Are all women effectively prostitutes?

[gurds]

On the face of it many will laugh but it is a genuine question.

We all know that prostitutes have sex in exchange for money. However, when it comes to marriage, men are expected to provide financially so effectively it is a similar scenario of sex in exchange for money.

The most successful relationships function when the man takes on a masculine role and the women can become feminine. For this to happen the man needs to out earn the woman by a big margin and therefore be the provider.

There was an American sugar daddy I watched a while ago that makes millions a yr and has many sugar babies. When asked about whether he thinks the sugar relationships he has are sex in exchange for money, he said bluntly that men pay for sex whatever it is, "wives do it for refrigerators".

This is true, also the better looking a woman you would want to acquire for a relationship the more money would be required. This is akin to more money needing to be spent to hire a hotter escort Vs a less hot one typically.

Maybe this is a cynical way of looking at things but I can't really see beyond this line of reasoning. I think long term exposure to escorts can also reinforce this type of viewpoint.

In my view the only women that it could be argued that are not prostitutes are women that are already very rich. Those women don't need any man, providing it wasn't men that enabled them to become very rich.

[MerlinGray]

No

[MerlinGray]

Have you ever actually had a woman as a friend and talked about sex? I recommend it. Outside o the punting sphere I have lifelong female friends who I am comfortable discussing sex with. From this I have discovered the revolutionary revelation that women enjoy sex.

I have discovered this also in my civilian life, in relationships that are independant of punting.


I think I may have fallen for your bait OP. More fool me.

[MissWolf]

WTAF 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

I'd take more water with it mate 

[Strawberry]

Totally lost for words.

[Doc Holliday]

I think I may have fallen for your bait OP. More fool me.

I wouldn't worry about it. Gurds draws in people every time he starts on of these threads about his views on male/ female relationships. At first he received good advice as he was young, appeared naive and inexperienced, with punting shaping and dominating his thought processes, but he takes no notice and just keeps repeating the same distorted view of women, including his self proclaimed narcissism.

I think now he is just trolling and best ignored, but no doubt this thread will once again get a productive reaction.

[RandomGuy99]

No.

Your view is very out dated. Have you recently thawed out after being frozen in a snow storm in the early 1200s?

I would hope people in a relationship have sex because they want to not because there's some kind of financial incentive or a refrigerator involved.

[maxxblue]

Maybe this is a cynical way of looking at things but I can't really see beyond this line of reasoning.

Maybe this is down to your IQ? 

[Blackpool Rock]

I wouldn't worry about it. Gurds draws in people every time he starts on of these threads about his views on male/ female relationships. At first he received good advice as he was young, appeared naive and inexperienced, with punting shaping and dominating his thought processes, but he takes no notice and just keeps repeating the same distorted view of women, including his self proclaimed narcissism.

I think now he is just trolling and best ignored, but no doubt this thread will once again get a productive reaction.

As soon as I saw who started the thread I thought to myself this looks familiar and will no doubt provoke a reaction 

I remember as a fresh faced 19 year old about 6 month into a new job joking in the office about how marriage was just another form of prostitution as this was a joke me and my mates had, my boss who was late 50's at the time went crazy and threatened me with a disciplinary for insulting his wife 

Society and lifestyles have drastically changed in the last 40 or 50 years, what was the norm is no longer relevant for most people and women now often earn more than their male partner which debunks the theory

On the other hand at it's most basic i'm reminded of the Capuchin Monkey experiment 

External Link/Members Only

[blubandy]

Relationships can be transactional, but this isn’t want women, or men, ultimately want.

You can tell when a an attractive woman really desires you, at a primal level, and it’s a wonderful feeling. Sex where an attractive woman is literally hungry for your dick, wants your dick over any other man, is something that paying for sex can never match.

[southcoastpunter]

I think now he is just trolling and best ignored,

YEP

no doubt this thread will once again get a productive reaction.

sadly YEP!

[daviemac]

I think now he is just trolling and best ignored, but no doubt this thread will once again get a productive reaction.

Unfortunately there are those who can't help themselves but feed trolls, I sometimes wonder if those who do are a bit trollish themselves.   

[Stevelondon]

Well……. Speaking as someone who has bought a hundred fridges

 

[Colston36]

What an extrordinarily unpleasant, pig-ignorant, disgusting attitude you have.

[Colston36]

On the face of it many will laugh but it is a genuine question.

We all know that prostitutes have sex in exchange for money. However, when it comes to marriage, men are expected to provide financially so effectively it is a similar scenario of sex in exchange for money.

The most successful relationships function when the man takes on a masculine role and the women can become feminine. For this to happen the man needs to out earn the woman by a big margin and therefore be the provider.

There was an American sugar daddy I watched a while ago that makes millions a yr and has many sugar babies. When asked about whether he thinks the sugar relationships he has are sex in exchange for money, he said bluntly that men pay for sex whatever it is, "wives do it for refrigerators".

