Author Topic: Cumslut Claire manchester Claire Adultwork Timewasting Tease Also an Agency Girl  (Read 5912 times)


2 review(s) for clarawood1 (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]
1 review(s) for Cumslut Claire (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

infoseeker

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Cumslut Claire
External Link/Members Only
Formerly known as manchester Claire

A Timewasting Tease
Will send you short Adultwork messages after a delay and keep stringing you along for an age.
Judging from her Adultwork feedback since I worked out her game perhaps she has had a few meets for some lucky / unlucky incredibly patient / persistent / desperate to see her punter(s).
From the content and character of her messages it is clear she seems to get off on being a Timewasting Tease.

To top if she sent me an e-mail accidentally telling me her real name.  From that I worked out that she was actually an Agency Girl presumably attempting to rebrand herself on Adultwork as an escorting virgin, she also had another Adultwork active profile!
Perhaps she thought being a timewasting tease fitted in well with her rebranding of shy / unsure escorting virgin.

She is
clarawood1
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

As clarawood1 I think she wastes less time and punters have ended up meeting her which is very unlikely as Cumslut Claire / manchester Claire.
Though from adultwork feedback it is clear that she wastes time even there and there is some feedback of multiple no shows here.
Through the agencies if she is still active I guess you'd get to see her.

Best Avoided at least through Adultwork - Many equally attractive girls about who won't waste your time for the enjoyment of it.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2014, 11:22:02 pm by infoseeker »

Offline bigbilly22

I did see Clara over a year ago now and would dissagree with IFs view of negative.

I found her great for comms and stunning to look at and pretty fine in the sack.

She is/was very niave and also managed to share her name, address, date of birth and NI number with me, actually asked me to help fill out her passport application.

Did here see's got a new boyfriend that doesn't apporve of the work she does so might not be currently working

BB

infoseeker

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
To be clear to readers the scope of this Negative Rating is for her External Link/Members Only profile (previously known as manchester Claire) due to the extreme timewasting persona she adopts through that profile... why she does that is anyones guess.

As for the escort herself bigbilly22s views are more Informed since he has met her.

Talking generally if you are keen, I would say book her through an agency if she still works through one (bigbilly22 might be able to advise on that) so you'll have less time waste or perhaps no time waste since you'll then be relying on the agency.

As mentioned her External Link/Members Only persona is expected to have less timewaste but judge for yourself that based on her Adultwork feedback and the link to some feedback on this forum on multiple no shows.

Maybe she doesn't do it on purpose, maybe she is just disorganised or thick as shit like another ex Northern Babe Chloe Willow, but as a punter you are warned the booking of this escort as an independent will be far from efficient.

bigbilly22 perhaps if you get time you could review her service as well (as Clarawood or whatever agency she works from) and from what you have mentioned I guessed she'd be a positive (with the caveat from this review of her comms and booking).

I myself have argued seperately on this forum that the Context and Info in a review is more important then headline rating.
That being said on this occasion I must say External Link/Members Only has earned herself a well deserved Negative.

Offline bigbilly22

Was probably 18 months ago I saw Clara and thought I'd reviewed her on the other site but don't seem to have!

Will right one up! I'll start a new thread as Clarawood1 as thats' who I saw

As for Claire/Clara being thick I'd saw she definately isn't. struck me as an intelligent young woman with a high sex drive and desire to make a bit of money. Was/Is at uni studying music.

Think I said at the time there'd been many a mixed review more about her comms etc but don't think I've seen anything bad said about her service.

BB
« Last Edit: August 25, 2014, 08:22:23 am by bigbilly22 »


Shopkeeper

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Her face pic in the private gallery looks really good.

I'm new to all this, but seems like she is in London now?

Offline bigbilly22


VOLPONE

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I saw her a couple of times a while back.
Observations -
She photographs well. Has slightly prominent front teeth so looks good in pics when she fully closes her mouth- looks better in pics than in real life,imo.
However she is generally a very attractive girl, submissive and eager to please.Excellent OWO ( didn't feel the teeth at all) and an enthusiastic swallower.
Communications are poor, I think due to plenty going on in 'civilian life' but making arrangements and then not even having the good grace to cancel ( never happened to me but reading aw comments it has to plenty of others) is piss poor.
Very intelligent girl in many ways but too trusting and forthcoming with personal details.

Mind you I doubt anyone would expect where they study to be posted on the internet right under a reference to their face pic!

Oh dear !

infoseeker

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=36743.msg500035#msg500035

Clarawood1 review

Thanks for the review bigbilly22  :hi:

At the time I was going through my torturous comms with Cumslut Claire / manchester Claire she only had the one picture up and once I found out her facebook and had a good look at it I decided to give up since she wasn't my type, mainly since she was too tall.
I have just noticed though she has more pics up now including a face pic in her Private Gallery not purchased it though.

Also forgot to add the profile screenshot which I have now started to do with all my reviews in case the profile goes dead or changes significantly from the review.

