Miss_Sammie.J - North Swindon

[Coriniumstud]

External Link/Members Only

Comms Text
Location Modern Flat in North Swindon
Duration 1 Hour £170

Arrived at location and sent text,quick reply so I walked over and once at the door Sammie opened it, quick kiss then upstairs,always great to follow so I can admire her ass , handed over the paperwork then straight into the bedroom.

This is Sammie at her best, she never gives you time to undress, she undoes my jeans and pulls them and my boxers down so she can start DT, which is the best I’ve ever had.
After a while it’s onto the bed for more DT then Sammie moves up for some kisses then suggest 69, she is always clean and fresh, she seems to enjoy it as she’s making all the right noises
Then it’s on with the bag and Sammie jumps on for some cg, it’s great seeing her bounce up and down then it’s my turn in doggy and she takes a good pounding before I cum in the bag.
Sammie cleans me up then it’s more kisses, get dressed and leave,drained once again

Will definitely return 

[daviemac]

What a coincidence, you post yet another positive review of this SP just after you post this ↓ on the last review which happened to be a negative.

Sorry to hear you had a crap punt
 Sammie has become my regular go to, have to say that she has never done drugs or drink when I have met her, also told me she had to give up her driving licence because of her health.
It’s just weird reading the review,as it’s the complete opposite of how she is with me but then I meet her in her flat and not a hotel (if that makes a difference ?)

You might want to give your steed a bit of hay and your armour a polish.

[Coriniumstud]

What a coincidence, you post yet another positive review of this SP just after you post this ↓ on the last review which happened to be a negative. You might want to give your steed a bit of hay and your armour a polish.

I haven’t reviewed her since last year

[CP123]

I'm just gonna say it, I reckon that last negative review of her is aload of nonsense

No offence to the OP of that review, but there's clearly something missing they haven't mentioned

Go ahead and call me her "Pimp" or "white knight" or whatever, but the facts are she's been reviewed on here for 10 years across the previous accounts shes had and never once had a negative review, ever

So for something like what the OP was saying in the negative review to have a meet go that bad with her, I don't believe it

[daviemac]

I haven’t reviewed her since last year

Yes I know, three in a row, March April and June, but that doesn't alter the fact you posted on a negative review in defence of her on 5th August and then posted a glowing positive a week later.

I'm sure members will make their own minds up when they look at your multiple reviews of her and your defence of her on a negative review and wonder if this positive has just been posted to counter the negative.

[daviemac]

I'm just gonna say it, I reckon that last negative review of her is aload of nonsense

No offence to the OP of that review, but there's clearly something missing they haven't mentioned

Go ahead and call me her "Pimp" or "white knight" or whatever, but the facts are she's been reviewed on here for 10 years across the previous accounts shes had and never once had a negative review, ever

So for something like what the OP was saying in the negative review to have a meet go that bad with her, I don't believe it

Not the way the site works, accusing other members of lying is out of order. It makes no difference if she'd had 1,000 positive reviews over 30 years the OP of that one posted his experience as he found it.

For future reference when reading reviews take from them any information you find useful, ignore the rest and act accordingly, if you have any questions relevant to the content of the review ask the OP for further information.

If you don't believe the review disregard it but leave others to make their own minds up on it's validity.

[RobT22]

Assuming that all the contributors on here are being honest which I believe they are then we can only assume that Sammie has got one of her mates to stand in for her. Probably for a very valid reason, unwell, time of month, previous engagement etc. Howevef, it has now badly backfired on her as she has been given a very poor review. Honesty and best policy come to mind.

[Your_dark_knight]

Not the way the site works, accusing other members of lying is out of order. It makes no difference if she'd had 1,000 positive reviews over 30 years the OP of that one posted his experience as he found it.

For future reference when reading reviews take from them any information you find useful, ignore the rest and act accordingly, if you have any questions relevant to the content of the review ask the OP for further information.

If you don't believe the review disregard it but leave others to make their own minds up on it's validity.

 

[daviemac]

Assuming that all the contributors on here are being honest which I believe they are then we can only assume that Sammie has got one of her mates to stand in for her. Probably for a very valid reason, unwell, time of month, previous engagement etc. Howevef, it has now badly backfired on her as she has been given a very poor review. Honesty and best policy come to mind.

Can you provide some evidence for your assumptions, have you seen her because I can't find your review of her?   

It's best not to post speculation as fact and take notice of reply #5. You making excuses on her behalf when you know nothing about it doesn't do anyone any good.

[90125]

@RobT22 your last Review was over 2 years ago so about time you corrected that.

[Cunning Punt]

we can only assume that Sammie has got one of her mates to stand in for her. Probably for a very valid reason, unwell, time of month, previous engagement etc.

Even if that were the case, which is a massive assumption on your behalf, then that would be tantamount to a bait and switch and there is no valid reason for that. If an SP is unwell etc then they should postpone or explain they could send someone else.

And anyway, we all know what ass-u-me makes don't we?

[SmokeEater]

What a coincidence, you post yet another positive review of this SP just after you post this ↓ on the last review which happened to be a negative. You might want to give your steed a bit of hay and your armour a polish.

So are you saying not to leave a positive review after another op leaves a negative review?
We can clearly see this op saw the sp because the review on her profile puts the date showing it happened.
This op is clearly a good cotributor to this site yet you seem to target him for his review. Surely as in your own words "If you don't believe the review disregard it but leave others to make their own minds up on it's validity"
Surely we should be encouraging everybody on this site to contribute rather than encouraging good contributors to stop?

[daviemac]

So are you saying not to leave a positive review after another op leaves a negative review?
We can clearly see this op saw the sp because the review on her profile puts the date showing it happened.
This op is clearly a good cotributor to this site yet you seem to target him for his review. Surely as in your own words "If you don't believe the review disregard it but leave others to make their own minds up on it's validity"
Surely we should be encouraging everybody on this site to contribute rather than encouraging good contributors to stop?

No I am not saying anything of the sort, do not try to put words in my mouth. I am not disputing the OP saw this escort though the date in the list of her reviews is only the date the review was posted, it does not show the date it took place.

The OP of this review posted 3 reviews in a row last year, in March, April and June and had they been noticed at the time, as they are so close, they would have been merged. Then he posted in her defence on the negative review quickly followed by another positive review. This resulted in reports of him white knighting and my involvement.

Repeated reviews of the same SP by the same punter does not add value to the site, 4 reviews by 4 different punters shows she gives a good service to a variety of people, 4 reviews by one person only shows she gives good service to one.

Are you saying we should be allowing touting and white knighting?   

[Nice_guy_eddy]

It cracks me up how everything is taken so seriously on here. Makes for good reading. 😆

[aanimator]

I understand why Coriniumstud posted this review, but understand why he probably shouldn't based on what the admins are saying. I think its easier just to add a new review as a comment to an existing review. I think the main point to get across to everyone on the site is maybe to just not get involved in others comments and reviews and just post reviews and thats it. Pity because I have found it helpful when someone trusted i.e. good amount of reviews and posts. Has something negative to say about a post or review. But again I understand why were not meant to call reviewers liars too