Author Topic: Mia (GEA) - Glasgow  (Read 5871 times)

Offline DrG

Booked for half an hour, £100.  Took place just before xmas.

External Link/Members Only

Going to keep this fairly short.  Flat out negative.  Got let into flat, Mia is attractive enough, slimmer than the pics and I thought all good, but zero personality.  Let me in, I followed into the room, she sat on the bed and said nothing, absolutely nothing.  Had to ask if I could use the shower to freshen up and was pointed to a hand towel on the chair.  Went in, a couple of empty bottles of shower gel on the floor of their absolutely minging shower.  Simply disgusting. 

Got out shower, awkward as fuck.  She basically said nothing, I was standing there with a towel round me like a right prick.  She was just half-sitting on the bed looking at me saying nothing.  I moved to the bed and initiated some very fucking reluctant kissing.

She quickly started some half-hearted oral and I was struggling to keep it up at this point.  Asked her to just finish me by hand, got dressed and got the fuck out of there.

If there was an opposite of a GFE this was it.  If there was a way to make a punter feel like they were paying for a very basic service this was it.  Will never be back at GEA again.

Offline Bru1901

Shes been on my to do list but unable to meet early morning or afternoon

I have been reccomended to her by a friend or two here too

Either a bad day or didnt click personality or looks wise

Gea facilities are a shit hole. Yesterday i counted 7 girls on. With 2 rooms it doesnt even make sense


Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Booked for half an hour, £100.  Took place just before xmas.

External Link/Members Only

Going to keep this fairly short.  Flat out negative.  Got let into flat, Mia is attractive enough, slimmer than the pics and I thought all good, but zero personality.  Let me in, I followed into the room, she sat on the bed and said nothing, absolutely nothing.  Had to ask if I could use the shower to freshen up and was pointed to a hand towel on the chair.  Went in, a couple of empty bottles of shower gel on the floor of their absolutely minging shower.  Simply disgusting. 

Got out shower, awkward as fuck.  She basically said nothing, I was standing there with a towel round me like a right prick.  She was just half-sitting on the bed looking at me saying nothing.  I moved to the bed and initiated some very fucking reluctant kissing.

She quickly started some half-hearted oral and I was struggling to keep it up at this point.  Asked her to just finish me by hand, got dressed and got the fuck out of there.

If there was an opposite of a GFE this was it.  If there was a way to make a punter feel like they were paying for a very basic service this was it.  Will never be back at GEA again.
Good review DrG and some similarities to mine (which was a neutral). Hand towel, light kissing and lack of enthusiasm which I found also.

Will add, she was a good looking lassie all the same so that wasn't a problem. If she's having a bad day or we didn't click is irrespective, my rating will be based on my booking and my money spent.

I'll also try not to have a 3/4year "to do list" and while I mainly punted /will punt afternoons, if I'm that keen on seeing a WG I'll at some point in my life, and have been, more flexible to go outwith that if need be.







Offline DrG

Either a bad day or didnt click personality or looks wise
With the "didn't click" part - there was no chance here, she was immediately disinterested and awkward to the point you'd think you were seeing some trafficked eastern european.  As for looks - I'm not here on a date, if she's going to only give decent service to punters she fancies she's in the wrong job.

Offline the fitter

Booked for half an hour, £100.  Took place just before xmas.

External Link/Members Only

Going to keep this fairly short.  Flat out negative.  Got let into flat, Mia is attractive enough, slimmer than the pics and I thought all good, but zero personality.  Let me in, I followed into the room, she sat on the bed and said nothing, absolutely nothing.  Had to ask if I could use the shower to freshen up and was pointed to a hand towel on the chair.  Went in, a couple of empty bottles of shower gel on the floor of their absolutely minging shower.  Simply disgusting. 

Got out shower, awkward as fuck.  She basically said nothing, I was standing there with a towel round me like a right prick.  She was just half-sitting on the bed looking at me saying nothing.  I moved to the bed and initiated some very fucking reluctant kissing.

She quickly started some half-hearted oral and I was struggling to keep it up at this point.  Asked her to just finish me by hand, got dressed and got the fuck out of there.

If there was an opposite of a GFE this was it.  If there was a way to make a punter feel like they were paying for a very basic service this was it.  Will never be back at GEA again.
I noticed that, the positives she has on here, are all 1 hour bookings, it shouldn't make any difference, but it does make you wonder.

