Author Topic: Sue? - Bliss - Chester-le-Street  (Read 854 times)

Offline Dunoon

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 1
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
External Link/Members Only

Decided for my first review I would try somewhere that i'd never been before in order to get a "fair" and unbiased treatment.

Seen plenty of mixed reviews for a Sue at Chester le street so figured I would give it a chance on the sole reason that she allegedly wore stockings in the past...

Comms - The only good part of this review to be honest, fast, straight to the point.

Location - Popular high street with lots of people out and about though I'm not too arsed about that - parking is close by and cheap.

Now while I didn't bother to ask for her name, I assume based on previous reviews that it was in fact Sue however I could be wrong given the absolutely awful experience, she was dressed quite unattractively and wearing a mask, a really long grey skirt and top, not what i'd usually expect.

Arrived half an hour early so text ahead to ask if I could come in, to which she replied yes.
Walked up the stairs to find no one there waiting for me as past reviews had mentioned, slowly walked further and further into the establishment to find her washing her hands in one of the massage rooms.

Gave her the money and she then went back to washing her hands while I got undressed - staying in the room which was a little awkward and uncomfortable for me at least.

Lay down and she immediately began tickling my back without oil and within about 5 minutes she hopped on top of the bed - great! I thought, off to a cracking start... wrong!

She then jumped off the bed after maybe 2 minutes and grabbed some hot stones and put them onto my back, covering me with a towel. This was honestly the best part of the whole thing.

She then had a quick 2 minutes on each of my legs before removing the hot stones and painfully massaging my neck.

The massage was so disappointing and lackluster that she might as well not have bothered.

She then began very gently tickling all over my body and butt crack, focusing on my crack before her phone pinged. WOW! - Immediately stopped what she was doing and started texting back with the keyboard clicks and everything, very off putting.

Was then asked to flip over and immediately thought to myself "That was fast"

She glanced down at it and asked "You want?" to which I said yes.

What followed was an unbelievably rushed attempt to get me to where I needed to be, not sensual, no moaning, no teasing, just straight up full speed ahead captain.

I slowly slid my hand up her very long dress to find the most disappointing part of the meet... Not only was she not wearing stockings as I had hoped, she was wearing extremely thick tights which might as well have been pulled up over her head.

She seemed to become stressed as she continued to hammer away at the little man harder for 10 minutes or so until I finally managed to get myself off.

Cleaned up quickly and had hot stones put onto me again for a few minutes and a 30 second head massage before being told "Okay" which I assumed meant finished.

Got ready, gave her the £20 extra for the HE (Which she didn't ask for or comment on but I assumed it was £20 from previous reviews) and left to find I'd been kicked out 15 minutes early.

Pros - Hot stones that I didn't ask for and fast comms.
Cons - Almost no oil used, room was too cold, bog standard massage with absolutely minimal effort, no touching or viewing of the otherwise mentioned lovely boobs and hairy bush. Constantly covering and uncovering me with pointless towels warming me up and cooling me down again because of the cold room. Remained in the room while getting undressed - off putting for me. Texting during the massage. Kicked out way too early.

All in all £40 + £20 for about 45 minutes.

Unbelievably disappointed by this meet and was probably my worst one to date, definitely will never return.

Please go easy on me as it is my first review!



Banned reason: Previously banned - Calapox
Banned by: daviemac

Offline catweazle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,054
  • Likes: 62
  •  
  • Reviews: 108
Considering the reason for his ban, the last line is clearly a lie.

That said  Sue's service has deteriorated since Covid lockdowns, and if the review is accurate,  the slide has continued.   Shame,  her service used to be superb.

Offline mackeson

Considering the reason for his ban, the last line is clearly a lie.

That said  Sue's service has deteriorated since Covid lockdowns, and if the review is accurate,  the slide has continued.   Shame,  her service used to be superb.

How come punters who are banned end up having reviews posted, this is not the first time!

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,553
  • Likes: 730
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
How come punters who are banned end up having reviews posted, this is not the first time!
Does having more than 1 account make the review invalid if it's following the trend of a decline in the standard of services.  :unknown:

If you think it does then ignore it.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2022, 11:08:08 pm by daviemac »