External Link/Members OnlyPrice and when - £170 for 1 hour, incall. Within past few weeks.
Location & facilities - Hotel in central area of Ealing with unmanned reception (for most of time, I suspect). Easy to fixate on the lifts like a customer and walk on by. A restaurant and distracting noise (for others) in the area. Generous parking near a park, free after 7pm.
Comms - Not good. Called-up during week 1 during mid-week. Never answers phone. Text only. Couldn't secure a time even after explaining that I'm about X mins away from Ealing so need to know when to set-off. Radio silence for rest of night. Left it over weekend. During one mid-week afternoon in week 2, I get a suprising text apologising. She was claiming busy and other things going on. That she was free afer 4pm. Even with that and pitching a time, with very little speed in replying, it was getting to that point where I'm thinking am I going to get messed about again? Couldn't pin down a definite time. Eventually, did.
Services - OWO, missionary, CIM, swallow.
The meet and looks - After having a short run of not getting that MILF look that I want, went the other way. 30-odd is about right. Face-wise, I'd say a cross between 80/90s Yvette Fielding and DJ Annie Mac (young, short hair). Hairstyle's probably not too far off (from the front). Yes, buzz cut from back as per other reviews, short around back and sides. From front, I'd say curly front and longer. So reasonably feminine from the front. Looks kinda Shoreditch cool. I had prepped in mind to think of a young Michelle Wild or young Jane Darling when they had short hair.
Nice clean, skin, complexion, very warm body. Pics I would say are accurate. And though not the G-cups that she mentions, big enough. Maybe 36C/Ds are more accurate. Somebody mentioned a lithe body. Just about agree with that and the hour-glass I think she mentioned. Size 8 bordering 10 about right at ~5'7", no shoes. Those tits do sit like they do in her current set of pics though - esp. when she's standing or sitting up in bed. Not fat, per se, not flat and when you're in the motions of it in missionary, it's not a gut staring back at you like I've seen in recent visits to others.
There was a point where she sits-up and it's deffo her body in the pics but there is a tiny bit of podge showing. Which isn't really visible when standing or on her back. Doesn't really detract from things. Still feminine looks. There was also exploring her body and OWO, which was good. Some saliva and I'm pretty sure I hit the back of her throat. Quite sensual and no teeth. It wasn't forced but I had to stop her as she was stimulating the tip really well.
Took swallow really well, no flinching, no dripping. I think even a smile after looking-up and laugh from both of us. It was really, shudderingly good. ...Possibly abstained from Week 1 that I had intended to see her upto this point.
My libido's been down since the past few years, so one-pop was realistic. Along with lacklustre positioning on my part. I rarely give/reciproate back (not like I used to with my 'Top' meetings). Had extra cash for an extra half-hour just in case...But within first few minutes of meeting her I kind of thought 1-hour would be enough. I have been in situations where I paid the extra to stay the extra time after Round 1. But not, here. She wasn't doing it enough for me.
As nice as it was, there were times where randomly, "Don't pull too hard on my tits". Was taken a-back. Checked that my mild groping and carressing was not bordering that, just as a barometer. She even confirmed it wasn't. Receiving Oral is incorrectly marked on profile, too (or she's changed her mind). She doesn't like it.
SummaryBorderline positive. I can't say Negative because services were delivered. But her comms and organisation are awful. It was so bad and it's frustrating trying to work around it all that I had contemplated giving a straight Negative with no meet. Suspect it's her way of trying to filter for clients. If it weren't for her demeanor, would be able to maintain a stiffy for a Round 2. I think others would. But, trying to keep the peace, cordiality and gauge what is acceptable and what is not just felt like a massive negoatiation exercise. You're always on tenterhooks.
She's lovely but I suspect what the other reviewer mentioned of her (probably being in the game a bit too long) is probably correct. Glad I persevered and the action, though restricted on my part, was good. Because of all of the tricky balancing acts, wouldn't go back as result.
Comparison and pursuit of my Top 4 Meets:SweetKinkyNicole (2641728);
_Natalie_x (4151879);
Shy Tiffany (2592267);
xxxKama (1313400).
Nowhere near.
