London / Adultwork: Pretty Amira 2/10/2014, Incall Aldgate East, E1

[laidbackasiandude]

Service Provider's Website Link

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Date of Event and location

Thursday 2/10/14. A well known hotel close to Aldgate East Tube station, the lifts are located toward the far right as
you pass the reception on your left hand side. Very discreet in the sense that there were guests coming and going
and no one paid any attention to the reviewer casually strolling to the lift. Standard double bedroom with ensuite
bathroom, though this one only had a shower cubicle, lavatory and sink.

Both the room and bathroom/shower cubicle were very clean and tidy, shower functioned perfectly
(stainless steel lever type handle) for both hot and cold water. There were clean and dry towels,
though range of shower gel was minimal.

Duration of session and fee paid

One hour  £160-00

Planning stage communications

She's been listed on AW for over a year, and attempted to meet with Amira in the past but due to unforeseen work
commitments and also Amira's rather restricted availability, previous booking attempts fell through. However, email
correspondence with Amira was efficient and courteous on her part. Noticed her profile re-appeared again after being
inactive for about a month and promptly fired off email along with the booking request, which were both acknowledged
by her in a timely manner.

Communication on day of event  02/10/2014

Excellent and very swift, called on the morning to speak with her to confirm my intent to meet with her later on, within
five minutes received an sms from Amira providing hotel name and post code. Nearer the time of the booking, texted her
for the room number when I was in the vicinity of the area. She promptly responded.

Amira does display her phone number on her profile when she's available for bookings, and from my experience
she also emails her number with respect to prospective booking enquiries requesting you to call her on the
day.

Note for those with a phobia of meeting WG's in hotels. Just relax, go for a little stroll away from the hotel
then once you get the room number walk casually toward the entrance bypassing the bods on reception.
DO NOT hang around in the lobby nervously glancing at your watch and phone awaiting either a call
or sms for the room number.

Physical Appearance of Amira

Amira is indeed pretty and an attractive young WG, age wise 22-23 and standing at 1.55metres tall without heels.
She has long black hair with brown tints, roundish shaped brown eyes, and chest wise she's certainly well endowed
and 34D is about right. Her breasts are natural based upon my intensive fondling during the session, very peachy
derriere and smooth shapely legs. Size wise she's about 8ish, hence petite. Her profile pictures or rather lack of
them doesn't give any realistic indication of who you will meet and to be honest I am not even sure those pictures
are actually her (Tineye and GRIS could not detect anything when I checked).

She wore a simple baby doll outfit (black) and matching high heels, overall very pleasing to the reviewer's eyes,
immaculately presented, freshly showered and subtle hint of perfume fragrance too.

Amira is British born of Indian (S.Asian) heritage, her spoken English is excellent. My understanding is that
she's at University and whoring (part-time) as a way to finance her studies. Her demeanour was polite and
courteous when I met her in person for the first time. However she is somewhat passive and reserved,
and quite possibly a tad nervous (on four occasions she asked me the same question toward the end
of the booking).

In order to provide the forum with a little more detail as to whom she resembles due to the paucity of pictures
on her profile, there is a striking similarity between Amira and the British Pakistani Porn (Ex porn) actress
"Zarina Masood" especially the eyes. Amira is somewhat darker in complexion and skin tone compared to
"Zarina Masood", and I estimate as a % the resemblance is about 60%.

Services Rendered During the Session

After dispensing with the usual starting formalities and shower to freshen up, started initially to kiss with some
exchange of tongue. It was not full on snogging, more "LFK" (light French kissing) but wanted to prolong the
kissing whilst with one hand fondling her right breast and gradually working my right hand down toward her
panties. I've experienced non-existent kissing when profiles suggest "FK/DFK", with Amira it was overall
reasonable FK or an attempt to FK without flinching. Again there was that essence of reserve and passivity on
her part.

