London / Rai Thai - Lee

[Kojac]

External Link/Members Only

264 Vauxhall Bridge Rd, London SW1V 1BB

Price £60 for 60 minutes £60 extras
Height: 5'3"
Hair colour: black
Face: 6/7
Body: 9
Personality: 9
Customer interaction: 10
Service: 9

Basement shop on the high street. 

Pushed open entrance door and walked down the stairs where I was greeted by Lee, she’s a bit past her prime in terms of looks but her body is still fit and her tits are off the scale.

She asked me “have you been here before”
I just laughed and said “yeah”
She showed me to a massage room containing a sturdy massage table and metal pole attached to the wall which I assume is to walk on customers backs.  She told me to get undressed and lie face down on table and she would be back in a few minutes after eating her lunch.  Now you all know I wasn’t going to do that.   

So I’m waiting and waiting, 10 minutes go by and I decide to leave the room, walk down the passage to the lobby area next to the stairs and wait for her outside her kitchen. If you someone entered the shop came rushing down the stairs they would have seen me standing there in my birthday suit smiling.

I stand outside waiting and Lee finally comes out and sees me there naked with a hard on. 
Pointing to my cock I said “you want some cock”,
she takes a look and smiles and then said “oh oh oh” then disappears to the bathroom to have a wash.

So I wait for her in the massage room cock in hand.
She comes in turns off the light and says “lie down on the table”
I said in a jovial manner “nah, I want to suck on your tits”
I point to the £80 I left on the side and repeated “I want to suck on your tits”
She picks up the money then says “you got to pay me more money”
I just ignore her and start caressing the big bazookas, she continues with the “pay me more money” and trying to get me to lie on the table.   This went on for a few more minutes and then suddenly Lee removes her bra, I start sucking and she eases herself onto the massage table where I climb on top of her. 
She says “you trying to make me horny love” while directing my mouth to alternate between sucking on the two nipples. Now these tits are big implants with big nipples and she enjoys having them sucked.

After 5 minutes or so I tell her “I want to suck on your pussy”
She replies “no no no you have to pay me more money”

I know this is her game and I slowly slide down her body all the while squeezing her bazookas and gently pulling on her nipples. She closes her legs to prevent access then opens them then closes them then opens them and then suddenly Lee tells me to wait, she then removes her knickers and I dive in. Picture the scene I’m sucking away on her pussy looking up at my hands full of her tits and she pushing my head into her pussy.

She then tells me to stop sucking, reaches for some oil and sprays her pussy, I go back to sucking and she starts grinding her pussy in my face.

Eventually Lee curtails the feasting frenzy stating the guy from nail shop listens in and complains about how vocal she is when she cums, anyway she kneels on the floor, sprays her tits with oil and puts my cock in between and I pump away spunking over her chest and neck.

I’m offered a shower which I take, while in the bathroom Lee tells me “I’ll fuck you but have to come back at night when the nail shop is closed because I like to scream during sex”. 

On second visit I phoned and booked for 1 hour.  When naked in the massage room I hand her £120 and tell I'm going to fuck her, the same song dance as before happened. 
Lee then tells me “no sex, you have to pay more because I have to give half to the man in the nail shop because we are partners”.
I smiled and proceeded to caress Lee’s tits as she had already just had a shower and changed into a mini skirt and bra and I knew it was just her way of testing me to see if I would hand over more money. 

She walked around the table a couple of times then stopped and removed her bra, I got to work on sucking  her big nipples, then she stops me, walks around the table and says
“no sex, you can only stay for 45 minutes because I have some coming after you”.
I laugh and continue feeding on her tits, then as if by magic Lee removes her knickers and climbs on the table with her legs wide open.  Obviously I immediately feast on her pussy while fondling her tits, she complements me on my cunnilingus skills and says “you are good babe”.