External Link/Members Only

Offline bigbilly22

Mind you I doubt anyone would expect where they study to be posted on the internet right under a reference to their face pic!

Oh dear !

Fair point and removed.

BB

infoseeker

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
lex has posted this on the "Miss Lauren accidentally revealing she was threatening to out a punter affair" thread.

I think TCM's actions are totally reasonable.  Infoseeker seems like an obsessive stalker type to me even going as far a looking for girls personal modelling/facebook pages

manchester Claire as she was then known was wasting my time (with small teasing replies) in making a booking she had absolutely no stats (like height etc) on her profile no face pic and only a partial body pic this one, and she was looking to get me to part with £150 of my hard earned money.

Hidden Image/Members Only

When she revealed her real name to me (and she seems to be prone to do that) and much more!!

She is/was very niave and also managed to share her name, address, date of birth and NI number with me, actually asked me to help fill out her passport application.

Naturally I Googled her, her (full) name is quite rare so no need to dig deep, there she was in all her 6 foot glory... way too tall for my liking and I didn't like her face either.  Saved time and saved £150.
It is a gross exagerration to then say that is "an obsessive stalker type".
bigbilly22 posted up her educational institution here until I asked Admin to remove it.
The reality is lots of girls that I meet and bigbilly22 meets like us a lot and tell us all sorts about their private life including their names and more then they should, thats what happens if you're young attractive, have confidence and charisma and a great fuck.  Lots of wg will even spends lots of time with you for free.


lex you have spent a while on UKPunting and made significant contributions and I think I recognise that weird looking avatar from auto-censored, the reason why you didn't get any take up on your bullshit point is since this is UKPunting and not auto-censored.
Over there you'd have got some mileage over here your bullshit point was ignored.


.....so if MissLauren had asked me advice on avoiding a booking from InfoSeeker I would have given the same advice as TCM in the same circumstances (i.e there was no mention of outing someone at the time)

Everyone in North West (including threechilliman) knows that I'd never have wanted to book that chavvy weed smoking wench Miss Lauren and I gave clear reasons why she does nothing for me and I HATE drugs.
You should also know that since you appear to read my posts on here and likely when I posted on auto-censored.


lex please stop trying to take (pathetic) pot shots at me perhaps just because I pointed out you know nothing about Secrets Escort Agency we all have gaps in our knowledge that is what the UKPunting forum and sharing Info is for.
I admire you since you have clocked up some quality time and contribution on ukpunting, I haven't read any of your reviews or punted off them, if I found issue with them I'd point it out if they were good I'd say so.
You appear to be an Active Contributing Punter... on this forum that is what counts for me, so I take my hat off to you  :hi:
but please consider changing that freakish avatar of yours. Thanks
« Last Edit: August 30, 2014, 04:42:45 pm by infoseeker »

Randy James

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'm new but to agree with info seeker here.

Too many guys get too involved with WGs. There are there for a reason. Don't see why people go all out defending them.

Also why would anyone want to talk about other punters.

People expecting a free punt .... Ain't happening

Rant over

Offline londonmaxxy

Agreed BW.  I have no interest in knowing the names or personal details , it's just business, in fact prefer the opposite & rarely go back more than once .  That's why these threads are so  tiresome on here. Wanting it for free , or discounted usually goes pear shaped. 

Tony Montana

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

but please consider changing that freakish avatar of yours. Thanks

Go fuck yourself.


infoseeker

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Go fuck yourself.

Calm down grumpy cat look who I brought in to put a smile on your face or should I say what the cat dragged in.  :)

By many accounts a throughly professional (if slightly highly priced agency escort) certainly not a timewasting tease like Cumslut claire.
« Last Edit: August 31, 2014, 01:44:40 pm by infoseeker »

Offline neddedhed

She's re-emerged on the scene under this guise: External Link/Members Only

I know this from contact with her, she's the same actual person behind profile as cumslut clair. Not sure how active the profile is , she logs in but it has a default ticked all the boxes and one pic look about it. I like to see the newer girls on aw as they are less jaded and generally more fun if you can build a rapore with them. I also like to know as much as I can about the person I'm seeing after a bad experience a few years ago. The internet knows everything about everyone for those who know how to look and this is definitely the same person.


Offline bigbilly22

Message her as did see her a few times a couple of years ago

Will wait and see

22

Offline kkyle

hey billy

waiting for your reply from her as I've had the luxury of meeting her when she was with agency. I can ditto others reply, nearly had a booking went through but fell through twice. if you can really get a booking through please share your moment as we're all intrigued to know. Thanks

Offline rovingman

......
 she had absolutely no stats (like height etc) on her profile no face pic and only............. there she was in all her 6 foot glory.....

Her links don't seem to be working..... 6ft and picture looks great..... if anyone has s working link for her I'd appreciate if you could message me it......

Thanks!
« Last Edit: February 25, 2016, 05:51:06 pm by rovingman »

VOLPONE

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
rovingman,

try the link on the post three above yours : it works fine.

Note the reference to 're-emerged' on that post : the earlier links are clearly dead.

Offline rovingman