Author Topic: April Thai - Miss69 - Gloucester Road - checked off the list  (Read 6443 times)


31 review(s) for Sweety April (29 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline Graham2050

External Link/Members Only

£120 for 30mins

She provided decent service in my case and this was a positive but I didn't find her as attractive in person vs the pics and so I don't think she warrants the current £120/30mins and £170/hr rates (looks I don't think so, she is no where near Cara so if Cara is on £170 then she definitely shouldn't be on £170, but even if Cara didn't exist for the comparison I still don't think her looks warrants her £170, so that leaves service - it's a bit better than Cara's but there's loads of thais on £150 that offer a similar service level so service doesn't take her to the £170 mark either, thus mispriced and there shall be a market correction soon (unless it's her choice to stay not busy and get a bit more from each customer, and she did indeed tell me that she isn't busy at all (at least for the day I visited) and so this could just be the way she wants to run her business))

she was darker skinned in person vs the pics, I find lighter thais like Cara/Tracy/Zelda etc etc more attractive vs darker skinned thais (imagine a darker skinned Cara vs Cara, the lighter skinned Cara i.e. the current one would be the one I find more attactive)

Facially also slightly photoshopped in the pics but not ugly, maybe a 6-6.5/10. I saw her later that evening in a supermarket near Gloucester road (I saw her but she didn't see me) and she didn't have make up on at all and she was a 4/10 and looked a bit like a thai auntie, 100% not a head turner and would not shag when she is in that state. 

Meet: DFK was on tap throughout the hour, OWO was fine, asked her to suck my balls and she complied, asked her to rim me and she complied, rimming went on for as long as I wanted and was decently deep, asked her to rim both before round 1 and round 2 and no complains from her. unlike some of the other smaller thais who I have commented can take a pounding despite their size (e.g. Rihanna, Kelly, Nadia, etc) April was a bit taller than them body construct wise (but not Julie tall) but would say she can't really take hard poundings, seemed to be in a bit of pain when I was pounding her hard in doggy although she didn't complain but I started going easier anyway. CIM was delivered good and continued sucking till I was finished. 

I won't be returning at current pricing but might be a plan B/C if she was on £140.

« Last Edit: April 08, 2023, 05:56:59 pm by Graham2050 »

Offline flamingice

thus mispriced and there shall be a market correction soon (unless it's her choice to stay not busy and get a bit more from each customer, and she did indeed tell me that she isn't busy)

No Graham - there will not be a “market correction” because punters like you are still booking these girls up  :dash:

Offline Colston36

No Graham - there will not be a “market correction” because punters like you are still booking these girls up  :dash:

Pussy is ruled by the same market forces as everything else. Eggs were selling for as much as £5 a box of six three weeks ago where I am - Bristol. Sex is more exciting than omelettes.

Offline flamingice

Pussy is ruled by the same market forces as everything else. Eggs were selling for as much as £5 a box of six three weeks ago where I am - Bristol. Sex is more exciting than omelettes.

Not sure what your point is, but my point is while punters keep accepting a WG’s list price, the price will only go up, not down  :hi:


Offline bonapati

Nice review. Reads as neutral to me. Prices “may” go up especially if you review on their website with a link to your review on UKP interest and popularity may increase as well as better not able to book her. Although your review here doesn’t put her in good light ;)
« Last Edit: May 08, 2023, 09:14:08 am by bonapati »

Offline pbrown355

Colston, That's only because you haven't had one of my omelettes

Offline 2happen

……..especially if you review on their website with a link to your review on UKP interest and popularity may increase as well as better not able to….

It’s the agency putting those links there, not reviewers

Offline bonapati

It’s the agency putting those links there, not reviewers

Are they allowed to do that. How would anyone know it’s the agency and not the punter?

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,544
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Are they allowed to do that. How would anyone know it’s the agency and not the punter?

Sadly UKP reviews are currently public domain (sans links which is questionable deterence) so the agency could quote (or have a tool to scrape).  Quoting it without attribution or means of assuring readers a genuine punter of theirs wrote it would make it about as reliable as a paid-for anonymous "review" but linking to UKP may do more to dissuade reviewers wanting privacy and also encourage review trading for publicised or backhand rewards.

Offline dd_love

Are they allowed to do that. How would anyone know it’s the agency and not the punter?

Olina been doing it for a while I expect lots of other agencies too

Online anonymouse72

House of Divine do it as well and have for some time now.

Offline Jeffe

In all likelihood the pimp at miss69 is a member here (along with probably all the other agencies too) to keep an eye on reviews etc. linking in such an unsubtle way to their site isn’t very bright and not on as pointed out due to punters seemingly not consenting.

Hopefully we don’t have other King Tarzan type members trading positive reviews for agency favours. The mods here do a good job so should be able to weed any wrong uns out if they’re lurking here though.