After sometime I get up and say to Lee “I want fuck you” and I pulled out a condom. 
By now all the game playing and testing have ceased and she’s submissive.   
Fucking Lee is like a dream, her body is super fit and she put herself in any position I wanted.  Just imagine fucking her in missionary with her head hanging off the end of the table while I’m holding on to her big bazookas and her legs are doing the splits.  Holding her waist while I fucked her in doggy was a treat, alternating between pulling her hair and spanking her fit ass. 

We arrived at the 50 minute mark and I told her to “lie on the table so I can spunk over your face”.
She said “next time you cream my face, this time you cream my tits”.  So I shot my load over her tits as requested.

Lee then says to me “you don’t have to go home do you because I want you to look at something”.   
I said “yeah no problem”.
Now I am not going to explain what I was looking at in her flat but I was in there with Lee nonstop talking to me for another 30 minutes and eventually I had to excuse myself as I got the impression I could have stayed a lot longer.

Recommended.

Lee is really great fun and provides an excellent service.  However, I can see her being a handful and run circles around punters who don't lead the interaction. 

[nickcrowne666]

This reads like an erotic novel for blokes - or fan fiction.

And I kinda hope it is given the implication of non-consensual actions in it.

[moonlight_lad]

And the link does't work.

[bluelad]

Think this might be closest you get to a link for this place: External Link/Members Only

It is very close to Victoria Station.

[scutty brown]

Think this might be closest you get to a link for this place: External Link/Members Only

It is very close to Victoria Station.

Address on that website is 642 Victoria station SW1V 1BB
Address OP gives is 264 Vauxhall Bridge Rd, London SW1V 1BB

Something is confused, and the original review sounds like a control freaks fantasy

[daviemac]

OP, if you haven't made this up there seems to be an awful lot of non consensual activity by someone who thinks that just because they've paid they can do what they like.  Not something that's approved of on this site.

[Punterperson1971]

From what I read it’s either his version of 50 shades or he’s a control freak and likes to do this to women

[westwardbound]

OP, if you haven't made this up there seems to be an awful lot of non consensual activity by someone who thinks that just because they've paid they can do what they like.  Not something that's approved of on this site.

The sp description and many other details are accurate.  I've seen Lee before a few times.  I couldn't help feel sorry for the poor lady reading this.

[Barneypunt]

Disgusting.

[Punterperson1971]

Is the temu version of KT

[youngboy_blue]

This ain’t even worth in the drafts

[Kojac]

OP, if you haven't made this up there seems to be an awful lot of non consensual activity by someone who thinks that just because they've paid they can do what they like.  Not something that's approved of on this site.

@ daviemac there was no non consensual activity going on.  At no time and under no circumstances was Lee forced, coerced, manipulated, threatened, abused or controlled due to money being paid.  

However, if the post gives the implication or interpreted in a way that non consensual activities took place, then for that I will apologise and take that onboard.

[rover_100]

@ daviemac there was no non consensual activity going on.  At no time and under no circumstances was Lee forced, coerced, manipulated, threatened, abused or controlled due to money being paid.  

However, if the post gives the implication or interpreted in a way that non consensual activities took place, then for that I will apologise and take that onboard.

Pitchforks down, nothing to see here. He's posted a disclaimer so we can - in good consience - overlook all the little gems in the original post.

So no need to get into a twist over being physically imposing -

She picks up the money then says “you got to pay me more money”
I just ignore her and start caressing the big bazookas, she continues with the “pay me more money” and trying to get me to lie on the table.

Or ignoring her requests -

After 5 minutes or so I tell her “I want to suck on your pussy”
She replies “no no no you have to pay me more money”

I know this is her game and I...

Or presuming her intent -

...I knew it was just her way of testing me to see if I would hand over more money

[rebelscum]

@ daviemac there was no non consensual activity going on.  At no time and under no circumstances was Lee forced, coerced, manipulated, threatened, abused or controlled due to money being paid.  

