British-Babe.x - Norwich - DON'T DO IT!

[secret.hombre]

[December 2023]
I found myself bored and up for a bit of fun very late one night, so I sent out a few texts and, alas, this lady was the only reply. The incall location was a small suburban house on an estate; overlooked by neighbours during daylight hours, but it was dark so...

I knocked, and after about 2 mins of clattering and bumping coming from inside, the door was answered. She saw I was looking a bit confused, so she explained that she had been tidying up or something(?). I entered, the house was v dirty, we went through the dimly lit hall to a room with the lights on.

This was the first time I got a proper look at this lady. I'll spare you the details, because I don't think there's much to be gained from being unnecessarily rude, but she was not in a good way. Arms covered in the marks of a drug addict. Very bad skin. And a very unhealthy overall look.

I was offered a glass of water, which I said yes to, but whilst she was out in the kitchen getting it, I came to my senses and decided it was time to leave. So I went through to tell her of this, we said a quick and actually pretty friendly good-bye. Then I was out of the door quick, without a backward glance.

Despite a very unhealthy lifestyle and questionable decision making, British-Babe.x was pleasant and polite during our brief meeting. I didn't feel in any sort of danger, but I couldn't get out of the door quick enough..

Is it the lady in the photos? I don't know.

I hope others learn from my mistake, it is not a good idea to contact this lady.

LINK: External Link/Members Only

[Tomcat007]

Thanks for the heads up I was tempted to try I will avoid.

[Condominium]

The needle marks would put most of us off, though on her recently filmed movies her body still looks pretty decent. Given she agreed to see you in the early hours, was there when you arrived and pleasant throughout, including when you walked, I hope you left her a few quid for her trouble? 

[PilotMan]

The needle marks would put most of us off, though on her recently filmed movies her body still looks pretty decent. Given she agreed to see you in the early hours, was there when you arrived and pleasant throughout, including when you walked, I hope you left her a few quid for her trouble?

You mean - I hope she left you a few quid for your trouble?

She lured him in with false advertising, he checked the goods and they weren't up to standard. He's the one who has gone to the trouble of travelling there and had his time wasted.

[Condominium]

You mean - I hope she left you a few quid for your trouble?

She lured him in with false advertising, he checked the goods and they weren't up to standard. He's the one who has gone to the trouble of travelling there and had his time wasted.

As I’ve said before on here, the patriarchy is alive and well 

Sending random texts to multiple women in the early hours is ‘being lured in’. The glass of water was probably also part of her cunning plan.

[Foxtail17]

Thanks for the review.

I was considering her for a visit to Norwich next week but her AW FB doesn’t look good/genuine and your report puts her in the bin.

[PilotMan]

As I’ve said before on here, the patriarchy is alive and well 

Can you clarify what you mean by that statement please and who are you referring to when you say "patriarchy"?

And add further context to "As I've said before on here".

[Condominium]

Patriarchy: A system of society in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it (general Google search)

Another def would be a society in which the male view prevails (Wade vs Roe etc) and the interests of men are put before those of women.

At the geo political level there are horrendous examples like Iran and Afghanistan. At the local level (say on here when it appears), it’s a more casual unthinking thing.

The lady in question here responded to a late night request, behaved decently and was even pleasant when he walked. So she may have had poor skin and possibly needle marks. That doesn’t preclude her from being treated decently like anyone else (as many surveys will attest, we’ve all slept with drug users knowingly or otherwise if we’re regular punters).

The OP acknowledged her calm response to his change of mind, and I don’t think it would be OTT to pay her a token sum for her time and potential loss of earnings from another booking.

[Jameson20]

Cheers for reviewing. She ghosted me last year and did me a favour by the sound of it. Well done for walking.

[The_Don]

Punting some times is about taking a chance.

If you don't like what you see, hear or feel. Walk away without handing over any money 

[PilotMan]

Patriarchy: A system of society in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it (general Google search)

Another def would be a society in which the male view prevails (Wade vs Roe etc) and the interests of men are put before those of women.

At the geo political level there are horrendous examples like Iran and Afghanistan. At the local level (say on here when it appears), it’s a more casual unthinking thing.

The lady in question here responded to a late night request, behaved decently and was even pleasant when he walked. So she may have had poor skin and possibly needle marks. That doesn’t preclude her from being treated decently like anyone else (as many surveys will attest, we’ve all slept with drug users knowingly or otherwise if we’re regular punters).

The OP acknowledged her calm response to his change of mind, and I don’t think it would be OTT to pay her a token sum for her time and potential loss of earnings from another booking.

My question was "who are you referring to when you say "patriarchy"? - I don't need an explanation of the meaning, and I don't need you to rehash the review. Your answer is condescending and patronising, and it avoids my question.

The review and my comments have nothing to do with Patriarchy or gender bias - that's just how you want to interpret it, given your previous rantings inferring that members on here are misogynists. You're going back down that rabbit hole (you've been there before) and inferring that members on here somehow treat women in a degrading manner.

ANYONE, male or female, has the right to refuse a service, especially if that service is being advertised as something it is not.

So get off your pretentious, patronising high horse and get back in your little box.

[Condominium]

So get off your pretentious, patronising high horse and get back in your little box.

Tragic stuff.

Perhaps you should arrange for me to be banned for having the temerity to suggest the OP show a bit of kindness (but then she ‘lured him in’, didn’t she?’)

[Mr Garmin]

The OP acknowledged her calm response to his change of mind, and I don’t think it would be OTT to pay her a token sum for her time and potential loss of earnings from another booking.

I have to say that this has never occurred to me before.  The next time I travel to view a car that turns out to be a pile of shite and not as described I'm going to remember to give the seller a little tip to make up for wasting his time.

