Author Topic: Arlis_Arias: Russian, London, Outcall Only. One Word Phenomenal!  (Read 12982 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6363905) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Introduction:

Oh my! What a booking! Spoiler alert... gents I would highly recommend Arlis.

To all those recent doomslayers of late, moaning about lack of quality, price inflation etc. All I would say is do your research (and that isn't just with UKP reviews, that is the internet and actually communicate with the girls (easier with Indy ones obviously) openly before booking to really ensure you are on the same page. Believe me sometimes you can find a pearl in the ocean.... this review is a point in case!

I had been looking for a particular type of meet for quite a while. One that is slightly different to my normal use of escorts, which is generally more aligned to kink than an ultimate GFE I sought this time, but this GFE had a one specific requirement thrown into the mix.

As such I read reviews on UKP and did diligent research on AW and other escort sites. I was very specific in what I was after, and I was more than happy to wait for this to happen than just jump in with someone for the sake of it. This meet was weeks in the making. I found a few escorts but finally narrowed it down to one. All good things and all that stuff! ;)

I much prefer Indy escorts than agency girls, so AW can work well overall, but obviously it can be a minefield. However, with proper care and attention, use of the good search facilities you can find real gems. Arlis is just such a find.

The Comms:

I connected via AW, talking about the type of booking I was after and proposed a few dates that could work for me. We exchanged a few emails, which just reinforced that Arlis was going to be fun, interesting and also really got my specific requirement over and above a very sensual GFE.

On the actual day, Arlis was travelling back into London so comms were slightly slower and at one point I was slightly concerned that the meet might not happen on our chosen evening, but everything panned out OK in the end. Exact time and duration agreed via WhatsApp and the AW booking request sent and accepted.

The Lady (Personality and Looks):

- Stated 5'7 is spot on I would say.
- Stated dress size is 12… she is much more slender than that really, I guess it must be her stunning derrière (see her pictures) that may officially make her a 12. As you may know from my reviews, I prefer slimmer ladies so believe me she has a stunning (all natural) body with beautiful derrière.
- Looks are subjective, but to me I loved her look. Auburn hair, pale complexion, great smile. Stunning IMHO.
- She does have ink, quite a bit, but I thought it was tasteful and it all just adds to her overall look.
- The quirky personality that comes across from her AW page and WhatsApp messages is genuine. She is a great girl. Fun, intelligent, worldly-wise and has a that great quirky personality. It may not be to everyone’s tastes, but I loved it!
- Genuine Russian, been in the UK for 10+ years, but she is thinking of leaving.

The Location:

My home so a tad biased, but I had set the mood for the type of fun we were going to enjoy.

The Fun Time:

Arlis arrived a little late but had kept me informed. Been a bit of a chill of late so we got to know one another in front of the log burner. She doesn’t drink so she had water whilst I had a glass of wine.

The next few hours were for me an ultimate GFE but with my added requirement… kissing, very sensual touch, slowly undressing each other. Arlis is very feminine and dresses accordingly even down to her underwear.

My main requirement for our meet other than being very slow and sensual was to be edged, prolonged oral worship. Use of mouth, tongue, hands, fingers, nails to edge me back and forth from orgasm for as long as she chose, only letting me cum when she let me. Well, all I can say is that I have not been edged like this in a very long time. (There was a young Hungarian girl that I met a couple of times in a horrible little studio near Lisson Grove a few years ago that was very good at edging, but no one has come as close until now. Arlis nails edging!)

Edging is an artform IMHO. Many girls say they know how to do it, but in reality they don’t. They may give great head, but not proper edging… not what I would genuially say is prolonged cock worship that ebbs and flows over a very for a long period.

We made out initially in the living room before moving upstairs to my bedroom. I was then edged for a good 30mins. My first orgasm was big and strong… I had not cum for 7 days deliberately due to the type of fun I was after.

It was then my turn and I spent a long time devouring her. Very reactive to the use of my tongue and genuinely came multiple times…. But that didn’t stop her then taking the lead again and my second edging experience started… this time longer and even more enjoyable, with so many different techniques and use of hands and mouth. My second orgasm was stronger than the first, but obviously the amount of cum was much less, but Arlis didn’t stop though, I was milked totally dry… an intense feeling that I love.

