_Sexy_Ana - Epping

[Mrbenn2016]

External Link/Members Only

I saw this Latin beauty today in some flats in Epping not far from the station. Flew on from Madrid

So she is a bit of a stickler for hygiene and although I showered before she insists on everyone showering before otherwise she cancels.

Her first photo and her WA photo in red are slightly in accurate she is a curvy size 10 now at least but still very atttactive. Love ass.

So I agreed 45 mins at £100 CIM is included 1hr or £20 extra

So on with some latin music and some twerking which got me hard, boobs out and some fondling and I play with her pussy, I am allowed to slip two fingers in. She gets wet quickly. She asks me to sit on the bed and gives me some nice DT and ball licking (she does use wet wipes but part of this is to clean up her saliva) I request 69 which she removed her knickers and she obliged. She was fresh.

On with the mack.We then moved on to missionary for which she likes a good pounding big quick strokes and will assist you pound hard against her, then some doggie and probone and more pounding missionary. CoB finish just after alarm she set.

She is shaved stubble bikini line but still hot.

No dfk but she had a cold.
Not much of a conversationalist but I think she likes to keep her private life private.

Carparking on the estate was a risk (permit) bit they were all empty

Pretty good value for money in my book

[Mrbenn2016]

External Link/Members Only

Ana has extended her stay for a few days

So I decided a second visit within a week.

45 mins with CIM - £120

Ana met at the door in white lingerie and was suprised and seemed pleased to see me. Paperwork and shower sorted.

A lot more at ease with each other. Choice of music offered again happy with latin. Again a good rear dance as towel removed watched by us both in the mirror to get me hard, passionate body kissing and french kissing with some nipple sucking (Ana is very sensitive) fingering. Ana bends down to give amazing wet sloppy deep throat as I sit on the bed with a combination of watching up and catching her perfect behind in the mirror.

She then asks for my turn and removes her knickers. Her pussy is clean shaven fresh as a daisy. I give her oral for about 20/25 mins which she really enjoys. She tells me she wants me to fuck her. On with the mack and some hard missionary pounding and doggy as time approaches I remove the jonny and cum in her mouth. As there is a lot she rushes to the loo to spit it out.

Pleasantries and promises to give each other good feedback and a nice kiss goodbye.

Would I see again. Yes next time if she is back I would.

[limarasa9]

What?? Two positive reviews for the same provider in a matter of days!!

[Mrbenn2016]

Genuine reviews. If your happy with the hygiene regime
She is good and worthwile

I have had plenty of meh fake South American "ooh baby" experiences you won't get that with her.

No kickbacks or freebies for this review just an enjoyable session

[PilotMan]

What?? Two positive reviews for the same provider in a matter of days!!

As there is nothing significantly different to the previous review, I would call this touting.

[Mrbenn2016]

Pilotman. Unfortunately you seem to miss the point she is good first time around but a lot more guarded. Second visit although some of the action was the same it was more intense. There were some details that I omitted.

Although unusual in her it is not that uncommon for OP's to leave feedback on a second or third visits in real time even field reports.

I actually see it more beneficial than some one leaving a review here on a lady they have seen a few times for her to move or take a break so they can keep their membership going.

As stated in the previous post I have not received any inducement to give positive reviews.

Regarding comms I am not entirely sure if she handles them herself or if an "agency" is involved in some aspect.

And that may be a reason for stickler time management.

[Mrbenn2016]

Also there isn't an abundance of attractive SP's in a 15-20 mile radius in the area excluding EE providers that a large proportion of us are it interested in.

[PilotMan]

Pilotman. Unfortunately you seem to miss the point she is good first time around but a lot more guarded. Second visit although some of the action was the same it was more intense. There were some details that I omitted.

Although unusual in her it is not that uncommon for OP's to leave feedback on a second or third visits in real time even field reports.

Unless the review has a different rating, or there is a significant difference to a recent review, any subsequent follow up meetings should simply be added to the previous review.

Creating a whole new review (that is a matter of days since your recent review) and is neither of the above, comes across as touting.

2 of her 3 positive reviews are from you. The other two are negative and neutral. So you can see how that looks.

[PilotMan]

Also there isn't an abundance of attractive SP's in a 15-20 mile radius in the area excluding EE providers that a large proportion of us are it interested in.

