Princess - young ebony thick ass - Croydon

[oversexed]

Quick review:

I rarely have time to punt these days after getting caught because an idiot prossie messaged me out of a blue.

Advice to others:
 Always block any prossie number on your phone even if you have formed acquittance with her
 Have a separate account for Uber/Bolt - those bastards dont allow you to delete your trip history easily
  Have a separate account for Google maps or any map app - again history on that
 Never ever use your personal phone - for browsing, calls or anything.

Digital footprint is real

Anyway, back to the review
I saw her twice. First for 15 mins. Second time for 30 mins

Link: External Link/Members Only
Girl: Looks exactly like her picture. Ass is wide and juicy. Not a great shelf. Personally, i will say B+

Service: Sex and oil play

Action: Usual parlour girl routine. Walk in, Princess was waiting on me wearing the attire she had on in the picture below.
Attempted to ask about my usual extras (DFK, OWO, CIM, Lapdance) but she barely speaks english.

I had a flash back to the moments that ive been fucked over by latin parlour girls so i decided i'm going to  oil up this bitch and fuck the shit out of her.

And that's what i did. Suck those titties. They were big. DDs i'll say. Rub my face in them.
Smack that ass, oil up it, play with it for while then it's time for action.

She lubed up, i condomed up and away we go in doggy style. I went hard man.
Finished in prone bone with her begging for her life.

Same thing the next day except she gave me OW and lip kiss. The lip kiss actually pissed me off so i just went hard in all positions.
Missionary to start, then sideways, then doggy to finish

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Caveat Emptor: You have to be firm with this girl. She's your whore. She might try to limit the sucking of those titties or limit your strokes. Dont take that, push her hand away and keep going.

Enjoy!

[Atrueyorkie]

What a read hahahaha, I’m quite intrigued in the digital footprint part? Seems like a story I could learn from

[Prince]

Good advice on being discreet.

Do you have a separate phone or separate SIM card?

P

[Iloveoral]

She lubed up, i condomed up and away we go in doggy style. I went hard man.
Finished in prone bone with her begging for her life.

Same thing the next day except she gave me OW and lip kiss. The lip kiss actually pissed me off so i just went hard in all positions.
Missionary to start, then sideways, then doggy to finish

You have to be firm with this girl. She's your whore. She might try to limit the sucking of those titties or limit your strokes. Dont take that, push her hand away and keep going.

Enjoy!

We don’t appreciate boundary pushers here
You’ve no respect and think it’s ok to tell others to take advantage too
Seriously?

[PantyDroppaPlayer]

We don’t appreciate boundary pushers here
You’ve no respect and think it’s ok to tell others to take advantage too
Seriously?

Although I do agree the review was wayyy out of line - it is read to sound like R*pe. And to be honest, to me she has young looking face 

But shouldn't oversexed have the chance to explain himself before being banned? From previous comments and reviews he hasn't shown this level of disrespect before, has he? It sounds as if Oversexed had his marriage/relationship ruined by a WG failings and this WG got the end of his stick - pun intended - as his retailation. He could be in a bad place at the moment.

If your answer is still no, then may I suggest you remove his review completely or doctor it to remove the those instructions in the interest of the WG safety. Just a thought.

[Atrueyorkie]

Although I do agree the review was wayyy out of line - it is read to sound like R*pe. And to be honest, to me she has young looking face 

But shouldn't oversexed have the chance to explain himself before being banned? From previous comments and reviews he hasn't shown this level of disrespect before, has he? It sounds as if Oversexed had his marriage/relationship ruined by a WG failings and this WG got the end of his stick - pun intended - as his retailation. He could be in a bad place at the moment.

If your answer is still no, then may I suggest you remove his review completely or doctor it to remove the those instructions in the interest of the WG safety. Just a thought.

Yeah I agree with you. Again the highlighted text from the mod does seem crazy but I’ve always seen an OP or someone who’s potentially going to be banned would get an opportunity to explain himself.

[Stevelondon]

I’ve suffered the indignity of a ban for something I personally felt was just a little joke. Wasn’t given the opportunity to explain myself 😂
But you live and learn so to speak.

But I have to admit I don’t particularly like the wording in the review. I don’t treat the SP’s I see as whores for a start and I certainly would not be taking any advice from the reviewer as to how to treat someone.

[Chezdon2]

Glad you're banned you absolute psycho. Poor girl, man. Disgusting behaviour.