This is true, also the better looking a woman you would want to acquire for a relationship the more money would be required. This is akin to more money needing to be spent to hire a hotter escort Vs a less hot one typically.

Maybe this is a cynical way of looking at things but I can't really see beyond this line of reasoning. I think long term exposure to escorts can also reinforce this type of viewpoint.

In my view the only women that it could be argued that are not prostitutes are women that are already very rich. Those women don't need any man, providing it wasn't men that enabled them to become very rich.

Besides being obnoxious your post is based on your ignorant 1950s assumption, that men are the providers. I live in a household where the woman works in an award-winning investment business making more money than I care to contemplate and the man looks after the child.

[Payyourwaymate]

No they are not. However, you can find women who act in the way your post describes if you search for them or try to attract those type of women.

[Doc Holliday]

Well……. Speaking as someone who has bought a hundred fridges

They don't call you Zanussi Steve for nothing.

[MissWolf]

They don't call you Zanussi Steve for nothing.

As long as he's not a Smeg man  

[Private Parts]

Quite an objectionable contributor.
Do we have to put up with this misogyny?
I’m ashamed that I responded to the thread,
But it got my goat! 🐐

[Stevelondon]

Bosch !!!

[pbrown355]

I have a garage full of fridges and a points card with Curry's!!!!

[MissWolf]

Bosch !!!

Bish Bash or just straight Bosch?

[GoodLookinGuy]

Ha ! As soon as I saw the topic, I knew that would provoke a reaction.

Personally I think that's a step too far. If you do think that you have probably been in this game too long at the exclusion of everything else.

I did however read somewhere from a relationship psychologist that all relationships are transactional. That doesn't necessarily mean financial or monetary. However if you are not getting anything positive from a relationship, why would you be in one. Even in a loving relationship that person (you'd hope) is fulfilling some need or want or delivering something positive for you.

[NottsSteve]

What sort of Andrew Tate nonsense is this 

Merlin had it right in his first reply of "No".

[nightbot]

Did I wake up in 1960s?

[deg_dilemma]

Maybe Gurds should speak to his mum about this.

It's obvious he doesn't have a sister, a wife or a daughter, or even female friends. Else he might have gained a different and more balanced perspective.

[B4bcock]

As long as he's not a Smeg man  

I've heard he has a hot point.

[PaulRuff]

Ha ! As soon as I saw the topic, I knew that would provoke a reaction.

Personally I think that's a step too far. If you do think that you have probably been in this game too long at the exclusion of everything else.

I did however read somewhere from a relationship psychologist that all relationships are transactional. That doesn't necessarily mean financial or monetary. However if you are not getting anything positive from a relationship, why would you be in one. Even in a loving relationship that person (you'd hope) is fulfilling some need or want or delivering something positive for you.

Agreed.  All relationships are transactional, else why would you form the relationship in the first place?  Romantic, platonic, business, personal - all relationships involve an exchange of value.

[markballoon]

Have you ever been close to a woman?  Not physically but had a deep loving connection with one?

[Doc Holliday]

Agreed.  All relationships are transactional, else why would you form the relationship in the first place?  Romantic, platonic, business, personal - all relationships involve an exchange of value.

Without wishing to get into a discussion regarding the broader definition of transactional, its usage almost always refers to financial ie an exchange of money and is specifically the case with the opening post and Prostitution generally 

[akauya]

On the other hand at it's most basic i'm reminded of the Capuchin Monkey experiment 

External Link/Members Only

From the article: "The capuchin has a small brain, and it's pretty much focused on food and sex" - that describes 99% of men imho 

[jamiekinkxxx]

Gurds how old are you? Have you ever had a relationship? You really need to grow up and live like a normal / real human! Everything you say is just niave, untrue and just smacks at someone who hasn't got a clue about life.

[deg_dilemma]

Gurds how old are you? Have you ever had a relationship? You really need to grow up and live like a normal / real human! Everything you say is just niave, untrue and just smacks at someone who hasn't got a clue about life.

His posting history alludes to never having had a girlfriend but that he has thought about it, though the easy/addiction of escorts is too comforting for him. Oh and let's not forget, all SPs he sees fall in love with him and can't resist his muscular body and kissing ability.

[Chris1990mcr]

Have you been watching a lot of Andrew Tate and similar types videos?

[DoorDash]

In the majority of the world, gurds is mildly on to something, although it’s been exaggerated.

South America, Eastern Europe, Asia, Middle East etc - women seek a male provider 99% of the time.

[DoorDash]

Besides being obnoxious your post is based on your ignorant 1950s assumption, that men are the providers. I live in a household where the woman works in an award-winning investment business making more money than I care to contemplate and the man looks after the child.

Exhibit A - you are the prostitute!!!! 

