Review repercussions

[monstar]

Firstly I just want to say thanks to everyone at UKP especially the reviewers! I've been lurking for a while and recently started punting, three punts in; two sessions were amazing - both girls had numerous positive reviews and recommendations on here. The other session was lacklustre, a last minute plan-b with no reviews which highlights the importance of this site. I have certainly learnt my lesson and will be sticking to the girls with a 'UKP recommended' stamp! Although there was some added excitement going in blind not knowing what to expect so I may TOFTT occasionally. 

I would like to start contributing and posting reviews, but am worried about possible repercussions of posting negative reviews and how to protect my anonymity. I have already read the 'punting top tips' thread and have a punting email, mobile, pseudonym and different AW / UKP usernames.

Do any of you seasoned reviewers have any tips or stories that will help me get over my worries or should I just man the fuck up!? Obviously mentioning specifics about the session will give me away to the WG involved if they were to read my review, should I even be concerned about this or am I being over cautious about a non-issue? (sorry, I'm an over-thinker!)

Cheers 

[Matium]

Post the two positive reviews first - that'll give you confidence.

Regarding the lacklustre third punt, did it have positive as well as negative aspects? If so, you can give her a neutral rating.

Whatever result you give (positive, negative, neutral), the news will get back to her as the Sisterhood watch UKP like hawks and always alert girls that they're being talked about.

[CatBBW]

Obviously mentioning specifics about the session will give me away to the WG involved if they were to read my review, should I even be concerned about this or am I being over cautious about a non-issue? (sorry, I'm an over-thinker!)

Don't post ANYTHING that could identify you. For examples: if you had a convo about the scar on her leg, DON'T mention in the review that you spoke about the scar on her leg. If you commented to her about how nice her towels are, DON'T mention in the review that her towels are nice. If she liked your shirt, don't mention the shirt... Get the pic?

Stick to the bare bones/facts, leaving out anything that could potentially ID you.

And don't worry about it, punting should be fun

[socks]

Don't post ANYTHING that could identify you. For examples: if you had a convo about the scar on her leg, DON'T mention in the review that you spoke about the scar on her leg. If you commented to her about how nice her towels are, DON'T mention in the review that her towels are nice. If she liked your shirt, don't mention the shirt... Get the pic?

Stick to the bare bones/facts, leaving out anything that could potentially ID you.

And don't worry about it, punting should be fun

...and man the fuck up

[Jimmyredcab]

Repercussions my arse.   

The only time I would exercise caution is if the girl has visited my house, if the punt was at her place I would say anything I wish to say.   

[smiths]

Firstly I just want to say thanks to everyone at UKP especially the reviewers! I've been lurking for a while and recently started punting, three punts in; two sessions were amazing - both girls had numerous positive reviews and recommendations on here. The other session was lacklustre, a last minute plan-b with no reviews which highlights the importance of this site. I have certainly learnt my lesson and will be sticking to the girls with a 'UKP recommended' stamp! Although there was some added excitement going in blind not knowing what to expect so I may TOFTT occasionally. 

I would like to start contributing and posting reviews, but am worried about possible repercussions of posting negative reviews and how to protect my anonymity. I have already read the 'punting top tips' thread and have a punting email, mobile, pseudonym and different AW / UKP usernames.

Do any of you seasoned reviewers have any tips or stories that will help me get over my worries or should I just man the fuck up!? Obviously mentioning specifics about the session will give me away to the WG involved if they were to read my review, should I even be concerned about this or am I being over cautious about a non-issue? (sorry, I'm an over-thinker!)

Cheers 

If you have protected your real identity so all the WG has is your punting phone number easily changed if need be and/or punting email address also easily changed and your description why be worried about posting negative reviews.

This fear is exactly what bad WGs and their pimps want punters to feel. Its why A/Ws feedback system works against punters interests in my view as many have posted they wouldnt give negative feedback in case the WG gives the same back thus potentially putting a future WG off them. I fortunately punt in London and surrounds so have a lot of WGs to choose from so i only book by phone, no phone number no business off me. Do a review on here instead would be my advice and like you use a different nick on here to A/W.

If you do a negative review you dont have to give an exact date and time, just say you punted with such and such WG recently, they might work out it was you but as you arent going to punt with them again and all they do have is your number/email and description i wouldnt worry about it. I certainly dont.

The other point about reviews is they arent an absolute guarantee of course, there isnt any such thing in punting. I read a post yesterday by a punter who had had a bad punt and was moaning that the review and feedback on the WG by others had been different to his own experience, thats punting. What reviews do is HELP locate WGs recommended by punters, and obviously HELP avoid those who offered a bad service.