Both spent, we chatted for a bit. It would appear that Arlis is very much multi-faceted, and also enjoys some areas of my other kinks, so I can 100% see another meeting happening in the not too distant future.

I ordered an Uber and Arlis left a little after what would have been 2hours from arriving. I slept well that evening I can tell you!

Bizarrely we didn’t have penetrative sex, but this really didn’t bother me. I was (constantly) hard pretty much for 2+ hours… massively turned on and I was thoroughly spent (and very happy) by the end having cum (incredibly hard) twice.

Summary of Services:
- DFK
- Lots of sensuality (licking and kissing every inch of body)
- OWO (edging... total cock worship)
- RO

Gents I would highly recommend Arlis.... oh I may have already said that!  But I didn't say she is one hell of a sexy lady!;)

The Cost:
£360 for 2 hours + Uber home

Link:
External Link/Members Only


« Last Edit: February 27, 2023, 12:21:22 pm by jamiekinkxxx »

Offline MLawro93


Offline tantraman

... Edging is an artform ...

You are right, jamiekinkxxx ... and it sounds like Arlis delivers a super-skilled full-body edging sexperience; I would consider a blissful half-hour (£100) in her hands and mouth ... HL'd, thank you, sir :drinks:

Offline tantraman

Outcall only  :(

Dammit :dash: ... I didn't pick up on that, so mesmerised was I by the write-up! :wacko:

Online patelprat

Thanks she looks and sounds great!

If only she did incalls !  :(


Offline jamiekinkxxx

Thanks she looks and sounds great!

If only she did incalls !  :(

We seem to like a similar look PatelPrat  :thumbsup: ... maybe book a hotel?

Online hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,665
  • Likes: 580
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Great review Jamie! My interest in her was piqued by her mention of Orto Parisi as a favourite perfume 😂 Proper niche choice, and that made me think we'd get on pretty well!

Online patelprat

We seem to like a similar look PatelPrat  :thumbsup: ... maybe book a hotel?

This one might actually be worth the extra hassle and cost…

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Great review Jamie! My interest in her was piqued by her mention of Orto Parisi as a favourite perfume 😂 Proper niche choice, and that made me think we'd get on pretty well!

Thanks Hendrix  :thumbsup:

She is quite a find IMHO, I am sure you would get on well, although maybe slightly different to some of your exploits  ;)

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Dammit :dash: ... I didn't pick up on that, so mesmerised was I by the write-up! :wacko:

alas tantraman, only outcall. Arlis 100% knows the artform you and I both love.

Offline shooter

 :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Great to finally get a review of this WG, and sounds like you had a great time  :D :D

 I have had on HL for a while, her 2 hour rate is above my limit though - if it was 300 I would def book but 360 is a real stretch.

She says she is back again - did she have an old profile for linking?  :hi:

Online patelprat

I emailed her earlier on AW with my vanilla GFE requirements- probably too boring for her??   :)

Online patelprat

I tried to book her, apparently booked up for weeks already.

Offline MLawro93

I tried to book her, apparently booked up for weeks already.

What a good review does for you. She does appear to have been working for a while, so if she is truly good, then I suspect some people will hesitate to be the first to review her, in order to ensure they can still get a booking once the demand skyrockets! It is a selfish approach, but one I completely understand as the number of leeches compared to active contributors is quite the gap.

Offline Bartolomeo

yep exactly why when I review, I refrain from putting superlatives in the thread title. It just attracts even more leechy parasites than usual

Online patelprat

What a good review does for you. She does appear to have been working for a while, so if she is truly good, then I suspect some people will hesitate to be the first to review her, in order to ensure they can still get a booking once the demand skyrockets! It is a selfish approach, but one I completely understand as the number of leeches compared to active contributors is quite the gap.

This is a repeat of the Vicky_28 situation - she told me she hates she now has all this extra exposure and messages off the back of the UKP review, as she has always been a low volume high quality provider.

« Last Edit: February 28, 2023, 03:45:34 pm by patelprat »

Offline jamiekinkxxx

I believe this is very much part-time. only really a couple of encounters per week. As such she wll get booked up.

