The Tate brothers are back inside jail.

[Private Parts]

Serial women abuser ( verbal and physical) Tate and his sidekick apologist brother are back arrested and enjoy gruel courtesy of the Romanian Courts.
Let’s see what his legal boys come up with?
I appreciate this has another thread, so mods if you wish to merge this please do.
However previous comments melted into a miasma of incomprehension.
I thought we would start again.
 

[scutty brown]

UK arrest warrants this time

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

[Dipper]

Let’s not jump the gun though..

‘Innocent until proven …’ etc etc.

[RedKettle]

Let’s not jump the gun though..

‘Innocent until proven …’ etc etc.

Agreed with the criminal charges.

But as for being a vile human being that was proven some time ago.

[Colston36]

Let’s not jump the gun though..

‘Innocent until proven …’ etc etc.

Odds on that won't be hard.

[Private Parts]

Do you think the veracity of a uk arrest warrant would not have been issued if Sniffer of the yard didn’t think he had a chance of success? The commissioner’s petty cash fund has many calls on it!
 

[Colston36]

Do you think the veracity of a uk arrest warrant would not have been issued if Sniffer of the yard didn’t think he had a chance of success? The commissioner’s petty cash fund has many calls on it!
 

What does "the veracity of a uk arrest warrant would not have been issued" mean?

[Private Parts]

What does "the veracity of a uk arrest warrant would not have been issued" mean?

Good old Google.

1 : conformity with truth or fact : accuracy. 2 : devotion to the truth : truthfulness.

[Private Parts]

Good old Google.

1 : conformity with truth or fact : accuracy. 2 : devotion to the truth : truthfulness.

Sniffer of the yard. = Policeman.

In essence do you think they would not have proceeded with the extradition of the young men if they didn’t stand a chance?

Sorry if it was confusing

[Private Parts]

Sniffer of the yard. = Policeman.

In essence do you think they would not have proceeded with the extradition of the young men if they, the police, didn’t stand a chance?

Sorry if it was confusing

[PumpDump]

Agreed with the criminal charges.

But as for being a vile human being that was proven some time ago.

Says the guy who fucks women for money and has written 88 reviews about his experiences 

I mean, seriously, the rest of the world would have a right laugh about anyone from this site lecturing others on morals.

[RedKettle]

Says the guy who fucks women for money and has written 88 reviews about his experiences 

I mean, seriously, the rest of the world would have a right laugh about anyone from this site lecturing others on morals.

If you despise the members here so much I suggest you fuck off.

Yes I pay for sex, with willing women who want me to do that, it is their living.  I do not rape women or promote aggressive and nasty behaviour towards women and girls.

[PumpDump]

If you despise the members here so much I suggest you fuck off.

Yes I pay for sex, with willing women who want me to do that, it is their living.  I do not rape women or promote aggressive and nasty behaviour towards women and girls.

I don't despise anybody. I am just socially aware enough to realise the general public would put you and I in much the same category as the Tate brothers. For you to moralise about them would be viewed as highly hypocritical. It is all to easy, in this bubble, to think what we do is generally accepted, but it is not. Many consider us as nothing more than rapists.

[RedKettle]

I don't despise anybody. I am just socially aware enough to realise the general public would put you and I in much the same category as the Tate brothers. For you to moralise about them would be viewed as highly hypocritical. It is all to easy, in this bubble, to think what we do is generally accepted, but it is not. Many consider us as nothing more than rapists.

That is a stupid argument, no logic to it at all.   So what if people have a particular idea that we do is wrong (unless you are saying we are rapists) it does not impact on what we actually are and the values we hold.  If you cannot see the difference between how the vast majority of members on here act and what the Tate brothers have done you have a serious problem.

And we are in a bubble here - we are talking amongest ourselves.

[PumpDump]

That is a stupid argument, no logic to it at all.   So what if people have a particular idea that we do is wrong (unless you are saying we are rapists) it does not impact on what we actually are and the values we hold.  If you cannot see the difference between how the vast majority of members on here act and what the Tate brothers have done you have a serious problem.