Offline mrwhite

I noticed that, the positives she has on here, are all 1 hour bookings, it shouldn't make any difference, but it does make you wonder.
I've met her for a few 30 minute bookings and reviewed them here somewhere (or at least 1) and never had service as bad as the OP describes, but, I've seen her on and off over a few years (going back to her indy days on AW and brief porn career) so that might be a factor.


Offline Scotpak

Mia was one of the first working girls I've met and seen her again on and off for years

I can never imagine her sitting on the bed not saying word 🤣

That would be a Xmas miracle

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Mia was one of the first working girls I've met and seen her again on and off for years

I can never imagine her sitting on the bed not saying word 🤣

That would be a Xmas miracle
When was the last time you booked her then?

Offline Scotpak


Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
None of your business  :thumbsup:

Oh FFS :dash: ….what a daft response. :wacko: I think you are just on here on the wind up. :thumbsdown:

In case you don’t realise, it’s about sharing info. You don’t have to give an exact date. You were the one who mentioned seeing her in the first place, it’s inevitable someone might ask you about her. :crazy: 
« Last Edit: February 06, 2024, 09:28:28 pm by Courtney »

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,200
  • Likes: 701
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Mia was one of the first working girls I've met and seen her again on and off for years

I can never imagine her sitting on the bed not saying word 🤣

That would be a Xmas miracle
I was just looking for your review of her, can you link to it please? If no review why are you white knighting her on a negative review.

BTW this is my business so a reply is required.

Offline Scotpak

Pretty standard stuff
Where you see clatty his WHITE knights follow

I've last seen her this year I've not reviewed her cause it would be so overwhelming positive like a puff piece and I cba with the drama that follows that.

The fact that you reckon the Xmas miracle is white knighting proves my point.

FYI just cause I use your site I never agreed to writing a story about every single pussy I eat.  I've searched for reviews of gea girls there not always easy to find is probs another reason that I've not bothered

Offline Scotpak

I was just looking for your review of her, can you link to it please? If no review why are you white knighting her on a negative review.

BTW this is my business so a reply is required.

Also didn't realize that you are only qualified to comment on a review if you too have reviewed the said working girl

I'm sure there have been other reviews of Mia that haven't been positive that I've not commented on the fact I've commented on one aspect of this review only I think that's quite rude as fuck calling white knighting

Is this a new thing or is there some other reason you and your 2 "colleagues" have decided to have a go?

Last time you banned me for no reason also funny enough your 2 best friends didn't seem to get banned at that time either

Offline Scotpak

Oh FFS :dash: ….what a daft response. :wacko: I think you are just on here on the wind up. :thumbsdown:

In case you don’t realise, it’s about sharing info. You don’t have to give an exact date. You were the one who mentioned seeing her in the first place, it’s inevitable someone might ask you about her. :crazy:

I admit my comment to your best friend was tongue in cheek cause he picks fights
After I was told to ignore him in future by your slave master he should have also been told not to comment on my posts in future

Other people have reviewed her your best friend included

Your trying to tell me that the punter walked into gea let into the room with the working girl not saying hello or any kinda greeting sat there just looking with a blank look no comms in 30 minutes and that's believable?

Of any British born working girl I would find that pretty mad but I'm just white knighting

The EDL don't like white knights 🤣🤣🤣

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
I've last seen her this year I've not reviewed her cause it would be so overwhelming positive like a puff piece and I cba with the drama that follows that.

…so what if it’s an overwhelming positive, you’ve opened your mouth about her, a review would be helpful. :dash:

You “cba” writing the review but you can certainly be arsed with a lot of passive aggressive back chat.

Also I noticed you registered for this site in October 2015 and never started posting until 2017 which I find odd….previously banned maybe? ….multiple accounts maybe? Hmm. :bomb:

« Last Edit: February 07, 2024, 07:00:38 am by Courtney »

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Your trying to tell me that the punter walked into gea let into the room with the working girl not saying hello or any kinda greeting sat there just looking with a blank look no comms in 30 minutes and that's believable?

