Author Topic: cerise_new - Manchester - No Show  (Read 3006 times)


2 review(s) for cerise (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]

Offline mrsid

I was in Manchester overnight a couple of weeks ago and put out a reverse booking on AW for someone to visit my hotel late evening. Had a few responses and I liked the look of cerise_new. We switched to text and confirmed everything. I did tell her I was not coming into Manchester until late that evening and kept in touch with my progress so I could honour the time we had agreed (10pm).

Everything was fine and the vibe was good with lots of 'cant wait to meet you' messages, until about 15 mins before the appointment was due to start when she goes quiet. I tried a couple of texts, but had no response so then left it.

Shame as she looks great on her profile, but saved me £150 I suppose.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline JRWK

I'm sure I had 3-4 bookings with her pre lockdowns.
I'm positive it's the same girl, same name and photos on her profile she was always punctual then, no idea why you were let down  :hi:

Offline montycat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
Very strange. I've seen her 3 times now, and the fourth is due in a few days. She's always been totally reliable with me, and I would be very surprised if this didn't continue.
Banned reason: Discussing negative review with SP and contradicting on her behalf.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Ihateaero

I’ve seen Cerise pre Covid and she was very reliable and a lovely girl. Never had any issues with her at all.

Offline lewisjones23


Offline Southernbloke

Only heard good things about this lady. Just goes to show that even having good feedback doesn’t mean that sp won’t do the dirty on you

Offline mrsid

Yes, its a shame. I had seen previous good things on here about her and she looks and sounds great. Probably something happened, so regrettably a red. Might try again when next in the area.

Offline mrsid

Very strange. I've seen her 3 times now, and the fourth is due in a few days. She's always been totally reliable with me, and I would be very surprised if this didn't continue.

Hope you get to see her, can you review if you do? I might try again if I see someone has successfully managed an appointment with her.

Offline montycat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
I already did, on December 12, a strong positive.
Banned reason: Discussing negative review with SP and contradicting on her behalf.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline montycat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
I saw her again yesterday. She drove a fair way in "the most difficult conditions I've ever driven in" to give me another lovely GFE. Her version of the events described at the start of this thread is very, very different to the above.

Banned reason: Discussing negative review with SP and contradicting on her behalf.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
I saw her again yesterday. She drove a fair way in "the most difficult conditions I've ever driven in" to give me another lovely GFE. Her version of the events described at the start of this thread is very, very different to the above.

Surprised you're discussing reviews on here with her, did you discuss your own either before or after you posted it?

If she wants to put forward her side of the story she's free to join (well, pay the £25) and do so.

Offline silverspoon

she has replied to my RB,now on the black list,thanks for the review

Offline montycat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
Surprised you're discussing reviews on here with her, did you discuss your own either before or after you posted it?

If she wants to put forward her side of the story she's free to join (well, pay the £25) and do so.

It's not something I would normally do (in fact it's the only time I have ever done it) but the review sounded so little like what I know of her that I felt the need to raise it. Sorry if I've broken any rules by doing so.

She may well join if she can figure out the bitcoin thing.
 
Banned reason: Discussing negative review with SP and contradicting on her behalf.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline spiralnotebook


Offline lewisjones23

I saw her again yesterday. She drove a fair way in "the most difficult conditions I've ever driven in" to give me another lovely GFE. Her version of the events described at the start of this thread is very, very different to the above.

dont be a big old fluffy

she obviously wouldnt turn round and just say “ oh yeah I couldnt be arsed so I fucked him off “

Offline montycat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
Not fluffy, she showed me hard evidence. And I have no connection with her other than as a very satisfied client.
Banned reason: Discussing negative review with SP and contradicting on her behalf.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lewisjones23

Not fluffy, she showed me hard evidence. And I have no connection with her other than as a very satisfied client.

hard evidence? if by that you mean some text messages then they are literally the easiest thing to forge

you’ve come on and white knighted her when you’ve fuck all reason to apart from having a soft spot for her

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,769
  • Likes: 755
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Not fluffy, she showed me hard evidence. And I have no connection with her other than as a very satisfied client.
Have I got this right, you read this review and decided just because you have had a different experience you pointed it out to her and discussed it, complete with her showing you private communications between her and another punter?   :unknown:

Firstly what has it got to do with you, this booking was and is between the person reviewing and her, now give me a good reason why you should remain a member if you are going to discuss other members with SPs you see.

You shouldn't even be talking about this site never mind members of it. Are you trying to score some brownie points to gain some favour from her??   :unknown:

Offline frankc

Not fluffy, she showed me hard evidence. And I have no connection with her other than as a very satisfied client.

Classic White Knighting :dash:

Offline montycat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
No, I just wanted to establish the facts - truth is very important to me. I'm sorry that I've upset people, and I won't discuss anything on here with SPs who aren't members on here again - as I said this the only time I've done it.

It's worth noting that there is no negative feedback on AW corresponding to the above report, probably because there was no booking. Also, although the vast majority of reports on here are true, human nature says that it's not 100%.
Banned reason: Discussing negative review with SP and contradicting on her behalf.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,769
  • Likes: 755
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
No, I just wanted to establish the facts - truth is very important to me. I'm sorry that I've upset people, and I won't discuss anything on here with SPs who aren't members on here again - as I said this the only time I've done it.

