Author Topic: Nadia - Mill Hill - London NW7  (Read 4713 times)


2 review(s) for nympho1 nadia (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

password02

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Big NEGATIVE for - External Link/Members Only -

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

TOFTT & Saw her yesterday and will put more details when I get some free laptop time later today/tomorrow -

Please avoid - very pretty with great 'fake' tits BUT no proper kissing only light lips touching, No RO and not allowed to touch or suck her tits more than 10 seconds, Also not allowed to go any where her pussy with a finger or anything else. Even when I managed to get hard enough to enter she had her hand on her pussy to make sure the condom was still in. She must have cleaned my dick about 10 times with a wet tissue even though I just had a shower - Crap BJ mainly hand with some sucking _ Complete waste of time - All for £100

Will add all the details later when I have more time!!!!

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Big NEGATIVE for - External Link/Members Only -

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

TOFTT & Saw her yesterday and will put more details when I get some free laptop time later today/tomorrow -

Please avoid - very pretty with great 'fake' tits BUT no proper kissing only light lips touching, No RO and not allowed to touch or suck her tits more than 10 seconds, Also not allowed to go any where her pussy with a finger or anything else. Even when I managed to get hard enough to enter she had her hand on her pussy to make sure the condom was still in. She must have cleaned my dick about 10 times with a wet tissue even though I just had a shower - Crap BJ mainly hand with some sucking _ Complete waste of time - All for £100

Will add all the details later when I have more time!!!!

Thanks for putting this review up so quickly. :thumbsup: This WGs looks might well attract many punters to her, they now know what she can be like.

Jason

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Sorry Password to hear about this. I feel a bit guilty to be honest as I went to meet Nadia myself back in June and when I was confirming services she told me that she does offer RO but it was £30 extra. When she told me that I thought she was taking the piss and I left. Bullet dodged … as it is proved from your review. There seems to be an art in TOFFTing. Btw regarding her face she didn't look like her first and third current profile pics.

Offline Robster199

Shame. She looks hot. Sure she will get clients - unless they read UKP.

LL

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Thanks for the review buddy.  Another girl gets removed from my coveted hotlist (one of 'em!)

Offline Rowntree

Thanks Password2 - I saw her about 2 months ago - and like you the session was a big disappointment.

Nice girl, but all so mechanical, just felt like a conveyor belt operation.

Clearly, others in the flat.  Bit like a poor meal in a restaurant - unlikely to return even if other dishes could be OK.

Offline Bigus Dickus

Thanks Password2 - I saw her about 2 months ago - and like you the session was a big disappointment.

Nice girl, but all so mechanical, just felt like a conveyor belt operation.

Clearly, others in the flat.  Bit like a poor meal in a restaurant - unlikely to return even if other dishes could be OK.

It's important to do a review. Could have saved PW some punting money for a decent girl!  :dash:

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Sorry Password to hear about this. I feel a bit guilty to be honest as I went to meet Nadia myself back in June and when I was confirming services she told me that she does offer RO but it was £30 extra. When she told me that I thought she was taking the piss and I left. Bullet dodged … as it is proved from your review. There seems to be an art in TOFFTing. Btw regarding her face she didn't look like her first and third current profile pics.

£30 extra for RO.   :thumbsdown:

Offline Steve2

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,510
  • Likes: 35
  •  
  • Reviews: 95
The 1st line of text should have been a warning sign

I love French Kissing (but I charge extra for it)

LL

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
The 1st line of text should have been a warning sign

I love French Kissing (but I charge extra for it)
Who charges for things they "love"?
What she means is, "I love it when someone pays me even more money, just for a bit of kissing".  :hi:

Offline nigel4498

Thanks Password2 - I saw her about 2 months ago - and like you the session was a big disappointment.

Nice girl, but all so mechanical, just felt like a conveyor belt operation.

Clearly, others in the flat.  Bit like a poor meal in a restaurant - unlikely to return even if other dishes could be OK.

Agree with Bigus Dickus. You have been a member since December 2012 so you obviously Know what this site is about, helping each other by reviewing punts in the hope we can improve the service that prossie's provide.
You could have saved password not only money but time and effort too.
Come on guys, help us help each other by reviewing your punts please.

password02

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Agree with Bigus Dickus. You have been a member since December 2012 so you obviously Know what this site is about, helping each other by reviewing punts in the hope we can improve the service that prossie's provide.
You could have saved password not only money but time and effort too.
Come on guys, help us help each other by reviewing your punts please.

+1 100% agree!!

Offline laidbackasiandude

Commiserations Password regarding your dire session and having the courage to report and share your experience with
others on this forum.

