Hayley - Bayswater

[nigel4498]

Just a heads up guys.
Hayley-x-x External Link/Members Only
In London Bayswater 13th and 14th December (train strikes permitting)

[LLPunting]

Why are you promoting an SP's tour?

Surely the 5 reviews you've written involving her in the last year is enough?

[boardyhell]

emailed her ,hopefully get a meet

[90125]

Why are you promoting an SP's tour?

Surely the 5 reviews you've written involving her in the last year is enough?

Hidden Image/Members Only

[LLPunting]

Hidden Image/Members Only

Is that mean for OP?

If for me then shouldn't it be black?  Being likened to a black horse is the closest I'll get to being hung like one.

[elnukky]

The kids these days use the term to mean a man who who comes in and lays his coat on the proverbial puddle for a woman.

Is that mean for OP?

If for me then shouldn't it be black?  Being likened to a black horse is the closest I'll get to being hung like one.

I hear its overrated anyway 

[southcoastpunter]

Why are you promoting an SP's tour?

i think you are being a little unfair to Nigel - i took it that he was providing a good deed/service to his fellow punters. There are very few like Hayley around and if anyone in London is interested in seeing someone like her, here is the chance.

I think the London guys owe Nigel a thank you for bothering to let them know in advance.

[lillythesavage]

i think you are being a little unfair to Nigel - i took it that he was providing a good deed/service to his fellow punters. There are very few like Hayley around and if anyone in London is interested in seeing someone like her, here is the chance.

I think the London guys owe Nigel a thank you for bothering to let them know in advance.

+1, TBH it is good intel and I read it the way it was meant  , after all is the site about sharing info.

The Argentinian who had her profile hacked is back in town, her replacement profile is not yet cleared, was going to post something similar, she has only excellent reviews, but this has put me off.

[boardyhell]

she is fully booked, on the reserve list
appreciate intel

[Circusboy]

Yeah, I agree it’s great intel. She is an awesome punt.

I saw her a good few years back. Ended up with me passing out from too much poppers while restrained to her cage while she was inserting large things deep inside of me. Oh sweet memories! 🤪🤣😵‍💫😈🤡

[LLPunting]

i think you are being a little unfair to Nigel - i took it that he was providing a good deed/service to his fellow punters. There are very few like Hayley around and if anyone in London is interested in seeing someone like her, here is the chance.

I think the London guys owe Nigel a thank you for bothering to let them know in advance.

Appreciate I was very blunt (perhaps I should have started "DUDE!..") and it would indeed be unfair if it's just a matter of an innocent "Lads a real UKP darling is headed your way" or "The lass I think is a corker is coming to you"; One of his  impartial PSAs about the tours of girls he thinks worth meeting.  But then where are his PSAs about Gorgeous Vicky (125/2/3), Sadie Strumpet (24/1/4) or e-Sensually-Sandy (11/0/0) even if he only reviewed them once each?   

Totally appreciate and respect his 100+ reviews to date but his post does him no favours about his impartiality, especially given how many times he's reviewed her (7 in total).
He's done a bang up job reviewing and I wouldn't want him to undermine all that great work, we don't need to lose another prolific vet to pussy madness  (so many have fallen). 

All she needs to do to appear on radars she wanted to court was add London locations to her profile so she pops on searches and her clear touring info does the rest.

Given Boardy tried to get in and she was already fully booked, was she already full before OP's post?   Is her contingency list of short notice gap fillers now swollen more than Boardy's balls in case the strikes fuck up her plans?
With over 100 reviews on here she is almost certainly aware of UKP and perhaps even fairly current about her mentions here.

[LLPunting]

+1, TBH it is good intel and I read it the way it was meant  , after all is the site about sharing info.

The Argentinian who had her profile hacked is back in town, her replacement profile is not yet cleared, was going to post something similar, she has only excellent reviews, but this has put me off.

You posting a link to her latest/reclaimed profile on your review of her or in the thread she was discussed would not raise a question of impartiality.

[lillythesavage]

You posting a link to her latest/reclaimed profile on your review of her or in the thread she was discussed would not raise a question of impartiality.

It has, from an abusive twat, even before I replied or knew about the new profile, another punter spotted it and asked if it was her

I do not understand why sharing information on very well reviewed people is questioned at all. Especially when all the reviews are positive 

In this case a punter from out of the area posted that she was coming to London, in advance, and gave those interested a heads up. Only to be accused of being a white knight.

We are dealing with human beings believe it or not, some punters get giving more information than others, some decent guys become friendly with SP,s, then when sharing intel on this site, which is for sharing information on good fucks, are accused of all sorts.

No wonder there is less posting these days, and it is not usually the Mods bringing up the questions or accusations, it is quite often a forum helper, those with an infatuation would not share info, give heads up, or whatever, they tend to keep the good ones to themselves.

Any positive review or post will quite likely cause an interest and a rise in footfall, just the way it is, but if it helps another punter get her on their radar, maybe enjoy a punt that may not usually come there way, is that not what the site is about ?

[LLPunting]

It has, from an abusive twat, even before I replied or knew about the new profile, another punter spotted it and asked if it was her

I do not understand why sharing information on very well reviewed people is questioned at all. Especially when all the reviews are positive 

In this case a punter from out of the area posted that she was coming to London, in advance, and gave those interested a heads up. Only to be accused of being a white knight.

We are dealing with human beings believe it or not, some punters get giving more information than others, some decent guys become friendly with SP,s, then when sharing intel on this site, which is for sharing information on good fucks, are accused of all sorts.

No wonder there is less posting these days, and it is not usually the Mods bringing up the questions or accusations, it is quite often a forum helper, those with an infatuation would not share info, give heads up, or whatever, they tend to keep the good ones to themselves.

Any positive review or post will quite likely cause an interest and a rise in footfall, just the way it is, but if it helps another punter get her on their radar, maybe enjoy a punt that may not usually come there way, is that not what the site is about ?

Posting of reviews and threads is generally up, at least here in London.

You clearly have a much rosier take on the breadth of punters here and the unchanging nature of their motivations.  It would be great if this were the perpetual truth, all our punting would be so much easier, SPs would respect the reviews and many would perhaps become better performers and richer.  Sadly we have had more than a few cases over the years, and you've been here to see some, where once venerated contributors have lapsed and some have been ejected.

Totally understand if you don't like your honour being questioned, none of us do that have any, but we are all strangers on the Internet not mates down the pub after playing a good game on the pitch and seeing each other starkers in the locker room.
If a challenge is raised on any of your posts then you can take a breath, re-read what you wrote to see if you can understand the misunderstanding and post a clarification.  That's as good as you can do.  Getting precious about it and choosing to state you won't share but then continue to read everyone else's contributions doesn't improve perceptions about you.  No one likes being called out unless they're a troll, most of us don't like calling out because it taints our hopes for a trustworthy collective but apparently questionable actions are better resolved so that genuine bad actors are discouraged.