[daviemac]

There's no denying what he has written in the review and members reading it will see that we have zero tolerance for boundary pushing twats on here.

[Colston36]

What a shitty, barely human being he is.

[daviemac]

What a shitty, barely human being he is.

It does make one wonder about those who might defend him.   

[Mr Sinister]

Although I do agree the review was wayyy out of line - it is read to sound like R*pe. And to be honest, to me she has young looking face 

But shouldn't oversexed have the chance to explain himself before being banned? From previous comments and reviews he hasn't shown this level of disrespect before, has he? It sounds as if Oversexed had his marriage/relationship ruined by a WG failings and this WG got the end of his stick - pun intended - as his retailation. He could be in a bad place at the moment.

If your answer is still no, then may I suggest you remove his review completely or doctor it to remove the those instructions in the interest of the WG safety. Just a thought.

It for sure reads like that, if that's the case then you have to deal with the consequences of your punting actions. Might have been better for him to explain himself to a mod(in private) to find out the reason for posting this type of review, it might have helped with whatever he's going through rather than cutting him loose still angry.

[PilotMan]

Whatever bad place he may be in (this is just speculation by others) there's no excuse for that behaviour, and use of such derogatory and clearly disrespectful language.

According to others on here  - you seem to somehow think it's acceptable / justifiable or there are mitigating circumstances if he has had a shit deal somewhere else in his life - really??

He also advising others to treat her the same way - WTF!

[daviemac]

It for sure reads like that, if that's the case then you have to deal with the consequences of your punting actions. Might have been better for him to explain himself to a mod(in private) to find out the reason for posting this type of review, it might have helped with whatever he's going through rather than cutting him loose still angry.

He posted that review because that's what he did in the booking and we do not want abusive boundary pushers on here, that sort of behaviour is totally unacceptable.

 

[Mr Sinister]

He posted that review because that's what he did in the booking and we do not want abusive boundary pushers on here, that sort of behaviour is totally unacceptable.

I'm not saying he should not have been banned, just hear him out if you could before doing so. It's done now, hope he can sort out whatever issues he is going through without having to resort to abusing WG.

[PilotMan]

I'm not saying he should not have been banned, just hear him out if you could before doing so. It's done now, hope he can sort out whatever issues he is going through without having to resort to abusing WG.

I don't think it's the remit of the MODS to offer counselling to abusers.

[PantyDroppaPlayer]

Whatever bad place he may be in (this is just speculation by others) there's no excuse for that behaviour, and use of such derogatory and clearly disrespectful language.

According to others on here  - you seem to somehow think it's acceptable / justifiable or there are mitigating circumstances if he has had a shit deal somewhere else in his life - really??

He also advising others to treat her the same way - WTF!

First of, let me make this clear, I am not defending him, his actions or his review - heck I've even suggested to take it down or doctor it to avoid any one from repeating this.

My stance is from a place where banning a member is so easily and regularly done that we are losing regular credible reviewers and having to fight off leechers.

In hindsight, I should have piped up on a lesser crime but seeing this ban I felt it was one ban too many for me to not say anything.

P.s just so it's out there... If I am ever banned for what ever reason I would like to say my apologies and my goodbyes from now - it's been fun, educational and inspiring to be apart of this forum. I also won't be coming back. 

[daviemac]

I'm not saying he should not have been banned, just hear him out if you could before doing so. It's done now, hope he can sort out whatever issues he is going through without having to resort to abusing WG.

We are not in the habit of listening to boundary pushing cunts make excuses for their unacceptable behaviour. If he has medical or mental health issues he should seek help from those qualified to give it.

When we find boundary pushers we ban them and that includes when we receive irrefutable evidence not just the self confessed.   

[daviemac]

First of, let me make this clear, I am not defending him, his actions or his review - heck I've even suggested to take it down or doctor it to avoid any one from repeating this.

My stance is from a place where banning a member is so easily and regularly done that we are losing regular credible reviewers and having to fight off leechers.

In hindsight, I should have piped up on a lesser crime but seeing this ban I felt it was one ban too many for me to not say anything.

P.s just so it's out there... If I am ever banned for what ever reason I would like to say my apologies and my goodbyes from now - it's been fun, educational and inspiring to be apart of this forum. I also won't be coming back. 

Two very simple questions.

Do you condone punters abusing escorts?

Do you think this site should turn a blind eye to those who do abuse escorts just because they've made a certain number of contributions.