….tell this to the OP and ask him the questions. :dash:

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Also didn't realize that you are only qualified to comment on a review if you too have reviewed the said working girl

I'm sure there have been other reviews of Mia that haven't been positive that I've not commented on the fact I've commented on one aspect of this review only I think that's quite rude as fuck calling white knighting

Is this a new thing or is there some other reason you and your 2 "colleagues" have decided to have a go?

Last time you banned me for no reason also funny enough your 2 best friends didn't seem to get banned at that time either

….seriously mate, what childish drivel are you spouting? :bomb: :wacko: :unknown:

BS aside, you seem to be over protective with regards to Mia, it comes across as white knighting to me aswell. You saw her this year, no excuse not to review.

Myself and many others I’m sure would be intrigued to see the overwhelming positive review and the services provided.

Offline Scotpak

It's white knighting for me to say that the op is talking rubbish?
But it's ok for you to say I'm talking rubbish?

I've said it pretty clearly
There is no chance this guys met mia and she's not said a single world during the meet
Not said hello and not ended the meet asking what he's up to for the rest of the day
That is standard hooker 101 chat page 1 of the manual

Like I said whoever the working girl was any punter who said they got through a 30 minute meet with not one word being said is at it

Offline Scotpak

…so what if it’s an overwhelming positive, you’ve opened your mouth about her, a review would be helpful. :dash:

You “cba” writing the review but you can certainly be arsed with a lot of passive aggressive back chat.

Also I noticed you registered for this site in October 2015 and never started posting until 2017 which I find odd….previously banned maybe? ….multiple accounts maybe? Hmm. :bomb:

Back chat?
You seem to have an inflated ego mate
You can find my registration detail :kiss:s on here if you want to have a chat about my conduct I'm open to taking you and clatty for a pint at the same time

I don't answer to you and your defo no authority on punting stick to being the site spell checker there's a good boy

Offline Max121

I’ve bumped into Mia a few times while in the flat - she always says a quick hello or small chat - have been with her also a few times over the years - I find this hard to believe that she just sits there without saying a single word - she is a fully fledged SP and small chat is her thing

Offline Bru1901

I’ve bumped into Mia a few times while in the flat - she always says a quick hello or small chat - have been with her also a few times over the years - I find this hard to believe that she just sits there without saying a single word - she is a fully fledged SP and small chat is her thing

This was my point too.

However all sps can have a bad day here and there. It does seem odd that she was willing to provide all services but be mute.

His review his experience

Ive never had a 1 on 1 with her but have bumped into her in the flat.

Like you say, shes a professional whos been doing this for years so it does seem odd and not reflective of normal behaviour
« Last Edit: February 07, 2024, 12:42:54 pm by Bru1901 »

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,200
  • Likes: 701
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
It's white knighting for me to say that the op is talking rubbish?
But it's ok for you to say I'm talking rubbish?

I've said it pretty clearly
There is no chance this guys met mia and she's not said a single world during the meet
Not said hello and not ended the meet asking what he's up to for the rest of the day
That is standard hooker 101 chat page 1 of the manual

Like I said whoever the working girl was any punter who said they got through a 30 minute meet with not one word being said is at it
How do you know, were you there? Pure WK statement for an escort you haven't reviewed.

I don't recall banning you before but I will check, though it would have been for a valid reason. I have to say you are treading on thin ice with accusations of bias.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2024, 12:54:58 pm by daviemac »

Offline Bru1901

How do you know, were you there? Pure WK statement for an escort you haven't reviewed.

I don't recall banning you before but I will check, though it would have been for a valid reason. I have to say you are treading on thin ice with accusations of bias.

Ita the same as you proving the punter was there and that the reviiew  did happen in the same words used

You cant confirm

He cant confirm.

I think there needs to be a scope for reviews and comments alike to be made without the instant threat of bans

Forums are a medium of conversation and that should be primary as opposed to threats, intimidation or bans.

DrG has accused a wg of sitting there and pouting. This would seem the oposite of what i would say is GEAs top performer whos consistant and been there for years. There would be multiple reports by now of laziness etc if this was the norm

Its not. Shes a seasoned pro who has done seeking, porn and now escorting.
Max121 is shocked at this accusation
I am too
As is one another

While it could have happened as it did - its seeming to be an extremely rare occurrence if the events unfolded as they did
« Last Edit: February 07, 2024, 01:53:18 pm by Bru1901 »

Offline Scotpak

How do you know, were you there? Pure WK statement for an escort you haven't reviewed.

