Why are AW reviews so unrealistically positive...

[Gameboy121]

...there must be a reason. Are they all fake or written by the pimps?

I don't give credence to them anyhow, but curious

[spentrac]

For legitimate feedback, to make us come back. If they meet a half decent guy, who isn't a time waster, they call us a sex god!
On the reverse side, we overpraise them because we might want to see them again.

[WARSZAWA16]

AW feedback is just an exercise in mutual back scratching. Take it with a pinch of salt.

[RandomGuy99]

I always read them like

"good looking guy" = feckin ugly
"Greal oral skills" = feckin clueless
"Knows how to please" = totally useless

[WingCommander]

My guess is that punters are reluctant to leave a negative, because they are afraid of a "revenge" negative from the SP. That might put off other SP's.

[juzz]

My guess is that punters are reluctant to leave a negative, because they are afraid of a "revenge" negative from the SP. That might put off other SP's.

Surely this!

[BrianC2]

My guess is that punters are reluctant to leave a negative, because they are afraid of a "revenge" negative from the SP. That might put off other SP's.

Quite right there. Some SP's require X number of positive and no negatives before will see you so I'm wary of posting a negative to a SP is a bad decision best just to give a feedback in those instances.

[Fuzzyduck]

It's mutually beneficial for SPs and SSs to give each other (overly) positive feedback. It leads to more bookings for SPs and more opportunities for SSs to book other SPs who may use AW feedback as a means to filter new clients. To that end, SP feedback is only indicative but, if she's received feedback from what looks like genuine punters (rather than a pimp on a marketing drive), then you have more confidence that she's legit.

[timelord]

AW is like the linkedin of the punting world - Everything is Awesome!

[Colston36]

AW is like the linkedin of the punting world - Everything is Awesome!

Post fuck euphoria.

[mrwhite]

Because of the way the system works and pettiness.

If it was a good punt for both parties then both leave each other positive feedback

If it was a shit punt (because of the SP) then if the SS leaves negative feedback the SP retaliates by writing something shitty
If the SP had a shit time because of the SS (eg unwashed, boundary pusher etc) and leaves the SS negative feedback then the seeker retaliates by writing something negative.

As some SPs won't see an SS with negative feedback, and SS won't see an SP with negative feedback then all that happens is people either leave a positive that isn't deserved or just doesn't bother to review at all.

[Gameboy121]

Got it. Make sense.
Thanks