Gradually peeled off her clothes to reveal a lovely petite shaped body, and the reviewer duly obliged in kissing and
licking every inch working down south to engage in cunnilingus. Her personal hygiene was impeccable and spent
a while licking her out. It took a while for her to warm up and show some response, but at least none of the OTT
ridiculous "oh darling you're so good/you're the best" fake moans one encounters from time to time.

Amira's own fellatio skills are somewhat different to what I've experienced before, there's minimal eye contact
and initially just slurping and licking the head (just to clarify she performed OWO). I had to gently coax or
encourage her to take the full length or go deeper than before, which eventually she duly obliged. At times
it was a little toothy, but improved as the session progressed. Again, there was that palpable sense of
reserved passivity on her part, but no where near as bad as sticking one's penis into the mouth of a rubber
blow up doll.

For a change from the norm, the reviewer decided to take up the offer of protected vaginal penetration, in three
different positions (two variations of missionary) and the classic doggie style. This was good, very good and
gave her a decent pounding. She didn't clamp her legs together as some WG's do to prevent full penetration.

The inevitable finale, with Amira getting off the bed and seated herself on the bedroom couch whilst sucking me
off and gently fondling my gonads. I climaxed resulting in a part messy facial (chin/right cheek) and a fair
amount covering her body too hence COF/COB combination. She took the facial element well without flinching
or turning head away, so credit where credit's due for Amira.

Time was running out and during hour bookings very rate for me to ejaculate twice, so the remainder of the
time just gradually elapsed with me lying on the bed, in deep contemplation as to how to sum up my
encounter with Amira. A decent session, have had better and certainly had some absolutely appalling
sessions too.

Final Analysis

Light to intermediate French Kissing.
Unusual OWO to begin with which improved as the session progressed.
Prolonged session of reverse oral and body kissing, impeccable personal hygiene
on part of Amira.
Protected penetration in three positions which was good.
Intense climax COF/COB.

Communications were excellent leading up to the session and on the day on part of Amira,
and overall pleasant and courteous disposition throughout the session.

Whilst I've marked the review as Positive, it's actually a borderline neutral-positive
review, but going for positive due to Amira delivering what was stated on her profile
enjoys list, protected penetration and the COF/COB climax tilting toward the positive
assessment.


Potential Drawbacks

Very limited availability and very much a P/T WG due to her University commitments.
She is somewhat reserved and passive, a tad too passive at times during the session.


CAVEAT EMPTOR  -  NEGATIVE REVIEW FOR PRETTY AMIRA

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=32548.msg452339;topicseen#msg452339

The negative review linked above makes for both alarming and depressing reading for any punter/client.
The review is an honest account reflecting a true and fair view of how unfortunately events
transpired for that reviewer.

Likewise my own review, is also an honest account reflecting a true and fair view of how the session transpired
for me earlier today when I met with Amira.

It's not implausible for a WG to be reviewed positively by one punter, and another punter visiting experiences
something opposite to that of the satisfied punter/client. Conversely, it's not implausible for a WG to be reviewed
negatively and subsequent to that another punter/client experiencing something opposite to the dissatisfied punter/
client.

My own hypothesis (as I don't have any real proof, just my intuition) is that Amira is definitely reserved and passive
with respect to her WG identity, she has very narrow and defined parameters which provides for her a "comfort zone".
Any deviation from this, she reacts badly, very badly. Note I am not defending Amira with respect to her behaviour
as mentioned in the negative review.

I was aware of the negative review before meeting Amira, however I decided to go ahead and meet with her
based upon the  fact that on PNET, there are three positive reviews for Amira, of which two of them have been
submitting numerous Field Reports since 2003.

[smiths]

Service Provider's Website Link

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Date of Event and location

Thursday 2/10/14. A well known hotel close to Aldgate East Tube station, the lifts are located toward the far right as
you pass the reception on your left hand side. Very discreet in the sense that there were guests coming and going
and no one paid any attention to the reviewer casually strolling to the lift. Standard double bedroom with ensuite
bathroom, though this one only had a shower cubicle, lavatory and sink.

