PetitSuraia - Shepherd's Bush

[MLawro93]

Link
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Communication
When she is working, communication is good on the day. Quick, fast, and responsive.

Location
Well known hotel with the funny layout near Shepherd's Bush station. Easy walking distance, with plenty of public transport options.

Price
£200 for the hour.

Appearance
She is tiny. Photos are excellent, but she is much better in the flesh. She has a very pretty face, for me it is a 9/10. YMMV.

Meet
I got lucky and managed to make a booking. She is popular, and only works one day a week at the moment.

I got to the location, a well known hotel in the area, popped Suraia a message and then went inside with no issues walking past reception. I got into the room, and she did the standard standing behind the door. I knew she was short but was still surprised. If short women aren't for you, then best look elsewhere. I sorted the paperwork out, and quickly had a shower.

I remember all the hype when she first popped onto the scene, so I was wary of being disappointed. I'm glad I was wrong, she is lovely. Insane body, and very pretty face.

Into the action, started with plenty of kissing, she definitely has a softer FK technique, which uses the tongue more sensually. Did this for a bit, with my hands all over her body. Switched it up with some RO, and she is very responsive. Moved onto some OWO, technique was excellent, plenty of spit, no hands, works the shaft and head really well. She knows how to suck cock. A bit of 69, with me grabbing a hold of that arse. Finally on with the rubber, a flurry of various positions, with a big finish in CG.

I was beat. Spent the majority of the session edging myself along, so a second pop was out of the question today. The rest of the time was filled with some great chat. She is a very intelligent young woman, so talking to her is really easy. She is fairly chilled out, and shy initially, but quickly opens up.

The only downside is booking her is extremely difficult. She only switches her phone on when she knows she will be working, this is usually the day before. Therefore, she gets booked fairly quickly. I'm definitely returning as soon as I can, the whole experience was a big positive.

[Jonestown]

Thanks for the review, I'm glad she is back, I missed her last time around

[patelprat]

Thanks for review.

Did you have to call her, or was it all via text?
Was it a same-day booking, or you were able to book ahead?

[tantraman]

Communication
When she is working, communication is good on the day. Quick, fast, and responsive.

... from my experience in texting Suraia for what seems like forever, it appears she's never working, because I have never had a reply

[Iloveoral]

Good review matey thanks 

[MLawro93]

Thanks for review.

Did you have to call her, or was it all via text?
Was it a same-day booking, or you were able to book ahead?

... from my experience in texting Suraia for what seems like forever, it appears she's never working, because I have never had a reply

All communication was via text. Simply put, I got lucky with availability. She works once a week (that is what she tells me) and the day is not set. She rarely logs into her AW account, but her number pops up from time to time, and I think that's purely based on people buying her PG or Movies.

If you can meet at short notice, which is what happened to me, then you have a decent chance at meeting. You just need to maintain some polite persistence, so a speculative message now and again that might catch her eye.

When she isn't working, the phone is off, and it gets turned on when she decides to work, so you can imagine the barrage of messages she must get, and she must likely prioritises regulars due to her limited working hours. She is still low volume on the day she chooses to work, so you won't be rushed out.

[VladtheImpaleHer]

She looks good. Love that ass! Added to my HL.

[tantraman]

All communication was via text. Simply put, I got lucky with availability. She works once a week (that is what she tells me) and the day is not set. She rarely logs into her AW account, but her number pops up from time to time, and I think that's purely based on people buying her PG or Movies.

If you can meet at short notice, which is what happened to me, then you have a decent chance at meeting. You just need to maintain some polite persistence, so a speculative message now and again that might catch her eye.

When she isn't working, the phone is off, and it gets turned on when she decides to work, so you can imagine the barrage of messages she must get, and she must likely prioritises regulars due to her limited working hours. She is still low volume on the day she chooses to work, so you won't be rushed out.

Many thanks for this excellent extra intel, good sir ... it would seem it's worth my while persevering with Suraia

[mrbang123]

Yeah, I remember those back shots, the jiggles and ripples from dat ass! 

[Jardent6]

Managed to see her a couple months ago will write a review shortly.

To everyone’s joy I have found a porn vid of her on the net. 20 min vid with her face in it im not sure on the rules of sharing such content but if management give the Green light I will divulge.

[LLPunting]

Managed to see her a couple months ago will write a review shortly.

To everyone’s joy I have found a porn vid of her on the net. 20 min vid with her face in it im not sure on the rules of sharing such content but if management give the Green light I will divulge.

If it's not gated behind membership and a paywall then you can link, assuming you know that she isn't currently trying to have it taken down (or perhaps would want it removed if she knew).

[Jardent6]

It is gated behind a paywall. I certainly do not know of her trying to get it removed , it appears to me she was in that business at the time but that’s the only professional vid I have seen of her.

I’d imagine there are a lot personal amateur vids of her as she allows filming

[MLawro93]

It is gated behind a paywall. I certainly do not know of her trying to get it removed , it appears to me she was in that business at the time but that’s the only professional vid I have seen of her.