It's worth noting that there is no negative feedback on AW corresponding to the above report, probably because there was no booking. Also, although the vast majority of reports on here are true, human nature says that it's not 100%.
Not good enough. How do we know it's the only time you've done it and exactly what facts do you think you need to establish about a booking that had nothing to do with you.

The ethos of this site does not include one member discussing another with the aim of discrediting the reviewer on the SP's behalf.

Offline montycat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
It is the the only time I've done it - my only messages of this type are on this thread. I assume it's also against the ethos of this site to post false reports, but for some reason everybody here seems to think that the report is true and I'm deluded.

Banned reason: Discussing negative review with SP and contradicting on her behalf.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,769
  • Likes: 755
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
It is the the only time I've done it - my only messages of this type are on this thread. I assume it's also against the ethos of this site to post false reports, but for some reason everybody here seems to think that the report is true and I'm deluded.
As with any review on here members read it, form their own opinions of it and take from it what information they find useful and act accordingly.

If, when reading previous reviews, they think the latest one is a bit suspect then it is up to them to discount it if they so wish, it is not up to other members to discuss it with the SP to prove or disprove anything.

Only the OP and the SP know the truth of the matter, you are posting third party information and hearsay.

Offline mrsid

I saw her again yesterday. She drove a fair way in "the most difficult conditions I've ever driven in" to give me another lovely GFE. Her version of the events described at the start of this thread is very, very different to the above.

montycat , these difficult driving conditions almost sound the same as your previous review on December 12th.

Offline mrsid

I am struggling to see what I might have done wrong with this SP. The events are as described, we agreed an appintment via a reverse booking on AW. I kept in touch throughout the day, let her know when I was in Manchester, what hotel I was in and that I would need to come down and meet her as the lifts needed a keycard. About 10 mins before the scheduled appointment, she went quiet. I texted her twice, but left it after that.

I also emailed her via AW last week to say regrettably our appointment did not go ahead, I hoped she was ok and said hopefully I could meet her in the future when I am next in Manchester. At all times I was polite even when 'stood up' so am really confused what may have happened here.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2023, 02:45:59 pm by mrsid »

Offline montycat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
montycat , these difficult driving conditions almost sound the same as your previous review on December 12th.

Yes, by bad luck both my last two punts with her were during the two cold spells we've had this winter. I expected this time to be easier but she said it was actually worse.


Banned reason: Discussing negative review with SP and contradicting on her behalf.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline montycat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 79
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
As with any review on here members read it, form their own opinions of it and take from it what information they find useful and act accordingly.

If, when reading previous reviews, they think the latest one is a bit suspect then it is up to them to discount it if they so wish, it is not up to other members to discuss it with the SP to prove or disprove anything.

Only the OP and the SP know the truth of the matter, you are posting third party information and hearsay.

Ok, I'll say no more on the matter unless asked.
Banned reason: Discussing negative review with SP and contradicting on her behalf.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,769
  • Likes: 755
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Ok, I'll say no more on the matter unless asked.
Sorry but we have to make it very clear that discussing another punter's negative review with an SP and then contradicting the review on her behalf is totally out of order.

Offline lewisjones23

Sorry but we have to make it very clear that discussing another punter's negative review with an SP and then contradicting the review on her behalf is totally out of order.

👏🏻 x 100

Offline Southernbloke

Don’t really understand why he got banned, the way I read it he just wanted to put a different point of view out there.
Members put up different point of view to plenty of positive reviews, seems harsh but you have probably refunded his money

Offline lewisjones23

Don’t really understand why he got banned, the way I read it he just wanted to put a different point of view out there.
Members put up different point of view to plenty of positive reviews, seems harsh but you have probably refunded his money

he started off with a bit of low level white knighting and then doubled down on it after seeing her

what was this hard evidence he alluded to? since when is it a member’s duty to try and disprove a negative review and defend WG’s?

the whole ethos of the forum was built upon it being for punters, not a platform for WG defence or promotion.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2023, 08:20:58 am by lewisjones23 »

Offline Southernbloke


Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,769
  • Likes: 755
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Don’t really understand why he got banned, the way I read it he just wanted to put a different point of view out there.
Members put up different point of view to plenty of positive reviews, seems harsh but you have probably refunded his money
He got banned, not because he had a different point of view, ut was because he told the escort about this review then discussed it with her, including her allegedly showing him messages between her and the OP of the review.

If you think that is acceptable you are on the wrong site. Discussing UKP with service providers is frowned upon, discussing other punters and their reviews it totally out of order.

Offline Southernbloke

He got banned, not because he had a different point of view, ut was because he told the escort about this review then discussed it with her, including her allegedly showing him messages between her and the OP of the review.

If you think that is acceptable you are on the wrong site. Discussing UKP with service providers is frowned upon, discussing other punters and their reviews it totally out of order.

Very kind of you to clear that up, I appreciate you taking the time thank you

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,769
  • Likes: 755
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Very kind of you to clear that up, I appreciate you taking the time thank you
No problem mate, always happy to explain why a decision has been made.

Offline OakTree

he started off with a bit of low level white knighting and then doubled down on it after seeing her

what was this hard evidence he alluded to? since when is it a member’s duty to try and disprove a negative review and defend WG’s?

the whole ethos of the forum was built upon it being for punters, not a platform for WG defence or promotion.

Wasn’t he on the now defunct NW forum?

Offline lewisjones23

Wasn’t he on the now defunct NW forum?

yeah he was on there, probably on the new one as well

lovely chap no doubt but one of the fluffiest punters ever