A lack of decent SP's in a given area is not a reason to leave what is essentially a similar review on the same SP in a matter of days.

[PilotMan]

As stated in the previous post I have not received any inducement to give positive reviews.

"Pleasantries and promises to give each other good feedback and a nice kiss goodbye."

You see how that looks?

[lillythesavage]

"Pleasantries and promises to give each other good feedback and a nice kiss goodbye."

You see how that looks?

It looks like he booked through AW and reported the punt as it was  . Have you never been reminded to leave AW feedback?

A tout would hardly leave that in a review 

No need for two in quick succession though, an update on the first more appropriate.

[Mrbenn2016]

It looks like he booked through AW and reported the punt as it was  . Have you never been reminded to leave AW feedback?

A tout would hardly leave that in a review 





No need for two in quick succession though, an update on the first more appropriate.

Thank you for your common sense comments. Noted on an update rather than another full review but Pilotman's are vwuite lengthy so there shouldn't be much complaint on that score. I think what most of us want here who don't want a quick p&d is a consistency of good service and  I can only post on my experience which has been based on actually seeing her.

What I was trying to highlight is that some of the negative frosty/barriers comments go away once she is more relaxed in your company.

[Mrbenn2016]

Unless the review has a different rating, or there is a significant difference to a recent review, any subsequent follow up meetings should simply be added to the previous review.

Creating a whole new review (that is a matter of days since your recent review) and is neither of the above, comes across as touting.

2 of her 3 positive reviews are from you. The other two are negative and neutral. So you can see how that looks.

Thank you for your post. Are these the forum rules or your own?

You seemed to have applied a bit of a U turn on your intent to see her on the last positive post which as far as I am aware as you havent left a review you didn't follow through.

Regarding your post retrospect assessment of her feedback that you didn't challenge in the previous other OP review
Which is actually only one neutral and a negative

The neutral: As far as I am concerned the OP chose not to co-operate and take a 5 min shower and elect to waste a round trip of anything from 40-60 mins. Sometimes others complain if  a shower is not on offerered. His view time-wasting. She did not charge him for a lost booking which can happen. We now know it is her hygiene requirements.
I and another OP took a gamble he was not prepared to take and were rewarded with a good experience.
Personally I see little value in this review.

The second is actually a positive review and the only a 15 min punt and the only inconsistency is OW for which the Op may have elected not to have a shower as a possible reason for this or some other hygiene issue.

Anyway no problem for me or the other OP.

I make that 3/4 or 3/3 if you ignore the neutral.

There are 5 good reviews on AW regarding different premises and area with some reference to a Receptionist and running overtime.

For me this means she was popular at the time so booked up. Ana is quite flexible if you are running late and if she accommodated this and OP's overran their time this has a knock on effect. She still saw them. This is just part of the game. There is no evidence this is the same management.

Your own reviews are lengthy so you cannot really accuse me of this.

As I said I feel more benefit from current and good reviews in real time and in the window when the girls are available not 2-3 weeks after the event when they have moved on and do not come back because business was slow in that area.

 I have provided pretty much more information for people to make an informed decision to visit her than any OP.

An accusation of gushy may have been fair.

May I suggest you either see elect to see her as you stated or if you don't that is up to you but you give the opportunity for others to comment without prejudice as your cynism is pretty much unwarranted.

[norwichfunseeker]

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently t to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).
No abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review

This is whats stated in the rules. I was checking myself having had a repeat visit of a wg I visited 3-4 months ago.

[daviemac]

I've merged your second review with your first, for one thing 2 positive reviews for the same SP in quick succession adds no value to the site, it only means either she gives you better service than others or you are easier to please.

Secondly some might see it as suspicious, 2 positive reviews from the same punter straight after a neutral and a negative. 

[LLPunting]

...
The neutral: As far as I am concerned the OP chose not to co-operate and take a 5 min shower and elect to waste a round trip of anything from 40-60 mins. Sometimes others complain if  a shower is not on offerered. His view time-wasting. She did not charge him for a lost booking which can happen. We now know it is her hygiene requirements.
I and another OP took a gamble he was not prepared to take and were rewarded with a good experience.
Personally I see little value in this review.
...