However, if the post gives the implication or interpreted in a way that non consensual activities took place, then for that I will apologise and take that onboard.

Ah, so you've got carte blanche to do anything you like because you handed over money? Do you hear yourself?

And yes, to the second point, you come across as a wrong 'un.

[LLPunting]

This reads like taking services by menace.

Perhaps this baby thinks he's cool writing in this tone and is a warped Walter telling stories this way.  From the moment he's standing naked outside the "kitchen" he's committing sexual harassment.  His insistence and physical persistence in taking services despite being told "No" and that he needs to pay more is beyond coercive.  It's irrelevant that she saw him again, just as many victimised women are subjected to multiple assaults by a perp over a period of time.

External Link/Members Only

This isn't a one off thing either, this is OP's m.o. by his own testimony, so even if "Lee" invited him back into her life making him think he had post-event consent, he is doing this kind of thing  to other SPs.

[Kojac]

You guys have taken this way out of context way out of context.  However, if you all feel so strongly about your conclusions then go ahead and petition the moderators to have me permanently banned.  If there are enough of you requesting my permanent ban I’m sure they will grant it.

Until then I will be writing further reviews detailing exactly what happened on a punt.  Now I repeat, if you all believe I’m a fantasist, control freak, physically threatening to SP’s etc, it behoves you all to stand up to be counted and petition the moderators to give me a permanent ban, because otherwise none of you are not going to browbeat me into not writing reviews based on my interactions with SP’s. 

[westwardbound]

Honestly, whether you contribute a review or not, the thought of you carrying on in this manner is far more disturbing and harmful than your continued presence on this site. Banning you does nothing to stop the behavior. Maybe it removes some ability for you to locate and plan your future attacks but my guess is you have been doing this long enough to know who is vulnerable and who isn't.

You gave me some advice on one of my recent reviews about how to behave so I will return the favor and I think 99% of the punters here would offer the same advice...

1. If the SP tells you to wait while she eats, finishes a call, does another customer, or just feels like a break... then you can either wait or tell them no and then leave. then by all means leave a negative review here for others to see.

2. If the SP says no sex is on offer at all... then no sex is on offer. End of discussion!

3. If the SP says no sex at the offered price then by all means either offer more money or leave and feel free to leave a negative review if you felt put out by the rejection.

4. Do not chase the SP around the table until (likely out of fear) they relent and give you sex with hopes that you will leave without hurting them.

5. Do not walk out into their place of business starkers to force them to deal with your shite.

Lee is not only a SP , she's the owner of the business and although she has protections under the law as a SP, as the owner, she knows that any complaint will likely affect her ability to do business in her shop. Many shops have been closed once complaints of sexual activity are made public. In addition, the poor woman barely speaks English and can hardly communicate. She is extremely vulnerable to this type of coercive activity.

I hope that you will reflect on the behavior as many more seasoned punters have chimed in that it's not acceptible. It's really not okay to treat people this way. These women are people.

If you continue to persist in this fashion, I hope that in the true spirit of Karma you get the chance to have someone twice your size negotiate for sex with you the same way you have done to others. I don't normally enjoy those types of reviews but in your case I'd read it if you wanted to share that experience.

[Punterperson1971]

Honestly, whether you contribute a review or not, the thought of you carrying on in this manner is far more disturbing and harmful than your continued presence on this site. Banning you does nothing to stop the behavior. Maybe it removes some ability for you to locate and plan your future attacks but my guess is you have been doing this long enough to know who is vulnerable and who isn't.

You gave me some advice on one of my recent reviews about how to behave so I will return the favor and I think 99% of the punters here would offer the same advice...

1. If the SP tells you to wait while she eats, finishes a call, does another customer, or just feels like a break... then you can either wait or tell them no and then leave. then by all means leave a negative review here for others to see.

2. If the SP says no sex is on offer at all... then no sex is on offer. End of discussion!

3. If the SP says no sex at the offered price then by all means either offer more money or leave and feel free to leave a negative review if you felt put out by the rejection.