Both the room and bathroom/shower cubicle were very clean and tidy, shower functioned perfectly
(stainless steel lever type handle) for both hot and cold water. There were clean and dry towels,
though range of shower gel was minimal.

Duration of session and fee paid

One hour  £160-00

Planning stage communications

She's been listed on AW for over a year, and attempted to meet with Amira in the past but due to unforeseen work
commitments and also Amira's rather restricted availability, previous booking attempts fell through. However, email
correspondence with Amira was efficient and courteous on her part. Noticed her profile re-appeared again after being
inactive for about a month and promptly fired off email along with the booking request, which were both acknowledged
by her in a timely manner.

Communication on day of event  02/10/2014

Excellent and very swift, called on the morning to speak with her to confirm my intent to meet with her later on, within
five minutes received an sms from Amira providing hotel name and post code. Nearer the time of the booking, texted her
for the room number when I was in the vicinity of the area. She promptly responded.

Amira does display her phone number on her profile when she's available for bookings, and from my experience
she also emails her number with respect to prospective booking enquiries requesting you to call her on the
day.

Note for those with a phobia of meeting WG's in hotels. Just relax, go for a little stroll away from the hotel
then once you get the room number walk casually toward the entrance bypassing the bods on reception.
DO NOT hang around in the lobby nervously glancing at your watch and phone awaiting either a call
or sms for the room number.

Physical Appearance of Amira

Amira is indeed pretty and an attractive young WG, age wise 22-23 and standing at 1.55metres tall without heels.
She has long black hair with brown tints, roundish shaped brown eyes, and chest wise she's certainly well endowed
and 34D is about right. Her breasts are natural based upon my intensive fondling during the session, very peachy
derriere and smooth shapely legs. Size wise she's about 8ish, hence petite. Her profile pictures or rather lack of
them doesn't give any realistic indication of who you will meet and to be honest I am not even sure those pictures
are actually her (Tineye and GRIS could not detect anything when I checked).

She wore a simple baby doll outfit (black) and matching high heels, overall very pleasing to the reviewer's eyes,
immaculately presented, freshly showered and subtle hint of perfume fragrance too.

Amira is British born of Indian (S.Asian) heritage, her spoken English is excellent. My understanding is that
she's at University and whoring (part-time) as a way to finance her studies. Her demeanour was polite and
courteous when I met her in person for the first time. However she is somewhat passive and reserved,
and quite possibly a tad nervous (on four occasions she asked me the same question toward the end
of the booking).

In order to provide the forum with a little more detail as to whom she resembles due to the paucity of pictures
on her profile, there is a striking similarity between Amira and the British Pakistani Porn (Ex porn) actress
"Zarina Masood" especially the eyes. Amira is somewhat darker in complexion and skin tone compared to
"Zarina Masood", and I estimate as a % the resemblance is about 60%.

Services Rendered During the Session

After dispensing with the usual starting formalities and shower to freshen up, started initially to kiss with some
exchange of tongue. It was not full on snogging, more "LFK" (light French kissing) but wanted to prolong the
kissing whilst with one hand fondling her right breast and gradually working my right hand down toward her
panties. I've experienced non-existent kissing when profiles suggest "FK/DFK", with Amira it was overall
reasonable FK or an attempt to FK without flinching. Again there was that essence of reserve and passivity on
her part.

Gradually peeled off her clothes to reveal a lovely petite shaped body, and the reviewer duly obliged in kissing and
licking every inch working down south to engage in cunnilingus. Her personal hygiene was impeccable and spent
a while licking her out. It took a while for her to warm up and show some response, but at least none of the OTT
ridiculous "oh darling you're so good/you're the best" fake moans one encounters from time to time.

Amira's own fellatio skills are somewhat different to what I've experienced before, there's minimal eye contact
and initially just slurping and licking the head (just to clarify she performed OWO). I had to gently coax or
encourage her to take the full length or go deeper than before, which eventually she duly obliged. At times
it was a little toothy, but improved as the session progressed. Again, there was that palpable sense of
reserved passivity on her part, but no where near as bad as sticking one's penis into the mouth of a rubber
blow up doll.

