Author Topic: Any regular in London that consistently performed ?  (Read 7837 times)

Online ollielon

I did with Emma External Link/Members Only

But it was a long time ago, I cannot afford her anymore.

thanks she increased her price significantly and added a few photos recently ...

Hidden Image/Members Only

Online ollielon

Katalina: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Not that I see her every time she comes to London. But I've seen her enough throughout the years to call her a regular. I know she is controversial but somehow we seem to have the right chemistry.

P

she had a few bad review over the years ... but I might just put her back on my list then ... cheers


Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline bedhedred

she had a few bad review over the years ... but I might just put her back on my list then ... cheers


Hidden Image/Members Only

I went back years after the neutral.
She's definitely worth seeing. You can expect her to quite blunt and assertive, but she's nice if you stay on her good side. Don't visit her after a curry and 4 pints like one bloke did.

You have to phone to book. I will try again next time she appears.

Offline jamiekinkxxx

I went back years after the neutral.
She's definitely worth seeing. You can expect her to quite blunt and assertive, but she's nice if you stay on her good side. Don't visit her after a curry and 4 pints like one bloke did.

You have to phone to book. I will try again next time she appears.

But her AW profile is dead?

Offline 1599337

Never had any issues with coco shanel and seen her a fair few times now. Always a good service worth the money.

External Link/Members Only

Only other escort I've seen who stayed consistently good was mia_bubble but I think shes quit now (either that or i cant find her)


Offline 1599337

Oh actually saw External Link/Members Only 3 times also but that was a fair while back and she doenst seem to be in uk currently. She gave a great service every time though and her ass is huge so I'd probably see her again if she comes back

Offline thebastard

Oliva from Diva - whenever I'm down in London I have to see her.

Offline MLawro93

Oh actually saw External Link/Members Only 3 times also but that was a fair while back and she doenst seem to be in uk currently. She gave a great service every time though and her ass is huge so I'd probably see her again if she comes back

She has been out of the UK for some time. Not sure she will return :unknown:

Her BJs were amazing

Offline ali sugar

the below mentioned girls have always delivered for me:
1.naughty Natt
  External Link/Members Only
2.Miss.Adrianna
External Link/Members Only

Online ollielon

Oliva from Diva - whenever I'm down in London I have to see her.

I have to agree .. did not see her since she moved to 250 though

Offline pantywetter

Agree Oliva from Diva.  Slightly professional demeanour but totally reliable high performer.  Reminds me I need to get back.

Offline nico2000


Offline Harry Stotle


Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,319
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
JasmineThaiCute is very consistent for me

External Link/Members Only

If you recommend a girl, it makes sense to do a review.

Offline jgillis

I know that many members here do not like rankings. Principally because the source data is sketchy and only AdultWork service providers can be ranked. But data is my thing, so I did rank the top escorts in London for my own use.

I used a Bayesian Estimator to calculate a weighted rank. This approach handles the issue of varying review counts and minimizes the posterior expected loss value. It is the same algorithm used by Amazon, IMDB and others.

Here are the top ten based upon this vector of analysis (data is a few months old):
If you don't like this approach, don't flame me - just move on.

Offline JO6688

External Link/Members Only

For me, it has to be CumFuckMyAss or Lily as she sometimes goes by. I've seen her X 4, one of which was a FFM with her colleague Sussy.

One should experience her just once, especially for her squirting

Offline JO6688

External Link/Members Only

For me, it has to be CumFuckMyAss or Lily as she sometimes goes by. I've seen her X 4, one of which was a FFM with her colleague Sussy.

One should experience her just once, especially for her squirting

External Link/Members Only

CumFuckMyAss's mate Sussy

Offline Steely Dan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,534
  • Likes: 76
  •  
  • Reviews: 154
Good post jgilllis.

Note that the one negative for Woofie was for a duo meet, and only referred to her duo partner (that the punter choose).  Not that it makes any difference, but it makes the point that numbers are limited, members need to read WHY the rating was given, not just take the number as fact.  Similarly, this score hides the fact that MIA has gotten a lot of neutrals over the last year.