I don't recall banning you before but I will check, though it would have been for a valid reason. I have to say you are treading on thin ice with accusations of bias.

You banned me for bickering
Apparently answering back is bickering
Forget the fact that I stopped answering to clatty and his bum chum who decide to chime in for no reason

But I was the only person banned

I've read plenty of reviews of people questioning services punters have claimed that the working girl clearly doesn't offer

No one got banned there either

All I'm saying is if I met a working girl and she didn't say 1 word that would be pretty rapey and I don't think I could go through with it

Different strokes for different folks though

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,200
  • Likes: 701
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
You banned me for bickering
Apparently answering back is bickering
Forget the fact that I stopped answering to clatty and his bum chum who decide to chime in for no reason

But I was the only person banned

I've read plenty of reviews of people questioning services punters have claimed that the working girl clearly doesn't offer

No one got banned there either

All I'm saying is if I met a working girl and she didn't say 1 word that would be pretty rapey and I don't think I could go through with it

Different strokes for different folks though
I respond to things that are reported however you do seem to have issues with certain members as shown in this reply along with others you have made and if you come across as a white knight then perhaps have a look at how you post in future.

If you think I am in any way bias then report it. 

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,200
  • Likes: 701
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Ita the same as you proving the punter was there and that the reviiew  did happen in the same words used

You cant confirm

He cant confirm.

I think there needs to be a scope for reviews and comments alike to be made without the instant threat of bans

Forums are a medium of conversation and that should be primary as opposed to threats, intimidation or bans.

DrG has accused a wg of sitting there and pouting. This would seem the oposite of what i would say is GEAs top performer whos consistant and been there for years. There would be multiple reports by now of laziness etc if this was the norm

Its not. Shes a seasoned pro who has done seeking, porn and now escorting.
Max121 is shocked at this accusation
I am too
As is one another

While it could have happened as it did - its seeming to be an extremely rare occurrence if the events unfolded as they did
The issue with Scotpak, along with his general attitude to others, is the fact he claims to have seen her but hasn't reviewed and the response from me to that is exactly the same as anyone else would get. The "she was/wasn't like that when I saw her" comments from people who haven't reviewed are something that a lot of members hate.

As with any review members are expected to take from them the information they find useful and act accordingly, if they don't believe it then ignore it or discount it. Nobody can claim something didn't happen in a review just because it didn't happen to them nor can they claim there would have been multiple reports of laziness as this might be a one off or the first time it's happened.

BTW the threat of a ban was for this - "Is this a new thing or is there some other reason you and your 2 "colleagues" have decided to have a go?

Last time you banned me for no reason also funny enough your 2 best friends didn't seem to get banned at that time either" - not anything else on this thread.

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
It's white knighting for me to say that the op is talking rubbish?
But it's ok for you to say I'm talking rubbish?

…yes you are going on a lot of rubbish, off at a tangent and making yourself out to be an even bigger whining tit. :wacko:

Why don’t you channel all that energy in to a review of Mia, so we can all read the “overwhelmingly positive” experience.

Offline Scotpak

…yes you are going on a lot of rubbish, off at a tangent and making yourself out to be an even bigger whining tit. :wacko:

Why don’t you channel all that energy in to a review of Mia, so we can all read the “overwhelmingly positive” experience.

You've already accused me of white knighting

Then you want me to post a positive review

Surely even someone as thick as you understands why that's not happening?

I mean we all appreciate the effort you take in correcting spelling and going by the fact you review every working girl you see managing a punt a year :dancegirl:

Daviemac has a point in future I'll make a point of avoiding any post that Courtney and chums post on.

Certainly isn't worth my time or energy

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Surely even someone as thick as you understands why that's not happening?

…why is it not happening? No, I still don’t get it. You mentioned her and your glowing experience with her. You’ve written a positive review before in a non-fluffy, informative way before so you’re more than capable. :unknown:


Offline Scotpak

…why is it not happening? No, I still don’t get it. You mentioned her and your glowing experience with her. You’ve written a positive review before in a non-fluffy, informative way before so you’re more than capable. :unknown:

Clearly you are as thick as you come across.

