Author Topic: MIA__ - Shoreditch - £200 ph  (Read 2761 times)


140 review(s) for MIA_. (122 positive, 16 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]
155 review(s) for MIA___ (133 positive, 19 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline jacy100



External Link/Members Only


Location: convenient if you’re based in the city/Shoreditch. Very busy entrance, but wouldn’t draw attention

The girl: I’ve seen Mia a few times before. Favially very cute (as per her photos), very slim. Her ass is defo softer and not as toned as her pics make out.

The meet, most has been said before. £200ph, service agreed before (OWO, anal and facesitting), request to be dominant. All arrangement via WhatsApp.

The meet happens mid November. Buzzed up to a snazzy flat. Welcomed in gym gear (as per request). Paperwork done.

Mia engages very promptly, still dressed she takes my dick out and starts some average OWO and handjob once hard enough came my favourite part, ‘ Ready to fuck my bum?’ Nice touch remembering that I was there for Anal.

I left her in her gym gear, bent over and just peeled her pants down to her knees. Quick squirt of lube for me and went for it. I think she lubes up before all arrivals turn up. Used her ass as requested for 10 mins before emptying in the bag.

Managed 2 more rounds, both solely anal.

Mia is big positive for me. Hot girl, offering anal readily, can take it as hard as you can give.


Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,617
  • Likes: 372
  •  
  • Reviews: 209
Funny how whenever this SP gets a neutral, latent punters come out of the woodwork, or past reviewers shower her with a second positive review.

 :unknown:

Offline patelprat

You are always so suspicious when it comes to this Sp.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,617
  • Likes: 372
  •  
  • Reviews: 209
You are always so suspicious when it comes to this Sp.

You posted two positive reviews of the this girl (MIA__) within a space of a few days, and yet conversely won't post a single review of another SP (naughtyalice) because said SP has "asked me not to do a review".

I think we should be more suspicious of you and you're propensity to discuss your reviews on UKP with SP's, and why that happens?


Offline patelprat

You posted two positive reviews of the this girl (MIA__) within a space of a few days, and yet conversely won't post a single review of another SP (naughtyalice) because said SP has "asked me not to do a review".

I think we should be more suspicious of you and you're propensity to discuss your reviews on UKP with SP's, and why that happens?

Who said I initiated any discussions about UKP?
Many SPs clearly already know about it, and have mentioned to me before without me even mentioning.



Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,617
  • Likes: 372
  •  
  • Reviews: 209
Who said I initiated any discussions about UKP?

I never once said initiated, that's your word (Freudian slip maybe).

Whether you brought it up or the SP did, you clearly pander to SP's though by your own admittance.

When asked why you hadn't reviewed Sweet Maya (not naughtyalice, my mistake) you said "She seems to know about UKPunting and asked me not to, so I didn’t."



« Last Edit: November 28, 2022, 02:30:25 pm by PilotMan »

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,688
  • Likes: 138
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
You are always so suspicious when it comes to this Sp.

Well, she does have a lot of fanboys and, quite frankly, we don't need them here talking up their beloved princess. To be fair to OP, it might be harsh to suggest that. However, he's contributed only 3 reviews in over 8 years of membership and been dormant for the last 9 months, then posts a positive review the day after a neutral one. He's seen her a few times before: why didn't review those meets?

It may be purely coincidence and he gets the benefit of my doubt, but there are a lot of "coincidences" with this SP.

Tbh, I hadn’t even paid attention to the string of neutrals until you mentioned.
It’s pure coincidence that my positive follows all that.

Sure, I’ll try to post more when I can.