For a change from the norm, the reviewer decided to take up the offer of protected vaginal penetration, in three
different positions (two variations of missionary) and the classic doggie style. This was good, very good and
gave her a decent pounding. She didn't clamp her legs together as some WG's do to prevent full penetration.

The inevitable finale, with Amira getting off the bed and seated herself on the bedroom couch whilst sucking me
off and gently fondling my gonads. I climaxed resulting in a part messy facial (chin/right cheek) and a fair
amount covering her body too hence COF/COB combination. She took the facial element well without flinching
or turning head away, so credit where credit's due for Amira.

Time was running out and during hour bookings very rate for me to ejaculate twice, so the remainder of the
time just gradually elapsed with me lying on the bed, in deep contemplation as to how to sum up my
encounter with Amira. A decent session, have had better and certainly had some absolutely appalling
sessions too.

Final Analysis

Light to intermediate French Kissing.
Unusual OWO to begin with which improved as the session progressed.
Prolonged session of reverse oral and body kissing, impeccable personal hygiene
on part of Amira.
Protected penetration in three positions which was good.
Intense climax COF/COB.

Communications were excellent leading up to the session and on the day on part of Amira,
and overall pleasant and courteous disposition throughout the session.

Whilst I've marked the review as Positive, it's actually a borderline neutral-positive
review, but going for positive due to Amira delivering what was stated on her profile
enjoys list, protected penetration and the COF/COB climax tilting toward the positive
assessment.


Potential Drawbacks

Very limited availability and very much a P/T WG due to her University commitments.
She is somewhat reserved and passive, a tad too passive at times during the session.


CAVEAT EMPTOR  -  NEGATIVE REVIEW FOR PRETTY AMIRA

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=32548.msg452339;topicseen#msg452339

The negative review linked above makes for both alarming and depressing reading for any punter/client.
The review is an honest account reflecting a true and fair view of how unfortunately events
transpired for that reviewer.

Likewise my own review, is also an honest account reflecting a true and fair view of how the session transpired
for me earlier today when I met with Amira.

It's not implausible for a WG to be reviewed positively by one punter, and another punter visiting experiences
something opposite to that of the satisfied punter/client. Conversely, it's not implausible for a WG to be reviewed
negatively and subsequent to that another punter/client experiencing something opposite to the dissatisfied punter/
client.

My own hypothesis (as I don't have any real proof, just my intuition) is that Amira is definitely reserved and passive
with respect to her WG identity, she has very narrow and defined parameters which provides for her a "comfort zone".
Any deviation from this, she reacts badly, very badly. Note I am not defending Amira with respect to her behaviour
as mentioned in the negative review.

I was aware of the negative review before meeting Amira, however I decided to go ahead and meet with her
based upon the  fact that on PNET, there are three positive reviews for Amira, of which two of them have been
submitting numerous Field Reports since 2003.

Thanks for the review. The fact is there are no guarantees in punting, all a punter can do is do a review on his experience with the WG. The fact another punter had a different experience is why its called punting. Sure reviews can help of course and if a WG gets consistently good reviews then that ups the chances of a good punt, BUT its still not a shoe in.

Me and Steve punted with a WG who offered us both FK and OWO but she didnt offer either to another punter and didnt one of the two to another. Fuck all i can do about that, she offered me those services so i posted so. And Caveat Emptor is spot on.

[leatherlover]

Was it 4th floor of this well known hotel? I might have seen you go in as I was having a cheeky punt there too at 1! 

[laidbackasiandude]

Was it 4th floor of this well known hotel? I might have seen you go in as I was having a cheeky punt there too at 1! 

My booking with Amira yesterday was on the fourth floor at 1pm for one hour. I didn't notice any one
else at the time, however even if we had noticed each other it's no big deal. You have no knowledge about me
(my real name, personal details/address etc) and vice versa, so no worries whatsoever.