And we are in a bubble here - we are talking amongest ourselves.

You say Tate is a rapist, Dame Diana Johnson MP think you are a rapist.

Ms Johnson warned sex trafficking was occurring on an “industrial scale” across the UK as she argued current laws mean the “minority of men in England and Wales who pay for sex do so with impunity, fuelling a brutal sex trafficking trade and causing untold harm to victims”.

“Vulnerable women are moved around networks of brothels and hotel rooms to be raped and abused by men who pay for sex,” she told the Commons.

[Private Parts]

I don't despise anybody. I am just socially aware enough to realise the general public would put you and I in much the same category as the Tate brothers. For you to moralise about them would be viewed as highly hypocritical. It is all to easy, in this bubble, to think what we do is generally accepted, but it is not. Many consider us as nothing more than rapists.

P&D. You have a low opinion of others. As if others were the personification of you.
If you think going on promoting publicly their (the Tates) behaviour towards women is akin to your own self perception is equated with the membership then you are on the wrong site. Try bestiality.com.
You are deluded. You probably think perspective is a type of shatterproof polycarbon.

[Dipper]

Says the guy who fucks women for money and has written 88 reviews about his experiences 

I mean, seriously, the rest of the world would have a right laugh about anyone from this site lecturing others on morals.

I don’t want to fall out with anyone, but this is an excellent point. IMO.

[RedKettle]

You say Tate is a rapist, Dame Diana Johnson MP think you are a rapist.

Why are defending those pieces of shit by attacking us?  If you want to discuss the public perception of punters and your view of yourself as a rapist perhaps start that as a separate thread.  I have made my position clear in earlier replies.

[RedKettle]

I don’t want to fall out with anyone, but this is an excellent point. IMO.

As I have said above it is not. It is a poor distraction to defend the indefensible. 

[Colston36]

Says the guy who fucks women for money and has written 88 reviews about his experiences 

I mean, seriously, the rest of the world would have a right laugh about anyone from this site lecturing others on morals.

Really? You see punting as morally wrong?

Morals are the principles of right and wrong. They have nothing to do with sex. And the rest of the intelligent world knows it

Since you are marooned in a time when sex was frowned upon maybe you should give up punting.

[Dipper]

Really? You see punting as morally wrong?

Morals are the principles of right and wrong. They have nothing to do with sex. And the rest of the intelligent world knows it

Since you are marooned in a time when sex was frowned upon maybe you should give up punting.

He was talking about how the rest of the (non punting?) world might view it/us Colston I think.

[JontyR]

I think if the Tate brothers posted their shit on here they would be getting a visit from the Mods banning hammer in very short order.

[RedKettle]

He was talking about how the rest of the (non punting?) world might view it/us Colston I think.

I think that is where he backtracked to.

[Adoniron]

I don't despise anybody. I am just socially aware enough to realise the general public would put you and I in much the same category as the Tate brothers. For you to moralise about them would be viewed as highly hypocritical. It is all to easy, in this bubble, to think what we do is generally accepted, but it is not. Many consider us as nothing more than rapists.

Well that has derailed the thread nicely.

Anyway back on topic, obviously they are innocent till proven guilty but the UK authorities wouldn't have applied for an arrest warrant without evidence so let's see what comes out. If the evidence suggests they are guilty, some of their acolytes still won't believe it.

[marcius2018]

Agreed with the criminal charges.

But as for being a vile human being that was proven some time ago.

 

[Private Parts]

Well that has derailed the thread nicely.

Anyway back on topic, obviously they are innocent till proven guilty but the UK authorities wouldn't have applied for an arrest warrant without evidence so let's see what comes out. If the evidence suggests they are guilty, some of their acolytes still won't believe it.

Quite. As I commented earlier they wouldn’t send the blues and twos on a wild goose chase.