4. Do not chase the SP around the table until (likely out of fear) they relent and give you sex with hopes that you will leave without hurting them.

5. Do not walk out into their place of business starkers to force them to deal with your shite.

Lee is not only a SP , she's the owner of the business and although she has protections under the law as a SP, as the owner, she knows that any complaint will likely affect her ability to do business in her shop. Many shops have been closed once complaints of sexual activity are made public. In addition, the poor woman barely speaks English and can hardly communicate. She is extremely vulnerable to this type of coercive activity.

I hope that you will reflect on the behavior as many more seasoned punters have chimed in that it's not acceptible. It's really not okay to treat people this way. These women are people.

If you continue to persist in this fashion, I hope that in the true spirit of Karma you get the chance to have someone twice your size negotiate for sex with you the same way you have done to others. I don't normally enjoy those types of reviews but in your case I'd read it if you wanted to share that experience.

Well said 

[DoorDash]

What an idiot you are op … . Furthermore, should the SP reflect on your forceful behaviour and choose to go to the police , you have just written a full blown confession and posted it on the World Wide Web hahahahah

[nickcrowne666]

You guys have taken this way out of context way out of context.  However, if you all feel so strongly about your conclusions then go ahead and petition the moderators to have me permanently banned.  If there are enough of you requesting my permanent ban I’m sure they will grant it.

Until then I will be writing further reviews detailing exactly what happened on a punt.  Now I repeat, if you all believe I’m a fantasist, control freak, physically threatening to SP’s etc, it behoves you all to stand up to be counted and petition the moderators to give me a permanent ban, because otherwise none of you are not going to browbeat me into not writing reviews based on my interactions with SP’s.

Dude, the problem here isn’t the review. “Being banned” from the forum isn’t the issue at all. The issue is that you’ve described a number of sex offences and people are pointing out abusive behavior.

Unless the post is fiction, then it is disturbing that this is how you’ve treated someone and are now only worried about being banned from a message board.

[Arfnice73]

This has been in the making for quite some time especially when you read Op’s advice to other UKPers in how they should conduct themselves.
No means No … simple to most but not to this (imho) sex pest.

[daviemac]

Pitchforks down, nothing to see here. He's posted a disclaimer so we can - in good consience - overlook all the little gems in the original post.

So no need to get into a twist over being physically imposing -
Or ignoring her requests -
Or presuming her intent -

So you also think you can do what you like just because you've paid, read the posts on this thread and see how many think the OP's behaviour is totally out of order.

Boundary pusher / control freaks and the like are not welcome here and being 'physically imposing' is boundary pushing.

[daviemac]

You guys have taken this way out of context way out of context.  However, if you all feel so strongly about your conclusions then go ahead and petition the moderators to have me permanently banned.  If there are enough of you requesting my permanent ban I’m sure they will grant it.

Until then I will be writing further reviews detailing exactly what happened on a punt.  Now I repeat, if you all believe I’m a fantasist, control freak, physically threatening to SP’s etc, it behoves you all to stand up to be counted and petition the moderators to give me a permanent ban, because otherwise none of you are not going to browbeat me into not writing reviews based on my interactions with SP’s.

We don't respond to requests for banning, we look at the way a member portrays themselves and if they show signs that they are in any way abusive a decision will be made on what action to take. The integrity of the site is the first consideration, we do not want to be seen to condone abusive behaviour.

If you are getting so many negative comments perhaps you should look at how you conduct yourself in bookings.

[rover_100]

So you also think you can do what you like just because you've paid, read the posts on this thread and see how many think the OP's behaviour is totally out of order.

Boundary pusher / control freaks and the like are not welcome here and being 'physically imposing' is boundary pushing.

Hey Davie bit of a segue but I'm a little confused and hoping you can clarify?

