Author Topic: Luna @ Lyn's studio - Wimbledon  (Read 987 times)

Offline Moutarde2

External Link/Members Only

Price paid: £120 + £20 tip

Location : A ground floor flat a few minutes walk from Wimbledon train station (a little after the Morrissons). Quite nice

Com : All good by text

Girl : I didn't see Lyn. It was a friend working on this day. Not sure how often this happens. Decent looking Thai girl around 40. She welcomed me with a short red dress which suited her well. She was pleasant to talk to.

Massage / Action : This was on a bed with some paper as a protection. First 30 minutes on the front : a decent massage with a bit of focus on my bits towards the end. On the turn, she started to stimulate my balls and negotiated a tip for a "extra special service". I gave in but regretted it instantly. Thank god I only had £20 extra with me. There was limited touch of her pussy. Clearly no finger, but rubbing the little hair more than a few seconds was discouraged. She gave me a hand job in "69 position" but while kneeling. I could see her pussy, breasts, and wanking action but without being able to put my mouth anywhere. She worked in a way to make me cum ASAP.  I forced her to pause for a few seconds to last longer but she clearly was annoyed with this. I eventually came (have to say her handjob and ball rubbing was good) on the 45 minute mark. Quick shower and out of there well ahead of the agreed time.
Maybe Lyn herself is better.

Offline goodguy22london

Thanks - useful to know and sounds disappointing

Online Stevelondon

I’m not going to white knighting here. But I’ve know and sessioned with Lyn at least 20 times. Both in her situation now as an independent and when she was with Zhangri-La.
So reviewing a girl as neutral,  who worked out of Lyn’s Studio for a week or so paints a poor picture if you ask me, of Lyn who you oh so obviously didn’t see.
Didn’t you get the girls name for instance. ?

This massage must have been a while back also as Lyn told me the girl only rented the room short term.

If you’re going to review as if this was a parlour….. which it isn’t…….. you need to get the name right.


Actually it does sound like I’m being a bit protective 😂😂 😂

I’m guessing this was Hannah.   Reviewed.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2024, 06:05:18 pm by Stevelondon »

Online Stevelondon

Thanks - useful to know and sounds disappointing

It is useful to know and if you were thinking of visiting. Then simply make sure it’s Lyn you’re seeing …….. and not a friend who’s visiting  :D :lol:

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,296
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Hasn't Lyn had visiting SPs before?

No idea how often someone else might be available even if Lyn about.

Offline Moutarde2

I trust you in the sense that Lyn is better than the girl she had at her place to replace her. Not sure how often she gets people to replace her, but I would indeed make sure it's her who you get. Maybe it was very exceptional and I was not lucky. Hard to know for me.

This happened last week, so not this long ago.  Girl gave me her name as "Luna".
I think my review is fair. Title is "Lyn's studio" which what I contacted and booked and the review text clearly says I didn't see Lyn.
At the end of the day, if Lyn gets replacements who are not up to her standards under her brand/website, she devalues her brand.
If she sees this, I would advise her to state in her communication "I am not available today, but my friend xyz is there and she gives a really good service".

By the way, in case this was not clear, as it was my first time there, I only found out that I saw Luna when I was naked on the bed. And my guess is that she was never supposed to tell me.


I’m not going to white knighting here. But I’ve know and sessioned with Lyn at least 20 times. Both in her situation now as an independent and when she was with Zhangri-La.
So reviewing a girl as neutral,  who worked out of Lyn’s Studio for a week or so paints a poor picture if you ask me, of Lyn who you oh so obviously didn’t see.
Didn’t you get the girls name for instance. ?

This massage must have been a while back also as Lyn told me the girl only rented the room short term.

If you’re going to review as if this was a parlour….. which it isn’t…….. you need to get the name right.


Actually it does sound like I’m being a bit protective 😂😂 😂

I’m guessing this was Hannah.   Reviewed.

Online Stevelondon

Firstly…….. you should have put the girls name in your title ……. As I said.

Secondly…….. I agree with you. If Lyn is having girls work under her banner (so to speak) …. Then clarity of that is important. Poor reviews are going to dilute the brand

Online Stevelondon

Sorry just noticed the reviewer says all comms done by text. So this could possibly be the fault of the receptionist in not letting it be known it would not be Lyn working that day.

But I still think if you advertise by website. It should be updated accordingly,
Monday…… Luna
Tuesday……Hannah
Wednesday…Lyn


Etc etc