rates and location. I can only say that her being a size 12 or even 14 (gasp) didn't make a gnat's worth of difference to the meeting when I saw her. Reviewing the photos of our session just now :P backs up my belief that she was probably a size 12 at the time, that's if my memory of the dim and distant time when my wife was a size 12 are correct.  :D

Offline The_Don

I don't mind the bigger W/G but thats me: different horses for courses

Off topic, just love the advert not! (Local Mums looking to shag!) - "NO bull shit" last time I checked. That picture is "Wifey" (Sandra Otterson)

Hidden Image/Members Only

lol sometimes just like when you see a picture on A/W book her and then she open the door and its not even close  :angry:

Offline JamesRockford

Would you like to advise anyone seeing Charlotte to 'Treat her well' while you're at it?

This raises an interesting and important question.  Does it make sense to be advising punters to "Treat her well" in respect of a "Submissive"?

Something of a three-pipe problem to ponder over on a long winter evening.

Offline mh

This raises an interesting and important question.  Does it make sense to be advising punters to "Treat her well" in respect of a "Submissive"?

 :lol:

bigone

  • Guest
Why also are all rhese subs large ladys?
I was looking to book wet ginger but ahe has
Put so much weight on  :crazy:

Offline mh

Why also are all rhese subs large ladys?
I was looking to book wet ginger but ahe has
Put so much weight on  :crazy:

Well I guess being predominantly submissive means a fair amount of laying about. Whether the size is cause or effect I could not say. :D

Offline The_Don

Why also are all rhese subs large ladys?
I was looking to book wet ginger but ahe has
Put so much weight on  :crazy:

link please!

Quesadilla

  • Guest
Why also are all rhese subs large ladys?
I was looking to book wet ginger but ahe has
Put so much weight on  :crazy:
Extra padding for all that spanking?