Author Topic: Antonella Brazilian - Chingford/Walthamstow  (Read 5374 times)


6 review(s) for Antonella Goddess (5 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Doyle]

Offline Condominium

External Link/Members Only

This lady deservedly gets consistently positive reviews for her authenticity and high service levels. My experience was no exception, here’s a brief summary of my recent (August) booking:

Comms: Antonella has been in UK 5 years now and is self taught in English to a level where she does all comms herself. She’s keen to learn and please, and our text and verbal exchange pre-punt were excellent.

Location: Her home, a clean safe apartment in residential Chingford. Parking is a challenge so worth asking to use her allocated space.

Price: £180 for an hour as per her advertised rates at the time. I note she’s just increased that to £200 which is a bit rich in my opinion despite her excellent service.

Lady: I’m sure I’ve read the usual nonsense about her possibly being a TS but trust me, she’s all woman. I’d guess 40 but very gym-toned and beautifully turned out. Very smiley, welcoming and chatty (once the action is over)

Action: This was a Dom session, something she said she prefers which I completely understand. As previous posters have pointed out, she doesn’t kiss or offer OWO, but she’s fantastic at roleplay and following instructions within her limits. This was the best Dom session I’ve had in a long time and a refreshing change from the standard GFE bookings.
Highlights were being restrained, face sitting, dirty talk and strapon culminating in a volcanic orgasm that went on and on.

Shower offered and taken, nice chat and out just inside the hour.
In conclusion I’d say Antonella is a credit to her profession and I’d visit again for £180. She needs to contain her natural Brazilian hustling instincts though and drop her new £200 an hour rates which are very much at odds with the cost of living crisis (lol)

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,458
  • Likes: 357
  •  
  • Reviews: 208
This lady deservedly gets consistently positive reviews

I'd hardly call two Positive and one Neutral review before you as "consistently positive".

Offline JO6688

I'd hardly call two Positive and one Neutral review before you as "consistently positive".

I assume he's referring to her reviews on AW which are consistently positive

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,458
  • Likes: 357
  •  
  • Reviews: 208
I assume he's referring to her reviews on AW which are consistently positive

And ain't worth the pixels they're displayed on - as we all know.

Offline JO6688

And ain't worth the pixels they're displayed on - as we all know.

Generally I'd agree in the context that UK Punting reviews are far more reliable than Adult Work.

I took a chance with Antonella for Domination and Full Sex services and I had a good time (see my review). If you live in Essex (as I do), it might be worth the trip and punt. Please let us know and post your review. However I'd say she appeals more to those into Dom than those wanting PSE or GFE.

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,458
  • Likes: 357
  •  
  • Reviews: 208
However I'd say she appeals more to those into Dom than those wanting PSE or GFE.

Thanks, but not for me.

Offline Condominium

You call yourself a forum helper but your comments here are anything but.

It’s not a case of AW reviews or UKP reviews. Both are valid if you’re capable of reading between the lines (like most review sites)

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,458
  • Likes: 357
  •  
  • Reviews: 208
You call yourself a forum helper but your comments here are anything but.

It’s not a case of AW reviews or UKP reviews. Both are valid if you’re capable of reading between the lines (like most review sites)

I'm stating the facts.

According to your thinking members have to read between the lines?

Which is less helpful?

Offline Condominium

You’re not stating facts, just your own personal biases.

AW is a perfectly valid source of reviews, especially when a WG has 94 positives and zero negatives, and many of those reviewers themselves have similarly positive feedback. That’s my take on reading between the lines

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,458
  • Likes: 357
  •  
  • Reviews: 208
You’re not stating facts, just your own personal biases.

AW is a perfectly valid source of reviews, especially when a WG has 94 positives and zero negatives, and many of those reviewers themselves have similarly positive feedback. That’s my take on reading between the lines

I'm stating the facts that are on this forum, which is where you are posting the review.

She had two Positives and a Neutral, that is a fact.

Get over it, you're digging yourself in to a hole.

Offline rover_100

I'm really inclined to agree with PilotMan here. Its an often seen practice where SPs trade profiles and one that belongs to one SP one week goes to someone completely different the next, inheriting all feedback. Then there's the account networks that cyclically give feedback to each other to prop up the veracity of "real punter accounts" and lather then SP accounts up with loads of fictitious positive feedback.

This has gone on External Link/Members Only

AW feedback, in my opinion, isn't worth a shite. 3 UKP reviews are worth more than 100 AW reviews for me.

This all feeds into why UKP and reviews like this are great.

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,792
  • Likes: 757
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
You call yourself a forum helper but your comments here are anything but.

It’s not a case of AW reviews or UKP reviews. Both are valid if you’re capable of reading between the lines (like most review sites)
What has him being a forum helper got to do with him stating the fact that this escort has 3 positive and 1 neutral reviews on here and that AW feedback is well known to be extremely dodgy, profiles being swapped, outright fake feedback being posted and members posting false positives so the don't get a retaliatory negative.  Read between the lines??? I think AW feedbacks need to be taken with a salt mine full of salt never mind a pinch.

BTW a forum helpers are here to help the mods by keeping the forum tidy by moving threads to the correct section/area, indexing reviews or changing review ratings at the request of the poster and things of that nature. Other than that they are members the same as you with the same freedom to post as they wish within the rules.

Offline Condominium

I wrote a decent review for the benefit of members and got a pedantic, nit-picky response from a forum helper.

It’s way too black and white, not to mention a tad arrogant, to suggest that AW reviews are ‘shite’ and UKP the font of all knowledge. Both are valid if used with a bit of common.

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,792
  • Likes: 757
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I wrote a decent review for the benefit of members and got a pedantic, nit-picky response from a forum helper.

It’s way too black and white, not to mention a tad arrogant, to suggest that AW reviews are ‘shite’ and UKP the font of all knowledge. Both are valid if used with a bit of common.
Like I said him being a forum helper is totally irrelevant, it has nothing to do with what he posts, you obviously misunderstand what a forum helper is despite it being explained.

Once again a forum helper is not here to help members any more that any other member is expected to help other members, they are here to help the moderators by correcting titles, moving threads posted in the wrong place and generally keeping the place tidy. Whilst what they do in that respect is greatly appreciated by the mods and admin, they are just ordinary members and are quite restricted in the help they can give and whatever they post is posted like any other member.

BTW AW reviews are acknowledged by the vast majority of punters to be a load of bollocks and only go to show the SP who happens to be using it at the time exists.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2023, 03:59:25 pm by daviemac »

Offline JO6688

I saw her a few months ago and am contemplating visiting her again. Enjoyed the first meet.

Has anyone seen her recently and if so, how was she?