I’d imagine there are a lot personal amateur vids of her as she allows filming

If it is a professional video, most likely fair game, if it is an amateur recording, gets a bit dicey, especially if her face is full view as she insists on masking up when filming in the present.

[Jonestown]

I still harbour hope toes her, so maybe  think twice about posting the link as its not a good idea to piss her off, last time that happened she went off the market for a year or so.

[MLawro93]

I still harbour hope toes her, so maybe  think twice about posting the link as its not a good idea to piss her off, last time that happened she went off the market for a year or so.

I don't think there is much she can do if it is a professional video, assuming she wasn't coerced (as many women have) etc, and signed a contract.

Wholly different situation if it is an amateur video. Not worth the risk with posting it. Could come back to bite you in the arse.

[Jonestown]

I don't think there is much she can do if it is a professional video, ........

Well there is, she can flounce off and not see anyone again.

[MLawro93]

Well there is, she can flounce off and not see anyone again.

But then we'll still have that video to keep us company 

[MLawro93]

Duplicate comment. 

[Jardent6]

I don't think there is much she can do if it is a professional video, assuming she wasn't coerced (as many women have) etc, and signed a contract.

Wholly different situation if it is an amateur video. Not worth the risk with posting it. Could come back to bite you in the arse.

I agree with u on amateur vid . But I can categorically say this a pro vid with watermark and tons of other vids on the platform I had seen the vid before but it only dawned on me it was her after I had seen her and then rewatched the vid

[dlgh11]

I agree with u on amateur vid . But I can categorically say this a pro vid with watermark and tons of other vids on the platform I had seen the vid before but it only dawned on me it was her after I had seen her and then rewatched the vid

If you can DM the link, that would be awesome!

[MLawro93]

I agree with u on amateur vid . But I can categorically say this a pro vid with watermark and tons of other vids on the platform I had seen the vid before but it only dawned on me it was her after I had seen her and then rewatched the vid

Ah fair enough then. I'll admit to being curious then, never realised she done porn.

[crazyboy]

at least let us know which website

[crazyboy]

If you can DM the link, that would be awesome!

yes please 

[Atrueyorkie]

If it’s public you might as well. You’re gonna get 10 million people Dm’ing you pleading for the link so it’s better to just post it one time publicly

[daviemac]

It is gated behind a paywall. I certainly do not know of her trying to get it removed , it appears to me she was in that business at the time but that’s the only professional vid I have seen of her.

I’d imagine there are a lot personal amateur vids of her as she allows filming

If it's behind a paywall then best not to give her free advertising on here. If it's one posted without her consent then it wouldn't be allowed anyway.

Can I just remind everyone about the rule regarding PM, if you aren't familiar with it then there's a link at the bottom of every page.

[MLawro93]

If it's behind a paywall then best not to give her free advertising on here. If it's one posted without her consent then it wouldn't be allowed anyway.

Spoilsport 

He will get a barrage of DMs anyway.   

[daviemac]

Spoilsport 

He will get a barrage of DMs anyway.   

And get a lot of people banned, including himself. See my post above.  BTW it takes 1 click of the mouse to take the PM facility away altogether.

[daviemac]

yes please 

Are you having a laugh, you've been here 2 years and your first post is to totally ignore the rules and leave yourself open to a ban.   

[filatino_jay]

Oh Suraia, how I remember those curves  interesting that she went down the porn route, would actually pay for that!

[daviemac]

at least let us know which website

Have you got a reason for your lack of reviews or meaningful contributions?   

[johnmat]

It's been a while since I've been here. I'm seeing her this week. If all goes well, I'll post a review.

[johnmat]

Managed to see her a couple months ago will write a review shortly.

To everyone’s joy I have found a porn vid of her on the net. 20 min vid with her face in it im not sure on the rules of sharing such content but if management give the Green light I will divulge.

Can you dm me the link as well please?

[MLawro93]

Can you dm me the link as well please?

Why are you trying so hard to get banned? 

[johnmat]

Why are you trying so hard to get banned? 

Oh, my bad if it's against the rules.

[patelprat]

It's been a while since I've been here. I'm seeing her this week. If all goes well, I'll post a review.

Post the review even if it doesn’t go well (actually, especially if if doesn’t go well )

[johnmat]

Post the review even if it doesn’t go well (actually, especially if if doesn’t go well )

lol yeah - will do, it's been a while since I've been here in the punting scene and I hope she lives up to the hype.

[DonaldGecko]

It is gated behind a paywall. I certainly do not know of her trying to get it removed , it appears to me she was in that business at the time but that’s the only professional vid I have seen of her.

I’d imagine there are a lot personal amateur vids of her as she allows filming

Are you able to allude to the site?

[Puntingutils]

If it's not gated behind membership and a paywall then you can link, assuming you know that she isn't currently trying to have it taken down (or perhaps would want it removed if she knew).