You're presumptious in your self-justifying defence.  The rules are clear enough without being specific that any reasonable person should consider how their actions appear given what they choose to write and how those words will be perceived by those who have no knowledge of what was deliberately omitted.

FYI I was in the area having already punted and was curious about several other SPs in the area so there was no desperation to nut and be trapped with an unwelcoming and ambivalent SP.  I just reported the encounter to inform others of the behaviour of an otherwise attractive SP plying her trade.

Since mine was her first mention here it served warning about her insistence on a shower; "useful" to more than a few punters who prefer not to be dictated to and shorted of time in this fashion.  Some punters aren't interested in repeating to improve relations so first-time impressions and attitude matter. 
Value comes for others in making a choice with any experience documented here taken into consideration, even if some like you then consider some of the information personally irrelevant.  Just like your second review on its own doesn't seemingly add to your first and could thus be deemed of little value, it is only in your replies to being challenged that perhaps more value accrues for others about you and the SP to make their decisions.

Admitting you discussed feedback doesn't absolve you from suspicion that this "feedback" is to your undisclosed advantage, whether implicit, assumed or expected given what she may've intimated to you in parting.
SPs who don't value feedback don't mention it, some discourage it.  Those who ask for it usually trade for it.
Those who are confident their performance sells itself also don't seriously court it.  They only need to pump the clients unforgettably, they can rely on the men wanting to tell someone about the great shag they had.

[GreyDave]

I've merged your second review with your first, for one thing 2 positive reviews for the same SP in quick succession adds no value to the site, it only means either she gives you better service than others or you are easier to please.

Secondly some might see it as suspicious, 2 positive reviews from the same punter straight after a neutral and a negative.

  I can see why merging the two reveiws has been done ... I and many others on here if they "click" with a WG may well see her again quickly and if this happens to mean the WG is more relaxed as he commented on then it does (in my cases ) mean a better performace from Me  and an " Ive got a returning customer , who is not a weirdo " aproach from WG ...just saying as an older punter

Mind you ..He might just be a nice guy who she thought this will be an enjoyable time     ...unlike GreyDave    as a PS Ive booked though the AW system to give the few line reveiws and have always asked them to reveiw me as many AW list WGs want references I ve never mentioned this site ..I have punted for many years though AW and only replied to the half dozen WG who have reveiwed me or confirmed the meeting went ahead I have less than 5% of my punts confirmed by their system .. Here I reveiw the new WGs I see and add to others reveiws...I ve only been asked to reveiw on here but said Sorry not got a clue about site to 3 or 4 WGs who really did not need reveiwing as their already have many 

[Mrbenn2016]

You're presumptious in your self-justifying defence.  The rules are clear enough without being specific that any reasonable person should consider how their actions appear given what they choose to write and how those words will be perceived by those who have no knowledge of what was deliberately omitted.

FYI I was in the area having already punted and was curious about several other SPs in the area so there was no desperation to nut and be trapped with an unwelcoming and ambivalent SP.  I just reported the encounter to inform others of the behaviour of an otherwise attractive SP plying her trade.

Since mine was her first mention here it served warning about her insistence on a shower; "useful" to more than a few punters who prefer not to be dictated to and shorted of time in this fashion.  Some punters aren't interested in repeating to improve relations so first-time impressions and attitude matter. 
Value comes for others in making a choice with any experience documented here taken into consideration, even if some like you then consider some of the information personally irrelevant.  Just like your second review on its own doesn't seemingly add to your first and could thus be deemed of little value, it is only in your replies to being challenged that perhaps more value accrues for others about you and the SP to make their decisions.

Admitting you discussed feedback doesn't absolve you from suspicion that this "feedback" is to your undisclosed advantage, whether implicit, assumed or expected given what she may've intimated to you in parting.
SPs who don't value feedback don't mention it, some discourage it.  Those who ask for it usually trade for it.
Those who are confident their performance sells itself also don't seriously court it.  They only need to pump the clients unforgettably, they can rely on the men wanting to tell someone about the great shag they had.

So you had already punted earlier and then refused to wash which is totally the SP choice and not unusual for older experienced SPs.

She made it clear to all her OP's shower or no action and you criticise her?

The rest of your post doesn't dignify a response. Full of verbose twaddle.