I just wanted to share with you and others an encounter I had with a well reviewed lady on AW who has clearly built up
a sizeable client base and possibly a fan club on forums such as UKP.

My encounter happened during August 2013, a full year prior to me joining UKP. I met the lady at the very same hotel in Canary
Wharf where I met Indian Nahdia earlier his week. The session I had last year was distinctly underwhelming, she performed
what was on her service profile list, but was IMHO totally under-par for a 90minute session costing £200.

After the session I realised what a waste of time and money that was, and couldn't believe how this WG had built up a large
number of positive ratings and profusely enthusiastic feedback reports.

To my utter surprise, she left me POSITIVE FEEDBACK on my service seeker profile BEFORE me leaving any feedback on her.
I didn't want to come across as a complete c**t,  so duly provided a positive return in kind, even though the session was at best mediocre. After that I did feel bad about leaving this WG the positive feedback, and was actually thinking "just don't leave any feedback, she won't for me as clearly she was unenthusiastic with meeting me". It's the only time I've done this as other feedback I've left I've genuinely had good or excellent sessions.

Now when it comes to leaving negative feedback especially for an " established top service provider", and this is applicable to me
in the above case, there's a genuine fear of being cyber-bullied and intimidated by such a WG's fan base clientele for uttering to
state the reality, had I reported on what actually happened on a forum like UKP during August 2013, assuming I was a member
of UKP then.

Whilst my experience wasn't as bad as your session, and the comparison not exactly a mirror image, I can see from the perspective
of a reticent punter/client not wishing to divulge a negative experience on a forum like UKP, for fear of retribution and malicious
cyber-bullying, being totally embarrassed about being cheated out of funds by a deceptive WG, feelings of hurt pride and loss
of "street-credibility" built up via posting on sites such as UKP, or in my situation with AW, to leave negative feedback there
which will then be rebutted by the WG and I'm made out (falsely) to be some kind of neanderthal monster.

As a consequence some punters/clients simply don't bother writing up any reports (positive/negative/neutral) as the potential
flak they may get from others is simply not worth the hassle, and thus stay off any forums.
 



 

Online hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,652
  • Likes: 568
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Commiserations Password regarding your dire session and having the courage to report and share your experience with
others on this forum.

I just wanted to share with you and others an encounter I had with a well reviewed lady on AW who has clearly built up
a sizeable client base and possibly a fan club on forums such as UKP.

My encounter happened during August 2013, a full year prior to me joining UKP. I met the lady at the very same hotel in Canary
Wharf where I met Indian Nahdia earlier his week. The session I had last year was distinctly underwhelming, she performed
what was on her service profile list, but was IMHO totally under-par for a 90minute session costing £200.

After the session I realised what a waste of time and money that was, and couldn't believe how this WG had built up a large
number of positive ratings and profusely enthusiastic feedback reports.

To my utter surprise, she left me POSITIVE FEEDBACK on my service seeker profile BEFORE me leaving any feedback on her.
I didn't want to come across as a complete c**t,  so duly provided a positive return in kind, even though the session was at best mediocre. After that I did feel bad about leaving this WG the positive feedback, and was actually thinking "just don't leave any feedback, she won't for me as clearly she was unenthusiastic with meeting me". It's the only time I've done this as other feedback I've left I've genuinely had good or excellent sessions.

Now when it comes to leaving negative feedback especially for an " established top service provider", and this is applicable to me
in the above case, there's a genuine fear of being cyber-bullied and intimidated by such a WG's fan base clientele for uttering to
state the reality, had I reported on what actually happened on a forum like UKP during August 2013, assuming I was a member
of UKP then.

Whilst my experience wasn't as bad as your session, and the comparison not exactly a mirror image, I can see from the perspective
of a reticent punter/client not wishing to divulge a negative experience on a forum like UKP, for fear of retribution and malicious
cyber-bullying, being totally embarrassed about being cheated out of funds by a deceptive WG, feelings of hurt pride and loss
of "street-credibility" built up via posting on sites such as UKP, or in my situation with AW, to leave negative feedback there
which will then be rebutted by the WG and I'm made out (falsely) to be some kind of neanderthal monster.

As a consequence some punters/clients simply don't bother writing up any reports (positive/negative/neutral) as the potential
flak they may get from others is simply not worth the hassle, and thus stay off any forums.

