FranchescaMay – Harlow – Deflated Sex Doll

[PilotMan]

Link:

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Location:

Harlow – Edinburgh Way District, not far from Harlow Station

Resident Parking + Visitors

Booking & Comms:

I text her on the day a few hours before and confirmed a time around 3 hours ahead. Confirmed the duration and services and extras I wanted via text.

The Fee

£150 – 45 minutes + £30 OWO + £30 CIM. Total £210

When:

January 2023

Upon arrival:

Franchesca gave me instructions where to park in the development and specific instructions about going up to her apartment. She opened the door wearing a teddy / camisole and sporting high heels. She stands 5’6” and is a slim size 4, with big D cup fake boobs, looks like a Barbie Doll. Age around 40ish (definitely not in her 20's as per her AW ). I would rate her 6.5 / 10 for looks.

She leads me in to the small bedroom and we agree services and exchange the fee. She asks if I want a shower and leads me to the bathroom. She hands me a folded towel, but I notice it has wet patches throughout. Either she’s got a rubbish tumble dryer, or it’s a used towel? Decent bathroom, good over bath shower, stocked with toiletries.

The Punt:

Back in the bedroom she puts some music on the very large TV that hangs on the wall and beckons me to join her laying down on the bed. She has no hesitation on providing full on DFK. I fondle her boobs through her underwear and massage her clit. She’s ooing and aaahing, “oh that feels so good”, but I can feel she’s as dry as a dry thing, so totally fake.

I’m fully hard now and invite her to suck my cock. She goes at it and does a pretty good job. Her head bobs up and down and she can get 75% of me in on every stroke, occasionally going full deep throat. In order to make the most of the punt, I invite her to climb on top.

She removes her camisole and mounts me, at this point I notice how much loose skin she has around her midriff. Her boobs are like two grapefruits suspended in a worn out 5p Tesco bag, just hanging there. Then I notice the loose skin around the top her legs. I found it quite off putting. I slap her arse while she’s riding me, but there’s nothing to bounce off, my hand just squishes in to her bones. My guess is that she was a fair few sizes larger (probably a 12) and has lost a lot of weight, hence the excess skin across most of her body. See close up from her AW gallery.

She climbs off, lays down beside me and pulls me on top of her; I reluctantly enter her in missionary. I’m not enjoying it, there’s no bounce-back from her body, she’s like a blow up sex doll that has a puncture. The thought of going doggy and smashing in to her bony structure was a vision I didn’t want to have planted in my memory. I can’t fuck her further, I just tell her that I need more oral.

She obliges and does a pretty good job all by herself and mostly only using her mouth. I unload in to her mouth, she holds it there until I’m fully finished. I didn’t notice what she did with my jizz, I think she must have spat it in to a tissue? She gives me a little wipe up.

We have some light post coital chat. She’s quite well spoken and seemingly well educated. I take another shower, get dressed and leave.

Would I return?

No. She’s a good service provider, but I think over priced (subjective) and I don’t like her body.





Hidden Image/Members Only

[Bornslippy]

Blimey this one has been on my HL for ages (in hope the pricing would become more attractive) but straight off. Photos suggest a lovely size 6 gym fit 20 something....clearly not then!

[PilotMan]

Blimey this one has been on my HL for ages (in hope the pricing would become more attractive) but straight off. Photos suggest a lovely size 6 gym fit 20 something....clearly not then!

Definitely not, very well crafted pictures, none in HiRes you'll notice. I would place my bet that she's over 40 vs being under.

[PilotMan]

Someone else mentioned that she has some loose skin round her hips, yes this is the case and I also noticed it in other places where there are folds like the armpits, I think she might have been a bit bigger at some point and now she is slim this is a consequence, these may be signs too much time on the sunbed or cosmetic work, I don't know. To be clear, its not that noticeable and for me it in no way affected how hot she is.

Calzone was the first to mention it - despite him saying someone else had.

[Magic500]

I saw her a few years back before covid hit the world. Even then I remember thinking to myself that she was really skinny and fake looking.
I think she did a stint with maxes angels many many years ago.. probably around 2007 when she may have been in her prime.

[calzone]

Sorry it wasn't a better punt for you PM, that's a costly neutral. Always good to get multiple perspectives.