But I agree, maybe I should not have put phenomenal in the title (or even reviewed, but I always try to give back, so that would not be my style!)

Online patelprat

I believe this is very much part-time. only really a couple of encounters per week. As such she wll get booked up.

But I agree, maybe I should not have put phenomenal in the title (or even reviewed, but I always try to give back, so that would not be my style!)

No it’s good you highlight.

I may need to wait a few months though :D

Offline Chief_smasher

Seems like a great service provider and enjoys what she does. Unfortunately will have to miss out though. No big cocks allowed, although she hasn’t given any sizes.

Offline Ivor Hunch

Does she do penetrative sex?  Doesn't appear on the likes list that I can see?

Online patelprat

Does she do penetrative sex?  Doesn't appear on the likes list that I can see?

I had been trying to book her, and she’s done her utmost best to put me off.
Shrinking her likes list, no penetration. A few other preferences removed too.

Only offered to peg me or give me a “sexless massage” in my particular case. :unknown:

Seems that’s all I deserve in her eyes lol

« Last Edit: March 17, 2023, 12:12:21 am by patelprat »

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Yes it would appear that from the review Arlis has decided to change the services she offers.

Not every girl wants 100's of emails from guys that dont even read the profile and make demand after demand after demand.

To say she wasn't happy with the extra attention from this review is an understatement from the conversations I have had with her since.

All I can say is that there are some guys in the hobby that really need to have a hard look at themselves and realise that SPs are human and not just a sex-machine. Treat them with respect guys!

Looks like my review sadly triggered a great deal of interest and not from people that seem to know how this industry works if you are to get the very best experience. I reviewed with the very best intentions to share a great experience but seems that has backfired for everyone, me, the SP and everyone that could have had a similar experience to me by a not so small minority of our peers (imagine most iof the lurkers and the people that are not members, but who knows)

Anyhow the last few comments are correct. Arlis now isn't offering sexual play other than massage and kink / fetish. No oral no sex. I guess maybe hand job, but I do not know.

So to all the guys that have read this review and then inundated the SP with inappropiate emails, thank you, for fucking it all up!

« Last Edit: March 17, 2023, 08:35:32 am by jamiekinkxxx »

Offline jamiekinkxxx

« Last Edit: March 17, 2023, 08:36:59 am by jamiekinkxxx »

Online hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,665
  • Likes: 580
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Well, another creep bites the UKP dust. Well done to all for exposing these scum  :thumbsup:

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Well, another creep bites the UKP dust. Well done to all for exposing these scum  :thumbsup:

Was Arlis one of his (patelprat) victims Hendrix?

Online hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,665
  • Likes: 580
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Was Arlis one of his (patelprat) victims Hendrix?

I don't know anything about that punter, but I do know that the admin/mods here are very thorough about investigating any such claims, so no doubt he's a wrong 'un.

Online Momodan38

Bloody hell. I’ve interacted that prat a little. He came off as a meek individual. IIRC he was even bullied by an SP here, who got herself banned for it.

Oh well. Shame about about this SP having to change her services due to all the twats.

Offline Bartolomeo

People are just asshats sometimes. Really is a shame that it results in someone having to change the way they work because of it.

Also, unfortunately patelprat is not the first clown and won't be the last to use threats of bad reviews to try to result for their own gain. He's questioned in past why he hasn't had response from some WGs when trying to book. Wonder if this was why

Online Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,698
  • Likes: 140
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Well, another creep bites the UKP dust. Well done to all for exposing these scum  :thumbsup:

+1

His posts on this thread smack of desperate boundary pusher, and glad he's been called out as a blackmailer. I hope Arlis appreciates that we're not all manipulative cunts. I did think once that he has an impressive number of positive reviews but concluded he was easy to please. Perhaps something more sinister going on. I did think he defended sexyyy_laura a bit too much a few weeks back.

Online hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,665
  • Likes: 580
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
People are just asshats sometimes. Really is a shame that it results in someone having to change the way they work because of it.