[Daffodil]

I believe it is very wise to take reasonable precautions so that a prossie cannot link you as the guy she punted to you as the reviewer here or elsewhere.

If you're going to post honestly you will have to criticise a prossie, or at least part of a service a prossie provides, on occasion. Even things that you don't think are contentious, even good things, can piss a prossie off.

If you've been careful (punting phone, fake name, fake email, etc) then there's no huge chance it's going to bite you on the arse, but it is possible. Say you've slated a prossie, and she has been able to put your face to the review, and then you're out in town with your wife and guess who you bump into 

It's unlikely, but the consequences can be devastating. There are those of us who could lose families, homes, jobs, etc.

In terms of preventing a prossie linking your review to you as a punter there's a few things I do:

1) Different name here to my AW username. Keep them separate.
2) Don't specify the date and time you saw the prossie. Don't even give a rough idea. Just say, "I saw this prossie some time ago…" or something like that.
3) Don't mention any details that she might be able to identify you or the meet by. Same as what CTG has said.
4) You can even post some untrue information, provided it doesn't undermine the review itself. For example, if you drove say that you arrived on foot. If you wore a blue shirt say you turned up in your lucky red shirt. If you had a beard say you were clean shaven for the event. Shit like that.

Looking forward to your reviews

[Toshiba]

Another reason i wont use AW and just agencies

Look no one forces people to do reviews buddy, if you are concerned in ANY way then please don't bother

We will all survive, dont fret 

[ForrestGump]

Welcome, Monstar, For the negative review I'd probably write it up offline (as a draft email, for example) so that I have more time to get straight what exactly I want to say before finally posting it here. That would enable me time to give it the due consideration and allow some time to elapse between the punt and the posting of the review which will make it more difficult for a connection to be made between you and the review. And, as has already been pointed out, just avoid including anything that could only have happened between you and the wg.

[threechilliman]

4) You can even post some untrue information, provided it doesn't undermine the review itself. For example, if you drove say that you arrived on foot. If you wore a blue shirt say you turned up in your lucky red shirt. If you had a beard say you were clean shaven for the event. Shit like that.

I'm in the process of writing a -ve review. I'm writing it exactly as it happened but will then go back and change certain details in order to confuse the SP about who she saw. A time interval between meet and review might help as well.

tcm

[monstar]

If you're going to post honestly you will have to criticise a prossie, or at least part of a service a prossie provides, on occasion. Even things that you don't think are contentious, even good things, can piss a prossie off.

If you've been careful (punting phone, fake name, fake email, etc) then there's no huge chance it's going to bite you on the arse, but it is possible. Say you've slated a prossie, and she has been able to put your face to the review, and then you're out in town with your wife and guess who you bump into 

It's unlikely, but the consequences can be devastating. There are those of us who could lose families, homes, jobs, etc.

This is my main concern really, I want to write a completely honest review or feel it's not worth doing. My positive experiences also had a few negative points that I feel should be included and could piss the prossies off even though it would be a positive review overall! Reading all your views and even just typing it out has helped me realise how ridiculous this sounds but considering the potential devastating consequences as you mentioned, I think it was worth the quick post!

Thanks guys, lots of useful tips to take on board that will be used in my future reviews.  to the UKP contributors.

[JV547845]

If I had any repercussions from a review, I'd post them on the original review thread.  If the reviewee wants to keep digging by starting some shit, they're just going to make a non situation into a far worse one.  There're still some very good prossies who've had negative reviews, and other wise good prossies who've lost it over positive reviews that said the wrong thing (e.g. fatter than in her pics) and completely deleted their AW profiles over it.

[kingkong]

My punting philosophy is to only see the same girl once, so if she is a shit WG , then I will say she is a shit WG. I have returned to some escorts multiple times, but this is only to the very best ones.

[dilettante]

It's certainly a double-edged sword - as punters we should have as much free range in what we write as the music critic of The Times, but there's also scope to offend by being too honest, especially if the WG is of the self-opinionated type.  (The problem would seldom if ever be met with when punting with EE girls.)  Eg I wrote an honest, flattering (as mine always are) FR on Hannah, which she thanked me for, saying it would have taken a lot of time to pen, concluding with a steely "I am very grateful.", then failing to be linked in on her profile page, unlike all the others.  Whoops, what did I say?  (Though as for one reason or another I'll not be seeing her again I will never have to 'face the music'.)  However like Jimmy I'd never try to dissociate myself from being the punter - otherwise, they could just respond, "Sorry, I don't remember meeting you at all."

