Author Topic: Carol Queen of Anal - Earls Court - Great GFE but lots of paid extras  (Read 3865 times)


4 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7335580) (4 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Payyourwaymate]
4 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7329936) (4 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline Lorachoop

Thanks to the TOFTT by Iz88, I visited Carlina and my experience was very similar to him. She has since changed her name from Carolina Party to Carol Queen of Anal.

Links:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only -

Price: £120 for 30 mins +£30 for DFK. Total £150. Expensive and her list of optional extras is bigger than extras on a brand new car. Also charges for OWO which I did not take.

Communication: Via text message. Booked with 4 hours notice.

Location: Residential street very close to Earl's Court station. She sends you to the apartment opposite hers so she can see you from her window. Once she approves, she gives you the correct apartment number.

LC's Classification: GFE

Description: Her profile on Kommons shows her old pictures where she was FAF. She is still in very good shape, just not that lean anymore. Age late 20s, early 30s. Slim waist and that ass is B/C, very firm with nice thick thighs. Tits are a handful, around a C cup size but fake. Doesn't speak much English.

Personality: Friendly but very business like. Wouldn't kiss properly unless I paid up. I only enjoy sessions with DFK on offer so paid the extra 30. DFK from then on was unlimited and awesome.

Positives:

  • She shares her apartment with another WG so had to wait for shower to be available. But it was clean and had everything needed.
  • Back in room. She looked fit with her kit off but was only doing lip kissing, so paid £30 extra later and DFK from then on was amazing. Made my dick go rock hard so worth it for me although still annoyed I had to pay for it.
  • Sucked on those melons, which are a handful.
  • OWO is extra, not taken. So she gave OW which was deep. Told her to suck balls which she happily did.
  • Bent her over, spreading her ass cheeks apart as she gave more OW cusping my balls. Tried to cheekily insert a finger but was rejected haha. Rubbing pussy and ass was fine.
  • Put her on the bed, head done, ass in the air and fucked her in bulldog. Pounded that ass hard and fast, no complaints.
  • More doggy variations, cowboy, prone etc with the same fast pace. She took it nicely without any resistance or issues. DFK continued throughout
  • Positioned her infront of the mirror, still in doggy, held both hands behind her back and fucked her RAW. It was intense and we were both breathing heavily
  • Came in the bag and the climax had me rolling my eyes. I stayed inside her to catch my breath before I took my cock out for her to clean me up
  • Another shower, and I was out slightly after 30 mins with a smile on my face thinking, gosh what a session!

Negatives:

  • limited english so was hard to explain certain things to her.
  • Long list of extras which includes OWO, DFK and Anal etc

Return: most likely not, purely due to the cost. If rates were reasonable, I would def. return.


As always, YMMV. Some pictures attached. Lean ones are old from her Kommons profile. Clearly shows she worked out regularly in her peak condition




Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: September 25, 2023, 05:25:39 pm by Iloveoral »

Online tergil

Price: £120 for 30 mins +£30 for DFK. Total £130. Expensive and her list of optional extras is bigger than extras on a brand new car. Also charges for OWO which I did not take.

Do you mean its 150 total for half an hour - DFK, OW

Offline Lorachoop

Do you mean its 150 total for half an hour - DFK, OW

my bad. Yes, total £150.

perhaps an admin can correct it

Offline mark.james.watches

You said you did her RAW… so she’s a barebacker? How did that come up because she doesn’t post on her profile. Should add her to BB thread

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,365
  • Likes: 723
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
You said you did her RAW… so she’s a barebacker? How did that come up because she doesn’t post on her profile. Should add her to BB thread
Is that wishful thinking on your part?   :unknown:

Quote
Came in the bag and the climax had me rolling my eyes.

Offline mark.james.watches

Not at all. Just observation. And yes saw the bag comment. Am relatively new to site so am trying to be helpful while also using to use resources here to avoid pitfalls. But am equally aware what raw means…so thought I’d ask to clarify.