[Iloveoral]

Happy to explain for those questioning it.

There’s really very little that can get a member an instant ban here, you’ve got to be super specially fucked up to win an instant boot.

Excessive boundary pushing, assault, sexual abuse and violence would be up there, this review in my opinion sadly contains at least one of the above.

As a site, we already have a bad wrap, constant complaints, from the public (inc the mumsxxx site) and SP’s, so we have zero tolerance to members acting this way, they are not welcome here, it gives the rest of us and the site a bad name.

We (the whole team here), try to be fair, yes as mentioned in the thread we should give members a chance to explain, I agree, in every other situation I think we do, if you guys ever think a decision is unfair, hit the report button, every report gets read by all mods, admin and the boss.

Hope that explains it a little better for those asking 

[Iloveoral]

Two very simple questions.

Do you condone punters abusing escorts?

Do you think this site should turn a blind eye to those who do abuse escorts just because they've made a certain number of contributions.

Beat me too it but exactly this

[Atrueyorkie]

PantyDroppaPlayer made a very good point at the start, surely we should edit/erase parts of the review for the safety of the WG?

[daviemac]

PantyDroppaPlayer made a very good point at the start, surely we should edit/erase parts of the review for the safety of the WG?

The trouble is if we do that then there's nothing to show why he was banned, if we leave it in then everyone sees that we don't accept that sort of behaviour plus they see the comments from other members agreeing it is out of order.

[Snagbadjer]

Glad you got banned. Scumbag. Hopefully someone make you "beg for your life" one day to see how it feels. Tosser.

[PantyDroppaPlayer]

Two very simple questions.

Do you condone punters abusing escorts?

Do you think this site should turn a blind eye to those who do abuse escorts just because they've made a certain number of contributions.

Two simple answers:

1) No
2) No

In efforts of you -  daviemac -  trying to paint the picture of me accepting this kind of behaviour even though post after post i have reflected otherwise. Again  you have completely missed my point...

My point/suggestion is a 1 strike warning system:
If you doctor/remove whatever offence against se policy/guideline and then advise the offending member of such rule that has been broken it gives said member a chance to apologise and act right going forwards. This way we would have more members and more credible reviewers not leechers.

SteveLondon above mentioned that they were banned to what he saw as a joke. Thankfully he came back and continues to post and/or review. (Let me be clear to you I don't know what he said or done so I am not defending him) But my above suggestion would allow all concerned to see that it was a joke and possibly issue an apology before a banned cycle is commenced. 

Before replying DavieMac please do not miss my ending point from my previous post. "In hindsight, I should have piped up on a lesser crime but seeing this ban I felt it was one ban too many for me to not say anything." In clearer words for you to understand, I am accepting that I should have said something on a different post rather than this one because it seems that is what you are focus on not in fact the point I am trying to make. 

[daviemac]

Two simple answers:

1) No
2) No

In efforts of you -  daviemac -  trying to paint the picture of me accepting this kind of behaviour even though post after post i have reflected otherwise. Again  you have completely missed my point...

My point/suggestion is a 1 strike warning system:
If you doctor/remove whatever offence against se policy/guideline and then advise the offending member of such rule that has been broken it gives said member a chance to apologise and act right going forwards. This way we would have more members and more credible reviewers not leechers.

SteveLondon above mentioned that they were banned to what he saw as a joke. Thankfully he came back and continues to post and/or review. (Let me be clear to you I don't know what he said or done so I am not defending him) But my above suggestion would allow all concerned to see that it was a joke and possibly issue an apology before a banned cycle is commenced.

I'm not sure what part of we don't tolerate boundary pushers you aren't getting. Apologies don't cut it, if we find out a member is abusing escorts or boundary pushing we ban them, no exceptions.

You answered no to the question "Do you think this site should turn a blind eye to those who do abuse escorts just because they've made a certain number of contributions."  yet that is exactly what you are suggesting now by giving the abusive cunts a chance.

To reiterate, those who abuse escorts get banned from here.

[LLPunting]

...

P.s just so it's out there... If I am ever banned for what ever reason I would like to say my apologies and my goodbyes from now - it's been fun, educational and inspiring to be apart of this forum. I also won't be coming back. 