[wristjob]

Do any of you seasoned reviewers have any tips or stories that will help me get over my worries or should I just man the fuck up!? Obviously mentioning specifics about the session will give me away to the WG involved if they were to read my review, should I even be concerned about this or am I being over cautious about a non-issue? (sorry, I'm an over-thinker!)

Cheers 

Write it up then wait a few weeks to post.

I don't really want to get into the fluffy "I won't say what happened in the room but I came out with a smile" PN BS but personally I think the actual sex side doesn't need to be massively detailed.You can do stuff like how accurate the photos/age were - nothing give you away with that. The location, parking comms too - unless she was proper mental but you can be a bit fuzzy about it and people ask you for more info. Sex - well like I say not sure there's merit in describing the positions you did in order but more if she was enthusiastic doing what you wanted or an obstacle. Did you spend a fun 5 minutes talking about Scottish independence while you were in the shower - miss that shit off.

[nova painted floozie]

Whatever result you give (positive, negative, neutral), the news will get back to her as the Sisterhood watch UKP like hawks and always alert girls that they're being talked about.

Not true. I've never had any contact from this mysterious Sisterhood, whoever they are. 

[NIK]

Not true. I've never had any contact from this mysterious Sisterhood, whoever they are. 

You're lucky then.

[Turtle1]

There're still some very good prossies who've had negative reviews, and other wise good prossies who've lost it over positive reviews that said the wrong thing (e.g. fatter than in her pics) and completely deleted their AW profiles over it.

hope they deleted it to hit the gym. too many cunts in this business and thats just the punters lol.

[finn5555]

The golden rule is tell them fuck all that traceable to you just bullshit like they all do 

[Boundless]

Not true. I've never had any contact from this mysterious Sisterhood, whoever they are. 

As per other threads, there is good evidence to suppose that person(s) unknown are trawling (trolling?) AW looking for negative comments and then tipping off the SP concerned. This has then led to attempts to discredit or stir shit about the reviewer. It has also been alleged that these, heaven forbid, may be punting guys who are members of UKP, a discussion in which I am not going to take part as I have no evidence either way.

[nova painted floozie]

As per other threads, there is good evidence to suppose that person(s) unknown are trawling (trolling?) AW looking for negative comments and then tipping off the SP concerned. This has then led to attempts to discredit or stir shit about the reviewer. It has also been alleged that these, heaven forbid, may be punting guys who are members of UKP, a discussion in which I am not going to take part as I have no evidence either way.

Do you mean UKP? This didn't happen to me. I found them all on my lonesome and comments on another forum which had been there months without my being tipped off. Perhaps it's only the special ones who get these mysterious notifications.

[Boundless]

Yes, I did mean UKP, well spotted!

I think it's not by any means all comments, or all SP's, probably only a small percentage but it seems to be a current topic of discussion.

It could very well be that the SP's themselves are seeing the negative comments, but there does seem to have been a more than normal amount of backlash lately.

[OldAdmin]

My old post about those who tip off prossies:

It's not just prossies who tip off other prossies when there are posts about them on this site.
It's also fluffy twats.
Earlier last year I started asking prossies who came to me demanding I delete negative reviews about themselves how they knew about this site. I offered to delete what they wanted if they told me the honest answer. I lied as I would never delete anything, but I managed to squeeze the name from 3 of them. All 3 gave me the same A/W member name, some twat living in London and with a couple of A/W feedback.

[rockharders]

Fire away. I've written plenty of negative reviews. I've had a couple of girls really pissed at me because of what I wrote. I don't care, because I'm here to help the punter and give back to the forum. Just be careful how and when you write to maintain your anonymity.

Personally I find negatives more useful than positives, it helps me make a more informed choice. UKP would be utterly useless if every review was a +ve, because it would just be like AW and useless.

[pierrot]

If your going to write a negative review the best idea is to leave it a couple of weeks before you do.
Most girls suffer from client blur and wont even remember which one you were.

[JV547845]

It's not just prossies who tip off other prossies when there are posts about them on this site.
It's also fluffy twats.
Earlier last year I started asking prossies who came to me demanding I delete negative reviews about themselves how they knew about this site. I offered to delete what they wanted if they told me the honest answer. I lied as I would never delete anything, but I managed to squeeze the name from 3 of them. All 3 gave me the same A/W member name, some twat living in London and with a couple of A/W feedback.

Interesting.  How much of it can be down to this one guy?