Author Topic: K-Pop Princess Bella - Kensington  (Read 13134 times)


5 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6703986) (3 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Waterhouse]

Offline silverfox75

External Link/Members Only
Meet happened on 4th May

Location: Flat near Royal Albert Hall,London

Price: 1 hour £200+ 70 extras

I messaged Bella around lunchtime,took her a while to reply but she was free
When I was so discussed what I wanted and confirmed the postcode.
The extra I had was the BB option.

Got to location and she messaged the address, very discreet entrance even though it’s on quite a busy road.
She buzzed me in and wow,gorgeous girl,pictures are very accurate.
Freshened up in the bathroom and got on the bed,she had a very small tight black dress on,no underwear.
She started with a bj,quite slow technique which I liked,I played with her tits and pussy while this was going on then we did 69,it was heavenly with my face buried between her legs,she tasted great.
Next I wanted to fuck her doggy,her bum is amazing stuck up in the air,I slid my cock in her bare and it felt wonderful,she was getting really wet and I just fucked her until I came deep in her pussy.
Licked her pussy for a while until I was ready for action again.
She rode me CG and then more doggy followed by mish,I was so close to cumming again but just couldn’t get over the line,we tried with a handjob to finish but I was just too sensitive to carry on.

Bella is a lovely girl and we talked quite a bit at the end of the meet,she has a really cute dog as well.

Would I return,probably but she is quite expensive even with out the add on.

Offline Lorachoop


Offline Gunner98

Expensive even without the add on? Her price is bog standard for London rates and if anything she is quite cheap when you consider the fact that she is offering 270 with Bareback. Hard pass, shame she does look nice

Offline gman28

Thanks for the review silverfox75

I've been meaning to see this one for a while now but haven't found a way to justify her price point in favour of others on my HL

Would you say she provides a "fully engaged" service for the money or is more toward the mechanical side of the scale?

Offline Londonpunter76

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Thanks for the review. I saw her recently too and had a similarly positive experience. I was debating whether to post or not fearing the bb backlash.

Btw, might not be a great idea to post location of escort no? I would edit my post and leave that out
Banned reason: No reviews since joining in 2015 though mentions meets
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline flamingice

Thanks for the review. I saw her recently too and had a similarly positive experience. I was debating whether to post or not fearing the bb backlash.

Btw, might not be a great idea to post location of escort no? I would edit my post and leave that out

You’ve been here since 2015 and not posted a single review?  How generous you were debating whether or not to write one this time.  Seems like you are a prime candidate for a ban countdown.
« Last Edit: May 07, 2024, 07:50:16 pm by flamingice »

Offline flamingice

Thanks for the review.  I keep debating whether to see her, but personally if I do I will not take the BB option.

My hesitation has always been her photos look like she has quite a bit of extra weight.  Do you think that’s a fair assessment?

Offline deg_dilemma


Offline Londonpunter76

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Thanks for the review.  I keep debating whether to see her, but personally if I do I will not take the BB option.

My hesitation has always been her photos look like she has quite a bit of extra weight.  Do you think that’s a fair assessment?

I would say she is size 10-12, probably a 10 actually. She is not the typical skinny Asian, but I would not call her overweight.
Banned reason: No reviews since joining in 2015 though mentions meets
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline flamingice

I would say she is size 10-12, probably a 10 actually. She is not the typical skinny Asian, but I would not call her overweight.

Thank you.  Still, putting your own review up would be appreciated.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2024, 05:38:51 am by flamingice »

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,328
  • Likes: 546
  •  
  • Reviews: 503
I would say she is size 10-12, probably a 10 actually. She is not the typical skinny Asian, but I would not call her overweight.

Could you explain why since 2015 you’ve never contributed a review please ?
It’s a sharing community here, that only works if we all share, and it is part of the site rules/ terms you agreed when signing up.

Offline Maverick1808

Could you explain why since 2015 you’ve never contributed a review please ?
It’s a sharing community here, that only works if we all share, and it is part of the site rules/ terms you agreed when signing up.

