Clarifying Tarzan's DFK Test

[jaj909]

Ive seen references made to Tarzan's kiss test throughout the forum, and I think at some point even read a thread where he mentions it, but ive never tried it and just want to get some clarity about it from those who have used this approach. Ultimately it seems like a negotiating measure to ensure that DFK is indeed DFK and that certain expectations are set from the start.

So, from what I gather about the test, you have to have booked to see the girl and then when you initially meet at the negotiating part, before you agree on length of meeting and services (though some girls of course want to know in advance - especially duration), you inquire whether DFK is extra.*

If you establish DFK is an extra, before you hand over the whole wad (e.g. 80 + 20 for DFK) you ask the girl if you can pay ONLY for DFK at 20 and say that if it is good then you will pay the remaining 80 - that the punt is contingent upon DFK being good, of which you are willing to pay for seperately. Is that the approach used by those who have done this? Feels like you are calling any DFK bluff that might exist, but at the same time it runs counter to the normal order of proceedings in the punt (you pay and THEN find out) and might set a weird/uncomfortable tone. Has anyone done this and actually walked if the DFK was bad? (which seems to be what is implied in the arrangement).


*(I suppose this test then doesn't apply to girls where DFK is included - although apart from girls who are known to offer good DFK as standard - Veronic69 for example - then this test wouldnt work and you would only find out whether DFK is actually restrained LFK once the punt has started.)

[Payyourwaymate]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=157415.0

You can find your answers on the original thread he created if you follow the link above.

[jaj909]

thanks. all the info is there, no need for this post to exist really.

[scutty brown]

If you try that stunt for real you're likely to fall out with the girls very quickly

[popmopcop]

Should add he was an abuser of girls and a little agency pet. 

It all fell apart when he shagged and trans after hating on them so long 

[daviemac]

Ive seen references made to Tarzan's kiss test throughout the forum, and I think at some point even read a thread where he mentions it, but ive never tried it and just want to get some clarity about it from those who have used this approach. Ultimately it seems like a negotiating measure to ensure that DFK is indeed DFK and that certain expectations are set from the start.

So, from what I gather about the test, you have to have booked to see the girl and then when you initially meet at the negotiating part, before you agree on length of meeting and services (though some girls of course want to know in advance - especially duration), you inquire whether DFK is extra.*

If you establish DFK is an extra, before you hand over the whole wad (e.g. 80 + 20 for DFK) you ask the girl if you can pay ONLY for DFK at 20 and say that if it is good then you will pay the remaining 80 - that the punt is contingent upon DFK being good, of which you are willing to pay for seperately. Is that the approach used by those who have done this? Feels like you are calling any DFK bluff that might exist, but at the same time it runs counter to the normal order of proceedings in the punt (you pay and THEN find out) and might set a weird/uncomfortable tone. Has anyone done this and actually walked if the DFK was bad? (which seems to be what is implied in the arrangement).


*(I suppose this test then doesn't apply to girls where DFK is included - although apart from girls who are known to offer good DFK as standard - Veronic69 for example - then this test wouldnt work and you would only find out whether DFK is actually restrained LFK once the punt has started.)

If you think emulating an abusive misogynistic cunt like KT is a good idea you're on the wrong site.   

[jaj909]

As a novice to this forum and from reading reviews and some casual references to it, my impression was that this practice was used sometimes and was acceptable (which to be honest did surprise me) though the full thread linked paints a very different picture. Moreover, Im surprised after reading it all that the subject is not outright banned on the forum, especially considering that so many other seemingly lesser things are prohibited.

[daviemac]

As a novice to this forum and from reading reviews and some casual references to it, my impression was that this practice was used sometimes and was acceptable (which to be honest did surprise me) though the full thread linked paints a very different picture. Moreover, Im surprised after reading it all that the subject is not outright banned on the forum, especially considering that so many other seemingly lesser things are prohibited.

Care to explain what you mean? what subject would you like banned? and what are the 'lesser' things that are prohibited?

The only person (to my knowledge) who has ever done the £20 kiss test is KT and he has been banned, you are the only person who has posted in support of it. 

If you try it on any half decent escort who is working independently and of her own free will you would be told where to go in no uncertain terms and, like KT, you would end up with reports on the likes of ClientEye.

[Stevelondon]

I’m not even going to put into words what I think of such a stupidly ignorant thing to do……. Or even think of doing.

I know the kind of answer I would be getting from the SP’s I have visited lately and it is not something I would want.

[jamiekinkxxx]

+1 to everyone that has responded

...you are an idiot TBH even taking anything he said at any sort of value!