External Link/Members OnlyHad my eye on Tracy for a while as I like the more girl next door look. In the end though it was an experience somewhere around the negative/neutral border.
Location - 5 Minutes from Earl’s Court. There is a disinterested porter. Once inside, small but standard and clean Earl’s Court hooker digs. I must have seen hundreds of them by now. There were a lot of steps to get up and no lift.
The Girl - Good likeness to the pictures facially and body shape wise. She is slightly on the curvy side and I knew what I was getting when going on based on the pictures so all good. Nice big natural titties and arse in the flesh.
Though she was wearing a nice night-dress thing, the appearance did seem a bit underwhelming. No make up, lingerie and a bit of a lack of sex appeal. It was indeed girl next door but not the type you fancy. From this perspective she really was missing the sexiness which shines through on the pictures. It was the same girl without the X factor.
The service - We went through the motions without complaint, but it had the excitement of a trip to my accountant.
She has the Moscow disinterested hooker vibe down well. A bit superior, a bit like she would rather be anywhere else, branded bags and clothes everywhere. I get the impression she wouldn’t have been like that a few years ago, but now goes through the motions with a disdain for her customers.
She is constantly fucking around with YouTube and her phone to put the music on whilst using it as an excuse for a scan of her messages.
Sex is kind of lacklustre and she wraps up LFK, BJ, Cowgirl etc quicker than I would like each time. It means we never find a rhythm and it’s all quite disjointed.
I did have 2 rounds but more out of principle rather than because I was enjoying it.
Overall - I’ll give her a generous neutral because the pics matched and she went through the motion's and delivered two rounds without complaint. Unfortunately though she needs a lot more customer focus, less distractions and more attempt at sex appeal if she is charging £300 an hour.
Damage - £300
Looks - 7/10
Service - 6/10
Would I return - No