Offline pantywetter

I know that many members here do not like rankings. Principally because the source data is sketchy and only AdultWork service providers can be ranked. But data is my thing, so I did rank the top escorts in London for my own use.

I used a Bayesian Estimator to calculate a weighted rank. This approach handles the issue of varying review counts and minimizes the posterior expected loss value. It is the same algorithm used by Amazon, IMDB and others.

Here are the top ten based upon this vector of analysis (data is a few months old):
If you don't like this approach, don't flame me - just move on.

The intersection of data science and punting.  Nice!

I can’t believe Ellie Roses clean sheet.  What a record!  Shame I’ve never been able to get a booking!
« Last Edit: May 18, 2023, 06:30:15 am by pantywetter »

Offline jgillis

[snip]
I used a Bayesian Estimator to calculate a weighted rank. This approach handles the issue of varying review counts and minimizes the posterior expected loss value.
[snip]

Another point to mention here. You can combine the weighted rank with the price charged to form a crude VFM index. If you do this, one observation is that Hungarian SPs very often under-charge the market. This could be a cultural thing, but it could be a random fluctuation given the small corpus size (although the trend is very strong).

For example, Hungarian ladies who are charging less than the fair-market-value (given their reviews) are the likes of: External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, etc.

I don't know if its possible to get direct access to the forum database. I would find that useful.

Offline jgillis

I can’t believe Ellie Roses clean sheet. 

This wins the pun-of-the-month competition :D

Offline wannabe

Another point to mention here. You can combine the weighted rank with the price charged to form a crude VFM index. If you do this, one observation is that Hungarian SPs very often under-charge the market. This could be a cultural thing, but it could be a random fluctuation given the small corpus size (although the trend is very strong).

For example, Hungarian ladies who are charging less than the fair-market-value (given their reviews) are the likes of: External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, etc.

I don't know if its possible to get direct access to the forum database. I would find that useful.

Could the lower price they're charging be because many of them are older (50s) or not very good looking? Not necessarily because they're Hungarian?

Offline Puntingutils

I know that many members here do not like rankings. Principally because the source data is sketchy and only AdultWork service providers can be ranked. But data is my thing, so I did rank the top escorts in London for my own use.
I was thinking of making a thread about this, but did see someone make one a while back with not a welcoming response. But I love this shit! It'd be great to identify and rank the SP's based on the positive:neutral:negative ratio of UKP reviews, and then factor in a threshold such as a minimum of 50 positive reviews. May I ask how you acquired the data in the first place, scrolling randomly through profiles seem to be luck based and time consuming.

Online ollielon

I was thinking of making a thread about this, but did see someone make one a while back with not a welcoming response. But I love this shit! It'd be great to identify and rank the SP's based on the positive:neutral:negative ratio of UKP reviews, and then factor in a threshold such as a minimum of 50 positive reviews. May I ask how you acquired the data in the first place, scrolling randomly through profiles seem to be luck based and time consuming.

while interesting conversation (and I really mean it) ... this should be taken out of this thread and deserve its own post ... cheers

Offline petermisc

Another point to mention here. You can combine the weighted rank with the price charged to form a crude VFM index. If you do this, one observation is that Hungarian SPs very often under-charge the market. This could be a cultural thing, but it could be a random fluctuation given the small corpus size (although the trend is very strong).
I suspect that punters expect less from a lower-priced WG than they do from a higher-priced girl, and rank accordingly.  If you are paying a significant sum for a super-model and she turns out to be very average, you are not going to be pleased.  If you are paying a bargain rate, your expectations will be lower.  How do other lower-priced girls compare?

I would be interested to know how you decided which were the top 10 girls.  Why so many Hungarians compared to say Brazilians, for example.

Looking at the rankings, it would appear that one negative can have a big impact.  If the girl hadn't had that one negative, she would have been much higher up the list.  One wonders where a girl with no negative but say 100 neutrals would have come.