I did see her again sometime after my first meeting, I could be wrong but I think she'd lost a bit of weight 2nd time round. That meeting was much the same as my first so I didn't review again. Having taken a bit more notice, I'd tend to agree with your age estimate at around 40 something. I think I disagreed with someone who gave that estimate a while ago so apologies if they read this.

[Mrbenn2016]

I haven't seen her in a while but my experiences were really good before her price hikes and consistent with Peiyee and Calzone encounters.

She is a barbie (may have been a size 6) who loves a sunbed (which may have aged her skin) I did not notice any stretch marks and she had a lovely curvy arse and she was really wet could take a pounding after reverse oral and attention on her.
She is unshaven not everyone's cup of tea.

You do have to book 45mins/1 hr to get the best from her and an equal return. She does give a good bj covered but I prefer hot sloppy OWO and CIM swallow and not prepared to pay £30 extra for each respectively.

Regarding the stretch marks (underarms and hips) this is nothing like a childbirth tummy. It may be something to do with her enhancements, coming of the pill, cutting out diary etc. I bet she is still one of the most attractive british girls in the area and describing her as a deflated sex doll is a bit harsh.

Unfortunately all the local girls under 50 with a dress size of 10 or less have a basic of £150-£200 with extras.

I do find it a little odd if Pilotman claims to have  seen her in January he made no mention in the previous review but prefered focused on prices when we and  he actually knew them.

[PilotMan]

I do find it a little odd if Pilotman claims to have  seen her in January he made no mention in the previous review but prefered focused on prices when we and  he actually knew them.

You will notice that I have recently posted several reviews of punts that took place in the past couple of months. I didn't do these before due to not having the time and opportunity. I also generally prefer to leave my reviews until after the dust has settled, unless there is a reason for doing it faster, such as a B&S warning.

describing her as a deflated sex doll is a bit harsh.

I'm not the only one to have reported the loose skin folds around her armpits and other places - plus the roughness of her skin. She has no arse cheeks, it's just flesh and no meat. That's how I felt she was, deflated.

Someone else mentioned that she has some loose skin round her hips, yes this is the case and I also noticed it in other places where there are folds like the armpits, I think she might have been a bit bigger at some point and now she is slim this is a consequence,

Does she have a stretch marks? I was viewing her private gallery and some off her latest photos looked like she did And put me off seeing her.

@Mrbenn2016 - you responded to Chandler12 and said this isn't the case, they're shadows. Maybe your memory has gone all fluffy - take a good look next time you punt her.

Three separate punters have observed that she has stretch marks all over her body. This isn't sunbed damage, that doesn't cause folds of skin, whereas losing excess weight does. That's what I believe it is the result of, and for me it was very noticeable.

Responding here and in other reviews defending this stretched skin, sounds like you're White Knighting her.

[PilotMan]

I think she did a stint with maxes angels many many years ago.. probably around 2007 when she may have been in her prime.

That's 16 years ago, which if you believe her AW profile, would have made her 11 years old at the time.

Backs up my assertion that she's 40+

[Bornslippy]

I will 100% go with your review, and input pilot 

[Mrbenn2016]

You will notice that I have recently posted several reviews of punts that took place in the past couple of months. I didn't do these before due to not having the time and opportunity. I also generally prefer to leave my reviews until after the dust has settled, unless there is a reason for doing it faster, such as a B&S warning.

I'm not the only one to have reported the loose skin folds around her armpits and other places - plus the roughness of her skin. She has no arse cheeks, it's just flesh and no meat. That's how I felt she was, deflated.

@Mrbenn2016 - you responded to Chandler12 and said this isn't the case, they're shadows. Maybe your memory has gone all fluffy - take a good look next time you punt her.

Three separate punters have observed that she has stretch marks all over her body. This isn't sunbed damage, that doesn't cause folds of skin, whereas losing excess weight does. That's what I believe it is the result of, and for me it was very noticeable.

Responding here and in other reviews defending this stretched skin, sounds like you're White Knighting her.

Rich_Playboy was infact the one that made a connection that skin wasn't smooth around her hips and attributed it to sun damage in 2021

I attributed it to possibly looking older.

Magic 500 did not review her at the time in 2018/2019 and there is nothing to confirm she worked at Maxes Angels in 2007. And what's her prime 18-30? As far as I am aware from what she told me she was in the South West. I doubt she is 46. Mid to late 30's is probably more accurate.

Regarding my photo I was referring to this one attached with clear shadowing.
Neither Chandler12 any other op or yourself corrected me and referred to another photo at the time.