The quoted post was (what I thought) very rich in sarcasm given that I took some pointy excerpts from the OP, but your post reads as if I've pissed in your chips?

[hult32]

OP. I am not in the habit of chipping into discussions and I also dislike (public and virtual) lynching. But, I read through what you and many of the other members here have written, and I feel the need to chip in. By way of perspective, I am a qualified lawyer and a former litigator. One of the most important lessons we learn in this profession is not to judge - there are always two (or more) sides to the story. Remembering to stay impartial is key because the complex trials rarely play out the way you expect them to. Looking at your your original post, I do however think that, at worst, several criminal and sexual offences have been committed, and, at best, you have incredibly poor judgment.

There is no need to repeat what was wrong with your conduct as this has been pointed out to you on various occasions now. But, having reviewed your post history on this forum, as well as your responses in this thread, the alarm bells suggest that you do not understand what is and has been wrong with your conduct. An invitation to some sex is not the same as the invitation for all sex. If someone tells you "no" then that means "no". The fact that they are a SP/masseuse is irrelevant. If they say "yes, if you pay more money" then that is a "no" unless you pay more money. You may think of yourself as a stud sucking on someone's tits or clit, but, legally, you are no different in terms of culpability from someone trying to shove their cock up her arse (technically you are as the former would constitute sexual abuse and the latter would constitute statutory rape).

You may think that this is all fun and games as you leave the place with a big grin on your face, but this is what 90% of sexual abuse looks like. The scenarios where the victim is beaten to a pulp are a tiny fraction. Put yourself in her shoes. She is a 40-something lady trying to run a massage parlor. You rock up swinging your dick in her face. What are her options? Being half your weight and size, they are limited. Get on the phone and call the police? What if you kicked her in the face? Who knows what else you are capable of?

If I were in academia, I could copy your original post and pass it over to a colleague to tell them they owed me a pint for helping them out with a scenario for a 2nd year criminal law exam. All you need to do it add in at the end: "Which offences, if any, were committed under the Sexual Offences Act 2003?"

I went for pints the other day with another learned friend and he revealed to me - a man of 40 years of age - and a friend for half a decade - that he had been abused in his teenage years. What he revealed to me was but a drop in the ocean by contrast to what you have attested to. The damage is ongoing. You need to rethink your conduct.

[Stevelondon]

Well I managed to force myself to read that (the review I mean)

I think possibly a good advert for any new punter to read.

“How NOT to behave when punting”

[scutty brown]

So you also think you can do what you like just because you've paid, read the posts on this thread and see how many think the OP's behaviour is totally out of order.

Boundary pusher / control freaks and the like are not welcome here and being 'physically imposing' is boundary pushing.

Davie
I think you've misread him being sarcastic about the OP there.
Poe's law strikes again   External Link/Members Only

[daviemac]

Hey Davie bit of a segue but I'm a little confused and hoping you can clarify?

The quoted post was (what I thought) very rich in sarcasm given that I took some pointy excerpts from the OP, but your post reads as if I've pissed in your chips?

Davie
I think you've misread him being sarcastic about the OP there.
Poe's law strikes again   External Link/Members Only

If the post was meant to be sarcastic I missed that, I can only go off the words that are written and to me they read as you were condoning the OP's behaviour. Would I have been the only one to miss your intention? 

[nickcrowne666]

If the post was meant to be sarcastic I missed that, I can only go off the words that are written and to me they read as you were condoning the OP's behaviour. Would I have been the only one to miss your intention?

I read it as sarcastic - the fact that he picked up absurd examples of wrong conduct to illustrate the point is what gave it away.

[nickcrowne666]

OP. I am not in the habit of chipping into discussions and I also dislike (public and virtual) lynching. But, I read through what you and many of the other members here have written, and I feel the need to chip in. By way of perspective, I am a qualified lawyer and a former litigator. One of the most important lessons we learn in this profession is not to judge - there are always two (or more) sides to the story. Remembering to stay impartial is key because the complex trials rarely play out the way you expect them to. Looking at your your original post, I do however think that, at worst, several criminal and sexual offences have been committed, and, at best, you have incredibly poor judgment.