[Princealbert1985]

On the face of it many will laugh but it is a genuine question.

We all know that prostitutes have sex in exchange for money. However, when it comes to marriage, men are expected to provide financially so effectively it is a similar scenario of sex in exchange for money.

The most successful relationships function when the man takes on a masculine role and the women can become feminine. For this to happen the man needs to out earn the woman by a big margin and therefore be the provider.

There was an American sugar daddy I watched a while ago that makes millions a yr and has many sugar babies. When asked about whether he thinks the sugar relationships he has are sex in exchange for money, he said bluntly that men pay for sex whatever it is, "wives do it for refrigerators".

This is true, also the better looking a woman you would want to acquire for a relationship the more money would be required. This is akin to more money needing to be spent to hire a hotter escort Vs a less hot one typically.

Maybe this is a cynical way of looking at things but I can't really see beyond this line of reasoning. I think long term exposure to escorts can also reinforce this type of viewpoint.

In my view the only women that it could be argued that are not prostitutes are women that are already very rich. Those women don't need any man, providing it wasn't men that enabled them to become very rich.

This is either a piss take, or, you're watching far to much Andrew Tate pal

[Moby Dick]

In my view the only women that it could be argued that are not prostitutes are women that are already very rich. Those women don't need any man, providing it wasn't men that enabled them to become very rich.

Are nuns prostitutes?
How about Lesbians?
And all the women that work whilst their men piss it up the wall?

[daviemac]

In the majority of the world, gurds is mildly on to something, although it’s been exaggerated.

South America, Eastern Europe, Asia, Middle East etc - women seek a male provider 99% of the time.

Unless you provide reliable documented evidence of your claim that in 'the majority of the wold' women seek men to provide for them you are as much of a troll as the OP.

[daviemac]

This is either a piss take, or, you're watching far to much Andrew Tate pal

He's a piss taking troll he's logged on 4 times today to see how much reaction his thread is getting.

Number one rule of internet forums, don't feed the trolls, the more reaction they get to the crap they post the more they do it.

[Stevelondon]

Bish Bash or just straight Bosch?

Gay Bosch 

[PaulRuff]

Without wishing to get into a discussion regarding the broader definition of transactional, its usage almost always refers to financial ie an exchange of money and is specifically the case with the opening post and Prostitution generally 

A financial exchange is but one form of transaction, there are plenty of others in most relationships. 

[Doc Holliday]

A financial exchange is but one form of transaction, there are plenty of others in most relationships. 

Yes I agree, but my point was this thread is about monetary transactions as part of prostitution 

[MerlinGray]

I wouldn't worry about it. Gurds draws in people every time he starts on of these threads about his views on male/ female relationships. At first he received good advice as he was young, appeared naive and inexperienced, with punting shaping and dominating his thought processes, but he takes no notice and just keeps repeating the same distorted view of women, including his self proclaimed narcissism.

I think now he is just trolling and best ignored, but no doubt this thread will once again get a productive reaction.

Thanks mate. Didn't know OP had previous.

[willie loman]

Women often , and often in jest ,refer to a man as "worth marrying", most sensible women tend to run a "credit check" , unless its a one night stand.

[Thephoenix]

On the face of it many will laugh but it is a genuine question.

We all know that prostitutes have sex in exchange for money. However, when it comes to marriage, men are expected to provide financially so effectively it is a similar scenario of sex in exchange for money.

The most successful relationships function when the man takes on a masculine role and the women can become feminine. For this to happen the man needs to out earn the woman by a big margin and therefore be the provider.

There was an American sugar daddy I watched a while ago that makes millions a yr and has many sugar babies. When asked about whether he thinks the sugar relationships he has are sex in exchange for money, he said bluntly that men pay for sex whatever it is, "wives do it for refrigerators".

This is true, also the better looking a woman you would want to acquire for a relationship the more money would be required. This is akin to more money needing to be spent to hire a hotter escort Vs a less hot one typically.

Maybe this is a cynical way of looking at things but I can't really see beyond this line of reasoning. I think long term exposure to escorts can also reinforce this type of viewpoint.

In my view the only women that it could be argued that are not prostitutes are women that are already very rich. Those women don't need any man, providing it wasn't men that enabled them to become very rich.

Might I suggest a new avatar fo you?
You should be living in the stone age!





Hidden Image/Members Only

[90125]

It’s threads like this that feed the hostility the site gets from certain factions.

I’m not sure whether to delete the thread or ban the OP as a misogynist

[MLawro93]

Obvious troll is trolling. 

[MissWolf]

It’s threads like this that feed the hostility the site gets from certain factions.

I’m not sure whether to delete the thread or ban the OP as a misogynist

It's a Friday knock ya self out with a bogof 

[90125]

Obvious troll is trolling. 

Do I get 2 hours for the price of 1