Banning someone without evidence of why isn't how this works.
Have you read his other reviews?  There is some history of going against SPs' wishes/preferences and when he's disappointed by a meeting he doesn't always take it graciously.  There is aggression and frustration too near the surface, so perhaps he needs professional help.  Our indulging him over these years clearly hasn't helped him work through it.
1 review this year, 3 last, 3 before that, contributor yes but hardly profligate.  A good few new (and hopefully lawful) joiners have already exceeded this rate of contribution.  He was called for not contributing previously, he claimed to be infrequent because of (frustration at) lack of talent.
How credible is someone who has clearly been unable to suppress aggressive behaviour towards SPs? 

Do you actually pay attention to bannings across the registered population?  57 since start of year, 13 for something other than protracted leeching (2 for abusing SPs, 3 touts, 1 malicious reviewer, the rest for unacceptable behaviour to others in forum) and in that time over 3500 new registrations.  Nothing excessive about that required enforcement in an anonymous online community.
If the girl indicated in any way that he should stop doing something and he forcefully continued then that constitutes a crime not just a breach of societal or forum manners.

Conflating your principles with the cause of a self-evidenced abuser seems an awfully hysterical act. 

Good luck punting talent you don't know without UKP as a resource, it's doable but a lot more risk. 

[JustaPunter]

What a read hahahaha, I’m quite intrigued in the digital footprint part? Seems like a story I could learn from

“What a read hahahaha”

Did you read the same abusive misogynistic review that everybody else did?

[pumps]

When I read the post before he got banned I could sense his jest, he's seen her twice so they probably built up abit of rapport with each other, where what he was saying was an exaggeration.

but that's not the point because there are alot of punters with very very low IQ's that will go out and literally do what hes said word for word to other prostitutes, and itll just take one fool whos loosely affiliated with this website to tarnish the place.

P.s. this is why I tend to completely avoid black latinas usually the Dominicans (unless I know them or theyre well reviewed), I've punted soo many and they often play alot of strange games compared to their white country women.

[Atrueyorkie]

The trouble is if we do that then there's nothing to show why he was banned, if we leave it in then everyone sees that we don't accept that sort of behaviour plus they see the comments from other members agreeing it is out of order.

Fair play 

[SonofAJohn]

P.s. this is why I tend to completely avoid black latinas usually the Dominicans (unless I know them or theyre well reviewed), I've punted soo many and they often play alot of strange games compared to their white country women.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Atrueyorkie]

“What a read hahahaha”

Did you read the same abusive misogynistic review that everybody else did?

Oh please jump off a cliff already.

I skim read the review first time, my following comments show that.

You’re still butt hurt about getting pulled up about ivy. Still waiting on the review!!!!

[JustaPunter]

Oh please jump off a cliff already.

I skim read the review first time, my following comments show that.

You’re still butt hurt about getting pulled up about ivy. Still waiting on the review!!!!

Classic deflection

Why not visit her yourself?

[Stevelondon]

Now now chaps……. No bickering please 😂


Iloveoral brought up a good point with regard  to how this site is viewed, especially by SP’s.

It’s not very often I visit someone and the conversation gets round to UKP.  If it does I tend to deflect with a,
“I’ve heard of it but I’m not a member” sort of comment.
But I have heard one or two talk about the site with annoyance on their voice. Thinking the only men who post on it are all tossers for want of a word. It’s the disdain I can’t understand. As if the men they talk about with such low regard should not be coming to see them in the first place.
Perhaps it’s these SP’s who simply just don’t like what they do for a living.

We certainly do not need reviews of this sort on here. It’s understandable to assume an SP reading it would look down on the site as a whole.
Which is unacceptable. Because there are some wonderfully written reviews and incredibly informative posts that not only help fellow punters. But will of course bring business to those SP’s too.

[Iloveoral]

It’s a tricky thing keeping this site going and head1 would never admit the shit he gets daily to have the site closed. He didn’t want the site but took it on when it was going to be closed by old admin just for you guys.
This is why we have zero tolerance, not only is it unacceptable it will eventually fuck things up and loose us the site. Maybe too much info but I’d like you guys to know, more goes on behind the scenes than possibly realised.
We’ve got a fantastic thing here, great community, it works, we just all need to keep it so.

[PantyDroppaPlayer]

The trouble is if we do that then there's nothing to show why he was banned, if we leave it in then everyone sees that we don't accept that sort of behaviour plus they see the comments from other members agreeing it is out of order.

For this context this method doesn't give the best protection for a SP though. It just shows your punishment to the UKP rule which stops his act yes but technically not others doing it to the same SP. (Others can just do the exact same thing to this SP and just not post it on here).

