Oriental Annie - Doncaster

[Hanzo]

External Link/Members Only

The meeting was supposed to take place last week. I texted Annie my request for an appt. four days in advance & got a couple of very quick replies back, one agreeing to the proposed date & time (late afternoon) the second just a series of XXXX. At lunchtime on the day of the meeting I switched my punting phone on to see two more texts from Annie, one asking for confirmation that the meeting was still on and the second simply saying ‘cancelled’. I texted back immediately saying that I would still like the meeting to go ahead, this got no response. I sent a final text a couple of hours later agreeing the meet was now off & I’d make alternative arrangements. I got no response to this text either. I was a bit disappointed but fortunately Doncaster has plenty walk-in options. If Annie had asked for a confirmation on the morning of the appt. when I was making the booking she would certainly have got one. Future visitors to Annie might want to take note & send a confirmation to her on the morning of the appt. regardless of whether she asks for one or not. A plan B might not go amiss either!

In terms of rating I can’t go green & red seems harsh so it’s a grey from me.

[Jomoore]

That sounds out of character.  I've been many times now and comms have always been good. You have to bear in mind that when she's with a client she rarely breaks off to answer texts, which is good if you're the client on the table, not so much if you're waiting for a reply.

[Hanzo]

Yep it does seem out of character based on the reviews I've seen. Perhaps she was just having a bad day, fancied the afternoon off or one of her regulars wanted the same time slot I'd booked. Who knows, fortunately I was able to make alternative arrangements. Interestingly she never did bother responding to either of my last two texts. 

[spikeexit]

Visited Annie last week Comms great as usual no problems at all
Very good visit great massage with lots of ball and cock play had me on all fou in about five mins she then puts her head under me and licks my balls and cock for a while
She then strips off and I stood up had a great feel and fondle of those betufiull boobs
While rubbing her pussy pushed her on the table and we cuddy and she rolled on top rubbing her self all over me
Very nice.
 Then for the hand job while I'm still feeling her clit and got her wet  came all over hands as she was sucking my nipple's
Quick clean up and got dressed and off
Paid £60 for a good full on half hour left after about 35 mins great girl good value
I'll be returning very soon .

[scutty brown]

Visited Jessica last week Comms great as usual no problems at all
Very good visit great massage with lots of ball and cock play had me on all fou in about five mins she then puts her head under me and licks my balls and cock for a while
She then strips off and I stood up had a great feel and fondle of those betufiull boobs
While rubbing her pussy pushed her on the table and we cuddy and she rolled on top rubbing her self all over me
Very nice.
 Then for the hand job while I'm still feeling her clit and got her wet  came all over hands as she was sucking my nipple's
Quick clean up and got dressed and off
Paid £60 for a good full on half hour left after about 35 mins great girl good value
I'll be returning very soon .

You would have been better off posting this as a new review

[drnotsostrange]

Visited Annie last week Comms great as usual no problems at all
Very good visit great massage with lots of ball and cock play had me on all fou in about five mins she then puts her head under me and licks my balls and cock for a while
She then strips off and I stood up had a great feel and fondle of those betufiull boobs
While rubbing her pussy pushed her on the table and we cuddy and she rolled on top rubbing her self all over me
Very nice.
 Then for the hand job while I'm still feeling her clit and got her wet  came all over hands as she was sucking my nipple's
Quick clean up and got dressed and off
Paid £60 for a good full on half hour left after about 35 mins great girl good value
I'll be returning very soon .

Is this a review for Annie or some other masseuse?

[daviemac]

Is this a review for Annie or some other masseuse?

It isn't a review mate, it's a comment about some unknown masseuse posted on a review of Annie and that only goes to confuse the situation.

If he's seen the one he's referring to he should post a review of her, talking about reviews is their a reason you haven't posted any?

[daviemac]

If he isn't reviewing the SP it can't be a review. Establishments can't be reviewed.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).
No abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.

If the OP is reviewing Jessica at Oriental Annie's then her name should be in the title and it should be made clear the appointment was with Jessica in the review, saves all the confusion.

[Hanzo]

If he isn't reviewing the SP it can't be a review. Establishments can't be reviewed.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).
No abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.

