Author Topic: Antonella Brazilian - Chingford  (Read 3822 times)


6 review(s) for Antonella Goddess (5 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]

Offline Moore2012

External Link/Members Only

Sorry for the late review, retired from punting as was in relationship and wont see girls, thats all done so Ive got a few to post that ive built up. Meet happened in early march when i was working in the area

Comms: quick and easy, great english

Venue: flat in private residential area

Girl: Exactly as in photos, latina, around 5'4, excellent tits and great arse

Price: £100 for 30 mins (Prices have gone up and 30 min is no longer an option)

Service: Went on a lunch break. Hidden behind room door as usual, dressed in lingerie. She is sexy, escorted to bedroom and cash handed over. I got undressed as she went to stash the money. She come back in and stood in front of me with her back turned, i moved up behind her and she started grinding on me and reached back to start tossing me off as i kissed her neck and played with her great tits. Slapped her arse as she turned round and told me to get on the bed. OW provided, great technique, proper goes for it. She did this for a while before asking if id like to fuck. Of course i did. She got on top and started riding and its a great sight. But i wasnt going to cum till i had had her from behind. Switched positions and had her in doggy and her bum is a sight to behold. I pumped away while grabbing her tits and finished not longer after. She cleaned me up and as there was time leftover, she gave a good massage before i had to leave to get back to work.

Rating: 7/10

Would i go back: probably not now as pricey but great effort and good looking girl

Offline rover_100

Cheers for the review. I don't want to piss on your chips but this might be one of the most suspect TS pictures I've ever seen.

Not trying to get one over on you, if it doesn't make a difference to you then more power to you. Some prefer to know though as it influences their decision to repeat.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,949
  • Likes: 395
  •  
  • Reviews: 213
Cheers for the review. I don't want to piss on your chips but this might be one of the most suspect TS pictures I've ever seen.

Not trying to get one over on you, if it doesn't make a difference to you then more power to you. Some prefer to know though as it influences their decision to repeat.

Can you see his cock poking through his stockings?

"Some prefer to know" - Can you enlighten us.

If you have something more to share, then share, at the moment it seems to me like you are trying to piss on his chips.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,575
  • Likes: 192
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Can you see his cock poking through his stockings?

"Some prefer to know" - Can you enlighten us.

If you have something more to share, then share, at the moment it seems to me like you are trying to piss on his chips.

Gotta say PM that those photos may look more glamourously attired than many ordinary transitioning TSs but the physique and features that lass is sporting definitely look as though they were built on XYs before the bolt-ons, tucks and gels were applied.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,949
  • Likes: 395
  •  
  • Reviews: 213
Gotta say PM that those photos may look more glamourously attired than many ordinary transitioning TSs but the physique and features that lass is sporting definitely look as though they were built on XYs before the bolt-ons, tucks and gels were applied.

Could well be aTS.

Someone making such bold claims should at least back it up, or explain more.

Offline rover_100

Can you see his cock poking through his stockings?

"Some prefer to know" - Can you enlighten us.

If you have something more to share, then share, at the moment it seems to me like you are trying to piss on his chips.

Lets be clear and I'll take a minute to clarify - I'm not saying this SP is a TS. I'm usually on the other side of this conversation, asking others how they're so sure of the same. If you want me to be verbatim, "this might be one of the most suspect TS pictures I've ever seen". Should have probably been very clear that this is my opinion and only a suspicion, nothing more. That said - have you got a pair of eyes and are we looking at the same pictures?

To answer the second bit, I don't have anything more to share. The information I have on this SP is exactly the same as what the rest of us have, which is the ad. "Some prefer to know" was referring to some punters wanting to know an SP they've seen was a TS. This was a slip on my part because it assumed the suspicion I raised at the start was true. I take the hit for that, my mistake.

If it warrants being removed please do. Its not a hill I'm willing to die on and it was poorly phrased, in hindsight. I avoid any grey area around site rules so if this is coming into scope (its currently not) I'll steer well clear in future.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,949
  • Likes: 395
  •  
  • Reviews: 213
Lets be clear and I'll take a minute to clarify - I'm not saying this SP is a TS. I'm usually on the other side of this conversation, asking others how they're so sure of the same. If you want me to be verbatim, "this might be one of the most suspect TS pictures I've ever seen". Should have probably been very clear that this is my opinion and only a suspicion, nothing more. That said - have you got a pair of eyes and are we looking at the same pictures?

To answer the second bit, I don't have anything more to share. The information I have on this SP is exactly the same as what the rest of us have, which is the ad. "Some prefer to know" was referring to some punters wanting to know an SP they've seen was a TS. This was a slip on my part because it assumed the suspicion I raised at the start was true. I take the hit for that, my mistake.

If it warrants being removed please do. Its not a hill I'm willing to die on and it was poorly phrased, in hindsight. I avoid any grey area around site rules so if this is coming into scope (its currently not) I'll steer well clear in future.

Furry muff  :hi:


Offline Moore2012

Honestly she looks a lot more feminine in person. If it is a Post-op then she’s fooled me… but in all honesty it don’t bother me so not fussed

Offline rover_100

Honestly she looks a lot more feminine in person. If it is a Post-op then she’s fooled me… but in all honesty it don’t bother me so not fussed

Man after my own heart. Over in this thread I thought the pics looked hot AF and it turned out to be a TS. I didn't see her but if I had and found out later...as long as I had a good time I wouldn't really give a shite.  :unknown:
« Last Edit: May 13, 2023, 12:30:04 pm by rover_100 »