[leatherlover]

My booking with Amira yesterday was on the fourth floor at 1pm for one hour. I didn't notice any one
else at the time, however even if we had noticed each other it's no big deal. You have no knowledge about me
(my real name, personal details/address etc) and vice versa, so no worries whatsoever.

Of course. No issues. Although I do hate it when someone is walking by when I am exiting a hotel room. Need to learn to use the spy hole first!

[mrhappypants]

Laidbackasiandude,  what did you think of the value for money? Given your description of the service would you book her again?  Would you recommend her based on your experience?

Dave

[laidbackasiandude]

Laidbackasiandude,  what did you think of the value for money? Given your description of the service would you book her again?  Would you recommend her based on your experience?

Dave

My belated commiserations Dave (as you were the reviewer/author of Amira's negative review), I wasn't a UKP
member at that time.

The concept of value for money is IMHO, purely subjective and the qualitative definition as such can vary from one
punter to another. For example, a "snooty" and wealthy client may pay upwards of £500 per hour to see a so called
upmarket escort, not necessarily because the "High Class Hooker" is worth it from his experience, he's also paying this
amount of money and more for the simple reason that a "simple common oik" like me wouldn't see her. This type of client
deems such an encounter as value for money from his perspective.

With respect to recommendations, in all my reviews I'm very careful to avoid the term "recommended/highly recommended"
for my positive reviews because I'm acutely aware that it's no cast iron guarantee that another punter/client will experience
the same. All I can do and have tried to the best of my abilities, is report in as much detail, to allow the punter/client to make
an informed decision and choice to proceed with a booking or decline and look elsewhere.

Regarding my session with Amira yesterday, for the £160-00 paid, I've experienced better but also had some dire sessions
when in the past I've paid £200 plus for the hour. My own view about Amira is that she seems to be (as a WG) in second/third
gear during the session, due to her passivity and also I believe her nervousness/awkwardness at times. Perhaps someone
else has met her and she's been more confident and far less reserved and passive? She has the looks and physical traits to
be potentially a very good service provider especially for a British Indian/Pakistani WG, as the majority of these type of WGs
provide a very plain and vanilla type of service. Amira in that sense and perspective is the exception and not the rule.

Following from the above, it's unlikely that I'll visit her again due to so many possibilities out there in London and near
surrounds.

[mrhappypants]

My belated commiserations Dave (as you were the reviewer/author of Amira's negative review), I wasn't a UKP
member at that time.

The concept of value for money is IMHO, purely subjective and the qualitative definition as such can vary from one
punter to another. For example, a "snooty" and wealthy client may pay upwards of £500 per hour to see a so called
upmarket escort, not necessarily because the "High Class Hooker" is worth it from his experience, he's also paying this
amount of money and more for the simple reason that a "simple common oik" like me wouldn't see her. This type of client
deems such an encounter as value for money from his perspective.

With respect to recommendations, in all my reviews I'm very careful to avoid the term "recommended/highly recommended"
for my positive reviews because I'm acutely aware that it's no cast iron guarantee that another punter/client will experience
the same. All I can do and have tried to the best of my abilities, is report in as much detail, to allow the punter/client to make
an informed decision and choice to proceed with a booking or decline and look elsewhere.

Regarding my session with Amira yesterday, for the £160-00 paid, I've experienced better but also had some dire sessions
when in the past I've paid £200 plus for the hour. My own view about Amira is that she seems to be (as a WG) in second/third
gear during the session, due to her passivity and also I believe her nervousness/awkwardness at times. Perhaps someone
else has met her and she's been more confident and far less reserved and passive? She has the looks and physical traits to
be potentially a very good service provider especially for a British Indian/Pakistani WG, as the majority of these type of WGs
provide a very plain and vanilla type of service. Amira in that sense and perspective is the exception and not the rule.

Following from the above, it's unlikely that I'll visit her again due to so many possibilities out there in London and near
surrounds.