If I had put a positive review up without commenting on this non prompted I would have been accused of white Knighting and retaliating against the recent negative.

It's happened before I'm sure I've seen people get banned for it and it's usually instigated by you funnily enough.  Bit of a double standard asking me to put a positive up if you are capable of thinking about it.

Another reason if you need one you don't reward morons with what they want it breeds negative behavior which is why I guess you are the way you are.

Not sure what your issue is however all you achieve is being a wee prick.  You see people being less active when your about bumping your gums.


Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Clearly you are as thick as you come across.

If I had put a positive review up without commenting on this non prompted I would have been accused of white Knighting and retaliating against the recent negative.

It's happened before I'm sure I've seen people get banned for it and it's usually instigated by you funnily enough.  Bit of a double standard asking me to put a positive up if you are capable of thinking about it.

Another reason if you need one you don't reward morons with what they want it breeds negative behavior which is why I guess you are the way you are.

Not sure what your issue is however all you achieve is being a wee prick.  You see people being less active when your about bumping your gums.

…really?! It’s about sharing YOUR experience, if some see it as WK ..so be it, it’s your review, I’m sure you can handle it.

Show me where and what I’ve instigated? No idea what you are on about. :unknown:

You seem very active with me when I’m around that’s for sure, plenty activity on my recent review, again you’re talking rubbish about people being less active.

All I can see is that you are effectively calling the OP a liar. His other reviews seem credible to me, so I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt.  :hi:







Offline cubaguy

Scotpak, didn’t you know? Everyone around here tells the truth don’t they?  :hi: There’s two way of looking at this review, the OP must be some mutant that the WG just took one look at him and blanked him for the rest of the session or he’s got nose size of Pinocchio , you decide which it is  :yahoo:

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,204
  • Likes: 538
  •  
  • Reviews: 501
Clearly you are as thick as you come across.

If I had put a positive review up without commenting on this non prompted I would have been accused of white Knighting and retaliating against the recent negative.

It's happened before I'm sure I've seen people get banned for it and it's usually instigated by you funnily enough.  Bit of a double standard asking me to put a positive up if you are capable of thinking about it.

Another reason if you need one you don't reward morons with what they want it breeds negative behavior which is why I guess you are the way you are.

Not sure what your issue is however all you achieve is being a wee prick.  You see people being less active when your about bumping your gums.

Can I suggest you add your review/ report of your own experience.
I’d also suggest this thread calms down as it’s no business of any other members to call out others with reviews/ lack of / or any of that shit.
If there’s a problem then hit the report button. Simple as.
Let’s keep it friendly.
If there’s an issue with any response to your/any review, hit report and we will look into it.
As Davie has mentioned, without a review, a members credibility can be questioned when commenting about a wg claimed to have met, so back yourself up with a review.

Let’s leave it there having a pop at each other, that’s the only thing that will get members banned, not reviews however fluffy  :drinks:


Offline Bru1901

The issue with Scotpak, along with his general attitude to others, is the fact he claims to have seen her but hasn't reviewed and the response from me to that is exactly the same as anyone else would get. The "she was/wasn't like that when I saw her" comments from people who haven't reviewed are something that a lot of members hate.

As with any review members are expected to take from them the information they find useful and act accordingly, if they don't believe it then ignore it or discount it. Nobody can claim something didn't happen in a review just because it didn't happen to them nor can they claim there would have been multiple reports of laziness as this might be a one off or the first time it's happened.


BTW the threat of a ban was for this - "Is this a new thing or is there some other reason you and your 2 "colleagues" have decided to have a go?

Last time you banned me for no reason also funny enough your 2 best friends didn't seem to get banned at that time either" - not anything else on this thread.

I havent taken much notice of scotpaks reviews tbh, or his comments. I guess we see different posts

I do agree tbere should be some communication. If we use solely this thread there is a few surprised members in regards to Mias actions

Im not disregarding they occurred but it seems im surprised she would act this way as have atleast 2 others. Matrix and scotpak

I dont see any issues with that or the shock

Mia may have had a bad day, disliked the punter, may have been tired having been fucked by x y z that day

No one knows

As gor the banning, i believe it was yourself in particular who gave another forum mod clattypants a telling off a few mo ths back but i do believe the issue lies in the moderation of the scotland sections


Offline Bru1901

Can I suggest you add your review/ report of your own experience.
I’d also suggest this thread calms down as it’s no business of any other members to call out others with reviews/ lack of / or any of that shit.
If there’s a problem then hit the report button. Simple as.
Let’s keep it friendly.
If there’s an issue with any response to your/any review, hit report and we will look into it.
As Davie has mentioned, without a review, a members credibility can be questioned when commenting about a wg claimed to have met, so back yourself up with a review.