4 Posts and 0 Reviews in 9 years and no doubt countless punts via leeching surely doesn’t even warrant a countdown clock? It should be an instant ban.

As great as this site is, it only works when we all work together.

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,620
  • Likes: 133
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
4 Posts and 0 Reviews in 9 years and no doubt countless punts via leeching surely doesn’t even warrant a countdown clock? It should be an instant ban.

As great as this site is, it only works when we all work together.

I feel similarly but walking around the ref waving an imaginary card, trying to get someone sent off, isn't a good look.

Offline silverfox75

Thanks for the review.  I keep debating whether to see her, but personally if I do I will not take the BB option.

My hesitation has always been her photos look like she has quite a bit of extra weight.  Do you think that’s a fair assessment?
She has an amazing body,she’s not skinny but I certainly wouldn’t say she’s got extra weight.One thing I would say is her boobs feel amazing and then I noticed scars under them,not that noticeable but definitely a boob job.

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 155
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
Great review silverfox75, nothing like a bare wet pussy wrapped around your cock. Very tempting but the price tag is just too high for my liking.
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Punting2022

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/26 @ 21:49
  • Posts: 996
  • Likes: 44
  •  
  • Reviews: 30
Brave review. But good on you tbh.
Yes its risky. But you are your own person. If you want bareback so be it.
Tbh if single. Not as risky. No wife to give a std too.
Im tempted to see her tbh. I would prob just rub my cock round her pussy bare. Not go in. Doing this helps get hard quicker.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2024, 10:08:19 am by Punting2022 »

Offline silverfox75

Mods,can you remove location please and just leave London

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,620
  • Likes: 133
  •  
  • Reviews: 133

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,620
  • Likes: 133
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Brave review. But good on you tbh.
Yes its risky. But you are your own person. If you want bareback so be it.
Tbh if single. Not as risky. No wife to give a std too.
Im tempted to see her tbh. I would prob just rub my cock round her pussy bare. Not go in. Doing this helps get hard quicker.

Such bollocks. :lol:

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,151
  • Likes: 332
  •  
  • Reviews: 205

Btw, might not be a great idea to post location of escort no? I would edit my post and leave that out

You should actually write a review first, before giving others advice about how to write theirs.


Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,151
  • Likes: 332
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Mods,can you remove location please and just leave London


Why?

SP has requested it

That's a bit of a dumb request, to say the least. Her AW states "Kensington, Knightsbridge, Chelsea, Hyde Park"

I don't really see the point of removing her locale on here, unless she intends to remove it on AW also.

Rules

1 Site ethos/mission
This Forum puts the interests of Punters first through the sharing of Reviews. The Forum does not endorse or promote any service provider or any other site. This site is totally independent—no favouritism, special treatment, vested interests, or pandering to service providers. Members are expected to post Reviews, although there is no formal quota (see rule 27). General chat relating to Punting is allowed on the appropriate board.


22 Privacy of service providers
It is generally not allowed to post personal information about service providers, such as real names, personal social networking profiles, and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.To clarify, this means no personal photos at all from anywhere. Phone numbers may be posted in full if the number is online in a current advert. Personal numbers are not allowed. Hotels may be named but not room numbers.
A general description of in-call locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers and street names. Modelling, porn, and media-related work are permissible to be posted, even if it includes their real names, as they actively sought publicity / higher profile. Any news items may be posted. All restrictions above do not apply to thieves and those with criminal convictions. Past name changes are never censored, regardless of the reasons.



Unlikely it will happen. London is a huge place, and without a location the review wastes a lot of members time figuring out if the SP is in the area in which they punt.


Offline SomTumFucker

Mods,can you remove location please and just leave London
THAT’S the detail she wants removing?!? Nuff said!  :bomb:
OP - why are you in contact with SP regarding your review - sounds fishy.
Slippery slope if factually correct reviews are amended at SP’s request on a whim.