I honestly don't think you should worry about "cyber bullies" or any of that wank. Just be honest. I recently posted a positive for a girl that had a negative here and had then made things even worse by threatening the punter!!!...BUT, my experience was different and very positive. It works both ways, and it's important to post HONEST information which helps others make up their mind. All the fuss with Madlin Moon's negative review showed that actually the vast majority (if I recall correctly) of so called "fanboys" here (maybe including me) said "that's a shame, sorry you had a shit punt" which is the reasonable thing to do.

Any punter worth his salt must know that EVERY SINGLE PROSSIE is going to fuck up. I don't care how good they are. MissKDD, Platinum Cindy, Sexy Elise, Michelle Independent etc, etc...all the UKP favourites. They WILL fuck up. It is impossible to get it right every time in a service industry. What matters, is how they respond, and every reasonable punter will understand that.

For example, a recently retired regular of mine gave me a surprisingly bad punt a while back (pre ukp) and 30 minutes into the 90 minute booking, I realised that it wasn't going to get any better so got up to leave. She apologised and said "sorry hendrix, had some bad news today, I couldn't concentrate, shouldn't have taken the booking" .....and gave me a full refund. No need for a drama, end of story. I went back again another time, all was good. Shit happens, but her response was the correct one as far as I'm concerned.

And, commiserations password for the shit punt :(
« Last Edit: August 21, 2014, 12:25:12 pm by hendrix »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Commiserations Password regarding your dire session and having the courage to report and share your experience with
others on this forum.

I just wanted to share with you and others an encounter I had with a well reviewed lady on AW who has clearly built up
a sizeable client base and possibly a fan club on forums such as UKP.

My encounter happened during August 2013, a full year prior to me joining UKP. I met the lady at the very same hotel in Canary
Wharf where I met Indian Nahdia earlier his week. The session I had last year was distinctly underwhelming, she performed
what was on her service profile list, but was IMHO totally under-par for a 90minute session costing £200.

After the session I realised what a waste of time and money that was, and couldn't believe how this WG had built up a large
number of positive ratings and profusely enthusiastic feedback reports.

To my utter surprise, she left me POSITIVE FEEDBACK on my service seeker profile BEFORE me leaving any feedback on her.
I didn't want to come across as a complete c**t,  so duly provided a positive return in kind, even though the session was at best mediocre. After that I did feel bad about leaving this WG the positive feedback, and was actually thinking "just don't leave any feedback, she won't for me as clearly she was unenthusiastic with meeting me". It's the only time I've done this as other feedback I've left I've genuinely had good or excellent sessions.

Now when it comes to leaving negative feedback especially for an " established top service provider", and this is applicable to me
in the above case, there's a genuine fear of being cyber-bullied and intimidated by such a WG's fan base clientele for uttering to
state the reality, had I reported on what actually happened on a forum like UKP during August 2013, assuming I was a member
of UKP then.

Whilst my experience wasn't as bad as your session, and the comparison not exactly a mirror image, I can see from the perspective
of a reticent punter/client not wishing to divulge a negative experience on a forum like UKP, for fear of retribution and malicious
cyber-bullying, being totally embarrassed about being cheated out of funds by a deceptive WG, feelings of hurt pride and loss
of "street-credibility" built up via posting on sites such as UKP, or in my situation with AW, to leave negative feedback there
which will then be rebutted by the WG and I'm made out (falsely) to be some kind of neanderthal monster.

As a consequence some punters/clients simply don't bother writing up any reports (positive/negative/neutral) as the potential
flak they may get from others is simply not worth the hassle, and thus stay off any forums.

What you may not be aware of is admin have posted about this very point quite recently and made it clear those that attempt to undermine a punter giving a negative on a WG they and a number of others have reviewed generally positively will get in bother with admin. This arose on the long Madlin Moon thread where Bangers and Gash posted his negative experiences of her and a small number of punters didnt seem to like what he posted. Madlin herself got banned soon afterwards.

So just be honest and you and other punters have nothing to worry about assuming they are genuine punters, which in your case i know you are and can vouch you are through our previous communications. :thumbsup:

mrfixit37

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
 :thumbsup:

Thanks for this review. Saved me a journey and some cash

 :hi:  cheers

Jason

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
New profile (inherited), new name, new location (Victoria):
hot&wetNAT: External Link/Members Only
phone number: 07486212179
« Last Edit: April 19, 2015, 09:10:53 pm by Jason »

Offline droplet

can any one confirm the content of her private gallery? Do any photos show any naked tits or pussy worth subscribing to?

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,379
  • Likes: 62
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
New profile (inherited), new name, new location (Victoria):
hot&wetNAT: External Link/Members Only
phone number: 07486212179

B&S on me, review to follow
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=53920.msg705318#msg705318