Author Topic: April @ Miss69, Gloucs Rd - Lies from the agency, and a disinterested WG  (Read 1953 times)


31 review(s) for Sweety April (29 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline londonchap

I'm sure she has an AW Profile, but I'm damned if I can find it. If anyone could link it for indexing, that would be just swell.

The girl: External Link/Members Only
The timing: December
The cost: £170 for an hour

The meet:
With a few hours free and a twitch in my balls, I thought I'd see what delights were available for a midweek evening in West London. I'd seen a few girls I liked the look of on Miss69, but had also seen a few disappointing reviews. I thought I'd see whether their comms were up to the high standards of Olina (who I'd already contacted and struck out on all the girls on my HL), so I dropped a message over asking for girls who can deepthroat.

The reply was punctual, and comms were clear. The suggestion was April and two other girls (names escape me), who I didn't much like the look of, available at my time. I booked April on the strength of the recommendations and some decent photos that didn't look too touched-up.

I arrived at the building on Gloucester Road, and was buzzed up and into a large flat that April seemed to have to herself. The girl herself looked like a good approximation of the photos on the website, albeit with slightly sharper facial features. If she could deliver on the promise of deepthroat, this would turn out to be a decent punt.

Into her bedroom, and the awkwardness began. This is usually a sign to be me that I'm going to get a subpar performance from a Thai WG. For example, Fallyn at Olina's jumped down my throat and started pulling my clothes off. By contrast, April just sort of stands there and leaves me to undress myself before we go for a (mechanical) shared shower.

In spite of not showing any interest or ability whatsoever to deepthroat (even when asked directly), she functionally delivered the things I'd asked for (OWO, Anal). Yet there wasn't the slightest trace of engagement in the process, her kissing was staunchly closed-lipped, and her BJ was constantly punctuated by spitting and dabbing her mouth with tissues. I swear she must have used a whole box of tissues.

Had this only been a dull but functional punt, I might have given it a neutral. As it was a dull punt where the specific thing I requested wasn't offered, it's a negative.

Not sure I'll bother with Miss69 again, and I'd encourage others to give April a swerve unless they enjoy disinterested WGs.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2024, 01:18:09 pm by londonchap »


Offline themats

I've stopped using this agency too after their attitude towards me which I mentioned in one of my reviews.

Offline Veinspulser

Totally agree, this agency was alright initially, but now slipping downhill obviously.