Author Topic: Marina baby, Whitechapel, E1  (Read 5365 times)


2 review(s) for Marina baby (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]

Offline Fancy

AdultWork Profile:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Pre-meet logistics:
Dropped her a text and was asked to call on the day-of. I asked about extras but got nothing back. Called her on the day-of and chatted times and some extras. She said “What do you want that’s extra?”. Settled on kissing and CIM. Didn’t fancy an arduous back-and-forth along the lines of “What about this? Well, what about this?”, but a list or some indication of extras on her profile would be good. After that it was easy breezy. Sent a postcode and given address and list of services from the beginning. All comms and confirmation by text.

Location:
Residential building near Whitechapel. Modern. Tidy. Sterile.

Looks:
Definitely the girl in the pics, but go in expecting that girl at your own peril. That filter is putting in work. She's still attractive, just not the young Salma Hayek I was expecting. I’d say she was in her early–mid 20s. Nice, round (enhanced) boobs. Not too big. A nice handful. Nice large Brazilian ass, lovely thighbrows to go with a tiny, toned waist. Lovely long black hair.

Services:
Anal Play, Deep Throat, French Kissing, Hand Relief, Oral (with), Penetration (Protected), Receiving Oral, Rimming (receiving)

Price:
£180 for 45 minutes (incl. £40 extras: ‘kissing and CIM’)

The Rendezvous:
Got the lift up to the floor and was let through the door. Went in knowing this was a TOFTT, so I was a bit apprehensive. Led me into the bedroom where we made what small talk we could. Bit of a red flag here: her English is not great, and I was a bit taken aback because the woman I spoke to on the phone seemed to be more eloquent. Potentially a maid?

Paid the fee and started off with some light kissing that got heavier as we both took our clothes off. Was a bit disappointed when she slapped a condom on me for oral. Anyway, fine. She then climbed on top of me for some cowgirl. Heaven. Here’s where her kissing game stepped up a notch. Spent the remainder of our time switching between doggy, missionary, RO, etc. She didn't mind me squeezing the sides of her throat or pulling her hair, or seemingly eating her ass as I was eating her out anyway, though she didn't let me touch her asshole in doggy. (I imagine this is extra).

I said I was about to finish and she jerked me off to completion. Took issue with this a bit, because I’d paid for CIM, so I was sort of waiting for her to initiate it, but time was not my friend given the situation. Turns out CIM is £40 extra, and kissing is £30 extra, so I'd basically paid for kissing and got stitched by a tenner (another reason why I think I dealt with a maid). Accepted my loss and took a shower (easy to use, fresh towels supplied), came back to her room and got changed. Made some brief smalltalk. Turns out she’s been in London for 3 months or so. Couldn’t get much else out of her due to the language barrier.

Abstract:
It’s a positive, but only just. The heavily-edited face pics and hassle with extras put a bit of a dampener on things, but she’s still good-looking and was quite happy for me to choke her a bit, so here we are. YMMV. Hope this helps!

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: July 29, 2023, 12:25:10 am by Fancy »

Offline arrow0404

FAF - generous positive - but hey you banged a super fit hunny

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,319
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
Thanks for TOFTT.

I did enquire about a booking with her for the following day, but she wanted me to phone on the day. Alas, on the day she didn't reply for over an hour, so I booked someone else.

At least you confirmed she is more or less real, except for the photoshop.

I'll have another try.

Offline Fancy

FAF - generous positive - but hey you banged a super fit hunny
Why a positive and not a neutral? I guess the pics were a minor infringement and would've been major if it turned out she wasn't attractive. I’ve certainly seen more egregious edits on dating apps before, too.
The extras thing was annoying, but I also could've done more to mitigate this if I wasn’t so eager to get my end away. In spite of those two points, still a great shag and a good time. :thumbsup:

Offline Burrell0377

FAF … was her pussy tight

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,571
  • Likes: 731
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
FAF … was her pussy tight
Is there a reason for your lack of contributions to the site by way of reviews.  :unknown:

Comments like "stunning" and Yummy" add nothing of value.

Offline Fancy

For additional clarity, this is closer to the girl I met as opposed to the one in the pics.



Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,319
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
For additional clarity, this is closer to the girl I met as opposed to the one in the pics.


Hidden Image/Members Only

Well, I don't know how you managed it,  should have walked  :lol:

Offline MrMohican

Conning you over the CIM that you blatantly paid for and going straight for condom when according to her profile she 'specialises' in owo and implies its part of her normal service package on her profile would make this a negative for me - but its your review.