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 155
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
Brave review. But good on you tbh.
Yes its risky. But you are your own person. If you want bareback so be it.
Tbh if single. Not as risky. No wife to give a std too.
Im tempted to see her tbh. I would prob just rub my cock round her pussy bare. Not go in. Doing this helps get hard quicker.

WTF, that's like ordering a lovely juicy fillet steak, chewing it and spitting it out without swallowing.
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 155
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
THAT’S the detail she wants removing?!? Nuff said!  :bomb:
OP - why are you in contact with SP regarding your review - sounds fishy.
Slippery slope if factually correct reviews are amended at SP’s request on a whim.

The OP mentioned the date he saw her in this review, the SP wouldn't need to be a genius to work out who wrote the review.
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline SomTumFucker

The OP mentioned the date he saw her in this review, the SP wouldn't need to be a genius to work out who wrote the review.
I get that - doesn't mean OP has to engage with her in taking editing requests.

Offline fred_mecury

Thanks for the review. I saw her recently too and had a similarly positive experience. I was debating whether to post or not fearing the bb backlash.

Btw, might not be a great idea to post location of escort no? I would edit my post and leave that out

is the reason you do not have a review because you're barebacking these ladies ?

please still post the reviews and state that you had unprotected sex with them, still useful for people that will chose to  stay away or proceed to do the same

Ignore the expected backlash, we aren't responsible for your sexual health, only you are

Offline JustaPunter


That's a bit of a dumb request, to say the least. Her AW states "Kensington, Knightsbridge, Chelsea, Hyde Park"

I don't really see the point of removing her locale on here, unless she intends to remove it on AW also.

Rules

1 Site ethos/mission
This Forum puts the interests of Punters first through the sharing of Reviews. The Forum does not endorse or promote any service provider or any other site. This site is totally independent—no favouritism, special treatment, vested interests, or pandering to service providers. Members are expected to post Reviews, although there is no formal quota (see rule 27). General chat relating to Punting is allowed on the appropriate board.


22 Privacy of service providers
It is generally not allowed to post personal information about service providers, such as real names, personal social networking profiles, and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.To clarify, this means no personal photos at all from anywhere. Phone numbers may be posted in full if the number is online in a current advert. Personal numbers are not allowed. Hotels may be named but not room numbers.
A general description of in-call locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers and street names. Modelling, porn, and media-related work are permissible to be posted, even if it includes their real names, as they actively sought publicity / higher profile. Any news items may be posted. All restrictions above do not apply to thieves and those with criminal convictions. Past name changes are never censored, regardless of the reasons.



Unlikely it will happen. London is a huge place, and without a location the review wastes a lot of members time figuring out if the SP is in the area in which they punt.

Its not really a "dumb request"

There are only a few hundred flats surrounding the Royal Albert Hall.

And they are all pretty nice, no social housing or council estates where residents may not care what their neighbours are up to.


Which is different to and area as large as Knightsbridge or Kensington

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,151
  • Likes: 332
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Its not really a "dumb request"

There are only a few hundred flats surrounding the Royal Albert Hall.

And they are all pretty nice, no social housing or council estates where residents may not care what their neighbours are up to.


Which is different to and area as large as Knightsbridge or Kensington

A large percentage of which will be owned by people who are not in occupation regularly, so wouldn't know what goes on in the area day by day.

Offline JustaPunter

A large percentage of which will be owned by people who are not in occupation regularly, so wouldn't know what goes on in the area day by day.

Thanks for that

What does it have to do with the fact that specifying the area around the RAH is pretty specific?

Rather than a generic Knightsbridge or Kensington which could be anywhere from Gloucester Road to Harrods?

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,151
  • Likes: 332
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Thanks for that

What does it have to do with the fact that specifying the area around the RAH is pretty specific?

Rather than a generic Knightsbridge or Kensington which could be anywhere from Gloucester Road to Harrods?

The description is still within the site rules, if you have a problem with it, report it to a Mod.