[Jameson20]

Tragic stuff.

Perhaps you should arrange for me to be banned for having the temerity to suggest the OP show a bit of kindness (but then she ‘lured him in’, didn’t she?’)

I'm interested to know in what way you think the OP was unkind to the SP when his account of their interaction seems completely reasonable? And why do you believe he should have offered a token sum before deciding to walk?

This SP ghosted me when I had a meeting arranged with her. She wasted my time and the cost of travelling to her and I didn't even receive an apology text, let alone a token sum of money for my trouble.

Not trying to start an argument, I'm just trying to understand how you've interpreted the review.

[PilotMan]

I'm interested to know in what way you think the OP was unkind to the SP when his account of their interaction seems completely reasonable? And why do you believe he should have offered a token sum before deciding to walk?

This SP ghosted me when I had a meeting arranged with her. She wasted my time and the cost of travelling to her and I didn't even receive an apology text, let alone a token sum of money for my trouble.

Not trying to start an argument, I'm just trying to understand how you've interpreted the review.

At the risk of repeating what we already know - here's how the OP handled the situation;

"I don't think there's much to be gained from being unnecessarily rude, but she was not in a good way. Arms covered in the marks of a drug addict. Very bad skin. And a very unhealthy overall look.

I was offered a glass of water, which I said yes to, but whilst she was out in the kitchen getting it, I came to my senses and decided it was time to leave. So I went through to tell her of this, we said a quick and actually pretty friendly good-bye. Then I was out of the door quick, without a backward glance."

He describes his demeanour and explained politely that he was leaving. How in any way shape or form could anyone interpret that as Patriarchal?

Imagine seeing a used car up for sale, you take the trouble to travel to view it, only to find when you get there find that the pictures are misleading and it's not what was advertised. Who on earth would think it's only fair to offer the seller "a few quid for their trouble"?

Condominium - that's who.

[PilotMan]

Tragic stuff.

Perhaps you should arrange for me to be banned for having the temerity to suggest the OP show a bit of kindness (but then she ‘lured him in’, didn’t she?’)

I haven't reported your post or you, nor do I intend to. I'm enjoying watching you make a twat of yourself, carrying on as the champion of all wrongdoing to women on here, whilst educating us patriarchal, misogynistic men.

[Jameson20]

At the risk of repeating what we already know - here's how the OP handled the situation;

"I don't think there's much to be gained from being unnecessarily rude, but she was not in a good way. Arms covered in the marks of a drug addict. Very bad skin. And a very unhealthy overall look.

I was offered a glass of water, which I said yes to, but whilst she was out in the kitchen getting it, I came to my senses and decided it was time to leave. So I went through to tell her of this, we said a quick and actually pretty friendly good-bye. Then I was out of the door quick, without a backward glance."

He describes his demeanour and explained politely that he was leaving. How in any way shape or form could anyone interpret that as Patriarchal?

Imagine seeing a used car up for sale, you take the trouble to travel to view it, only to find when you get there find that the pictures are misleading and it's not what was advertised. Who on earth would think it's only fair to offer the seller "a few quid for their trouble"?

Condominium - that's who.

Completely agree. I don't see any unkindness, just a factual review of a WG who is quite possibly leading a chaotic lifestyle. Politely declining and walking away seems a sensible option, and it hardly seems necessary to compensate her for that when she's willing to mess punters around.

[Condominium]

Just for clarity in case the facts get lost..

I’m not accusing the OP of being patriarchal. I merely suggested he leave her a token sum for cancelling during the booking. It’s interesting to see the complete lack of any empathy towards her in the general responses but that’s your problem, not mine.

The patriarchal post was Pilotman’s, suggesting she compensate him and that she’d lured him in. She did no such thing unless advertising her wares was the crime.

Holding a minority view holds no terrors for me and I’ll continue to promote what I see as best practice in WG relations. Just try to be kind (lol)

[Alwayswhoreney]

Reviewer WAS kind and respectful. He didn’t sneak out whilst she was in the kitchen, he didn’t play the ‘I’ve left my wallet in the car’ trick; he had the RESPECT and DECENCY , to tell the young lady politely and honestly that he was not going to complete the transaction, and did so in a gentle manner, that she seems to have appreciated.

He could have left some pity cash, but I doubt she’s in the habit of giving freebies if her personal addictions create erratic or unreliable appointment keeping, so it seems an egalitarian balance has been achieved.

[PilotMan]

The patriarchal post was Pilotman’s, suggesting she compensate him and that she’d lured him in.

In what way do you comprehend that my post was patriarchal? Utter nonsense, you've taken my comments that are purely about a transaction, and attempted to make it in to something it isn't.

You have have a constant theme on UKP, that is to chastise as many members as possible and shoehorn their actions, making them a villain with whom you can wage your Matriarchal Crusade against.

It's getting boring luv.

[Jameson20]

I hadn't noticed some (relatively) new feedback on her AW profile from another punter who has obviously been messed around. Seems she's got form. Definitely one to blacklist.

[Tomcat007]

secret.hombre

Thanks for your review.
As for the suggestion of giving her money for you to turn up...
Can you imagine how much a shop would make every time you picked up something to look at...ffs grow up..

Thanks OP

[Analist]

I've reviewed her under her previous name. Good service but unreliable and no needle marks. Then we arranged a meet where she asked to be paid in advance and it never happened. I suspected she was into drugs and it's probably gotten worse now.

[PilotMan]

I've reviewed her under her previous name. Good service but unreliable and no needle marks. Then we arranged a meet where she asked to be paid in advance and it never happened. I suspected she was into drugs and it's probably gotten worse now.

Can you add a link to that review please 

I'll index them both together.