I don't think value for money is *purely* subjective as you yourself say there are so many other possibilities (implicitly at a comparable price). I don't think your review meets the criteria for a positive rating because you say yourself you probably won't go back and see her again.  Actually I think it is highly unlikely that you will change your rating.  After seeing the stooges who responded to my original review honestly I am a bit suspicious of your VERY long, detailed and carefully argued post.  Did you know she had threatened me with a knife when you decided to book her?

[laidbackasiandude]

I don't think value for money is *purely* subjective as you yourself say there are so many other possibilities (implicitly at a comparable price). I don't think your review meets the criteria for a positive rating because you say yourself you probably won't go back and see her again.  Actually I think it is highly unlikely that you will change your rating.  After seeing the stooges who responded to my original review honestly I am a bit suspicious of your VERY long, detailed and carefully argued post.  Did you know she had threatened me with a knife when you decided to book her?

If you believe that I am lying about anything in this review or any of my previous reviews, then report me to the site owner
for consideration. If you're suspicions are accurate I'll be banned from this site permanently.

I reported an honest assessment and review (like my previous reviews) and further more I certainly am not a stooge of anyone,
period. In my review toward the end I stated it was borderline neutral-positive and in addition I was aware of your review
BEFORE meeting Amira, but read positive reports about her from an alternative site, hence took the decision to meet her.

[mrhappypants]

So let's be clear about this.  You read a review about a girl who accused a punter of raping her and threatened him with a knife, but you decide to go and see her anyway.  You pay £160 for the hour for what you describe as a passive and reserved performance, and then write an enormously detailed review that careful deals with any and all the points in previous reviews on this girl.  Finally you acknowledge you wouldn't go back and see her or recommend her to other punters, but rate the report as positive anyway.

I'll let other punters on here form a view of whether that passes the "sniff" test.

[laidbackasiandude]

So let's be clear about this.  You read a review about a girl who accused a punter of raping her and threatened him with a knife, but you decide to go and see her anyway.  You pay £160 for the hour for what you describe as a passive and reserved performance, and then write an enormously detailed review that careful deals with any and all the points in previous reviews on this girl.  Finally you acknowledge you wouldn't go back and see her or recommend her to other punters, but rate the report as positive anyway.

I'll let other punters on here form a view of whether that passes the "sniff" test.

I refer you to my previous reply, namely if you have any real evidence that I'm a liar than do disclose to the site owner
for consideration.

There are other reviews marked on this site as positive but the reviewer has indicated he wouldn't return or revisit.
I stand by what I've written in this review and my previous ones too.

[smiths]

So let's be clear about this.  You read a review about a girl who accused a punter of raping her and threatened him with a knife, but you decide to go and see her anyway.  You pay £160 for the hour for what you describe as a passive and reserved performance, and then write an enormously detailed review that careful deals with any and all the points in previous reviews on this girl.  Finally you acknowledge you wouldn't go back and see her or recommend her to other punters, but rate the report as positive anyway.

I'll let other punters on here form a view of whether that passes the "sniff" test.

There is no rule i know of on here that states a punter can only do a positive review on a WG he intends to punt with again. Some punters ONLY punt with new WGs to them. A punter is able as far as i know to do a positive review on his one-off experience with a WG.

I have had dealings with the OP of this thread on here and elsewhere over the years and know he IS a real and genuine punter.

[mrhappypants]

I apologise to the original poster given what you say. I suggest members do their research before making a decision to visit Ameera; know what you are getting yourself into.

[leatherlover]

There is no rule i know of on here that states a punter can only do a positive review on a WG he intends to punt with again. Some punters ONLY punt with new WGs to them. A punter is able as far as i know to do a positive review on his one-off experience with a WG.

I have had dealings with the OP of this thread on here and elsewhere over the years and know he IS a real and genuine punter.

And I confirm that the punt happened. I saw an Asian guy go into the room at 1pm which was the time of my punt three doors further down!

[Dreyfus]

I like this girl and saw her a few times. Very cute face, petite, intelligent, nice legs and has shed some weight lately. Takes it well and CIM or CIF is always on offer.