I think the subsequent posted hip photo's are exaggerated by her pose and not proof of any significant cellulite or flabby skin.

Regarding the excuse for not disclosing sooner I understand that reasoning under normal circumstances but there was nothing sensitive and if there was no intent to see her again that would have prevented full  disclosure and you could have stepped in and prevented an Op from being called a dick which was totally avoidable.

You didn't click. She doesn't have a trout pout - the deflated sex doll title is over dramatic and doesn't really balance with a neutral.

I have already stated my reasons I am not in a rush to revisit her.

White knighting lowest common denominator defence.



Hidden Image/Members Only

[Makka124]

Rich_Playboy was infact the one that made a connection that skin wasn't smooth around her hips and attributed it to sun damage in 2021

I attributed it to possibly looking older.

Magic 500 did not review her at the time in 2018/2019 and there is nothing to confirm she worked at Maxes Angels in 2007. And what's her prime 18-30? As far as I am aware from what she told me she was in the South West. I doubt she is 46. Mid to late 30's is probably more accurate.

Regarding my photo I was referring to this one attached with clear shadowing.
Neither Chandler12 any other op or yourself corrected me and referred to another photo at the time.

I think the subsequent posted hip photo's are exaggerated by her pose and not proof of any significant cellulite or flabby skin.

Regarding the excuse for not disclosing sooner I understand that reasoning under normal circumstances but there was nothing sensitive and if there was no intent to see her again that would have prevented full  disclosure and you could have stepped in and prevented an Op from being called a dick which was totally avoidable.

You didn't click. She doesn't have a trout pout - the deflated sex doll title is over dramatic and doesn't really balance with a neutral.

I have already stated my reasons I am not in a rush to revisit her.

White knighting lowest common denominator defence.



Hidden Image/Members Only

Why has this triggered you so much? Are people not allowed an opinion?
Have you heard of photoshop? Where people can remove anything
As you said white knighting is the lowest yet you kind of doing in that post

[PilotMan]

Rich_Playboy was infact the one that made a connection that skin wasn't smooth around her hips and attributed it to sun damage in 2021

Rich_Playboy only mentioned that her skin wasn't smooth, it was Calzone who first mentioned the "folds of excess skin", and referred back to Rich_Playboy (who said sun damage)

Magic 500 did not review her at the time in 2018/2019 and there is nothing to confirm she worked at Maxes Angels in 2007. And what's her prime 18-30? As far as I am aware from what she told me she was in the South West. I doubt she is 46. Mid to late 30's is probably more accurate.

Let's give her the benefit of the doubt and say she was barely legal at 18 in 2007, then she's at least 34. If she was mid twenties at Maxes, then she's easily pushing 40. Calzone has stated above that he thinks she's closer to 40, correcting his earlier assessment. I never said 46, I think she's north of 40, and I stand by that.

Regarding my photo I was referring to this one attached with clear shadowing.
Neither Chandler12 any other op or yourself corrected me and referred to another photo at the time.

I think the subsequent posted hip photo's are exaggerated by her pose and not proof of any significant cellulite or flabby skin.

Chandler12 stated "private gallery" - I haven't paid to see it and it isn't allowed to be posted on here, so how would we know?

Your response just dismisses it, so one could assume you were referring to her private gallery. Only now do you mention that you are referring to a picture in her public gallery.

you could have stepped in and prevented an Op from being called a dick which was totally avoidable.

If you're referring to peiyee being called a dick, it was because of his dismissive response to being asked to clarify price and duration, the basics for any review. I agree, it was totally avoidable by him, he could have simply stated the facts. A MOD also seemed to think his response was unreasonable too.

You didn't click. She doesn't have a trout pout - the deflated sex doll title is over dramatic and doesn't really balance with a neutral.

I never said we didn't click, in fact we got on really well.

I never said she has a trout pout.

The deflated sex doll I think is appropriate, because that's how it felt to me. I made positive remarks on her good service, however according to her AW, the stated age and her carefully curated low res images disguise the reality, for which I decided to mark her down to a neutral overall.


You seem to have quite an opinion on my review; out of curiosity, what would you suggest my review rating should be and why?