Let’s leave it there having a pop at each other, that’s the only thing that will get members banned, not reviews however fluffy  :drinks:

I agree that members [including me] have maybe not reviewed as often as they should

I do think there is too much of the - you havent reviewed since X day of joining the site etc

In my view, you cant win by asking Scotpak to review MIA after reading this - if he reviews then he will be seen as a white knight, if he hasnt seen her recently then may not remember all the details

I do however believe that anyone who spends time with the person who has been reviewed would be a better judge of character than someone who hasnt and is looking at the review as someone who hasnt

I also think part of the problem is that there should be peaceful discussion. If someone doesnt agree they should be free to say why - asking for a review is absolutely pointless as its being forced rather than shared by themselves.

Part of the reason for that is the shitstorn that follows. Take this tbread. You have courtney who in short is nothing but a shit stirrer and scotpak is going to get in a he says she says argument which leads to nowhere. Im not sure if its him.but theres members who search posts for key words or spelling mistakes and look for previous posters - who cares if someone is banned and back. If they abide by the rules then they are no less member than anyone who is a forst time.member

I think one of the 'mates' he is referring to is another forum mod clattypants who in my eyes is not capable of being a forum mod as he cant call another member a cunt or whatever he did and got away with a slap. Hes another person who cant be a forum mod as hes not neutral and cant be. He has his favourites and there needs to be a more neutral environment. Ive had several run ins with him.
I recall it was daviemac who told him to calm down but clattypats mod rights should have been removed the moment he had a tantrum against another member and swore at him.

A slap on the wrist shows favouritism when some mebers have been banned for less severe issues.

The scottish section has too many reviews like this one where it goes off topic

Ive reviewed over 50 girls in all my time here and i know the shitstorm that follows if you review some girls. It should be more collective discussion and less of the shitstorm.

Everyone starts at zero posts and zero reviews and the more comfortable a poster gets the more he will review. There is always leechers and always people who review more than others

There needs more ambience for the reviews count to increase.

I also suggest that some threads be able to be locked if they go off tangent.

There also needs to be less confrontation and shitstorm posts by members who want to do nothing but cause chaos to get someone banned

Offline Bru1901

Clearly you are as thick as you come across.

If I had put a positive review up without commenting on this non prompted I would have been accused of white Knighting and retaliating against the recent negative.

It's happened before I'm sure I've seen people get banned for it and it's usually instigated by you funnily enough.  Bit of a double standard asking me to put a positive up if you are capable of thinking about it.

Another reason if you need one you don't reward morons with what they want it breeds negative behavior which is why I guess you are the way you are.

Not sure what your issue is however all you achieve is being a wee prick.  You see people being less active when your about bumping your gums.

You do realise your talking to a brick wall. You got provoked and then fell for it

Pointless communicating and provoking shit as it goes nowhere and in the end you will get banned for fuck all.

Might as well calm and relax, if others hate let them hate

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
courtney who in short is nothing but a shit stirrer

…excuse me Benson, as you yourself, as a multiple previously banned member you are clearly holding a grudge because I caught you out years ago when I flagged you up as a continuing returner. If anyone is shit stirring here it’s yourself mate, chipping in with long posts and explanations on how you think the forum should be run. :bomb:

I’ve actually left you in peace recently, I suggest you stop mentioning my name in your silly long posts please. :hi:

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,200
  • Likes: 701
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
You do realise your talking to a brick wall. You got provoked and then fell for it
You do realise ILO told everyone to leave it there and that included you yet you make 3 more posts.  :wacko:

As gor the banning, i believe it was yourself in particular who gave another forum mod clattypants a telling off a few mo ths back but i do believe the issue lies in the moderation of the scotland sections

Clattypats, who is not a mod BTW, had a 14 day ban last November so when you come back be very careful what accusations you make.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2024, 08:33:59 am by daviemac »