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,365
  • Likes: 723
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Not at all. Just observation. And yes saw the bag comment. Am relatively new to site so am trying to be helpful while also using to use resources here to avoid pitfalls. But am equally aware what raw means…so thought I’d ask to clarify.
How can he be fucking her bareback if he came in a condom? 

Perhaps you are confusing 'raw' with 'bare'.

Hidden Image/Members Only

You are accusing both the escort and the punter of being barebackers when the OP clearly states he was waring a condom.

BTW the OP has 70 reviews to his name with no indication of bareback.

« Last Edit: January 06, 2024, 06:21:50 pm by daviemac »

Offline mark.james.watches

Am not accusing anyone. Was a question. And if that’s the case - yes confused btw the two, because raw and bare are the same. But maybe that’s just back in NYC and not here… apologies if I have aggravated you with my question. Will obviously not try to be helpful again

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,365
  • Likes: 723
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Am not accusing anyone. Was a question. And if that’s the case - yes confused btw the two, because raw and bare are the same. But maybe that’s just back in NYC and not here… apologies if I have aggravated you with my question. Will obviously not try to be helpful again
Suggesting a longstanding member with 70 reviews has barebacked an escort is not being helpful, regardless of what you want to think he states in his review he had a condom on. Do you really think he fucked her bareback then put a condom on to fuck her again?    :unknown:

We have a welcome message for new members perhaps you would benefit from reading it.

Quote
Welcome to UKP!
Here are a few helpful tips to make your stay here more comfortable
Please take a few minutes to have a look around the site to get a feel of how it works and to read the site rules

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

We are a sharing community, and the forum needs reviews to thrive.
Try and make your first post a review.
To post a review, choose either the escorting or massage section, select the area, e.g. London, and click on the 'New Review' button in the top right corner.

External Link/Members Only

Don't jump in and ask for information without using the search bar at the top of the page; the most common questions have already been asked; failing that, you can make a post in the discussion section, and another member will be able to help.

Admin and the mods are here to keep order; you can also report a particular post to them if you think any site rules have been broken. ............

Happy punting!!!

Offline mark.james.watches

Again, no accusation. And no confusion either. Just asked for a clarification

Hidden Image/Members Only

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,365
  • Likes: 723
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Again, no accusation. And no confusion either. Just asked for a clarification
You don't give up do you. You have brought this up on a review that is nearly 6 months old, nobody else out of the 1,205 views has taken the meaning to be anything other than he fucked her until she was raw, as in the dictionary meaning of raw, sore, not your version.

Now can you explain how you think it worked for her to give him oral with a condom on then take it off for him to bareback her then put another one on for him to cum.   :unknown:  Or are you going to accuse him of lying about cumming in the condom?


Offline mark.james.watches

Yes it’s a 6 months old review because I was checking if there was any review of her as was/am
Interested in seeing her. Isn’t that part of the use of the site…? So yes, I commented on the one thing that seemed off. And from that you go full frontal. Chill

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,365
  • Likes: 723
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Yes it’s a 6 months old review because I was checking if there was any review of her as was/am
Interested in seeing her. Isn’t that part of the use of the site…? So yes, I commented on the one thing that seemed off. And from that you go full frontal. Chill
You are implying that the OP and the escort are both barebackers and that can be very damaging to both of their reputations.

You have been given advice about how to use the site which you seem to have ignored and you have been asked to explain your thinking in how it works for the escort to give oral with a condom then remove the condom to be fucked bareback only to put another condom on for the punter to cum, so can you please explain.


Offline Lorachoop

thankyou daviemac for having our back, appreciate it.

I just meant by fucking RAW that "I fucked the hell out of her, not holding back etc etc" but perhaps in some urban slang, it means to have sex without condom which confused you. Although later on in the review, I did say "I came in the bag" which is an obvious hint that protection was used.

So if you were confused, just ask for explanation or clarity as a newbie, instead of assuming things or mistaking the SP or punter for doing bareback sex. These things are not taken lightly here and IMO, daviemac telling your off politely and then strictly was justified.