At the very least, Admins should be able to doctor it to remove the SP's link in his and any abusers review leaving a caption like [link removed due to violation of rule # and protection of SP] , void this as a review and possibly move it to a banned thread? This way an example is still set and maximum protection to the SP?

[PantyDroppaPlayer]

It’s a tricky thing keeping this site going and head1 would never admit the shit he gets daily to have the site closed. He didn’t want the site but took it on when it was going to be closed by old admin just for you guys.
This is why we have zero tolerance, not only is it unacceptable it will eventually fuck things up and loose us the site. Maybe too much info but I’d like you guys to know, more goes on behind the scenes than possibly realised.
We’ve got a fantastic thing here, great community, it works, we just all need to keep it so.

 

[Atrueyorkie]

Classic deflection

Why not visit her yourself?

Probably will, tell her some loser is crying over her pussy and thinks it’s Romeo and Juliet.

What a sorry man you are. See you in the next thread

[daviemac]

For this context this method doesn't give the best protection for a SP though. It just shows your punishment to the UKP rule which stops his act yes but technically not others doing it to the same SP. (Others can just do the exact same thing to this SP and just not post it on here).

At the very least, Admins should be able to doctor it to remove the SP's link in his and any abusers review leaving a caption like [link removed due to violation of rule # and protection of SP] , void this as a review and possibly move it to a banned thread? This way an example is still set and maximum protection to the SP?

UKP as a site can't protect escorts from those who are inclined to abuse them, all we can do is remove them so they can't brag about it as well as making it very clear that boundary pushing is unacceptable in any form.

This site is regarded by many as being full of misogamists but threads like this give anyone reading it a clear indication that not only do abusers get banned but the majority of punters are decent people who abhor such behaviour but doctoring the review would detract from that.

I should add that we get information about dodgy punters from a variety of sources, not just by their own admission on here so just because they don't post about it doesn't mean we won't find out.

[massagepuntingfan]

It’s a tricky thing keeping this site going and head1 would never admit the shit he gets daily to have the site closed. He didn’t want the site but took it on when it was going to be closed by old admin just for you guys.
This is why we have zero tolerance, not only is it unacceptable it will eventually fuck things up and loose us the site. Maybe too much info but I’d like you guys to know, more goes on behind the scenes than possibly realised.
We’ve got a fantastic thing here, great community, it works, we just all need to keep it so.

Thats an enlightening post. Thanks to the mods and admin.

[YoungOGPunter]

It’s a tricky thing keeping this site going and head1 would never admit the shit he gets daily to have the site closed. He didn’t want the site but took it on when it was going to be closed by old admin just for you guys.
This is why we have zero tolerance, not only is it unacceptable it will eventually fuck things up and loose us the site. Maybe too much info but I’d like you guys to know, more goes on behind the scenes than possibly realised.
We’ve got a fantastic thing here, great community, it works, we just all need to keep it so.

Salute! 

[Dinekid7]

Hidden Image/Members Only

HILARIOUS

[Snagbadjer]

Personally, when someone "jokes" about abusing someone, like making a woman "be for her life", I don't think they're joking at all. I know this type well. They're scum who get off on dominating women. More often than not, they're absolute bottle jobs around other men, though.

Well done mods for showing zero tolerance to these losers.

[Garyhart]

Personally, when someone "jokes" about abusing someone, like making a woman "be for her life", I don't think they're joking at all. I know this type well. They're scum who get off on dominating women. More often than not, they're absolute bottle jobs around other men, though.

Well done mods for showing zero tolerance to these losers.

Fully agreed. The fact that oversexed felt comfortable enough to even say something that messed up on a public forum makes me fear for other women he’s seen and what he hasn’t disclosed on UKP…

[JustaPunter]

Probably will, tell her some loser is crying over her pussy and thinks it’s Romeo and Juliet.

What a sorry man you are. See you in the next thread

Only one saddo here.

And you seem to have some feelings of resentment towards Ivy

[Atrueyorkie]

Only one saddo here.

And you seem to have some feelings of resentment towards Ivy

“you seem to have some feelings of resentment towards Ivy” - What hard drugs are you smoking to come to this conclusion? You are overdosing on the dummy juice right now. I’m a bit dumbfounded how you came to this retarded conclusion. You actually make no sense it’s funny

Resentment? You must be slow

[Iloveoral]

We done here yeah?
I know your both not going to spam this thread with anymore daft comments