Author Topic: Silvermonica - Greenwich - 2023 - High neutral / Low positive  (Read 7721 times)


27 review(s) for Whoopsie_ohno (26 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by RedKettle]

Offline Carloco


Didn't log on here for a few weeks but was aware of the IG posts.

She name checked Pepsi and bluegene in particular. Pepsi over the way he writes blah blah and for bluegene she posed assault accusations his way via shared intel from her side.

She addressed and refuted some other comments on this thread.
She laughed at my speculation on her sexuality and the general idea she's not head in the game anymore.
She intimated that OP was a bit of a wet blanket and has come to the forum to act as if he was short-changed but the reality was he couldn't handle her.

Also gave an eye to past reviews perhaps embellishing a few things. However did confirm anal is off cards and stated it is for health reasons.

Thought I'd just say what's what cos not sure why so many comments yet pps seemingly reluctant to just say what was up.
Also covering myself cos some who read this thread might be wondering who is the one she expressed the assault accusation about. To reiterate, it was bluegene.

Thanks for this. I have not read the IG posts and not planning tbh, so I can only comment on your summary. I am of course only speaking for myself.

IMHO, maybe or maybe not I am a 'wet blanket' who cannot handle women like Monica. Who knows? The only thing I know is that I paid 90 minutes to be with a sex worker and, despite many positives (as stated in my review), I was not totally satisfied in the end. It is a subjective opinion and we can speculate endlessly on why this happened. At the end of the day, the earth will continue going around the sun, I will visit other SW and I'm sure she will have other clients. That's all I can say from my perspective.


Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,339
  • Likes: 546
  •  
  • Reviews: 503
I personally wouldnt take anything serious I’d read of a WG’s insta / twitter / media pages.
Generally speaking it’s usually a kick back from a review they didn’t like, for short changing a punter and then kicking off because it’s on here for all to read. If I had a penny for every time I’d almost be able to afford her  :D

If she had any serious concerns about members here surely she would have contacted the site

« Last Edit: March 06, 2024, 03:55:28 pm by Iloveoral »

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
OP - to be clear, neither you nor I were name checked. But there were obvious references. In fact there were some screen shots within her 'laughing' of things we said. But name/handle omitted. Fair play to her TBH
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline MCullen71

If she had any serious concerns about members here surely she would have contacted the site

That's what she did when she had concerns in the past, just not this site

Offline Carloco

OP - to be clear, neither you nor I were name checked. But there were obvious references. In fact there were some screen shots within her 'laughing' of things we said. But name/handle omitted. Fair play to her TBH

 :hi:

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,339
  • Likes: 546
  •  
  • Reviews: 503
That's what she did when she had concerns in the past, just not this site
Obviously we can’t do much if she’s complained elsewhere, but we do have an advertised email address for anyone with concerns about members.