Profile link:
External Link/Members OnlyI paid £140 for One Hour plus two or three extras (she has a few as listed, ranging from 10 to 40 quid I think). I remember we didn't do one of said extras I requested simply by virtue of me not requesting it in the moment. She refunded the difference no problem, which I thought was fair play to her. I might give her a bonus mark in my end rating just for that. I've had some odd/bad experiences with extras in past. Refusal of refunds despite the reason it wasn't done was because the WG made false promises (e.g. I can take big sizes for anal). I respect Szofi for refunding without taking issue when it was my
faultComms and Venue -Via text. All good.
New build in Willesden area. The whole set up was quite discreet. A lot going on and everything big so you're just an ant sort of discretion.
Formalities, Looks and the Meet itself -She's pleasant but somewhat to the point.
Looks fine and no surprises compared to pics but I'd say everything just a bit less good in the flesh. Whether it be face less pretty, bum less good, boobs less perky (she doesn't hide that they are small in pics, but in pics they look perky IMO).
During booking did:
Kissing, good enough but some might feel not good enough as it's an extra.
Oral without, solid.
Oral on her she is receptive in body movement but near to no sound effects. I think I fingered her without issues although it's technically not listed. Her labia are quite meaty and long, and look even more so as she isn't exactly a big girl.
Protected sex was good enough but just overall lacked something. She wasn't too restrictive but it got to a point she was saying to me you need to finish I'm not trying to get blown out, in not so many words.
Ratings -Face: 3 stars
Body: 3 stars
Attitude: 3 star
Service: 3 stars
I can see attitude and service being lower for some. As per some reports I can see her being a bit off key potentially. Customer service probably isn't her main objective
. Also has that air of something not quite right upstairs, and while it's not as harmless as SianBabe's, it's certainly not as potentially threateninig as English.Ella's.
Overall: 12/20. She will go below Lulymay. Although I dissed Lulu's looks, her level of services means WGs like Szofi simply cannot be put higher than her.
Rankings to date:
POSITIVES:
1) Carol Queen of Anal 18/20
2) LittleLouisexox 18/20
3) Scarlette_Wolfe 17/20
4) Tammy_xoxo 17/20
5) Elizabeth Romanova 17/20
6) BUSTY KLARA DEVINE 17/20
7) TurkishYasemin 17/20
8) Brielle 21 17/20
9) Yours_Khloe 17/20
10) juicy_jasmine 17/20
11) Elite-Jessica 16/20
12) Sensitive_Nympho 16/20
13) HarperLAX 16/20
14) lexi.babe 15/20
15) Little-Brat-Jess 15/20
16) Englishslutjessica 15/20
17) Natalia_UK 15/20
18) AaliyahMoore 15/20
19) JessicaMilfRabbit 15/20
20) Lavish Diana 15/20
21) Angel-Alvarez 15/20
22) LatinaCleoRose 14/20
23) CleoEnglish 14/20
24) Angèle 14/20
NEUTRALS:
25) Beky-Bournemouth 13/20
26) BritishJasmineUK 13/20
27) SianBabeXXX 13/20
28) WannaComeAndPlayxx 13/20
29) British Lola May 13/20
30) British Dolll Lucy 13/20
31) Vicky_28 12/20
32) lulymay1 12/20
33) Szofi Hunter 12/20
34) TheArabPixie 12/20
35) KeiraKnoxx 12/20
NEGATIVES:
36) Pigeon Mode 11/20
37) English.Ella 11/20
38) Camilly big ass 10/20
39) english_tiffany_ 7/20