If the OP is reviewing Jessica at Oriental Annie's then her name should be in the title and it should be made clear the appointment was with Jessica in the review, saves all the confusion.

No name was given during the text exchange when I made the booking. I believe the masseuse is called another name only because two or three of the reviews on here mention the name but as this was going to be my first time visiting Oriental Annie I didn’t know that for certain or that their is only one masseuse there. Apologies for any confusion caused.

[scutty brown]

This is a massage parlour so this applies

The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.

Nothing wrong with the original review by Hanza.
Where it's gone wrong is Spikeexit  tagging his piece on, which should have been his own new review

[daviemac]

This is a massage parlour so this applies


Nothing wrong with the original review by Hanza.
Where it's gone wrong is Spikeexit  tagging his piece on, which should have been his own new review

That only applies to the name of the SP, establishments can't be reviewed and the OP gave the impression that it was Oriental Annie the parlour being reviewed.

You will notice it wasn't moved until the OP clarified and now he has it won't be.

I've already posted that spikeexit should post his own review and that his post caused the confusion.

[scutty brown]

That only applies to the name of the SP, establishments can't be reviewed and the OP gave the impression that it was Oriental Annie the parlour being reviewed.

You will notice it wasn't moved until the OP clarified and now he has it won't be.

I've already posted that spikeexit should post his own review and that his post caused the confusion.

The online advert is in the name of Oriental Annie, and the review appears to be simply about her (Oriental Annie's) failure to provide the booked service.
He mentions he was in contact with Annie, the online profile was posted by "Annie" and the free text in the profile uses the name Annie. No other name given in the profile.
There's subsequent speculation in the thread that Annie's real name is something else. OK it may be, but when you look at it analytically she's not publicly using that alternative name so stating it is akin to outing her. Most punters wouldn't dream of posting a working girls real name, but it looks like it has been done here in subsequent posts. Criticising the OP because he reviewed using her advertised name is effectively criticising him for not using her real name: i.e. criticising him for not outing her.
It may be that she's happy to work under a split identity - e.g. Alice/Susan/Wendy or whatever at "Oriental Annie's Massage" but so far we have no evidence of that.
As I see it, the OP reviewed negatively the person he believed he'd booked using the name provided to him. He's got no way of knowing if  that name refers to one girl, a parlour or an agency troupe. He did his best. Criticising him is a nonsense.

[daviemac]

The online advert is in the name of Oriental Annie, and the review appears to be simply about her (Oriental Annie's) failure to provide the booked service.
He mentions he was in contact with Annie, the online profile was posted by "Annie" and the free text in the profile uses the name Annie. No other name given in the profile.
There's subsequent speculation in the thread that Annie's real name is something else. OK it may be, but when you look at it analytically she's not publicly using that alternative name so stating it is akin to outing her. Most punters wouldn't dream of posting a working girls real name, but it looks like it has been done here in subsequent posts. Criticising the OP because he reviewed using her advertised name is effectively criticising him for not using her real name: i.e. criticising him for not outing her.
It may be that she's happy to work under a split identity - e.g. Alice/Susan/Wendy or whatever at "Oriental Annie's Massage" but so far we have no evidence of that.
As I see it, the OP reviewed negatively the person he believed he'd booked using the name provided to him. He's got no way of knowing if  that name refers to one girl, a parlour or an agency troupe. He did his best. Criticising him is a nonsense.

For the life of me I don't know why you are making a big thing out of this, I don't know anything about this place so have to rely on what other people post. Had someone who knows reported that the name spikeexit used could be her real name, which is something you normally do, it would have been removed .

Now we are in a situation where I have to reply to you being a wannabe mod posting what you think the rules are and what you think the OP meant when the whole thing would have been sorted out between me, spikeexit and the OP.

The rule about wannabe mods was brought in to avoid situations like this.

[daviemac]

No name was given during the text exchange when I made the booking. I believe the masseuse is called another name only because two or three of the reviews on here mention the name but as this was going to be my first time visiting Oriental Annie I didn’t know that for certain or that their is only one masseuse there. Apologies for any confusion caused.

Thanks for the reply mate, that is all that was needed to sort this out. It wasn't you who caused the confusion BTW.

As the name spikeexit posted isn't advertised I'll remove mentions of it and remind people that only what appears on the advert can be posted.