Punters reviews sites escort girls use

[aklgn]

There are a few sites girls use to check the reviews using the number you call/text from. Recently found out that there is a fake review saying terrible stuff on one of those that was left by a fake girl that I rejected. What are the main ones except AW? Is there a way to check the reviews on yourself?

[FiveKnuckles]

'Rejected', as in you walked on arrival or didn't follow up on text?
Perhaps they stuck your number on their 'clienteye app' as a time waster.

[daviemac]

Don't know what you mean about review sites, as far as I know the only place escorts can leave any sort of review is AW. How do you know there's a fake 'review' about you?

Escort have SAAFE where they can report punters, but they don't publish full phone numbers, then there's ClientEye and UglyMugs where reports can be left and checked by phone number but you have to be a fully verified service provider to access those.

16 page thread here about ClientEye. -   https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=300677.0

All the information given in that thread is repeated in this one. - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=373112.msg3820533#msg3820533

If anyone wants information about ClientEye then please read those threads, they contain facts, including quotes from ClientEye themselves.

As an aside that 16 page thread was the biggest 'shoot yourself in the foot' post ever, prior to that anyone could put their phone number in and see any reports in detail, once that thread started, which they were watching, as work-arounds were published ClientEye closed them.   

Now unless you are a member any phone number you put in shows 1 report but no details. 

Edit

Is there a reason you haven't reviewed the SP you are refering to, or anyone else for that matter.

[lewisjones23]

There are a few sites girls use to check the reviews using the number you call/text from. Recently found out that there is a fake review saying terrible stuff on one of those that was left by a fake girl that I rejected. What are the main ones except AW? Is there a way to check the reviews on yourself?

Just ditch the sim and get a new number

[nightbot]

Think he's refering to Clienteye

[daviemac]

Think he's refering to Clienteye

See reply #2.

If he does mean ClientEye an escort who's a verified member would have to check for him, it's not something punters can do.

[tynetunnel]

There are a few sites girls use to check the reviews using the number you call/text from. Recently found out that there is a fake review saying terrible stuff on one of those that was left by a fake girl that I rejected. What are the main ones except AW? Is there a way to check the reviews on yourself?

Am I the only one who notes the irony that she left a review about you 

[Fuzzyduck]

Am I the only one who notes the irony that she left a review about you 

[scutty brown]

There are a few sites girls use to check the reviews using the number you call/text from. Recently found out that there is a fake review saying terrible stuff on one of those that was left by a fake girl that I rejected. What are the main ones except AW? Is there a way to check the reviews on yourself?

Which girl did this?
And how recently was this? If within the last six months you could post it as a review explaining what happened and why you rejected her. Would be useful info to put on record

[daviemac]

Which girl did this?
And how recently was this? If within the last six months you could post it as a review explaining what happened and why you rejected her. Would be useful info to put on record

The OP needs to clarify which site it was, as far as I know the only site where an escort can leave any sort of review which identifies the punter is AW.

SAAFE don't publish the full phone number and if he's put his number into ClientEye then he will see one report, every number does but without any detail.

[FLYING BLUE]

Am I the only one who notes the irony that she left a review about you 

Oh, we love a bit of irony 

[scutty brown]

Am I the only one who notes the irony that she left a review about you 

We're all aware of the irony, but just too nice to say anything

[Fuzzyduck]

We're all aware of the irony, but just too nice to say anything

Or just don't want to get banned.

[daviemac]

As SAAFE has been mentioned here there's a thread that we should all read, it's called 'Prefer to be back to back' some think 5 mins between punters is enough and couldn't give a shit if they bump into each other, it makes a grim read and emphasises that punting is not for the faint hearted or squeamish. 

[berksboy]

The fact that Florence_Rose is happy to double book  tells us all we need to know about her.And the lies she is happy to tell as well.

[kingmg]

The OP needs to clarify which site it was, as far as I know the only site where an escort can leave any sort of review which identifies the punter is AW.

SAAFE don't publish the full phone number and if he's put his number into ClientEye then he will see one report, every number does but without any detail.

anyone have a client eye that works?

[daviemac]

anyone have a client eye that works?

Yes, any escort who's fully verified. No punters though, we used to be able to access it but the thread on here put a stop to that. As a work-round was posted on here they closed the loophole, they were watching the thread. 

Talk about shooting yourself in the foot. 

As an aside there was one member who said he had access but they knew who he was and stopped it.

[uncle jessie]

The fact that Florence_Rose is happy to double book  tells us all we need to know about her.And the lies she is happy to tell as well.

I think double booking is very common , most likely explains the total radio silence sometimes when arriving for a punt . In one of my punts earlier in the year ( reviewed on here ) I'm 99.9% certain I witnessed the other punter beat me to the door .

[Scuderia Fan]

As SAAFE has been mentioned here there's a thread that we should all read, it's called 'Prefer to be back to back' some think 5 mins between punters is enough and couldn't give a shit if they bump into each other, it makes a grim read and emphasises that punting is not for the faint hearted or squeamish. 

I read that thread. I wish I knew her AW profile so I’d know not to book.

What’s the deal with matching SAAFE names to AW profiles on here? Is it allowed?

[daviemac]

What’s the deal with matching SAAFE names to AW profiles on here? Is it allowed?

How do you propose doing that in a way you are absolutely certain the names match and some innocent SP on AW isn't linked to a dodgy one on SAAFE?   

Just as we have nothing to gain by using our AW names on here they have nothing to gain by using their's on there.

[scutty brown]

What’s the deal with matching SAAFE names to AW profiles on here? Is it allowed?

What would be the point? You would just be reducing their levels of safety

[Scuderia Fan]

How do you propose doing that in a way you are absolutely certain the names match and some innocent SP on AW isn't linked to a dodgy one on SAAFE?   

Just as we have nothing to gain by using our AW names on here they have nothing to gain by using their's on there.

My thinking was I’d like to avoid SP’s who double book and have poor hygiene like the one you mentioned.

I’ve read SAAFE a bit and identified some local SP’s quite easily from comments they wrote. But yes, I accept that misidentifying members would be a possibility. So get the point you’re making.

[maxxblue]

My thinking was I’d like to avoid SP’s who double book and have poor hygiene like the one you mentioned.

I’ve read SAAFE a bit and identified some local SP’s quite easily from comments they wrote. But yes, I accept that misidentifying members would be a possibility. So get the point you’re making.

.. and this is one of the benefits of checking on UKP - use WGs with positive reviews, including their reliability/good hygiene. 

[Scuderia Fan]

.. and this is one of the benefits of checking on UKP - use WGs with positive reviews, including their reliability/good hygiene. 

There’s not enough reviews to cover this as much as it could be though. The more information the better.

For example there are several parlours close to me that haven’t had any reviews in months or years. There’s no way that they are not being frequented by UKP members.

People really do need to contribute more here so that we can all avoid skanks line the one mentioned.