If this were just a matter of opinion I'd agree, but you're actually spouting medical rubbish which needs to be countered
Read page 15/27 for the European Medical Agencies parameters and limits for bioequivalence.
External Link/Members Only"1.1 Background
Two medicinal products containing the same active substance are considered bioequivalent if they are
pharmaceutically equivalent or pharmaceutical alternatives and their bioavailabilities (rate and extent)
after administration in the same molar dose lie within acceptable predefined limits. These limits are set
to ensure comparable in vivo performance, i.e. similarity in terms of safety and efficacy."
Page 15/27:
"Parameters to be analysed and acceptance limits
In studies to determine bioequivalence after a single dose, the parameters to be analysed are AUC(0-t),
or, when relevant, AUC(0-72h), and C max. For these parameters the 90% confidence interval for the ratio
of the test and reference products should be contained within the acceptance interval of 80.00-
125.00%. To be inside the acceptance interval the lower bound should be ≥ 80.00% when rounded to
two decimal places and the upper bound should be ≤ 125.00% when rounded to two decimal places."
You will see the FDA and UK agency with similiar tolerances.
External Link/Members Only