There is no need to repeat what was wrong with your conduct as this has been pointed out to you on various occasions now. But, having reviewed your post history on this forum, as well as your responses in this thread, the alarm bells suggest that you do not understand what is and has been wrong with your conduct. An invitation to some sex is not the same as the invitation for all sex. If someone tells you "no" then that means "no". The fact that they are a SP/masseuse is irrelevant. If they say "yes, if you pay more money" then that is a "no" unless you pay more money. You may think of yourself as a stud sucking on someone's tits or clit, but, legally, you are no different in terms of culpability from someone trying to shove their cock up her arse (technically you are as the former would constitute sexual abuse and the latter would constitute statutory rape).

You may think that this is all fun and games as you leave the place with a big grin on your face, but this is what 90% of sexual abuse looks like. The scenarios where the victim is beaten to a pulp are a tiny fraction. Put yourself in her shoes. She is a 40-something lady trying to run a massage parlor. You rock up swinging your dick in her face. What are her options? Being half your weight and size, they are limited. Get on the phone and call the police? What if you kicked her in the face? Who knows what else you are capable of?

If I were in academia, I could copy your original post and pass it over to a colleague to tell them they owed me a pint for helping them out with a scenario for a 2nd year criminal law exam. All you need to do it add in at the end: "Which offences, if any, were committed under the Sexual Offences Act 2003?"

I went for pints the other day with another learned friend and he revealed to me - a man of 40 years of age - and a friend for half a decade - that he had been abused in his teenage years. What he revealed to me was but a drop in the ocean by contrast to what you have attested to. The damage is ongoing. You need to rethink your conduct.

This is a great post.

I still think there’s a good chance the OP is a bit of a fiction author, ie. He embellishes the stories throwing in his own control freak fantasies. Also a good chance he’s simply trolling in this forum.

But not being sure, I think calling it out at face value is the right thing.

[rover_100]

If the post was meant to be sarcastic I missed that, I can only go off the words that are written and to me they read as you were condoning the OP's behaviour. Would I have been the only one to miss your intention?

Its a fair point. The reason I kicked it up is because my immediate thought was "if you misread it, how many others did" and I don't want to associate myself with OP's predatory behaviour.

Sarcasm is hard in written form, I'll likely just avoid it in future.

[Chinaman]

Just as a footnote, I was passing the premises tonight. Building works going on for refurbishment. Nails / Massage sign still up, but judging from my previous visits, I doubt that Lee would be able to afford this herself. I’m assuming she’s moved out.

If anyone has any info over the next weeks (whether on Lee, or the shop makeover), I’m sure we’d all like to hear (particularly that she’s safe).

[westwardbound]

She is not okay.  She said she was forced out of the space with nothing. 

[beastmaster]

You guys have taken this way out of context way out of context.  However, if you all feel so strongly about your conclusions then go ahead and petition the moderators to have me permanently banned.  If there are enough of you requesting my permanent ban I’m sure they will grant it.

Until then I will be writing further reviews detailing exactly what happened on a punt.  Now I repeat, if you all believe I’m a fantasist, control freak, physically threatening to SP’s etc, it behoves you all to stand up to be counted and petition the moderators to give me a permanent ban, because otherwise none of you are not going to browbeat me into not writing reviews based on my interactions with SP’s.

Your behaviour was disgusting - brutish, disrespectful and borderline sexual assault/rape. Sex workers are women who have agree to provide a sexual service for a  direct exchange of money. This does nor diminish their status, they derserve to be treated with the same degree of respect and courtesy as you (presumably) treat other non-SW women. I am sure that she was left extremly upset with your behaviour, and this may well have a negative effect on her treatment of future far more respectful and civilised punters.