[Bornslippy]

And, as if by magic, the shop keeper appeared. No sign of Mr Benn though 

[Mrbenn2016]

Why has this triggered you so much? Are people not allowed an opinion?
Have you heard of photoshop? Where people can remove anything
As you said white knighting is the lowest yet you kind of doing in that post

Her Photo's are old and cropped. They aren't photoshopped but you are not really adding any value to the conversation

[Mrbenn2016]

Pilotman is is entitled to post the review as he sees fit but it should be consistent with the title.

The image/analogy of a blow up sex doll is fake everything lips, hair, skin and boobs and a trout pout is often a reference to this.

A flat wrinkly one with folds I would associate with a WG in her 50's past her prime with a possible longterm  drug addiction.

I have never had sex with a fully inflated or flat sex doll. 😂

Regarding "clicking" I was not referring to the social side but the physical he didn't want to continue having sex with her.
In my book that is no chemistry.

I think a neutral is probably the right choice for him but I stress that the sex doll stuff is an over exaggeration.

We will see what other people review.

[PilotMan]

This is what I think of / mean when referring to a deflated blow up sex doll 

You could squeeze it and it doesn't have any solidity to it.

As opposed to a silicon or rubber doll, that cannot deflate and would give you a firm rebound when pressed.

Just to make clear, other than Franchesca, I've never had sex with a blow up or any other type of doll    

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Bornslippy]

So... She's in her 40s. Looks like it too. Line up if you wish. I could easily pull something like this up the boozer so..... no thanks

[Milfman1112]

You guys want to get a room?

[pepsicolaboy]

Shame about the age lie, I always wanted to see her but could not justify her prices and extras 

and its Harlow!

[Mrbenn2016]

This is what I think of / mean when referring to a deflated blow up sex doll 

You could squeeze it and it doesn't have any solidity to it.

As opposed to a silicon or rubber doll, that cannot deflatedand would give you a firm rebound when pressed.

Just to make clear, other than Franchesca, I've never had sex with a blow up or any other type of doll    

Hidden Image/Members Only

As previously mentioned you did not describe her as like a half inflated or under inflated doll with a few wrinkles or a slow puncture and you have not  chosen an image of a classic sex doll over the years which traditionally has the open mouth which many reference as the trout pout or duck face.
Franchesca doesn't have this.

Her boobs are fake and really firm and more like a Silicon doll if anything.

The image you choose is actually an inflated sex doll.

There is a bit of back tracking.

These are the extreme types of imagery some of us would picture in our minds with comparisons of girls that have had too many surgeries and body dismorphia that may put people off totally unnecessarily.

I don't think the analogy you have chose is fair or apt or what most of us who have met her would have used and could have been worded a lot better.





Hidden Image/Members Only

[Mrbenn2016]

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Bornslippy]

 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[PilotMan]

@MrBenn2016

The image I posted looks deflated compared to the image you posted.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only



Why are you so determined to discredit my review?

[Makka124]

@MrBenn2016

The image I posted looks deflated compared to the image you posted.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only



Why are you so determined to discredit my review?

He’s probably getting deal with her if he bring up her credit

[JollyJack]

Where is the place to park for this building, please?

Ive been using spaces next to the sales office opposite the main building whilst construction works have been ongoing, thinking they'd not ticket potential customers, but I am concerned by the number of no-parking signs outside that I've now taken to using the parking by the carvery that's3 min walk away, and free for enough time!

[Thisemailbet]

I always park outside the carvery when going to either flat buildings by the station there’s 3 hours for free parking - never once got a ticket

[Condominium]

I always park outside the carvery when going to either flat buildings by the station there’s 3 hours for free parking - never once got a ticket

I’ve heard mixed and conflicting reports about the carvery. Some say it’s a bit of scrawny chicken loosely tied together with overcooked, deflated roasties and veg that have seen better days and lie about their sell by.

But others have reported a succulent meat roast with lashings of hot, wet gravy and young, tight, moist sprouts that have to show their birth certificate to qualify for the bag. All with big fluffy King Edwards out front, leading the charge.

Who to believe?!

[Bornslippy]

 

[PilotMan]

I’ve heard mixed and conflicting reports about the carvery. Some say it’s a bit of scrawny chicken loosely tied together with overcooked, deflated roasties and veg that have seen better days and lie about their sell by.

But others have reported a succulent meat roast with lashings of hot, wet gravy and young, tight, moist sprouts that have to show their birth certificate to qualify for the bag. All with big fluffy King Edwards out front, leading the charge.

Who to believe?!

You could always go for the tasting menu, if you don't like what you see in the warming cabinet you can make a swift exit.