Can I ask why the last part matters? Morally speaking, sure she regrets her decision of making the film and she doesn't want her face to be publicised now, but at the same time he gave the consent of being filmed at that time and was happy for it to be distributed. Unless she makes a settlement with the production company, it should be fair game? If the video is still up via the production company we can assume the latter.

[MLawro93]

Are you able to allude to the site?

Given how long she has been doing this work, and if she genuinely had professional videos online. I am genuinely surprised they haven't already surfaced 

[sky1234]

so curious about the video, I'm sure it can be posted if it's a legit professional video right? She probably has an onlyfans too lol

[daviemac]

so curious about the video, I'm sure it can be posted if it's a legit professional video right? She probably has an onlyfans too lol

Are you sure enough to risk being banned? lol

[daviemac]

Can I ask why the last part matters? Morally speaking, sure she regrets her decision of making the film and she doesn't want her face to be publicised now, but at the same time he gave the consent of being filmed at that time and was happy for it to be distributed. Unless she makes a settlement with the production company, it should be fair game? If the video is still up via the production company we can assume the latter.

Whatever is posted on other sites has no relevance to what can be posted on here. There's things already on this site that can't be reposted, quoted or linked to.

[Puntingutils]

Whatever is posted on other sites has no relevance to what can be posted on here. There's things already on this site that can't be reposted, quoted or linked to.

So why exactly is sharing the video a banneable offence? There's a thread on the site that shares escorts with online videos https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=76000.0
I'm struggling to see why that thread is permissible and yet this video being shared, or even requested in the PM's, is an offence that can lead to a ban.

[LLPunting]

So why exactly is sharing the video a banneable offence? There's a thread on the site that shares escorts with online videos https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=76000.0
I'm struggling to see why that thread is permissible and yet this video being shared, or even requested in the PM's, is an offence that can lead to a ban.

It seems you have no proper concept of consent, you may want to check out the laws of the land before approaching another woman.

[Puntingutils]

It seems you have no proper concept of consent, you may want to check out the laws of the land before approaching another woman.

As far as I'm aware, she signed a contract that allowed distribution of the video. Whether she regrets it or not doesn't matter - the production company can continue to distribute it. Also, how do you know all the videos shared on the other thread are with SP consenting .

[daviemac]

So why exactly is sharing the video a banneable offence? There's a thread on the site that shares escorts with online videos https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=76000.0
I'm struggling to see why that thread is permissible and yet this video being shared, or even requested in the PM's, is an offence that can lead to a ban.

As far as I'm aware, she signed a contract that allowed distribution of the video. Whether she regrets it or not doesn't matter - the production company can continue to distribute it. Also, how do you know all the videos shared on the other thread are with SP consenting .

What part of my post above, reply #41, are you having difficulty with?    Let me know and I'll try and explain in a way you can understand.

[Puntingutils]

What part of my post above, reply #41, are you having difficulty with?    Let me know and I'll try and explain in a way you can understand.

Yeah, so after reading it for a while -it seemed from that reply, It doesn't matter if the other site still publicises even f she regretted it, it would not be allowed on this site because she may not want it to be discovered. So your going through the moral route rather than the legal route, I get that. But then why exactly is the other thread allowed, as how would you know the other SP's want those videos publicised and not removed. And we still don't even know if this SP wants the video removed! Do you see where I'm coming from?
Or is the issue the fact that it's gated behind a paywall

[daviemac]

Yeah, so after reading it for a while -it seemed from that reply, It doesn't matter if the other site still publicises even f she regretted it, it would not be allowed on this site because she may not want it to be discovered. So your going through the moral route rather than the legal route, I get that. But then why exactly is the other thread allowed, as how would you know the other SP's want those videos publicised and not removed. And we still don't even know if this SP wants the video removed! Do you see where I'm coming from?

Look mate, last time.

It does not matter what is posted elsewhere on the internet or who has or hasn't given permission or has asked for something to be removed. This site has it's own rules regarding what can and can't be posted and we are not here to promote any escort's ppv videos.

There are 100's if not 1000's of pictures and videos on this site that can NOT be reposted, linked to or quoted.

[Puntingutils]

Look mate, last time.

It does not matter what is posted elsewhere on the internet or who has or hasn't given permission or has asked for something to be removed. This site has it's own rules regarding what can and can't be posted and we are not here to promote any escort's ppv videos.

There are 100's if not 1000's of pictures and videos on this site that can NOT be reposted, linked to or quoted.

Ah got it, wanted to know the exact reason why it couldn't be posted. It wasn't due the consent like the forum helper implied. That clears things up 

[daviemac]

Ah got it, wanted to know the exact reason why it couldn't be posted. That clears things up 

I said that 5 days ago, you just chose to ignore it. Don't think my posting something in a more friendly, advisory way, instead of a direct instruction, means it isn't against the rules. If I give advice it will be on the rules.

If it's behind a paywall then best not to give her free advertising on here. If it's one posted without her consent then it wouldn't be allowed anyway.

Can I just remind everyone about the rule regarding PM, if you aren't familiar with it then there's a link at the bottom of every page.