[akauya]

Says the guy who fucks women for money and has written 88 reviews about his experiences 

I mean, seriously, the rest of the world would have a right laugh about anyone from this site lecturing others on morals.

You are conflating two different issues and forgetting/ignoring one little but essential detail: consent.

Paying for sex, with fully consenting women who are offering their services is not illegal (not in this country anyway.) Forcing/coercing women into sex work (as it is alleged the Tate brothers have done) is illegal in practically every country in the world.

What other people think of us paying for sex has no relevance on the discussion about the alleged crimes committed by the Tate brothers.

[PumpDump]

Quite. As I commented earlier they wouldn’t send the blues and twos on a wild goose chase.

It wouldn't be the first time. Remember Cliff Richard?

[PumpDump]

You are conflating two different issues and forgetting/ignoring one little but essential detail: consent.

Paying for sex, with fully consenting women who are offering their services is not illegal (not in this country anyway.) Forcing/coercing women into sex work (as it is alleged the Tate brothers have done) is illegal in practically every country in the world.

What other people think of us paying for sex has no relevance on the discussion about the alleged crimes committed by the Tate brothers.

It's all allegations though, isn't it? Where is the evidence? Where is the court case? They were arrested over a year ago in Romania and still nothing. Now the UK authorities have some allegation from 10 years ago. Sounds like a vendetta to me. Also the Tate is a Muslim and they take him in to jail on first day of Ramadan.

[Private Parts]

I see the apologists are crawling out from under their safety blankets.

It really is pathetic

They will get off for the moment. But the smell of 💩 sticks to the undersole of them that know.
It follows them around

[JontyR]

It wouldn't be the first time. Remember Cliff Richard?

The issue with Cliff Richard was the public way that a raid to gather evidence was conducted and the media inclusion was facilitated.

That was an attempt (on behalf of the police as an investigatory body) to find evidence.

Here there will be a need to show evidence - known as the full code test - before there will have been the decision on whether to try and extradite or not.

Romania, IMO, must also think that there is a real chance and public interest in prosecuting or else he'd already be on his way back here.

On a separate point, now we've set precedent with Shamina Begum having her citizenship removed without trial because she was a dual national could the same be done with Tate?

[Alelcourt]

I don't despise anybody. I am just socially aware enough to realise the general public would put you and I in much the same category as the Tate brothers. For you to moralise about them would be viewed as highly hypocritical. It is all to easy, in this bubble, to think what we do is generally accepted, but it is not. Many consider us as nothing more than rapists.

Spot on. You have to be aware enough to not have the herded opinion about someone.

[RedKettle]

Spot on. You have to be aware enough to not have the herded opinion about someone.

Have you understood the point you are agreeing with?

Because i shag women for money (with consent) i am not able to express an opinion about a man I think is a piece of shit because of his activities on social media and his alleged crimes??  Really?

It is not about whether my view of them is right he is saying I lost the right to express that view because there are some others in society who take a dim view of my sexual activities.

Very big brother of you.

[Alelcourt]

Have you understood the point you are agreeing with?

Because i shag women for money (with consent) i am not able to express an opinion about a man I think is a piece of shit because of his activities on social media and his alleged crimes??  Really?

It is not about whether my view of them is right he is saying I lost the right to express that view because there are some others in society who take a dim view of my sexual activities.

Very big brother of you.

Didn’t think he said you’re not allowed to have an opinion he just stated what opinions people may have on people like us

[alabama1]

Says the guy who fucks women for money and has written 88 reviews about his experiences 

I mean, seriously, the rest of the world would have a right laugh about anyone from this site lecturing others on morals.

Fuck right off you idiot !

[alabama1]

Didn’t think he said you’re not allowed to have an opinion he just stated what opinions people may have on people like us

FFS mate ! 

[Iloveoral]

This thread definitely has a poor choice of words and needs a calm down please, some comments are unacceptable to other members.