Also, unfortunately patelprat is not the first clown and won't be the last to use threats of bad reviews to try to result for their own gain. He's questioned in past why he hasn't had response from some WGs when trying to book. Wonder if this was why

Yeah, this is a bugbear of mine. Just move on ffs!


Offline MLawro93

Yeah, this is a bugbear of mine. Just move on ffs!

Came off as a bit entitled, surprised he was banned though. But at least that is one less wrong un off the site

Online Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,698
  • Likes: 140
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Came off as a bit entitled, surprised he was banned though. But at least that is one less wrong un off the site

In spite of the reason he was banned?

Offline MLawro93

In spite of the reason he was banned?

Poor wording on my part, sorry.  :) I meant I thought he was alright, turns out he was not, hence the surprise. Deserves the ban fully for the reason highlighted

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,767
  • Likes: 545
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
I don't know anything about that punter, but I do know that the admin/mods here are very thorough about investigating any such claims, so no doubt he's a wrong 'un.

Warning thread about him on SAAFE

Offline DanniMalone69

Warning thread about him on SAAFE

Wow! Just had a little read of it - a real creep indeed! I knew there was something off about the guy, just the way he wrote his reviews and posting like he had all the intel of some of the SPs. Glad he’s been outed!

Offline Joelawerence

Wow! Just had a little read of it - a real creep indeed! I knew there was something off about the guy, just the way he wrote his reviews and posting like he had all the intel of some of the SPs. Glad he’s been outed!

Yeah, I also called him out for simping and constantly defending a particular WG. Seems like he mentions his reviews on this forum for getting services as per desire from WGs.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2023, 11:22:21 am by Joelawerence »

Offline Ivor Hunch

Warning thread about him on SAAFE

would you mind posting a link?  My search skills are letting me down.

thanks

Ivor

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,767
  • Likes: 545
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
would you mind posting a link?  My search skills are letting me down.

thanks

Ivor

not allowed by the rules

Online hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,665
  • Likes: 580
  •  
  • Reviews: 63

Offline MLawro93

Cheers, what a twat.

I found the thread about him, definitely agreed. I then stumbled on the King Tarzan thread on SAAFE and wanted to gag, what is wrong with people?  :dash:

Offline Bartolomeo

I found the thread about him, definitely agreed. I then stumbled on the King Tarzan thread on SAAFE and wanted to gag, what is wrong with people?  :dash:

yep same here  :vomit:

Offline EasyRider21

I found the thread about him, definitely agreed. I then stumbled on the King Tarzan thread on SAAFE and wanted to gag, what is wrong with people?  :dash:

OMG, what did I just read???

How some men can allow themselves to treat others (especially women) like this is beyond my comprehension. What a bunch of pathetic losers.  :thumbsdown:

On the flip side at least they got caught in the end. But still, they reviewed plenty of SPs before they got banned. I wish WGs were a bit more forthcoming about bad punters. It seems to me that they are still too afraid to come forward.
Banned reason: White knighting SP he hasn't seen - sending her copies of reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Ivor Hunch

not allowed by the rules

I query the rationale of a rule that allows someone to refer to a specific page on another website, but not post a link to it.

What purpose can that serve?

Offline Prince

I found the thread about him, definitely agreed. I then stumbled on the King Tarzan thread on SAAFE and wanted to gag, what is wrong with people?  :dash:


What did he do?

Offline yesbby

The strangeness of those girls’ description of him are hard to expunge from your head

Offline jamiekinkxxx

She has gone guys:

External Link/Members Only

Sorry, the page you requested does not exist.


« Last Edit: April 13, 2023, 11:46:12 am by jamiekinkxxx »

Online patelprat

She has gone guys:

External Link/Members Only

Sorry, the page you requested does not exist.


And for the record, it wasn’t due to me lol

Offline jamiekinkxxx

And for the record, it wasn’t due to me lol

😂 we know that now.

Much more to do with my review triggering creeps inundating her with messages.  :thumbsdown:



« Last Edit: April 13, 2023, 01:59:10 pm by jamiekinkxxx »

Offline jamiekinkxxx

I thought this might get communicated back to the SP! Funny that… a guy (or guys) on here using the site to gain favour with a SP.

Such an easy experiment.