Author Topic: Thought I was done with Latinas then I saw her... Young Naughty Maia (Bristol)  (Read 3813 times)


10 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6919220) (9 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Payyourwaymate]

Offline simping

Her: External Link/Members Only

(She's also here with a friend: External Link/Members Only)

They're both here for a week.

1hr/60
Extras kissing £30, OWO also £30. Didn't go for any of them.

She's staying in the stoke croft area, all coms were handled through text [received the standard stock message which included the post code, price, extras etc] had to wait for a couple minutes as she was getting ready lol typical. Got sent a pic on WhatsApp of the rental they're staying at. Buzzed and was let in.

Honestly day or night you're pretty much exposed so just pretend you're smoking a ciggy as you wait to see her or her friend.

Right, she's hot. Natural tits, round peachy ass like Anal Becky if not better, tan lines and perfect height for me 5'4.

Decent enough English, held a little convo with her but alas the translator app came out 🤷‍♂️

Led to the bedroom and handed cash over; whilst she was counting I could hear her friend getting her cheeks clapped and moaning away. So to the guy who saw her good on you!

Maia is the same — the girl can take a pounding in doggy, she can throw it back too. Same in missionary, though she did tell me to slow it down a bit when I placed her legs on my shoulders. Cowgirl is phenomenal the girl can ride you as if she's on one of those mechanical bull machines, watching her perky tits bounce up and down was fucking amazing!

Cons: I suspect a lot of her dirty talk is the result of the porn she watches for umm research ;)

Offline princerico

Both look hotter than a Mexican's lunch.

Good work.

Offline Colston36

Both look hotter than a Mexican's lunch.

Good work.

What a wonderful phrase!

Our colleague has misquoted cost as £60. If only! It is £160 - good value by the sound of it.

Offline simping

Our colleague has misquoted cost as £60. If only! It is £160 - good value by the sound of it.

That'd be a dream!

Offline princerico

What a wonderful phrase!


Russ Meyer it used to describe Miss Kitten Natividad in Return of the Ultravixens.


Offline Urban_G

She looks and sounds good so thanks for the review but £30 each for kissing and OWO is taking the piss, particularly given her standard rates.

Offline Jnorris999

A duo with these 2 would be a dream

Offline southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,044
  • Likes: 159
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
She looks and sounds good so thanks for the review but £30 each for kissing and OWO is taking the piss, particularly given her standard rates.

well you don't have to pay it if you don't want to but not putting it on her profile is, i think, a bit naughty. Hopefully the OP was told at the time of booking not just on arrival?

Offline simping

well you don't have to pay it if you don't want to but not putting it on her profile is, i think, a bit naughty. Hopefully the OP was told at the time of booking not just on arrival?

I agree it really should be in her profile. Yh her first response was a text message containing all the info I needed when I was trying to book her.

Offline Palace123

She looks and sounds good so thanks for the review but £30 each for kissing and OWO is taking the piss, particularly given her standard rates.

Not saying its the case with her...but the number of times girls will opportunistically try to bump up...I've had countless occasions where I've agreed it with them up front and then they try to upgrade in person...fortunately, I get everything on text always and almost always they accept in the end when I produce it. Of course, they get texts with guys mixed up most of the time. Also, if she's working for someone else...which she almost certainly is if Brazilian, they usually do what their "co-ordiinator" tells them...the look of surprises I've seen when I've shown them the messages....but in the end they seem to have a good time.
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac